B.Hall -NDS incident??
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
B.Hall -NDS incident??
I was at the game saturday night,and didn't get into Melbourne til yesterday. Was I just a biased Stkilda supporter saturday night,or was I blinded by the condition i was in,or did Hall elbow Dal in the head??????
Was anything said of this in the media or anything?
Thought it was quite possibly the worst decision with the holding the ball ruling for as long as i can remember??? Then he doesn't get reported?????
Or did I just make something out of nothing at the time?
Was anything said of this in the media or anything?
Thought it was quite possibly the worst decision with the holding the ball ruling for as long as i can remember??? Then he doesn't get reported?????
Or did I just make something out of nothing at the time?
Certainly not making something out of nothing mate!
There is a thread that you might find interesting all about it
http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=34248
You aren't the only one, that's for sure!
Haven't heard anything about it in the media through.
There is a thread that you might find interesting all about it
http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=34248
You aren't the only one, that's for sure!
Haven't heard anything about it in the media through.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Thanks for thatLiam_G wrote:Certainly not making something out of nothing mate!
There is a thread that you might find interesting all about it
http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=34248
You aren't the only one, that's for sure!
Haven't heard anything about it in the media through.
So nothing in the media,nothing by the AFL???? More evidence of this corrupt laughable league. The untouchable swans. Saturday night was the closest thing to cheating I have seen. Yet Stkilda say nothing about it? Yet whenever other clubs get a bad run they want an enquiry. Time Butterrs pushed this cheating agenda I think,or are they gagged?
- saintdooley
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Mon 20 Feb 2006 2:32pm
yeah!
i was like going mental,
because it happened at the sydney end i didnt see it until the replay, but i can tell you now i was not happy!
i mean, you would probably expect that from a thug like hall, i can get over that, but NOT THE FACT IT WAS HOLDING THE BALL!
and i was going crazy when late in the 3rd qtr the ball was kicked to fraser and both fraser and some sydney scum were holding each other, fraser lost the fight/holding/push and shove, and was pushed to the ground. the yellow maggot blew the whistle and i was so happy, but then awarded it to the scum, i dont think i have ever been so pi$$ed off!
these umps are getting worse and worse as the weeks go on!
i was like going mental,
because it happened at the sydney end i didnt see it until the replay, but i can tell you now i was not happy!
i mean, you would probably expect that from a thug like hall, i can get over that, but NOT THE FACT IT WAS HOLDING THE BALL!
and i was going crazy when late in the 3rd qtr the ball was kicked to fraser and both fraser and some sydney scum were holding each other, fraser lost the fight/holding/push and shove, and was pushed to the ground. the yellow maggot blew the whistle and i was so happy, but then awarded it to the scum, i dont think i have ever been so pi$$ed off!
these umps are getting worse and worse as the weeks go on!
"Another storied win in Robert Harvey's career. They say he is the embodiment of their motto of strength through loyalty, and on the day he became just the tenth man to play 350 league games the saints reward him with a seemingly impossible victory."
No but I dont have rose coloured glasses. I was there and also saw it on TV. Missed his head otherwise would have been reported. An d by the way asked NDS at the post match about it and he said he missed him but he was really upset with the decision. How do you want answer that.Sam23 wrote:LOL are you blind.plugger66 wrote:Hall missed NDS in the head no doubt about it but it was not holding the ball. A ball should have been the decision.
Shoulder clearly clipped just above the chin.
- my les foote
- Club Player
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Tue 12 Dec 2006 6:03pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 2 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 171 times
- Been thanked: 383 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
thks plugger - a voice of FACT - nice to hear!plugger66 wrote:No but I dont have rose coloured glasses. I was there and also saw it on TV. Missed his head otherwise would have been reported. An d by the way asked NDS at the post match about it and he said he missed him but he was really upset with the decision. How do you want answer that.Sam23 wrote:LOL are you blind.plugger66 wrote:Hall missed NDS in the head no doubt about it but it was not holding the ball. A ball should have been the decision.
Shoulder clearly clipped just above the chin.
IMO the umpires should issue a written explanation to St.Kilda re this incident.
It was a disgraceful act by them and should be held accountable.
Why haven't the media knobjockeys got onto it?
Are they stupid, or just sheep waiting for it to fire up on talkback radio or fanforums before they do something?
Come on USC, write something about it!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
- my les foote
- Club Player
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Tue 12 Dec 2006 6:03pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 2 times
Only going on what I saw on TV on both the original full speed and slow motion from two separate angles. All of them showed high contact. It is what the umpires should have seen.plugger66 wrote:Even though NDS told me there wasnt you know there was.my les foote wrote:There was definite contact to the jaw or neck area with the upper arm. It should have been a free for high contact but even though Boofhead is my least favorite player, it was not reportable.
And if there was no high contact, why would he be upset with the decision? He made no effort to get rid off it.
Win it for HIM!