Webster appalling

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5098
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1453 times
Been thanked: 1523 times

Re: Webster appalling

Post: # 2075125Post Yorkeys »

Scollop wrote: Wed 21 Aug 2024 11:38pm Personally, I think it's not appropriate to bring up this old thread. Just fkn start a new one re Houston

Out of respect for Jimmy Webster, why do we need to keep seeing this thread title?

Move on. I know you want to link the two incidents, but you can still do that without everyone reading the same crap title.
............................…............................…...............

Houston doesn't normally play that way. You could see that Port were under instructions to target Rankin physically

Leaders at footy clubs do that. In Dan Houston mind he had an opportunity as a senior player to physically hurt someone from Adelaide and he did it

That's the same sort of thing that happened shortly before Webster ran towards Simpkin. Simpkin tried to rough up one of our players, so Jimmy Webster felt the need to retaliate in a physical way.

Webster obviously made a bad judgement call. He didn't do it legally. He hit Simpkin high plus he bumped late, but everyone makes mistakes.

Webster paid for his indiscretion and now Dan will too. Jimmy copped the longest suspension, but Houston might get the biggest penalty of all - in terms of missing a possible Grand Final.
Scollperson, if you want to swear at me like that come out side, you sanctimonious wank.
And how dumb is it to say do disapprove, then go on to contribute heartily. Fool.


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12082
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3698 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Re: Webster appalling

Post: # 2075127Post Scollop »

Yorkey ya knob

You're a sensitive soul aren't ya? I'm sorry if I hurt ya feelings.

Yes...I contributed to the conversation instead of simply just voicing an opinion regarding the thread title I keep seeing...and I did that out of respect for everyone else who also contributed :mrgreen:


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14030
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1314 times
Been thanked: 2092 times

Re: Webster appalling

Post: # 2075145Post The_Dud »

Both bad and obviously looked at harshly in todays AFL, Webster's still clearly worse, and probably incurred a 'dumb' tax for doing it in a practice match!


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10472
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1334 times

Re: Webster appalling

Post: # 2075146Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 22 Aug 2024 9:57am Both bad and obviously looked at harshly in todays AFL, Webster's still clearly worse, and probably incurred a 'dumb' tax for doing it in a practice match!
StKilda tax with Maynard extra loading.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10472
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1334 times

Re: Webster appalling

Post: # 2075147Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 22 Aug 2024 9:57am Both bad and obviously looked at harshly in todays AFL, Webster's still clearly worse, and probably incurred a 'dumb' tax for doing it in a practice match!
StKilda tax with Maynard extra loading.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17042
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3660 times
Been thanked: 2926 times

Re: Webster appalling

Post: # 2075154Post skeptic »

Websters was more severe
Houston’s is a cheaper shot


Post Reply