Casey Scorpions vs. Frankston - Sat 25th 2 pm
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Gilbert The Great
- Club Player
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 12:34am
- Location: Melbourne
I think that
allen for voss
armo for attard
thommo for ball
would be very positive for looking towards 2008 as well as perhaps fixing holes in the 2007 version.
allen for voss
armo for attard
thommo for ball
would be very positive for looking towards 2008 as well as perhaps fixing holes in the 2007 version.
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- Munga
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5287
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
2007 TRUenergy VFL Seniors
Casey Scorpions 2.3 6.8 8.10 13.13 (91)
Frankston 4.1 4.3 11.8 12.9 (81)
GOALS:
Casey Scorpions: Watts 3 Biagi 2 Garrubba 2 Gwilt Jones McQualter Allen Parker Matthews
Frankston: Marigliani 2 Whelan 2 Barnes 2 Barry Murray Burns Barker Berry Winterton
BEST:
Casey Scorpions: Thompson Garrubba Wall Geary Jones Armitage
Frankston: Winterton Barry Marigliani Pollard Kennedy Collins
REPORTED PLAYERS:
Casey Scorpions: J Geary for Wrestling J Berry during the 1st quarter
Frankston: J Berry for wrestling J Geary during the 1st quarter
Casey Scorpions 2.3 6.8 8.10 13.13 (91)
Frankston 4.1 4.3 11.8 12.9 (81)
GOALS:
Casey Scorpions: Watts 3 Biagi 2 Garrubba 2 Gwilt Jones McQualter Allen Parker Matthews
Frankston: Marigliani 2 Whelan 2 Barnes 2 Barry Murray Burns Barker Berry Winterton
BEST:
Casey Scorpions: Thompson Garrubba Wall Geary Jones Armitage
Frankston: Winterton Barry Marigliani Pollard Kennedy Collins
REPORTED PLAYERS:
Casey Scorpions: J Geary for Wrestling J Berry during the 1st quarter
Frankston: J Berry for wrestling J Geary during the 1st quarter
Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
- Gilbert The Great
- Club Player
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 12:34am
- Location: Melbourne
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7064
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
- Oh When the Saints
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006 4:25pm
- Location: QLD
- Contact:
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7064
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
- Nick_Dal_Santo = ChAmPiOn
- Club Player
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Fri 18 Aug 2006 11:39pm
- Location: melbourne, vic
so u dont think we will make finals then?mad saint guy wrote:Bloody hell...forgot about Harvs and Max.Oh When the Saints wrote:Thompson is going to have a farewell game as Lyon said ...
IN: Thompson, Harvey
OUT: Attard (inj), Voss
OUT: Attard, Ferguson, Blake
IN: Thompson, Hudghton, Harvey
Think Vossy might get his farewell game, too.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Ferguson would be a bit stiff getting dropped after one game, and that against probable Grand Finalists West Coast. Give him another run to see what he can do against a lesser team.
I would drop Birss, and Matt Clarke. Attard will obviously not be available. If Adelaide beat Brisbane this round, as they are playing Collingwood Friday night we will know before our game whether we have a show or not. If Adelaide beat Collingwood, then they finish eight. We may as well tank against Richmond.
With that in mind, I would name Harvs, & Thommo in the team, with Armo, Brooks, and maybe Allen as emergencys.
If we cant make the eight, play the three emergencies and rest Ball, and two others.
I would drop Birss, and Matt Clarke. Attard will obviously not be available. If Adelaide beat Brisbane this round, as they are playing Collingwood Friday night we will know before our game whether we have a show or not. If Adelaide beat Collingwood, then they finish eight. We may as well tank against Richmond.
With that in mind, I would name Harvs, & Thommo in the team, with Armo, Brooks, and maybe Allen as emergencys.
If we cant make the eight, play the three emergencies and rest Ball, and two others.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 762 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
And M. Clarke?n1ck wrote:What abuot a possible last game for Gehrig and / or Harvey?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Given Richmond don't have any recognized ruckmen (like Freo atm) I would be inclined to drop M.Clarke, but it would likely be his last game so there may be a 'push' to keep him in the side (especially if we are already out of finals contention).
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Gee, I have always respected your thoughts on players, but I can't believe you are suggesting that Fergs should get dropped???mad saint guy wrote:
Bloody hell...forgot about Harvs and Max.
OUT: Attard, Ferguson, Blake
IN: Thompson, Hudghton, Harvey
Think Vossy might get his farewell game, too.
Where you at the match???
Also, Blake will play IMO and M Clarke will get dropped for Rix IMO.
M Clarke really only plays at the dome and I don't feel he will get a game at the G...
For me ...
OUT: Attard, M. Clarke and either X or Ball (out injured)
IN: Rix, Harvey, Thompson.
If Harvey, Thompson and Hudghton are all fit (which I doubt)
The one to miss is Thompson IMO
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
getting in the best means nothing according to you plugger66 otherwise why argue it re: brooks.plugger66 wrote:At the moment the only changes will be Harvey in and Attard out. Why would Rix play. Did he get in the best the last 2 weeks at Scorps. No. And how could Allen play not even sure he will be in the finals side with the 12-10 rule.
Anyway we are struggling to find a second leading half forward and thus the opposition double tag roo. Allen has got a couple of games under his belt and I don't think we will lose anything swapping voss for him.
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
Agree Voss is finished but would be totally unfair on Allen and the other players if he got a game. Not sure who should play for Voss but you are right he should be omitted. Sorry I missed him.Solar wrote:getting in the best means nothing according to you plugger66 otherwise why argue it re: brooks.plugger66 wrote:At the moment the only changes will be Harvey in and Attard out. Why would Rix play. Did he get in the best the last 2 weeks at Scorps. No. And how could Allen play not even sure he will be in the finals side with the 12-10 rule.
Anyway we are struggling to find a second leading half forward and thus the opposition double tag roo. Allen has got a couple of games under his belt and I don't think we will lose anything swapping voss for him.
no problems, played really well in the preseason but injury has struck him down. Is exactly the type of player we need and now that the finals are out of our hands (bringing 1-2 youngsters against rich should not mean we lose), we should look at getting a game into allen. Might be a good wild card if we do make finals or a spur for him over pre-season. Give him a taste of it.plugger66 wrote:Agree Voss is finished but would be totally unfair on Allen and the other players if he got a game. Not sure who should play for Voss but you are right he should be omitted. Sorry I missed him.Solar wrote:getting in the best means nothing according to you plugger66 otherwise why argue it re: brooks.plugger66 wrote:At the moment the only changes will be Harvey in and Attard out. Why would Rix play. Did he get in the best the last 2 weeks at Scorps. No. And how could Allen play not even sure he will be in the finals side with the 12-10 rule.
Anyway we are struggling to find a second leading half forward and thus the opposition double tag roo. Allen has got a couple of games under his belt and I don't think we will lose anything swapping voss for him.
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- Oh When the Saints
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006 4:25pm
- Location: QLD
- Contact:
where is harvey at? wow many choicesOh When the Saints wrote:Surely Thommo would come in for one last game??
He deserves a farewell, and I would be mightily pissed off if Lyon didn't play him.
Was BOG for the Scorps ...
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7064
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Ferg played a pretty good game against LeCras, but with Max back next week and Richmond's crap forward line we just wouldn't need Ferg. Like Gwilt eariler in the season he will be dropped for team balance rather than form.St Fidelius wrote:Gee, I have always respected your thoughts on players, but I can't believe you are suggesting that Fergs should get dropped???
M Clarke really only plays at the dome and I don't feel he will get a game at the G...
The one to miss is Thompson IMO
Maguire v Richardson
Hudghton v Brown
S.Fisher v Schulz
L.Fisher v Pettifer
Gram v Krakouer
If Richmond go very tall in the forward line and include two of Schulz Riewoldt and Hughes then Ferg might get another game.
I think Clarke and Thompson will both get a farewell game.
Last edited by mad saint guy on Sat 25 Aug 2007 11:58pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Honestly, should it really matter that much re team selections??
IMO if we can't get over Richmond (margin not relevant - one goal win is acceptable), even with some dodgy selections/some injured players that don't come up, it would be an embarassment to the jumper.
I guess also if Adelaide win on Friday night who really cares???
IMO if we can't get over Richmond (margin not relevant - one goal win is acceptable), even with some dodgy selections/some injured players that don't come up, it would be an embarassment to the jumper.
I guess also if Adelaide win on Friday night who really cares???
Last edited by saintspremiers on Sat 25 Aug 2007 11:56pm, edited 1 time in total.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Doubt Max will be back next week so Ferg should play. Thommo might be a slight chance but only if harvs isnt right which I doubt. Clarke will probably play but he doesnt deserve a farewelll game off the Saints.mad saint guy wrote:Ferg played a pretty good game against LeCras, but with Max back next week and Richmond's crap forward line we just wouldn't need Ferg. Like Gwilt eariler in the season he will be dropped for team balance rather than form.St Fidelius wrote:Gee, I have always respected your thoughts on players, but I can't believe you are suggesting that Fergs should get dropped???
M Clarke really only plays at the dome and I don't feel he will get a game at the G...
The one to miss is Thompson IMO
I think Clarke and Thompson will both get a farewell game.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times