LDU

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11639
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2531 times

LDU

Post: # 2064123Post B.M »

Rumours that we are into him?!

Can’t see how that would work - he is contracted - he is not a FA - we would need to give up a minimum first round selection

Which would be pick 5 right now

Most intelligent analysts suggest we need to hit the draft hard and rebuild.

Would you consider a 26yo gun for an 18yo pick 5?


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18686
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1550 times
Been thanked: 1905 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064125Post SaintPav »

Probably not but it depends on the objective.

Management isn’t always good at thinking long term.

Hit the draft and try and recruit a free agent depending on who is available.

Pass.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11045
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3393 times
Been thanked: 2372 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064132Post Scollop »

Even if you just had LDU for 5 years, he's a known quantity . I keep saying that Ross is in a hurry

That's a 'sure thing' versus a 'maybe' in the draft

If Ross Lyon and our football department are serious about rebuilding organically for sustainable success, we wouldn't be doing this, but these guys aren't there for the future of St Kilda. They're looking after their job and their reputation


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10312
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1326 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064133Post asiu »

Would you consider a 26yo gun for an 18yo pick 5?

yep

(given current context)


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8328
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 136 times
Been thanked: 1158 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064134Post Devilhead »

FA next year


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8506
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 600 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064135Post Otiman »

2026. North will be under cap pressure like GWS and GC were with all their high picks.

Or 2025 trade for Howard - a win win.


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8109
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1786 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064155Post WellardSaint »

Tony74 posted on 5 Apr
That we'll go after LDU in 2026

He said 'LDU plus plus'
Maybe him plus at least 2 other RFAs and/or FAs

Use the search function.
Easy


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
wally
Club Player
Posts: 801
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064157Post wally »

Even next year we may well have to trade for him if they match the bid .
NM probably will want more than 1 first rounder


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7135
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 478 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064159Post meher baba »

Otiman wrote: Wed 05 Jun 2024 11:09pm 2026. North will be under cap pressure like GWS and GC were with all their high picks.

Or 2025 trade for Howard - a win win.
Why LDU for Howard? If we are going to head into the world of totally deranged fantasy, why not LDU for Bonner? Or Sharman?

If LDU is somehow available to play for another club in 2025, it won't be the Saints. The only time we have ever been able to trade A-grade players into our club was when Gehrig and Hamill wanted to play under Blight. As far as I can see, the only big name player who is a massive fan of RTB is Brad Hill, and we've already got him.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10712
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 813 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064163Post ace »

Norf will be looking for a full forward.
A straight trade King for LDU.
If only to spare St Kilda supporters the angst of King's histrionics.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7135
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 478 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064165Post meher baba »

ace wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 9:22am Norf will be looking for a full forward.
Why? Are they getting sick of how accurate a kick on goal Larkey is and want to try something different?


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3326
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 167 times
Been thanked: 508 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064167Post older saint »

the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.

If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also


St Dave
Club Player
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064174Post St Dave »

older saint wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.

If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
Unfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.


The G Train Legacy
Club Player
Posts: 667
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2022 3:22pm
Has thanked: 76 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064178Post The G Train Legacy »

A low first rounder and Dougal Howard would be in the realms of a reasonable trade for LDU.


User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6194
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 255 times
Been thanked: 1078 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064182Post Sainter_Dad »

What is LDU's motivation for coming to St Kilda?????

So he can become the whipping boy of SaintSational??


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
SinCitySainter
Club Player
Posts: 914
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064184Post SinCitySainter »

North will not trade for Battle, the only way they would go after him is as a free agent.
The problem we have is that if Battle does go as a free agent and we receive fairly high compo for him we will be restricted in looking for Free Agents ourselves as it would water down the compo.
If North want to trade LDU, which makes no sense given they are trying to build through the draft, they will be looking for two first rounders minimum. We cannot afford to pay that. I can see no way that LDU comes to the Saints next year beyond crippling our draft hand and salary cap.


SteeleSaints
Club Player
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon 22 Apr 2024 7:03pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064185Post SteeleSaints »

Apparently North are mad on Trainor and have already floated the idea of trading out Pick 1 with other clubs. If we end up with 2 x early draft picks we might be able to work something to move up the order and pick up LDU.

As TDTL mentioned the club are keen to off load Howard, so perhaps North or another club assists with buying into the LDU trade.

Otherwise it will be a wait until 2025 when LDU becomes a UFA, if we are really interested and are willing to pay big $$$.


The G Train Legacy
Club Player
Posts: 667
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2022 3:22pm
Has thanked: 76 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064191Post The G Train Legacy »

SinCitySainter wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 1:21pm North will not trade for Battle, the only way they would go after him is as a free agent.
The problem we have is that if Battle does go as a free agent and we receive fairly high compo for him we will be restricted in looking for Free Agents ourselves as it would water down the compo.
If North want to trade LDU, which makes no sense given they are trying to build through the draft, they will be looking for two first rounders minimum. We cannot afford to pay that. I can see no way that LDU comes to the Saints next year beyond crippling our draft hand and salary cap.
If LDU is 26 as stated in this thread, then he's going to be over 30 by the time North could possibly be contenders. In that time, they're going to have to pay Sheezel, Wardlaw & McKertcher (who will be stars) a fortune. They also desperately need key defenders because they haven't got any, in fact any good defenders at all.

I think that makes getting LDU in a trade possible, particularly if he decides he wants to go.


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3326
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 167 times
Been thanked: 508 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064192Post older saint »

St Dave wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 11:39am
older saint wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.

If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
Unfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.
UFA is correct however there have been plenty of examples of players and clubs negotiating deals or wanting to look after existing club, such as when Dangerfield went to Geelong and even the fudged "non trade" with Gresham.
Not sure he wants to leave but the $$$ will probably see him go.


Brunswicksainter
Club Player
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon 15 May 2017 7:18pm
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 69 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064193Post Brunswicksainter »

SinCitySainter wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 1:21pm North will not trade for Battle, the only way they would go after him is as a free agent.
The problem we have is that if Battle does go as a free agent and we receive fairly high compo for him we will be restricted in looking for Free Agents ourselves as it would water down the compo.
If North want to trade LDU, which makes no sense given they are trying to build through the draft, they will be looking for two first rounders minimum. We cannot afford to pay that. I can see no way that LDU comes to the Saints next year beyond crippling our draft hand and salary cap.
There isn’t really any free agents left that we are a realistic to go for besides Jarrod Berry and Bailey Banfield. So wouldn’t stress to much about that.


St Dave
Club Player
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064194Post St Dave »

older saint wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:25pm
St Dave wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 11:39am
older saint wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.

If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
Unfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.
UFA is correct however there have been plenty of examples of players and clubs negotiating deals or wanting to look after existing club, such as when Dangerfield went to Geelong and even the fudged "non trade" with Gresham.
Not sure he wants to leave but the $$$ will probably see him go.
No leaving player is going to care about what deal their old club gets out of it, they will want their new club to be as strong as possible so ideally want their new club to give up as little as possible.

Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't Gresham a restricted free agent? That basically forced the bombers hand, they had to offer enough to make us happy with the compo, otherwise we just match and force a trade. The same thing that North would do to us next year if we are going down the free agency route.


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3326
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 167 times
Been thanked: 508 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064199Post older saint »

St Dave wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:43pm
older saint wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:25pm
St Dave wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 11:39am
older saint wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.

If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
Unfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.
UFA is correct however there have been plenty of examples of players and clubs negotiating deals or wanting to look after existing club, such as when Dangerfield went to Geelong and even the fudged "non trade" with Gresham.
Not sure he wants to leave but the $$$ will probably see him go.
No leaving player is going to care about what deal their old club gets out of it, they will want their new club to be as strong as possible so ideally want their new club to give up as little as possible.

Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't Gresham a restricted free agent? That basically forced the bombers hand, they had to offer enough to make us happy with the compo, otherwise we just match and force a trade. The same thing that North would do to us next year if we are going down the free agency route.
History says there are examples where they have - Dangerfield the most well known could have walked to Geelong for a late first round compo but Adelaide worked out a trade which got more in for them and allowed Geelong and Dangerfield to structure a ocntract to suit them over years as opposed to having to front end to get greater compo. It is all about clubs wanting best compensation and well as receiving club wanting flexibility with cap .
Time will tell what will happen


St Dave
Club Player
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064201Post St Dave »

older saint wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 4:29pm
St Dave wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:43pm
older saint wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:25pm
St Dave wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 11:39am
older saint wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.

If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
Unfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.
UFA is correct however there have been plenty of examples of players and clubs negotiating deals or wanting to look after existing club, such as when Dangerfield went to Geelong and even the fudged "non trade" with Gresham.
Not sure he wants to leave but the $$$ will probably see him go.
No leaving player is going to care about what deal their old club gets out of it, they will want their new club to be as strong as possible so ideally want their new club to give up as little as possible.

Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't Gresham a restricted free agent? That basically forced the bombers hand, they had to offer enough to make us happy with the compo, otherwise we just match and force a trade. The same thing that North would do to us next year if we are going down the free agency route.
History says there are examples where they have - Dangerfield the most well known could have walked to Geelong for a late first round compo but Adelaide worked out a trade which got more in for them and allowed Geelong and Dangerfield to structure a ocntract to suit them over years as opposed to having to front end to get greater compo. It is all about clubs wanting best compensation and well as receiving club wanting flexibility with cap .
Time will tell what will happen
Just gave it a quick look and Dangerfield was also an RFA (per this Adelaide press release https://www.afc.com.au/news/423982/deal ... angerfield) so he didn't have any real say in what geelong had to pay. Instead of matching or accepting the pick 14 compo Adelaide took geelongs offer of pick 9 plus some other little bonuses.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8506
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 600 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064210Post Otiman »

Going hard in the draft again this year means no trading for players. We don't have our own 2nd rounder so hope Adelaide doesn't finish the season strongly as we have theirs.

Then in 26 we go hard for FA and if there are players available to trade in we go then too.

The list management strategy is sound and makes sense. Delusions of grandeur last year would have tempted a few but glad we are sticking the course.


SinCitySainter
Club Player
Posts: 914
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: LDU

Post: # 2064213Post SinCitySainter »

Brunswicksainter wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:29pm
SinCitySainter wrote: Thu 06 Jun 2024 1:21pm North will not trade for Battle, the only way they would go after him is as a free agent.
The problem we have is that if Battle does go as a free agent and we receive fairly high compo for him we will be restricted in looking for Free Agents ourselves as it would water down the compo.
If North want to trade LDU, which makes no sense given they are trying to build through the draft, they will be looking for two first rounders minimum. We cannot afford to pay that. I can see no way that LDU comes to the Saints next year beyond crippling our draft hand and salary cap.
There isn’t really any free agents left that we are a realistic to go for besides Jarrod Berry and Bailey Banfield. So wouldn’t stress to much about that.
I would have thought that Cameron Zurhaar was one we would seriously look at unless he is already re-signed, which he could well be.


Post Reply