Battle

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6594
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 465 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076401Post Jacks Back »

Killa wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 7:52pm Wilkie is 191cms.

Battle is 193cms.

Howard is 199cms
Sad to see Battle go but another soldier takes his place.

Just to note:

Arie 197cms

Houston 186cm


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12274
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2645 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076402Post B.M »

Are is 194cm


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18998
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1591 times
Been thanked: 1998 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076406Post SaintPav »

Ratten and Boofhead are up to their necks in this.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12781
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 792 times
Been thanked: 427 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076407Post Mr Magic »

SaintPav wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 10:54pm Ratten and Boofhead are up to their necks in this.
Maybe, but I think there is ‘creativity’ within the Hawks offer to Battle
There’s something extra that’s not included in the published offer from them that makes it more exciting than our apparently greater offer.


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12781
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 792 times
Been thanked: 427 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076409Post Mr Magic »

spert wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 8:53pm
Mr Magic wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 7:27pm Something smells here.
Battle has said he’s looking after the future of his family.
If it’s true we offered more than the apparent deal he’s accepting from Hawthorn then how does that ‘look after the future of his family’?
There can only be 2 reasons why you would accept less to leave:-
1. You don’t want to stay
2. The reported deal you’re accepting is actually not the deal - there’s a side-deal component not being made public
Not everyone is on the same page as Lyon, and apparently there was a sour taste in some mouths at Ratten being sacked in that manner
I think your desire to denigrate the appointment of Lyon is colouring your view of everything going on at StKilda
There’s no way what you’re implying could have been kept quiet from the hundreds of journos looking for stories.


User avatar
TheGreatZacsby
Club Player
Posts: 648
Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2023 8:59am
Has thanked: 37 times
Been thanked: 220 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076410Post TheGreatZacsby »

I’m gutted by the news. Always been a huge fan of Battle. I feel we got royally f***ed over by this deal.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13905
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1314 times
Been thanked: 2077 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076412Post The_Dud »

Reportedly went to Hawthorn for less money.

Doesn’t say much for our club or where we’re headed…


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2190
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 187 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076413Post Zed »

Losing Battle is a blow if we don’t get Band 1 and a win if we do get Band 1

Some reputations on the line at the club betting we get Band 1 and trying to game the system
I’ve never known St Kilda to successfully game the system. Let’s see how this plays out.

We’ve never been that smart - and the AFL likes to keep us in our place in the bottom half of the ladder. I will be pleasantly surprised if we get Band 1. I’m expecting end of first round compo.

We are useful to the AFL for tv rights dollars, but not one of the big clubs that brings in the big crowds and big dollars that fills AFL coffers. We are the equivalent of the Washington Wizards for the Harlem Globetrotters- a necessary component but ultimately not the main attraction that brings in the dollars. At the end of the day, its not in the AFL’s interest to give us a leg up. That’s why I expect them to change the formula and we wont get Band 1.


“If you want the rainbow you gotta put up with rain” Dolly Parton
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8068
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 226 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076414Post magnifisaint »

I'm going to guess anywhere from pick 15 to pick 30.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10214
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 145 times
Been thanked: 1310 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076416Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 11:09pm Reportedly went to Hawthorn for less money.

Doesn’t say much for our club or where we’re headed…
Yep of course he did.

The oldest of old chestnuts it’s not about the money.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Josh Battle
Club Player
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun 19 May 2019 7:49pm
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076420Post Josh Battle »

Mr Magic wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 11:01pm
spert wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 8:53pm
Mr Magic wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 7:27pm Something smells here.
Battle has said he’s looking after the future of his family.
If it’s true we offered more than the apparent deal he’s accepting from Hawthorn then how does that ‘look after the future of his family’?
There can only be 2 reasons why you would accept less to leave:-
1. You don’t want to stay
2. The reported deal you’re accepting is actually not the deal - there’s a side-deal component not being made public
Not everyone is on the same page as Lyon, and apparently there was a sour taste in some mouths at Ratten being sacked in that manner
I think your desire to denigrate the appointment of Lyon is colouring your view of everything going on at StKilda
There’s no way what you’re implying could have been kept quiet from the hundreds of journos looking for stories.
I don't think what spert is suggesting is denigrating Lyon. It's denigrating the St Kilda president and the board isn't?

Perhaps Battle wasn't initially offered a 5 or 6 year deal and that's what he was chasing. We definitely lowballed him imo, so that's where he may have decided to consider leaving.

We're talking about a complicated situation for Battle and he may have committed to Hawthorn 2 months ago. That's when our team wasn't playing very good footy.

If anyone is wondering... I'm not related and I don't personally know Josh. I'm just a fan


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 348 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076421Post Killa »

In the light of this decision I would not place any trust in anything Battle has said relating to St Kilda FC

In regards successful Clubs, you have players accepting less than market value to ensure the side sticks together and that it can recruit to compete

Commitment is to your Club and your fellow players and this builds bonding including thru your future life

Measure Battle against that criteria and St Kilda is best advised to invest the capital into a player committed to the cause

The brutality of the AFL is that a level of performance is required to remain on a List

This is because the AFL, seeking 24/7 publicity 365 days a year decrees you have to sack a certain number of players ahead of the compromised Draft they laud over

The AFL has the credibility of Battle


St Dave
Club Player
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 59 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076422Post St Dave »

magnifisaint wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 11:24pm I'm going to guess anywhere from pick 15 to pick 30.
Band 2 world be end of first round so around 20 (I don't believe there is a lot of father/son or academy hijinks this year), and band 3 would be after our second pick which would be around pick 25.

Without knowing what the Hawks offered it is difficult to predict what we might get, but this article from last year about Ben McKay provides a little extra context around why we might not be as lucky this year.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-tr ... 996293d0da
The problem is how this year’s (referring to 2023 and Ben McKays deal) free agents are being paid based on 2024’s salary cap, but being valued by the AFL based on 2023’s salary cap.

Players can only be compared to existing contracts, naturally. But this trade period’s deals are being compared to 2023 salaries - before a near 15 per cent jump in the salary cap.

That is why Ben McKay, earning just under $800,000 a year guaranteed, qualifies in the top five per cent of players (which is the bar for band 1, band 2 is top 15%) this year (also thanks to being the youngest possible restricted free agent at 25).

If he was a free agent in 2024, he would have needed to be paid over $900,000 a year to sit in the top five per cent of contracts.
There might be a small chance the Hawks ended up increasing their offer. But I expect we probably land chose to the top of band 2. It sucks but thankfully this draft is expected to be pretty even over the first 25-30 picks (unless anyone has any more up to date info)


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4979
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1430 times
Been thanked: 1463 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076424Post Yorkeys »

Kudos to our recruitment/retention mob. They set a value and played their cards pretty well. Not overpaying, will get ok compo, salary cap flexibility. Tested Josh's resolve.
Josh is very good but so are plenty of other players.
It's a constant player churn industry for various reasons. He now has to build up relationships at Hawthorn which has its own court issues unresolved and construct a new life. Has to tell them its what he always wanted, telling the Saints he was conflicted was just a negotiation tactic to manage his desertion.
Saints caravan moves on, no hard feelings. It's also now known Saints are not pushovers.


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8389
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 1172 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076427Post Devilhead »

Battle will be all but forgotten after we are given Pick 8


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8068
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 226 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076429Post magnifisaint »

Devilhead wrote: Fri 30 Aug 2024 1:18am Battle will be all but forgotten after we are given Pick 8
I hope you are right.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
SaintWiki
Club Player
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 07 Jan 2007 4:18pm
Location: Derby, West Kimberley WA
Has thanked: 765 times
Been thanked: 151 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076431Post SaintWiki »

Mr Magic wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 7:27pm Something smells here.
Battle has said he’s looking after the future of his family.
If it’s true we offered more than the apparent deal he’s accepting from Hawthorn then how does that ‘look after the future of his family’?
There can only be 2 reasons why you would accept less to leave:-
1. You don’t want to stay
2. The reported deal you’re accepting is actually not the deal - there’s a side-deal component not being made public
Well I heard that he supported Hawthorn when he was young and that his best friend plays for Hawthorn, although I don't know who that is.


SaintWiki
Club Player
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 07 Jan 2007 4:18pm
Location: Derby, West Kimberley WA
Has thanked: 765 times
Been thanked: 151 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076432Post SaintWiki »

mod delete
Last edited by SaintWiki on Fri 30 Aug 2024 8:37am, edited 1 time in total.


Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4915
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 335 times
Been thanked: 481 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076433Post Moods »

SaintWiki wrote: Fri 30 Aug 2024 7:31am
Mr Magic wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 7:27pm Something smells here.
Battle has said he’s looking after the future of his family.
If it’s true we offered more than the apparent deal he’s accepting from Hawthorn then how does that ‘look after the future of his family’?
There can only be 2 reasons why you would accept less to leave:-
1. You don’t want to stay
2. The reported deal you’re accepting is actually not the deal - there’s a side-deal component not being made public
Well I heard that he supported Hawthorn when he was young and that his best friend plays for Hawthorn, although I don't know who that is.
Imagine being a fully grown man and using that as an excuse to change clubs? I used to barrack for the Hawks. Spare me.
My best mate plays there. Like he doesn’t have mates at StKilda. Every BS excuse trotted out is worse than the one before. I’ve heard from a good mate who has lots of connections at Halebury that he’s not very bright, but this is beyond stupid.
He wants to play in a flag and he obviously doesn’t see that happening with st Kilda. He can get f***ed as far as I’m concerned


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18998
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1591 times
Been thanked: 1998 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076434Post SaintPav »

It’s Scrimshaw


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Beno88
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2346
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
Location: Bentleigh East
Has thanked: 268 times
Been thanked: 606 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076436Post Beno88 »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 11:09pm Reportedly went to Hawthorn for less money.

Doesn’t say much for our club or where we’re headed…
We'll finish above Hawthorn next season. Comfortably.

Don't be fooled by the soft draw syndrome. We had it last year. Fremantle the year before.

Geelong and Hawthorn have had it this year.


repta
Club Player
Posts: 724
Joined: Thu 06 Dec 2007 3:14pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076438Post repta »

It all started with low ball offer.
Then the saints insulted him by chasing Weitering on double what they were prepared to offer him.
Yes it is about family.
It is about future.

The saints are run by muppets.

There was no surprise when the Hawks came knocking he accepted the call. A long successful team. A coach that valued him highly. More money. A bigger chance of ultimate success. Hawks are a very very successful team in the last 40 years (are they the most successful? If not they would be close) and on the rise again.
Premerierships pay their way for years after the boots are hung up.

Saints would want to learn from the mistakes with Battle. With the young crop coming through they need to keep their mouth shut, reward the future stars and plan for tomorrow.


SinCitySainter
Club Player
Posts: 970
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
Has thanked: 56 times
Been thanked: 124 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076439Post SinCitySainter »

Odds on there are a couple of under the table parts to the deal. His wife gets a two day a week job she can do from home for a couple of hundred grand a year maybe. I am very suspicious of people saying they are going for less money rarely happens. Even Geelong who everyone said they took less to keep the team together had the famed Costa-living-allowance.


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8068
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 226 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076440Post magnifisaint »

Moods wrote: Fri 30 Aug 2024 7:41am
SaintWiki wrote: Fri 30 Aug 2024 7:31am
Mr Magic wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024 7:27pm Something smells here.
Battle has said he’s looking after the future of his family.
If it’s true we offered more than the apparent deal he’s accepting from Hawthorn then how does that ‘look after the future of his family’?
There can only be 2 reasons why you would accept less to leave:-
1. You don’t want to stay
2. The reported deal you’re accepting is actually not the deal - there’s a side-deal component not being made public
Well I heard that he supported Hawthorn when he was young and that his best friend plays for Hawthorn, although I don't know who that is.
Imagine being a fully grown man and using that as an excuse to change clubs? I used to barrack for the Hawks. Spare me.
My best mate plays there. Like he doesn’t have mates at StKilda. Every BS excuse trotted out is worse than the one before. I’ve heard from a good mate who has lots of connections at Halebury that he’s not very bright, but this is beyond stupid.
He wants to play in a flag and he obviously doesn’t see that happening with st Kilda. He can get f***ed as far as I’m concerned
I think you're right. Mitchell probably said how many flags have St Kilda won and how many have Hawthorn won. Where are you most likely to win one?


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10214
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 145 times
Been thanked: 1310 times

Re: Battle

Post: # 2076441Post CURLY »

repta wrote: Fri 30 Aug 2024 9:57am It all started with low ball offer.
Then the saints insulted him by chasing Weitering on double what they were prepared to offer him.
Yes it is about family.
It is about future.

The saints are run by muppets.

There was no surprise when the Hawks came knocking he accepted the call. A long successful team. A coach that valued him highly. More money. A bigger chance of ultimate success. Hawks are a very very successful team in the last 40 years (are they the most successful? If not they would be close) and on the rise again.
Premerierships pay their way for years after the boots are hung up.

Saints would want to learn from the mistakes with Battle. With the young crop coming through they need to keep their mouth shut, reward the future stars and plan for tomorrow.
Who actually said we offered Weitering that? Also Weitering is an elite defender and Battle third wheel in a strong defensive unit.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Post Reply