Momentum killers
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 293 times
Momentum killers
In key moments we lost momentum last night.....
Seb Ross kick out on the full after butlers run down tackle was disgusting.
As was Bonners miss.
Jones free kick (stupid)
Marshall free kick (unlucky)
I'm sure there were others. Any one one of those don't happen and who knows what happens.
Jones, Ross, Bonner no where near our best side. I'd drop them in that order.
Seb Ross kick out on the full after butlers run down tackle was disgusting.
As was Bonners miss.
Jones free kick (stupid)
Marshall free kick (unlucky)
I'm sure there were others. Any one one of those don't happen and who knows what happens.
Jones, Ross, Bonner no where near our best side. I'd drop them in that order.
Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22781
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8695 times
- Been thanked: 3803 times
Re: Momentum killers
Sadly, I gave to agree with you re Seb. The other two are definitely spuds,nostalgicsaint wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jun 2024 12:55pm In key moments we lost momentum last night.....
Seb Ross kick out on the full after butlers run down tackle was disgusting.
As was Bonners miss.
Jones free kick (stupid)
Marshall free kick (unlucky)
I'm sure there were others. Any one one of those don't happen and who knows what happens.
Jones, Ross, Bonner no where near our best side. I'd drop them in that order.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9685
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1242 times
Re: Momentum killers
The free against Marshall was just poor umpiring.
Sebs two kicks were horrendous
Jones 50 was another umpire gift
Sebs two kicks were horrendous
Jones 50 was another umpire gift
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13582
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1308 times
- Been thanked: 2019 times
Re: Momentum killers
Was exactly the same as the one Higgins got in the last.
Seb’s possession is just too costly.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11009
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3384 times
- Been thanked: 2363 times
Re: Momentum killers
The free against Marshall was technically correct because unfortunately RoMa didn't contest. RoMa didn't make an attempt to mark it himself
You can't look at your opponent, and make it obvious to the umpire that you're blocking them and then you don't even try to mark it yourself
You can't look at your opponent, and make it obvious to the umpire that you're blocking them and then you don't even try to mark it yourself
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11009
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3384 times
- Been thanked: 2363 times
Re: Momentum killers
I think Seb, Mason and Hilly were shocking with some of their kicks. But all these guys tried their guts out.
Bonner was the bloke who let us down.Not just with the kick for goal but mainly his inability to contest a ground ball. Too timid
The 50m penalty against Windhager was the one that was not umpired in the spirit of the game.
All night they gave warnings and gave instructions to players to go back 2 metres. That killed our momentum
Bonner was the bloke who let us down.Not just with the kick for goal but mainly his inability to contest a ground ball. Too timid
The 50m penalty against Windhager was the one that was not umpired in the spirit of the game.
All night they gave warnings and gave instructions to players to go back 2 metres. That killed our momentum
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9004
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 416 times
Re: Momentum killers
A big momentum killer is the lack of defensive pressure from our half forwards- the work rate required keep the ball in the scoring zone..it killed us last night especially in the first half. Yet again, an opposition defender is amongst the best on the ground. Bonner did a couple of poor things, but not our worse player, also did some nice link ups. Seb and Hill are a worry, and I wouldn't complain too much about the umpires, as we got away with a few things too last night.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22781
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8695 times
- Been thanked: 3803 times
Re: Momentum killers
Wood also f***ed up one certain goal in the first and failed to land his boot on the ball in the goal square in another chance gone begging.Scollop wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jun 2024 2:14pm I think Seb, Mason and Hilly were shocking with some of their kicks. But all these guys tried their guts out.
Bonner was the bloke who let us down.Not just with the kick for goal but mainly his inability to contest a ground ball. Too timid
The 50m penalty against Windhager was the one that was not umpired in the spirit of the game.
All night they gave warnings and gave instructions to players to go back 2 metres. That killed our momentum
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11009
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3384 times
- Been thanked: 2363 times
Re: Momentum killers
It's interesting isn't. The blokes who played their guts out like Wood also made huge stuffups. I was furious with Higgins for his early miss when Henry had the free kick and he chose to take advantage.saynta wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jun 2024 2:28pmWood also f***ed up one certain goal in the first and failed to land his boot on the ball in the goal square in another chance gone begging.Scollop wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jun 2024 2:14pm I think Seb, Mason and Hilly were shocking with some of their kicks. But all these guys tried their guts out.
Bonner was the bloke who let us down.Not just with the kick for goal but mainly his inability to contest a ground ball. Too timid
The 50m penalty against Windhager was the one that was not umpired in the spirit of the game.
All night they gave warnings and gave instructions to players to go back 2 metres. That killed our momentum
Then Higgins tried to outmark Max King who was in a genuine 1-1 contest. I was furious with him again... but he came good.
Same with Mason Wood. He played well right up until the end. He defended and he put his head over the footy and got some important ground balls out to guys like Henry in the last quarter.
Same with young Darcy. He made some mistakes early but kept running, kept presenting and contributed well in our last quarter fightback
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Tue 22 Aug 2023 11:26pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Momentum killers
It's not illegal to look at your opponent, although umpires and commentators think it is. Marshall was in good position to mark the ball, yet a couple of Saints players drifted in front of him and marked the ball.Scollop wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jun 2024 2:08pm The free against Marshall was technically correct because unfortunately RoMa didn't contest. RoMa didn't make an attempt to mark it himself
You can't look at your opponent, and make it obvious to the umpire that you're blocking them and then you don't even try to mark it yourself
A disproportionate number of the momentum killers were questionable umpire decisions. Just off the cuff .. the 666 .. this one against Marshall and the 50m against Winhager. All questionable and all momentum killers.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11009
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3384 times
- Been thanked: 2363 times
Re: Momentum killers
Agreed on all pointsBig Max wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jun 2024 3:54pmIt's not illegal to look at your opponent, although umpires and commentators think it is. Marshall was in good position to mark the ball, yet a couple of Saints players drifted in front of him and marked the ball.Scollop wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jun 2024 2:08pm The free against Marshall was technically correct because unfortunately RoMa didn't contest. RoMa didn't make an attempt to mark it himself
You can't look at your opponent, and make it obvious to the umpire that you're blocking them and then you don't even try to mark it yourself
A disproportionate number of the momentum killers were questionable umpire decisions. Just off the cuff .. the 666 .. this one against Marshall and the 50m against Winhager. All questionable and all momentum killers.
I know it's not illegal to look at your opponent. I separated the 2 paragraphs.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4684
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1346 times
- Been thanked: 1350 times
Re: Momentum killers
Butler taking good mark inside 50, Lions defence in disarray, Butler stands next to the marker and plays on into him with multiple options for a walk in goal begging. Saints then caught out. SIGH.
How to coach monumental brain fades? Dan is a serial offender who has also refined the hitting a post skill.
How to coach monumental brain fades? Dan is a serial offender who has also refined the hitting a post skill.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1797
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 379 times
Re: Momentum killers
True. Butler is so frustrating, does some good things and then tries low percentage fancy stuff that gifts it to the opposition.Yorkeys wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 9:10am Butler taking good mark inside 50, Lions defence in disarray, Butler stands next to the marker and plays on into him with multiple options for a walk in goal begging. Saints then caught out. SIGH.
How to coach monumental brain fades? Dan is a serial offender who has also refined the hitting a post skill.
I'd prefer developing some of the younger players.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8993
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Re: Momentum killers
I'm not sure that the 50 against Windhager was because he went over the mark. He came from behind the mark through the protected area which you can't do. The real culprit was the other Saints player who left the mark.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9685
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1242 times
Re: Momentum killers
You seriously aren’t saying Marshall and Higgins frees were identical??
Marshall held position to take a mark.
The Brisbane player basically jumped front on into Higgins with a hip and shoulder.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- Sanctorum
- Club Player
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
- Has thanked: 1448 times
- Been thanked: 970 times
Re: Momentum killers
Either way, it was an unjustfied 50 m penalty for such a tiny infraction by Windhager, 99 times out of 100 that would not have been paid.perfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 10:22amI'm not sure that the 50 against Windhager was because he went over the mark. He came from behind the mark through the protected area which you can't do. The real culprit was the other Saints player who left the mark.
Bloody ridiculous!!
"To do good is noble. To tell others to do good is even nobler and much less trouble.."
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9685
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1242 times
Re: Momentum killers
Amazing that such a blatant 50 wasn't paid against Collingwood.Sanctorum wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 2:07pmEither way, it was an unjustfied 50 m penalty for such a tiny infraction by Windhager, 99 times out of 100 that would not have been paid.perfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 10:22amI'm not sure that the 50 against Windhager was because he went over the mark. He came from behind the mark through the protected area which you can't do. The real culprit was the other Saints player who left the mark.
Bloody ridiculous!!
Just luck I guess but how many times can you be just lucky?
Bl;atant cheating.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13582
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1308 times
- Been thanked: 2019 times
Re: Momentum killers
They either both should have been 50 or neither.CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 12:18pmAmazing that such a blatant 50 wasn't paid against Collingwood.Sanctorum wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 2:07pmEither way, it was an unjustfied 50 m penalty for such a tiny infraction by Windhager, 99 times out of 100 that would not have been paid.perfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 10:22amI'm not sure that the 50 against Windhager was because he went over the mark. He came from behind the mark through the protected area which you can't do. The real culprit was the other Saints player who left the mark.
Bloody ridiculous!!
Just luck I guess but how many times can you be just lucky?
Bl;atant cheating.
So which is it?
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13582
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1308 times
- Been thanked: 2019 times
Re: Momentum killers
Why do you have to flat out lie all the time Curly?
Both were moving back into their player looking at them and not the ball, both were trying to do the same thing - block them from the contest, both were easy free kicks and paid correctly.
For once just stop lying to fuel your deranged conspiracy theories.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9685
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1242 times
Re: Momentum killers
See you are just plain talking bulls*** not even lying.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 2:40pmWhy do you have to flat out lie all the time Curly?
Both were moving back into their player looking at them and not the ball, both were trying to do the same thing - block them from the contest, both were easy free kicks and paid correctly.
For once just stop lying to fuel your deranged conspiracy theories.
Marshall glanced back got the position of his opponent then attempted to mark.
The Brisbane player knocked Higgens over with his back to the ball the entire time.
Last edited by CURLY on Mon 17 Jun 2024 3:08pm, edited 1 time in total.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9685
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1242 times
Re: Momentum killers
Well one was so obvious the whole football world is unanimously saying it was missed.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 2:36pmThey either both should have been 50 or neither.CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 12:18pmAmazing that such a blatant 50 wasn't paid against Collingwood.Sanctorum wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 2:07pmEither way, it was an unjustfied 50 m penalty for such a tiny infraction by Windhager, 99 times out of 100 that would not have been paid.perfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 10:22amI'm not sure that the 50 against Windhager was because he went over the mark. He came from behind the mark through the protected area which you can't do. The real culprit was the other Saints player who left the mark.
Bloody ridiculous!!
Just luck I guess but how many times can you be just lucky?
Bl;atant cheating.
So which is it?
The Windhager 50 was fine tooth comb bottom of the rule book in small letters technically there if you want to pay it.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13582
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1308 times
- Been thanked: 2019 times
Re: Momentum killers
You do realise there is widely available footage of all of this, don't you?CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 3:06pmSee you are just plain talking bulls*** not even lying.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 2:40pmWhy do you have to flat out lie all the time Curly?
Both were moving back into their player looking at them and not the ball, both were trying to do the same thing - block them from the contest, both were easy free kicks and paid correctly.
For once just stop lying to fuel your deranged conspiracy theories.
Marshall glanced back got the position of his opponent then attempted to mark.
The Brisbane player knocked Higgens over with his back to the ball the entire time.
5 minutes to go in the third Marshall is looking directly at his player when he backs into him, after contact he then turns his head towards the ball which would have landed 3 meters in front of him if Caminiti didn't mark it, at no point is Marshal attempting to mark or contest the mark, like many players do he was trying to protect the area so his teammate can mark. Again, this is on video, explain at what specific point is Marshall attempting to mark.
10 minutes to go in the last the Brisbane player is looking at Higgins and runs into him with the back of his shoulder knocking him to the ground (which Higgins is good at) while turning to face the contest. The Brisbane player is a bit more crude than Marshall in his attempt but is doing the exact same thing - attempting to block a player from contesting the marking contest to help out a teammate.
A throw is a throw whether its 1m or 10m. A block is a block, both clear free kicks.
Again, this is all on video. Those are the facts. Try not to blatantly lie.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13582
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1308 times
- Been thanked: 2019 times
Re: Momentum killers
It's literally right there, c'mon Curly, you just can't blatantly lie your way out of ever situation!CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 3:08pmWell one was so obvious the whole football world is unanimously saying it was missed.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 2:36pmThey either both should have been 50 or neither.CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 12:18pmAmazing that such a blatant 50 wasn't paid against Collingwood.Sanctorum wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 2:07pmEither way, it was an unjustfied 50 m penalty for such a tiny infraction by Windhager, 99 times out of 100 that would not have been paid.perfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 10:22amI'm not sure that the 50 against Windhager was because he went over the mark. He came from behind the mark through the protected area which you can't do. The real culprit was the other Saints player who left the mark.
Bloody ridiculous!!
Just luck I guess but how many times can you be just lucky?
Bl;atant cheating.
So which is it?
The Windhager 50 was fine tooth comb bottom of the rule book in small letters technically there if you want to pay it.
19. FIFTY METRE PENALTY
19.2 WHEN IMPOSED
Where a field Umpire has awarded a Mark or Free Kick to a Player, or a Player is preparing
to bring or bringing the football back into play after a Behind is scored, a Fifty Metre
Penalty in favour of that Player will be awarded if the field Umpire is of the opinion that
any Player or Official from the opposing Team:
(d) enters or does not make every endeavour to immediately vacate the Protected
Area, except when the Player is accompanying or following within two metres
of their opponent;
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue 13 Oct 2020 9:25pm
- Has thanked: 494 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: Momentum killers
As much as I like seb why in the hell is he still been gifted games Pou is a better option he did get 28 touches at sandy or Crouch but seb has to go.
Can we play Bonner on the HF with his kicking distance he would be a real weapon.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7865
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 210 times
- Been thanked: 568 times
Re: Momentum killers
Oh but Laura Kane ticked it off!CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun 2024 12:18pmAmazing that such a blatant 50 wasn't paid against Collingwood.Sanctorum wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 2:07pmEither way, it was an unjustfied 50 m penalty for such a tiny infraction by Windhager, 99 times out of 100 that would not have been paid.perfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun 2024 10:22amI'm not sure that the 50 against Windhager was because he went over the mark. He came from behind the mark through the protected area which you can't do. The real culprit was the other Saints player who left the mark.
Bloody ridiculous!!
Just luck I guess but how many times can you be just lucky?
Bl;atant cheating.
Posting 20 years of holey crap!