Battle told not to attend B and F

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Sanctorum
Club Player
Posts: 1915
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
Has thanked: 1504 times
Been thanked: 1036 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079289Post Sanctorum »

I can't imagine the club would have put any pressure on Josh Battle to confirm or deny media reports that he would be moving to Waverley Park next year, and it was his decision to announce that he would take up the Hawks offer sooner rather than later.

So I agree with the view that once he advised the club of his intention to play for Hawthorn next year, he in effect shut the door on his days as a St Kilda player and should have realised that it would be inappropriate for him to attend the Barkers Award night with his former team mates.

It also makes me wonder why he asked if he could run through the banner with his kids rigged up in the club's colours one last time in his final game against Carlton - maybe he is planning to write a book :)


"Where there is no hope, it is incumbent on us to invent it.."

Albert Camus (1913-1960) French philospher
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8337
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1893 times
Been thanked: 879 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079291Post WellardSaint »

let him run through a Hawks banner the first time Hawks play us.
Josh wears Hawks colours, the kids just wear their dirty nappies, which are Hawks colours too


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
St Dave
Club Player
Posts: 263
Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
Has thanked: 99 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079295Post St Dave »

B.M wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 1:22pm So his family wouldn’t have been supported if he stayed at StK on $950 a year over 6 years?
No-one is saying he wasn't getting a good deal with the Saints reported offer, just that there are ways that what appeared to be walking out for less money can actually be more money in the long run.

We will never know the intricacies of the Saints offer or the Hawks deal so we can never really say which deal was 'better' (both financially and non-financially). Only Battle can do that and he has told us through his decision.


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4562
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 314 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079296Post whiskers3614 »

Could it be thst he was pissec off thst King and Hill were on more?


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10332
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 147 times
Been thanked: 1320 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079297Post CURLY »

whiskers3614 wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 2:38pm Could it be thst he was pissec off thst King and Hill were on more?
What's he going to do leave every club where there is someone on more money.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13953
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1314 times
Been thanked: 2082 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079298Post The_Dud »

It's pretty obvious he's left because he thinks he'll have more chance of success at Hawthorn.

The hard question to ask is then, what does that say about the direction of the club if someone who's been there for years and a part of the inner sanctum doesn't see success on the horizon?


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10332
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 147 times
Been thanked: 1320 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079299Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:07pm It's pretty obvious he's left because he thinks he'll have more chance of success at Hawthorn.

The hard question to ask is then, what does that say about the direction of the club if someone who's been there for years and a part of the inner sanctum doesn't see success on the horizon?
You haven't been around football clubs much have you?


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11936
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2546 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079301Post Scollop »

CURLY wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:19pm
The_Dud wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:07pm It's pretty obvious he's left because he thinks he'll have more chance of success at Hawthorn.

The hard question to ask is then, what does that say about the direction of the club if someone who's been there for years and a part of the inner sanctum doesn't see success on the horizon?
You haven't been around football clubs much have you?
You're dismissing what he said and you're not actually saying anything specific...as usual

We know he was a Hawthorn supporter growing up, but that's not enough motivation to want to leave a football club you've been part of for 7 years.

Give us something CURLY. Why do you think Battle wanted to leave the Saints?


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10332
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 147 times
Been thanked: 1320 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079302Post CURLY »

Scollop wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:47pm
CURLY wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:19pm
The_Dud wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:07pm It's pretty obvious he's left because he thinks he'll have more chance of success at Hawthorn.

The hard question to ask is then, what does that say about the direction of the club if someone who's been there for years and a part of the inner sanctum doesn't see success on the horizon?
You haven't been around football clubs much have you?
You're dismissing what he said and you're not actually saying anything specific...as usual

We know he was a Hawthorn supporter growing up, but that's not enough motivation to want to leave a football club you've been part of for 7 years.

Give us something CURLY. Why do you think Battle wanted to leave the Saints?
Players leave clubs all the time and no matter how good the culture, environment the success they still leave. It's baffling, frustrating and to be honest mind blowing that you can sit with a bloke that has just played in a Grand Final and they are thinking about going elswhere.
This unfortunately is how clubs and players are.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11936
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2546 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079306Post Scollop »

CURLY wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:55pm
Scollop wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:47pm
CURLY wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:19pm
The_Dud wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:07pm It's pretty obvious he's left because he thinks he'll have more chance of success at Hawthorn.

The hard question to ask is then, what does that say about the direction of the club if someone who's been there for years and a part of the inner sanctum doesn't see success on the horizon?
You haven't been around football clubs much have you?
You're dismissing what he said and you're not actually saying anything specific...as usual

We know he was a Hawthorn supporter growing up, but that's not enough motivation to want to leave a football club you've been part of for 7 years.

Give us something CURLY. Why do you think Battle wanted to leave the Saints?
Players leave clubs all the time and no matter how good the culture, environment the success they still leave. It's baffling, frustrating and to be honest mind blowing that you can sit with a bloke that has just played in a Grand Final and they are thinking about going elswhere.
This unfortunately is how clubs and players are.
Thanks for the cliches and generalisations

We don't know how we would understand the world without you


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10332
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 147 times
Been thanked: 1320 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079307Post CURLY »

Scollop wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 4:08pm
CURLY wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:55pm
Scollop wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:47pm
CURLY wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:19pm
The_Dud wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:07pm It's pretty obvious he's left because he thinks he'll have more chance of success at Hawthorn.

The hard question to ask is then, what does that say about the direction of the club if someone who's been there for years and a part of the inner sanctum doesn't see success on the horizon?
You haven't been around football clubs much have you?
You're dismissing what he said and you're not actually saying anything specific...as usual

We know he was a Hawthorn supporter growing up, but that's not enough motivation to want to leave a football club you've been part of for 7 years.

Give us something CURLY. Why do you think Battle wanted to leave the Saints?
Players leave clubs all the time and no matter how good the culture, environment the success they still leave. It's baffling, frustrating and to be honest mind blowing that you can sit with a bloke that has just played in a Grand Final and they are thinking about going elswhere.
This unfortunately is how clubs and players are.
Thanks for the cliches and generalisations

We don't know how we would understand the world without you
Why thank you. Why do you think it has to be something sinister the club has done rather than just another player thats enjoyed being chased.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11936
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2546 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079308Post Scollop »

CURLY wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 4:12pm
Scollop wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 4:08pm
CURLY wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:55pm
Scollop wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:47pm
CURLY wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:19pm
The_Dud wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:07pm It's pretty obvious he's left because he thinks he'll have more chance of success at Hawthorn.

The hard question to ask is then, what does that say about the direction of the club if someone who's been there for years and a part of the inner sanctum doesn't see success on the horizon?
You haven't been around football clubs much have you?
You're dismissing what he said and you're not actually saying anything specific...as usual

We know he was a Hawthorn supporter growing up, but that's not enough motivation to want to leave a football club you've been part of for 7 years.

Give us something CURLY. Why do you think Battle wanted to leave the Saints?
Players leave clubs all the time and no matter how good the culture, environment the success they still leave. It's baffling, frustrating and to be honest mind blowing that you can sit with a bloke that has just played in a Grand Final and they are thinking about going elswhere.
This unfortunately is how clubs and players are.
Thanks for the cliches and generalisations

We don't know how we would understand the world without you
Why thank you. Why do you think it has to be something sinister the club has done rather than just another player thats enjoyed being chased.
Yes he enjoyed being chased. Ok. That was his only motivation was it?

You're quick to accuse me of something specific but you want to talk bs and cliches in response to a direct question

Why did he WANT to LEAVE the Saints?

If you don't know. Then just say so


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079309Post Killa »

Perhaps, just perhaps, Kennett has offered him pre selection in a “safe” Liberal seat post his football career

Except that, given the spotlight on just some of the toxic DNA of the Liberal Party and the control Kennett has threatening pre selections, there may not be a Liberal seat in wider Melbourne, let alone a “safe” one Federal or State

Correct assumption?

Don’t know, but as good as any other speculation doing the rounds

One thing for certain, he had made up his mind well before season’s end, if not well sooner

Again noting others have moved from St Kilda to Hawthorn with Robert Harvey going the other way so back to St Kilda

As one who has put that St Kilda require support for Marshall , King and Howard (plus adding midfield class), the absence of Lyon saying Battle is a required player is telling

So Battle, playing as a KPP at 193cms and 83kgs was part of the problem, not part of the fix

And his lack of flexibility despite opportunity being given

Anyway he is now in the employ of a competitor Club and his locker at St Kilda is empty awaiting the next user

Life goes on


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11346
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1338 times
Been thanked: 457 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079310Post Sainternist »

This video explains it pretty well:



It was another dumb media beat up, nothing more.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11936
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2546 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079312Post Scollop »

Killa wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 4:49pm
As one who has put that St Kilda require support for Marshall , King and Howard (plus adding midfield class), the absence of Lyon saying Battle is a required player is telling

So Battle, playing as a KPP at 193cms and 83kgs was part of the problem, not part of the fix
We're on the same wavelength. I said this back in May

https://www.saintsational.net/viewtopic ... 2#p2062412


User avatar
SydneySainter
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2424
Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079318Post SydneySainter »

While in one hand it may sound petty, but there is likely more than one side to this story.

If players and staff alike are snubbing Battle, it may be more than just sour grapes. As good a player as Battle is, we aren’t losing a league top fiver.

Maybe there is discontent as to how Battle handled the negotiation process, what he told his peers compared to what transpired?

Maybe it’s warranted, maybe not.

All I know is that we’ve recently tried being the club of pleasant, cuddly men and that certainly hasn’t helped our brand.


Bad management is bad management
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19052
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1597 times
Been thanked: 2009 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079324Post SaintPav »

What’s the price of a ticket these days?

$250? Plus extras drinking like a horse.

He won’t be eating and drinking on the club tit.

Not on my watch!


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
D.B.Cooper
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2102
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
Has thanked: 768 times
Been thanked: 718 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079326Post D.B.Cooper »

People keep stating (as fact) Battle left for less money than we offered.

I am yet to see one piece of evidence proving this.

Surely the reliable Tom Morris is not the source?


There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
User avatar
Kent the Butler
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 06 Nov 2023 3:13pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079327Post Kent the Butler »

The_Dud wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 3:07pm It's pretty obvious he's left because he thinks he'll have more chance of success at Hawthorn.

The hard question to ask is then, what does that say about the direction of the club if someone who's been there for years and a part of the inner sanctum doesn't see success on the horizon?

One player leaving ...that's a massive sign of a lack of faith in the Club's direction.
Maybe Josh wants to support them in the Federal Court, or is cool with their family planning advice to their players' partners...
I take it you're a big fan of the Hawks' past culture, Dud?


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8337
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1893 times
Been thanked: 879 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079328Post WellardSaint »

Another rumour is that his dad refused to attend his games. Rumour.
He's one guy. He preferred the Hawks for a few reasons, and only a few (Wilkie and some other players) would know the truth.
If he's peed off about Hill's+King's $$ that's the fault of Lethlean etc for wasting $ on Hanneberry, but I suspect it's not the sole reason


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
Kent the Butler
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 06 Nov 2023 3:13pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079329Post Kent the Butler »

Total rumour.
His Dad was a regular in the Quill Room for Saints' Level 2 Reserved Seat members


saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3625
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 487 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079331Post saintbob »

CURLY wrote: Tue 01 Oct 2024 2:58pm Apparently Battle was asked not to attend the Best and Fairest.

What are peoples thoughts on this.
It’s an absolute s*** go, if it’s true.

Clubs need to be better than that, I’m sure the players wouldn’t have given two f**** and would’ve preferred to see him there.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18610
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1957 times
Been thanked: 855 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079335Post bigcarl »

Sainternist wrote: Tue 01 Oct 2024 5:47pm He lied to his teammates and coach, saying he would remain a Saint only a day before telling the world he would be leaving us for less money to go to the Dingley Tip.
Yes, that was ordinary


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9124
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 436 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079337Post spert »

WellardSaint wrote: Wed 02 Oct 2024 10:33pm Another rumour is that his dad refused to attend his games. Rumour.
He's one guy. He preferred the Hawks for a few reasons, and only a few (Wilkie and some other players) would know the truth.
If he's peed off about Hill's+King's $$ that's the fault of Lethlean etc for wasting $ on Hanneberry, but I suspect it's not the sole reason
He was also pretty pi$$ed off with Ratten getting the flick apparently, but not every thing that happens in footy clubs, pleases everyone. Let's go forward..there's a new season coming.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19052
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1597 times
Been thanked: 2009 times

Re: Battle told not to attend B and F

Post: # 2079340Post SaintPav »

Yeah he was also pissed off that Watters got the flick.

He thought that he was going to be the next big thing.

:roll:


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Post Reply