![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Sorry - I read to much rubbish in the papers.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
TeflonTeflon wrote:maybe but the obvious bias in his sig gives him away a touch to be taken to seriously I wouldve thought....Oh When the Saints wrote:always tomorrow is an accurate poster IMO
The Peanut wrote:'always tomorrow' - Nice to see you back again - a new laptop or did you get the other fixed
FYI & FOR THE RECORDbarks4eva wrote:yeah, if yesterday's man "always tomorrow" had of not stuffed up our recruiting for five years in the recent past, we might not NOW be behind the eight ball, going forward
"always needs to be talked about" might be more appropriate
or perhaps
"always full of himself "
or just maybe
"always should have stuck to the walnut diet"
barks4eva wrote:The Peanut wrote:'always tomorrow' - Nice to see you back again - a new laptop or did you get the other fixed
![]()
yeah, if yesterday's man "always tomorrow" had of not stuffed up our recruiting for five years in the recent past, we might not NOW be behind the eight ball, going forward
"always needs to be talked about" might be more appropriate
or perhaps
"always full of himself "
or just maybe
"always should have stuck to the walnut diet"