Up to 6(!) Picks in the National Draft.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Oh When the Saints
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006 4:25pm
- Location: QLD
- Contact:
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
ok fine lets for get hes been at the saints for 5 years lets look at the games he has played in the aflShaggy wrote:Forget the 5 years rubbish given his injuries.
He has come good the past season … 8 bests in 17 matches is not something to belittle.
He has not destroyed the opposition as I thought he would this year but if you see him he is still just a kid.
I believe he is wakening up to himself as a footballer. Now would be the most stupid time to get rid of him.
on decent game against a decimated lions team in the last game of the year and the rest substandard bench rotations games where he showed no passion no drive and no determination to keep his name in the senior team
Shaggy wrote: He has come good the past season … 8 bests in 17 matches is not something to belittle.
.
in the VFL i never said he was a bad VFL play just not a good afl player shouldnt the fact we were lacking in the ruck department give you an indication that if he was AFL quallity he would of got a game ?? why is it easier to believe the coach doesnt like him then hes not up to it ?
diferance being when Hamish had his opertunity he didnt lack enthusiasm brooks cant say the sameDan Warna wrote:2007 was the year hamish macintosh came good after 4 years of SFA, macintosh was in the magoos for 4 years and didn't have injuries., he is 6 months younger than brooks.
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
has Brooks been given a game in the ruck for the seniors in the saints in 07?st_Trav_ofWA wrote: diferance being when Hamish had his opertunity he didnt lack enthusiasm brooks cant say the same
certainly not 1/2 the opportunities carbon rod rix and witches hat clarke have been given
Bewaire krime, da krimson bolt is comeing to yure nayborhood to smach krime
SHUT UP KRIME!
SHUT UP KRIME!
- busso mick
- Club Player
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 8:57pm
- Been thanked: 10 times
Brooks has got talent no doubt, but his attitude is what holds him back. Players with less talent than him have made it in the AFL, his laconic approach is his biggest handicap. If Rix had his talent then we will have found our man. Maybe a trip to the local dog pound for an injection of mongrel is what is required. If he does get the chop then he has only got himself to blame.TwoTowers wrote:Not a chance Brooks will be delisted. He has been terrific this year. His real benefit to us in future will be as a forward who can help out in the ruck. Gehrig, Kozi, Roo and team balance meant he paid his dues in the reserves. He will be given his first real opportunity in the seniors next season.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 764 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
I don't think we had anyone on the veterans list this yearborderbarry wrote:I believe Sweeney and Raymond have both been dropped from the list. If we cannot have 6 rookies and anyone on the veteran list, what happened this year with Harvs and Max, and the 6 rookies?
I dont know if Attard is too old to be retained as a rookie, but Jones certainly is.
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
veterans can beMr Magic wrote:I don't think we had anyone on the veterans list this yearborderbarry wrote:I believe Sweeney and Raymond have both been dropped from the list. If we cannot have 6 rookies and anyone on the veteran list, what happened this year with Harvs and Max, and the 6 rookies?
I dont know if Attard is too old to be retained as a rookie, but Jones certainly is.
a)- inside the list- withint the main list of 38 - as Max and Harves were this year
b) - outside the list- and included in the 6 next players- ie 2 veterans and 4 rookies
list total 44
you can have more than 2 veterans and from reading may be up to 4 ?
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Brooks played some ruck in all of his last three AFL games. He's got the athletic ability to contest the centre bounces, but lacks the strength to compete at around the ground stoppages. Rix might not be a match-winning ruckman, but at least he's not going to get pushed around like Brooks.Dan Warna wrote:has Brooks been given a game in the ruck for the seniors in the saints in 07?
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga