Attack ON Burkie's Integrity
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Attack ON Burkie's Integrity
Watching the Footy Show and i have never been angrier at the way in which Hutchy tried his best to undermine Burkie's integrity because he wants to be on the board but had a conflict of interest being apart of the MRP and the committee that appointed Bailey for the Demons coaching position. Perleaze Hutchy do the noble think and STFU. Burke has more integrity in his pinkie than you will ever dream of having.
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
Agree he had a go at his integrity and instead of saying he didn't no for 6-8 weeks, he should've pushed on the integrity thing.
Because Hutchy was doing it.
Burke then went on the contradict himself saying he only new for 2-3 weeks.
Should've really pushed becasue Hutchy is a dirty bushpig who the AFL does not need.
Because Hutchy was doing it.
Burke then went on the contradict himself saying he only new for 2-3 weeks.
Should've really pushed becasue Hutchy is a dirty bushpig who the AFL does not need.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon 03 Sep 2007 12:59am
Lol Hutchy reminds me of the Iraqi Communications Minister. "The Americans have not entered Bahgdad we are simply having difficulty with a fireworks factory"maverick wrote:Course he is, they play in the gutter together.ausfatcat wrote:hutchy is friends with butters
Had to laugh when Hutchy said, lets be honest, he doesn't know what the word means......
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
- Dal_Santos_Gal
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5158
- Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005 9:38pm
- Location: In the Saints Year Unknown Premiership Cup
- Contact:
thats the media..... Burkie is big enough to handle it.
You say yes to an interview and you will always get grilled
moving on
You say yes to an interview and you will always get grilled
moving on
In Ross Get lost!
I am excited to stay at St Kilda and this is a great result for the Club and all our fans. I’m proud to be part of the Saints and am pleased to be playing football with the Clubâ€
I am excited to stay at St Kilda and this is a great result for the Club and all our fans. I’m proud to be part of the Saints and am pleased to be playing football with the Clubâ€
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6440
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 11:13pm
Same i thought for that moment he had nearly every Saints member wanting to vote for SFF. Oh and DSG not saying that Burkie needed to be aware of criticism my problem was that Hutchy tried to claim that the conflict o interest not only affected the Saints but other clubs within the AFL. That got my blood boiling.aussierules0k wrote:Replay the interview. The very first thing Burke said was brilliant. I stood and applauded!
He's got my vote.
If they win, I'll renew my SC.
Hutchy aint worth talking about.
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
What else do you expect from the gutter rat in Hutchy. Did you see the way in which Burkie left the panel. He got up as they were going to a break and JB was the only one to acknowledge him leaving while the other three ignored him completely.HarveysDeciple wrote:Bull s*** journalism.....what par of being objective and balanced (the very cornerstone of the profession) can you see discuss allegations as "clearly this was inferred"......piss poor gutter Journalism.
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
- GeorgeYoung27
- Club Player
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 2:54pm
- Location: on a tight angle at the South Rd end
Why did Hutchy go so soft on RB? Every question he asked was a dorothy dixer like they do at Parliament question time. If Hutchy is such a friend of NB's why was the body language so cold both ways. When they faded to an ad Burkey left to go out, acknowledging Garry and JB and totally avoiding Hutchy.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6440
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 11:13pm
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Lets face it - unless your James Hird, Buckley or Judd you just dont rate for the footy show.aussierules0k wrote:Yep, noticed that. Disgusting. Burke as polite as you'd expect said goodbye, probably expected to shake Huts hand as gentlemen do. NB stood tall among dwarfs, in fact he became a ruckman!Buckets wrote:Did you see the way in which Burkie left the panel. He got up as they were going to a break and JB was the only one to acknowledge him leaving while the other three ignored him completely.Kudos to JB. Mud to the others.
I saw the schemozzle they gave Buckley for his milestone game...almost an entire segment devoted (cant remember the games number) and compared that to Harvs and I remember thinking...these pr!cks give us no respect...
“Yeah….nah””
Slight difference is that Burkie was there as a special guest of TFS and the way he was treated club champion or not was disgraceful.Teflon wrote:Lets face it - unless your James Hird, Buckley or Judd you just dont rate for the footy show.aussierules0k wrote:Yep, noticed that. Disgusting. Burke as polite as you'd expect said goodbye, probably expected to shake Huts hand as gentlemen do. NB stood tall among dwarfs, in fact he became a ruckman!Buckets wrote:Did you see the way in which Burkie left the panel. He got up as they were going to a break and JB was the only one to acknowledge him leaving while the other three ignored him completely.Kudos to JB. Mud to the others.
I saw the schemozzle they gave Buckley for his milestone game...almost an entire segment devoted (cant remember the games number) and compared that to Harvs and I remember thinking...these pr!cks give us no respect...
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
It seems to me that this alternate ticket is riding behind the record of Burke as a (former) St Kilda player and the reputation he forged during his time at the club.
So, tell me Nathan, why did you resign from the coaching panel when you did and what were your relationships with the remainder of the coaching staff at that time, and with the administration?
Depending on the answer, you would then question any on-going relationship with any of those parties.
I note he distanced Fox, which contradicts other media reports.
And tell me Nathan, when you refer to the loss of sponsors, are you aware of any particular reasons for those losses, because there must be reasons, and what are the connections any incoming Board members have which will deliver major and significant sponsors to the St Kilda FC, and address the falling revenue you have identified? Because St Kilda FC need people on the board who have such connections and can deliver those connections to St Kilda FC and its revenue stream.
And tell me Nathan, how much can you improve the revenue base of St Kilda FC by to accomodate your laudable extra spending on the football department and, in the absence of this improvement in revenues, would you go back into debt to accomodate such spending? And who willl lend to St Kilda FC and on what basis?
The presentation was limp and the questioning was limp.
As I have said on the "Rhetoric or substance" thread, we are being led by gloss, rhetoric and the revered status of a former player when we want substance.
So, tell me Nathan, why did you resign from the coaching panel when you did and what were your relationships with the remainder of the coaching staff at that time, and with the administration?
Depending on the answer, you would then question any on-going relationship with any of those parties.
I note he distanced Fox, which contradicts other media reports.
And tell me Nathan, when you refer to the loss of sponsors, are you aware of any particular reasons for those losses, because there must be reasons, and what are the connections any incoming Board members have which will deliver major and significant sponsors to the St Kilda FC, and address the falling revenue you have identified? Because St Kilda FC need people on the board who have such connections and can deliver those connections to St Kilda FC and its revenue stream.
And tell me Nathan, how much can you improve the revenue base of St Kilda FC by to accomodate your laudable extra spending on the football department and, in the absence of this improvement in revenues, would you go back into debt to accomodate such spending? And who willl lend to St Kilda FC and on what basis?
The presentation was limp and the questioning was limp.
As I have said on the "Rhetoric or substance" thread, we are being led by gloss, rhetoric and the revered status of a former player when we want substance.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6440
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 11:13pm
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 8:38pm
- Been thanked: 25 times
TTP -
What i heard from the RB board in response today was more rhetoric, defensiveness, political ploys, and no substance and no plan or vision forward for the club.....
So far, the rival ticket, though with some flaws (its only just come together), was far surperior to the incumbent that is falling apart.....
What i heard from the RB board in response today was more rhetoric, defensiveness, political ploys, and no substance and no plan or vision forward for the club.....
So far, the rival ticket, though with some flaws (its only just come together), was far surperior to the incumbent that is falling apart.....
- GeorgeYoung27
- Club Player
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 2:54pm
- Location: on a tight angle at the South Rd end
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Before jumping all over TTP with conspiracy theories...why not actually read what hes put up?
It HAS been reported the Fox family are behind this
AND it does appear - on football biggest rating prime time TV show that Greg Westaway hid behind Nathan Burke. He aint dumb .....he knows Burkes revered by members/supporters and most of these wouldnt dare question Nathan Burke because he in their eyes is above reproach.
That aside - No side has yet come out ewith any substance - the current Board does at least have a history to guage performance but still should put out its own way forward IMO.
The Family First group MUST put up. Show us a plan- where is the new revenue for all the football dept spending coming from? ...so far in their propoganda Ive read "use banks money".....ok.........but that carries risk also.............and after 5 yrs of clearing debt.....youd wanna get that "balance" as Greg calls its between good/bad debt spot on....or we will suffer big time and go backwards.
It HAS been reported the Fox family are behind this
AND it does appear - on football biggest rating prime time TV show that Greg Westaway hid behind Nathan Burke. He aint dumb .....he knows Burkes revered by members/supporters and most of these wouldnt dare question Nathan Burke because he in their eyes is above reproach.
That aside - No side has yet come out ewith any substance - the current Board does at least have a history to guage performance but still should put out its own way forward IMO.
The Family First group MUST put up. Show us a plan- where is the new revenue for all the football dept spending coming from? ...so far in their propoganda Ive read "use banks money".....ok.........but that carries risk also.............and after 5 yrs of clearing debt.....youd wanna get that "balance" as Greg calls its between good/bad debt spot on....or we will suffer big time and go backwards.
“Yeah….nah””
Maybe, but it beats being led by gloss, rhetoric and someone too chicken sh** to face a person he believes is white-anting the club and would rather embarrass himself and the club in public.To the top wrote:. . . we are being led by gloss, rhetoric and the revered status of a former player when we want substance.
Nathan doesn't lack courage and can hardly be accused of being "glossy".
I'd have thought the complete opposite of what we've had leading us for the past 7 years.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Sat 25 Aug 2007 7:20am
When reporter asked Butterss for their 3 year [lan ( and they have been there for years) , they didn't have one. As a business person, i can say that if you don"t have a written business plan , you shouldn't be running a business over $1m turnover, let alone $20m.
Love how RB deflects away from his lack of a plan by asking the @ day challengers to prepare one .
Dirty pool.
Love how RB deflects away from his lack of a plan by asking the @ day challengers to prepare one .
Dirty pool.