Clearly our forward line isn't working and King and Membrey are a little way off at the moment.
This week i think either one of Battle or Howard need to play forward -Probably Battle as more easier to replace in the back line than Howard due to size.
If Battle was to play forward could bring in either Highmore or Cordy (if fit) as a replacement.
While not a long term solution clearly what we have available with the cattle we have the current structure isn't working and bringing in another rookie who isnt smahing it as a forward at Sandy isn't the answer either.
Potential line up
B: Stoker , Howard, Wilkie
HB Webster, Highmore/Cordy, NWM
C: Hill , Crouch, Byrnes
HF: Sharman , Battle, Higgins
F: Butler, Caminiti, Gresham
Foll: Marshall, Steele, Sinclair
Int: Clark, Jones, Windy, Clark
Sub : Bytel
in : Highmore/Cordy, Higgins
Out: Peris, Pho ( rested)
others under pressure: Stoker, Brynes, Caminiti
Not many options to come in - Paton.
Hayes needs more than 1 Sandy gaem after 15 mths out surely
Structural change option
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5060
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1446 times
- Been thanked: 1498 times
Re: Structural change option
If J.Battle can't turn himself into a forward I think his days are numbered.
I think Hill, Butler, Stocker, Byrnes, Jones, and Gresham's days as first team regulars are also numbered in the low 50s.
I think Hill, Butler, Stocker, Byrnes, Jones, and Gresham's days as first team regulars are also numbered in the low 50s.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: Structural change option
I actually think he has been ok as a third defender/ intercept defender - had better season than Howard, but probably the easiest to replace also.
Will be interesting to see if they change up much .
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Structural change option
Rather than push Battle forward and replace him with Cordy, why not simply put Cordy back in the forward line (if he has recovered from his concussion)? Nobody can deny that we went much better when he was playing there.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17032
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3647 times
- Been thanked: 2921 times
Re: Structural change option
Edited for accuracymeher baba wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jul 2023 4:44pm Rather than push Battle forward and replace him with Cordy, why not simply put Cordy back in the forward line (if he has recovered from his concussion)? Nobody can deny that we went much better DESPITE HIM playing there.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5060
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1446 times
- Been thanked: 1498 times
Re: Structural change option
Because good forwards dine out on Josh?skeptic wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jul 2023 5:28pmEdited for accuracymeher baba wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jul 2023 4:44pm Rather than push Battle forward and replace him with Cordy, why not simply put Cordy back in the forward line (if he has recovered from his concussion)? Nobody can deny that we went much better DESPITE HIM playing there.
(Not suggesting Mr Cordy is the answer. )