I did use quotation marks around "reliable" didn't I? FFS if this is the evidence that forced them to the tribunal they seriously must be joking?rodgerfox wrote:Wouldn't they?milnedog wrote:Well they wouldn't take it to the tribunal if any of the afl's "reliable" witnesses had said there was nothing in it.rodgerfox wrote:Why 'obviously'?saintdooley wrote:obviously baker has done something wrong!
Baker's case is underway - discussion
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
BROWNLOW: DalSanto 06, Ball 08, Riewoldt 07, Ball + Dal + ROO tie 09.
- n1ck
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9871
- Joined: Sun 08 Aug 2004 2:28am
- Location: Clarinda
- Has thanked: 78 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
But it wont.Grimfang wrote:Freo trainer has said Baker supposedly laid a hip-and-shoulder on him but has also admitted his view of the incident was obscured.
Case has to be thrown out. What a crock.
I can just see Baker missing the rest of the season, just like Johnson will.
Absolute disgrace allowing testimony from an official of one of the sides - no matter how pointless or unconvincing it is.
Fact is, now that the 'expert witness' has said hes not sure, Bakes will get rubbed out because the tribunal have to protect themselves after wrongly interviewing Voss, and now this Freo official.
- St. Luke
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5268
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 12:34pm
- Location: Hiding at Telstra Dome!
Seriously, if it were any other team it'd be over by now and the whole thing dismissed. Stick a bit of Red. White & Black in there and it's on for young and old. Baker doesn't need to admit or own up for anything!
When they created LENNY HAYES (in the shadow of Harvs) they forgot to break the mold (again)- hence the Supremely Incredible Jack Steven!!
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
The freo trainer...whata tosser.
Basically saw nothing except Bakes running 45 degrees towards Farmer before...
Well helo sunshine.... Baker was PLAYING on him. FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
What a joke.
Based on the evidence put up....should NEVER have come to the tribunal. Is a disgrace.
Basically saw nothing except Bakes running 45 degrees towards Farmer before...
Well helo sunshine.... Baker was PLAYING on him. FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
What a joke.
Based on the evidence put up....should NEVER have come to the tribunal. Is a disgrace.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue 30 May 2006 7:34pm
- Location: the new home of the saints :)
Mr Magic wrote:Can you 'prove' Farmer didn't run into Baker?fonz_#15 wrote:well they were both high contact and they were both forceful so tell me why there is a huge difference milnedog
sorry mr.magic i was referring to the johnso and rowe cases, have a look on page 1 of this thread to see what im talking about
Robert Harvey- Simply the best
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 8:38pm
- Been thanked: 25 times
This is a kangaroo court!!!
What a disgrace!!
How can someone (other than the players) associated with one of the clubs give 'evidence'???
If baker is suspended (possibly for 4+ weeks) on this garbage, it could potentially cost us the game against the eagles...If that is the case, then we don't make the finals and miss out on critical revenue.
This is a serious mis-carrage of justice!
What a disgrace!!
How can someone (other than the players) associated with one of the clubs give 'evidence'???
If baker is suspended (possibly for 4+ weeks) on this garbage, it could potentially cost us the game against the eagles...If that is the case, then we don't make the finals and miss out on critical revenue.
This is a serious mis-carrage of justice!
- St. Luke
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5268
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 12:34pm
- Location: Hiding at Telstra Dome!
Apparently they want to bring in the head of the Freo cheer squad now!
...then if that doesn't work Buckley said he'll come in and give reason as to why Baker should be suspended!
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
When they created LENNY HAYES (in the shadow of Harvs) they forgot to break the mold (again)- hence the Supremely Incredible Jack Steven!!
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
That plus it is somehow a "criminal" offence fora defender to pick up the forward that he is playing onausfatcat wrote:So my understanding is a tribunal hearing based on, not anyone seeing the incdent that someone saw baker running in a different direction that what Baker said he was...... THAT IS bulls***, even if they believe him how can someone be suspended for that.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
I mean Bakes was obviously meant to according the feo not pick up his man!!!!!!!!
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 763 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
My apologiesfonz_#15 wrote:Mr Magic wrote:Can you 'prove' Farmer didn't run into Baker?fonz_#15 wrote:well they were both high contact and they were both forceful so tell me why there is a huge difference milnedog
sorry mr.magic i was referring to the johnso and rowe cases, have a look on page 1 of this thread to see what im talking about
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Just reported that the Saints have proven that Kirkwood's evidence of where the ball was is incorrect from stills and video.
So he didn't see the impact, he is wrong where the ball was and he is the only person who saw the incident say that Baker ran toward Farmer.
The guy is obviously a liar and a fool.
If I had a kid going to his school i would pull them out of his classes. He is not the type of character whom I would want influencing my children.
If Baker doesn't get off it is a complete disgrage.
If he gets anything, this gutless bunch of squibs that call themselves a board better take it to the Supreme court.
A load of bulls.hite and Fremantle should be ashamed of their crap.
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
So he didn't see the impact, he is wrong where the ball was and he is the only person who saw the incident say that Baker ran toward Farmer.
The guy is obviously a liar and a fool.
If I had a kid going to his school i would pull them out of his classes. He is not the type of character whom I would want influencing my children.
If Baker doesn't get off it is a complete disgrage.
If he gets anything, this gutless bunch of squibs that call themselves a board better take it to the Supreme court.
A load of bulls.hite and Fremantle should be ashamed of their crap.
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- MC Gusto
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6069
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 369 times
joffaboy wrote:Just reported that the Saints have proven that Kirkwood's evidence of where the ball was is incorrect from stills and video.
So he didn't see the impact, he is wrong where the ball was and he is the only person who saw the incident say that Baker ran toward Farmer.
GET IN
ALL OVER RED ROVER
THEY CANNOT POSSIBLY FIND HIM GUILTY
#1 Ryder fan
- n1ck
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9871
- Joined: Sun 08 Aug 2004 2:28am
- Location: Clarinda
- Has thanked: 78 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
You watch... they will.MC Euro Gusto wrote:joffaboy wrote:Just reported that the Saints have proven that Kirkwood's evidence of where the ball was is incorrect from stills and video.
So he didn't see the impact, he is wrong where the ball was and he is the only person who saw the incident say that Baker ran toward Farmer.
GET IN
ALL OVER RED ROVER
THEY CANNOT POSSIBLY FIND HIM GUILTY