Gee, Grumps, I didn't realise you had such a low opinion of pond algae!GrumpyOne wrote:We as a forum don't want to be represented by some individual with the collective intelligence of a bucketfull of pond algae.
Our chat with Westaway and Burke.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5511
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Have you read some of his recent posts Dan.Dan Warna wrote:its a free forum
I disagree with 95% of what B4E has to say but he has the right to say it as long as he doesn't break forum rules.
Broken more rules that I've had hot breakfasts.
Does this every year, and its always glossed over.
Somebody needs to get the balls to delete this intellectually disabled simian.
maybe.GrumpyOne wrote:Have you read some of his recent posts Dan.Dan Warna wrote:its a free forum
I disagree with 95% of what B4E has to say but he has the right to say it as long as he doesn't break forum rules.
Broken more rules that I've had hot breakfasts.
Does this every year, and its always glossed over.
Somebody needs to get the balls to delete this intellectually disabled simian.
I remember b4e from the social games, and from seeing him at the footy.
i disgree with the stuff he's typing but he is a saints person, just with a different view.
9 months ago it was me being lambasted for having a view different from the norm.
7 years ago it was the pro timmy/anti timmy fights.
IMO every time we lose a poster or move towards homogeniety its a poorer place.
B4E IMO has issues, so be it. accept him for what he is and move on.
we all want st kilda to succeed, just see the mechanism differently.
Bewaire krime, da krimson bolt is comeing to yure nayborhood to smach krime
SHUT UP KRIME!
SHUT UP KRIME!
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5511
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
Questions for you nickn1ck wrote:stuck on repeat stuck on repeat stuck on repeat stuck on repeat.
Which player always took 100 cents in the dollar while many others took 22.5 cents in the dollar to keep this club in existence?
Need some clues?
Same player left for another club at exactly this same time, when there was more money to be made elsewhere
getting warmer
Have any players who took 22.5 cents in the dollar for actually PLAYING ON THE FOOTBALL GROUND IN OUR JUMPER ever sued the club for not recieving money that is actually owed to them.
still need more clues
The guy who took 100 cents in the dollar, you know the guy who was never owed one cent, is the same guy who is currently suing the club which includes $167,000 for holiday pay that he is not even owed.
Apparently this guy loves the club, bleeds red, white and black and would never do anything to hurt it
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
It's indefensible isn't it?n1ck wrote:so you just repeat it again?
why not say it once more?
go on.
we all know you have nothing new or interesting to say, so prove us right, again.
These FACTS don't sit to well with the brainwashed and conned, disenfranchised malcontents and cult worshippers do they?
Do the maths and you'll find that the squares are rooted
Last edited by barks4eva on Tue 02 Oct 2007 2:14pm, edited 1 time in total.
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
Grant Thomas is gone FFS. Get over it.
1. Who gives a flying rats tossbag what he did in the 1980s?
2. Who gives a flying rats tossbag what he did in the 1990s?
3. Who gives a flying rats tossbag what he's doing right now?
HE IS IRRELEVANT. Like most of this thread now thanks to hijacking.
Look forward to the transcript. Can I suggest you post it in a closed topic that people can read unpolluted, and then a second comments thread for the replies?
1. Who gives a flying rats tossbag what he did in the 1980s?
2. Who gives a flying rats tossbag what he did in the 1990s?
3. Who gives a flying rats tossbag what he's doing right now?
HE IS IRRELEVANT. Like most of this thread now thanks to hijacking.
Look forward to the transcript. Can I suggest you post it in a closed topic that people can read unpolluted, and then a second comments thread for the replies?
Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
SENsaintsational wrote:Grant Thomas is gone FFS. Get over it.
1. Who gives a flying rats tossbag what he did in the 1980s?
2. Who gives a flying rats tossbag what he did in the 1990s?
3. Who gives a flying rats tossbag what he's doing right now?
HE IS IRRELEVANT. Like most of this thread now thanks to hijacking.
Look forward to the transcript. Can I suggest you post it in a closed topic that people can read unpolluted, and then a second comments thread for the replies?
Yeah and how many people will be voting for a new board based solely on the exiting out of Thomas?
How relevant is that?
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
Well then they need to look further. Grant Thomas was a symptom of RB and his board's poor management. The fact that they couldn't reign him in until it was inevitable.
I think sacking GT was one of the only good things RB has done in the last 2-3 years.
As for GT's replacement, my jury is still well and truly out. Again, this is another RB decision.
I'll be helping to vote RB's arse out, based on all the facts that I know. GT is just one.
I repeat GT is irrelevant.
I think sacking GT was one of the only good things RB has done in the last 2-3 years.
As for GT's replacement, my jury is still well and truly out. Again, this is another RB decision.
I'll be helping to vote RB's arse out, based on all the facts that I know. GT is just one.
I repeat GT is irrelevant.
Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
SEN I think u miss the point. This isnt all about GT this is all about B4E.
Look at me Look at me....I have an opinion....quick everyone look at me.
The biggest problem with Narcicism is that the person who is suffering has no idea. Its everyone else who has a problem.....and they just wont "Look at me"
Its about time you found a new mirror barks.
Look at me Look at me....I have an opinion....quick everyone look at me.
The biggest problem with Narcicism is that the person who is suffering has no idea. Its everyone else who has a problem.....and they just wont "Look at me"
Its about time you found a new mirror barks.
What concern is that of yours? The individual member can vote on the board makeup for whatever reason they like?barks4eva wrote:
Yeah and how many people will be voting for a new board based solely on the exiting out of Thomas?
How relevant is that?
Relevancy or otherwise has nothing to do with it.
You might not like it but if every single person voted on the GT sacking and no other issue, then you would have to suck it up.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9071
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 427 times
As for people dragging GT up over and over, I agree, he is gone and so is Alves, Jeans and various other coaches..can we move on please. From what I can work out, currently there is the board with Butters as President, RL is coach and so on and so forth..lets have a holiday and look forward to our successful 2008 season with a minimum of fuss as any successful club would expect to do.
Yes quite so.bob__71 wrote:SEN I think u miss the point. This isnt all about GT this is all about B4E.
Look at me Look at me....I have an opinion....quick everyone look at me.
The biggest problem with Narcicism is that the person who is suffering has no idea. Its everyone else who has a problem.....and they just wont "Look at me"
Its about time you found a new mirror barks.
Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18580
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1906 times
- Been thanked: 843 times
Yeah and how many people will be voting for a new board based solely on the exiting out of Thomas?
it's not to be underestimated as a factor in rb's demise. split the club. now the people will have their say. don't underestimate good people
Last edited by bigcarl on Tue 02 Oct 2007 2:46pm, edited 1 time in total.
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
You misunderstood the contextjoffaboy wrote:What concern is that of yours? The individual member can vote on the board makeup for whatever reason they like?barks4eva wrote:
Yeah and how many people will be voting for a new board based solely on the exiting out of Thomas?
How relevant is that?
Relevancy or otherwise has nothing to do with it.
You might not like it but if every single person voted on the GT sacking and no other issue, then you would have to suck it up.
SENsaintsonal stated that GT is irrelevant
What you quoted was in reference to that, just making the point that Thomas would still be relevant to some people who would be basing their choice on this
nothing more, nothing less
As for the board challenge, I'm still sitting on the fence, not decided either way
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
nothing more except for previously calling such peoplebarks4eva wrote:You misunderstood the contextjoffaboy wrote:What concern is that of yours? The individual member can vote on the board makeup for whatever reason they like?barks4eva wrote:
Yeah and how many people will be voting for a new board based solely on the exiting out of Thomas?
How relevant is that?
Relevancy or otherwise has nothing to do with it.
You might not like it but if every single person voted on the GT sacking and no other issue, then you would have to suck it up.
SENsaintsonal stated that GT is irrelevant
What you quoted was in reference to that, just making the point that Thomas would still be relevant to some people who would be basing their choice on this
nothing more, nothing less
As for the board challenge, I'm still sitting on the fence, not decided either way
"brainwashed and conned, disenfranchised malcontents and cult worshippers"
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
SENsaintsational wrote:Yes quite so.bob__71 wrote:SEN I think u miss the point. This isnt all about GT this is all about B4E.
Look at me Look at me....I have an opinion....quick everyone look at me.
The biggest problem with Narcicism is that the person who is suffering has no idea. Its everyone else who has a problem.....and they just wont "Look at me"
Its about time you found a new mirror barks.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Considering you voted for Howard at the last election SENsaintonal I'll just accept that once again you have no idea
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
Relevance?barks4eva wrote:SENsaintsational wrote:Yes quite so.bob__71 wrote:SEN I think u miss the point. This isnt all about GT this is all about B4E.
Look at me Look at me....I have an opinion....quick everyone look at me.
The biggest problem with Narcicism is that the person who is suffering has no idea. Its everyone else who has a problem.....and they just wont "Look at me"
Its about time you found a new mirror barks.![]()
![]()
![]()
Considering you voted for Howard at the last election SENsaintonal I'll just accept that once again you have no idea
Anyone?
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Thomas is quite clearly relevant to you in almost every way.barks4eva wrote:You misunderstood the contextjoffaboy wrote:What concern is that of yours? The individual member can vote on the board makeup for whatever reason they like?barks4eva wrote:
Yeah and how many people will be voting for a new board based solely on the exiting out of Thomas?
How relevant is that?
Relevancy or otherwise has nothing to do with it.
You might not like it but if every single person voted on the GT sacking and no other issue, then you would have to suck it up.
SENsaintsonal stated that GT is irrelevant
What you quoted was in reference to that, just making the point that Thomas would still be relevant to some people who would be basing their choice on this
nothing more, nothing less
As for the board challenge, I'm still sitting on the fence, not decided either way
He's winning. You're not.
It bothers you. Clearly.
The more you talk about him, the more he wins.
Let go, he's gone.
Move on.
What the HELL has that got to do with it????????????????? except perhaps your appallingly condescending and patronisng attitude to anyone who dares hold a differing view to your good selfbarks4eva wrote:SENsaintsational wrote:Yes quite so.bob__71 wrote:SEN I think u miss the point. This isnt all about GT this is all about B4E.
Look at me Look at me....I have an opinion....quick everyone look at me.
The biggest problem with Narcicism is that the person who is suffering has no idea. Its everyone else who has a problem.....and they just wont "Look at me"
Its about time you found a new mirror barks.![]()
![]()
![]()
Considering you voted for Howard at the last election SENsaintonal I'll just accept that once again you have no idea
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v131/littlemiter/66sig.jpg)
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
Dan I have one question about thisDan Warna wrote:GrumpyOne wrote:Have you read some of his recent posts Dan.Dan Warna wrote:its a free forum
I disagree with 95% of what B4E has to say but he has the right to say it as long as he doesn't break forum rules.
Broken more rules that I've had hot breakfasts.
Does this every year, and its always glossed over.
Somebody needs to get the balls to delete this intellectually disabled simian.
maybe.
I remember b4e from the social games, and from seeing him at the footy.
i disgree with the stuff he's typing but he is a saints person, just with a different view.
9 months ago it was me being lambasted for having a view different from the norm.
7 years ago it was the pro timmy/anti timmy fights.
IMO every time we lose a poster or move towards homogeniety its a poorer place.
B4E IMO has issues, so be it. accept him for what he is and move on.
we all want st kilda to succeed, just see the mechanism differently.
How many people do you think dot speak up and contribute to this forum because of abusive bullies?
I appreciate the freedom of spech thing, but quite frankly we have read it all before
maybe thats what the b4 in b4e stands for
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16898
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3585 times
- Been thanked: 2853 times
can't we just habe a poll as to whether or not ban barks...
I think most forumites like me are sick of
- the same reptitive dribble
- hijacking countless good threads
- the unnecessary swearing and abuse
- the facts that aren't facts, mysterious sources and the posts that are ignored because they blow his argument apart
- the fact that he contributes nothing to this forum and that (IMO) most forumites enjoy it when he's not here
I think most forumites like me are sick of
- the same reptitive dribble
- hijacking countless good threads
- the unnecessary swearing and abuse
- the facts that aren't facts, mysterious sources and the posts that are ignored because they blow his argument apart
- the fact that he contributes nothing to this forum and that (IMO) most forumites enjoy it when he's not here