Windhager and protected area
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2523
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 171 times
- Been thanked: 375 times
Windhager and protected area
Simply appalling umpiring
The law states that there is a 5metre protected area behind the player which cannot be entered until kick is taken or play on called
So when Marcus takes the mark in the middle of the ground and is tackled by a player standing literally right behind him it has to be a 50 metre penalty
These decisions are not complicated or gray
Donāt get me started on the non in the back to Caminiti
The law states that there is a 5metre protected area behind the player which cannot be entered until kick is taken or play on called
So when Marcus takes the mark in the middle of the ground and is tackled by a player standing literally right behind him it has to be a 50 metre penalty
These decisions are not complicated or gray
Donāt get me started on the non in the back to Caminiti
" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."
ā Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
ā Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
Umpire chose to ignore a clear infringement
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8255
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1849 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
Adding another umpire hasn't helped, they all missed these blatant ones that a 12 y.o. ump in a suburban comp would get right
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ā¤![š¤](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6285
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1097 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
You are 100% right - we had 27 incompetent Not-professional Non-Accountable inconsistent Umpires last year - now we need 36 of them.WellardSaint wrote: āSun 09 Jul 2023 1:48am Adding another umpire hasn't helped, they all missed these blatant ones that a 12 y.o. ump in a suburban comp would get right
Make them:
- Professional
- Accountable
- Semi-competent
- Schooled on consistency
āYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ā
ā Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
ā Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18834
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1567 times
- Been thanked: 1959 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
Not the reason why we lost so not allowed to talk about it.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6285
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1097 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
Says The_Dud - I am sorry - but would you go to a law firm who called themselves Dud, Stupid and Lame.
I am a Sainter_Dad - he is The_Dud
āYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ā
ā Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
ā Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
hi time the dud removed that ratten photo and put his own image in his avatar.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
4 umpires means last year each game 1 wasn't good enough. last nighty number 1 was appalling and got bailed out by out of zone umpires on multiple occasions including Owens high tackle after the poor handball in the square.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4895
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1410 times
- Been thanked: 1429 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
Seems to me umpires have largely stopped policing the protected area, concentrating instead on the "stand rule" ; allow more illegal off the ball blocks, very selective about in the backs', and have given up on serious attempts to police the try to dispose of the ball when tackled requirement: many players just hang on, fall forward and pretend through jerky body movements or just submit in possession. Looks like the AFL Operations Dept. has stopped caring about a holistic application of the rules of the game, consequently game is reverting to pre-Hocking stoppages. Tackles are certainly not being rewarded, time to dispose seems to be increasing to ridiculous lengths and players more and more deliberately loitering in/behind the protected zones and obstructing ball movement by being "clumsy". Umpires seem to be deciding which rules to apply and when. Steven May has a licence to throw.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
Yes Steven May threw the ball at least 3 times which were blatant.Yorkeys wrote: āMon 10 Jul 2023 9:40am Seems to me umpires have largely stopped policing the protected area, concentrating instead on the "stand rule" ; allow more illegal off the ball blocks, very selective about in the backs', and have given up on serious attempts to police the try to dispose of the ball when tackled requirement: many players just hang on, fall forward and pretend through jerky body movements or just submit in possession. Looks like the AFL Operations Dept. has stopped caring about a holistic application of the rules of the game, consequently game is reverting to pre-Hocking stoppages. Tackles are certainly not being rewarded, time to dispose seems to be increasing to ridiculous lengths and players more and more deliberately loitering in/behind the protected zones and obstructing ball movement by being "clumsy". Umpires seem to be deciding which rules to apply and when. Steven May has a licence to throw.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6285
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1097 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
You are WRONG!!!!! The_Dud says so.Yorkeys wrote: āMon 10 Jul 2023 9:40am Seems to me umpires have largely stopped policing the protected area, concentrating instead on the "stand rule" ; allow more illegal off the ball blocks, very selective about in the backs', and have given up on serious attempts to police the try to dispose of the ball when tackled requirement: many players just hang on, fall forward and pretend through jerky body movements or just submit in possession. Looks like the AFL Operations Dept. has stopped caring about a holistic application of the rules of the game, consequently game is reverting to pre-Hocking stoppages. Tackles are certainly not being rewarded, time to dispose seems to be increasing to ridiculous lengths and players more and more deliberately loitering in/behind the protected zones and obstructing ball movement by being "clumsy". Umpires seem to be deciding which rules to apply and when. Steven May has a licence to throw.
āYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ā
ā Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
ā Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8586
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 191 times
- Been thanked: 614 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
The protected area is not protected. It's not an umpire interpretation issue but the rule needs tweaking.
My suggestion is: Other than the player standing the mark, opposing players are not to interfere in play in the protected area until they have moved outside of the original protected area (and play on is called).
My suggestion is: Other than the player standing the mark, opposing players are not to interfere in play in the protected area until they have moved outside of the original protected area (and play on is called).
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4895
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1410 times
- Been thanked: 1429 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
Fair enough.Sainter_Dad wrote: āWed 12 Jul 2023 8:31amYou are WRONG!!!!! The_Dud says so.Yorkeys wrote: āMon 10 Jul 2023 9:40am Seems to me umpires have largely stopped policing the protected area, concentrating instead on the "stand rule" ; allow more illegal off the ball blocks, very selective about in the backs', and have given up on serious attempts to police the try to dispose of the ball when tackled requirement: many players just hang on, fall forward and pretend through jerky body movements or just submit in possession. Looks like the AFL Operations Dept. has stopped caring about a holistic application of the rules of the game, consequently game is reverting to pre-Hocking stoppages. Tackles are certainly not being rewarded, time to dispose seems to be increasing to ridiculous lengths and players more and more deliberately loitering in/behind the protected zones and obstructing ball movement by being "clumsy". Umpires seem to be deciding which rules to apply and when. Steven May has a licence to throw.
A good feature of this forum is it indulges posters like me who say wrong things to do that out loud and then reflect at how they sound/read/are received, at leisure.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13781
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1313 times
- Been thanked: 2051 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
Wowee, didnāt realise I was so popular! Probably no need for me to reply, best just leave this circle jerk to continue, butā¦ ![š](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f601.svg)
Was it the umpires who missed all those easy shots at goal?
Was it the umpires who fluffed so many golden opportunities to score?
Was it the umpires who turned the ball over repeatedly?
Was it the umpires who continued to kick the ball to May over and over and over again?
We won nearly all the important stats, AND the free kick count 19-15. Thereās only one group to blame for the loss in that game.
BUT I am confused, as it seams we have so many posters highly concerned with the quality of umpiring, starting multiple threads, butā¦
Where was the thread and outrage about fair umpiring when we won the free kick count 28-14??
Where was the thread and outrage about fair umpiring when we won the free kick count 25-12??
Where was the concern about 50m penalties after the Sydney game??
Where is the weekly updated thread with the free kick count for the season, that was such a favourite for the usuals to frequent? After all the free kick count has been the ārock solid evidenceā for systematic cheating against the Saints for years, and all of a suddenā¦![š¤·āāļø](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f937-200d-2642-fe0f.svg)
Iām just concerned for you guys, as I know youāre all so passionate about the quality of umpiring, and Iād hate for you to be labelled hypocrites, or worse.
+50 on the year. Swings and roundabouts.![š](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f44d.svg)
Was it the umpires who missed all those easy shots at goal?
Was it the umpires who fluffed so many golden opportunities to score?
Was it the umpires who turned the ball over repeatedly?
Was it the umpires who continued to kick the ball to May over and over and over again?
We won nearly all the important stats, AND the free kick count 19-15. Thereās only one group to blame for the loss in that game.
BUT I am confused, as it seams we have so many posters highly concerned with the quality of umpiring, starting multiple threads, butā¦
Where was the thread and outrage about fair umpiring when we won the free kick count 28-14??
Where was the thread and outrage about fair umpiring when we won the free kick count 25-12??
Where was the concern about 50m penalties after the Sydney game??
Where is the weekly updated thread with the free kick count for the season, that was such a favourite for the usuals to frequent? After all the free kick count has been the ārock solid evidenceā for systematic cheating against the Saints for years, and all of a suddenā¦
Iām just concerned for you guys, as I know youāre all so passionate about the quality of umpiring, and Iād hate for you to be labelled hypocrites, or worse.
+50 on the year. Swings and roundabouts.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4895
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1410 times
- Been thanked: 1429 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
The_Dud, you may be miss comparing quantitative with qualitative. Aggregate figures don't drill down to the blatantly wrong decisions and their immediate impact. A few wrong calls Sat night were diabolical and hurt us significantly. Maybe the roundabout will turn but it won't change past results. Might come when not even needed.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
The_Dud wrote: āWed 12 Jul 2023 11:09pm Wowee, didnāt realise I was so popular! Probably no need for me to reply, best just leave this circle jerk to continue, butā¦
Was it the umpires who missed all those easy shots at goal?
Was it the umpires who fluffed so many golden opportunities to score?
Was it the umpires who turned the ball over repeatedly?
Was it the umpires who continued to kick the ball to May over and over and over again?
We won nearly all the important stats, AND the free kick count 19-15. Thereās only one group to blame for the loss in that game.
BUT I am confused, as it seams we have so many posters highly concerned with the quality of umpiring, starting multiple threads, butā¦
Where was the thread and outrage about fair umpiring when we won the free kick count 28-14??
Where was the thread and outrage about fair umpiring when we won the free kick count 25-12??
Where was the concern about 50m penalties after the Sydney game??
Where is the weekly updated thread with the free kick count for the season, that was such a favourite for the usuals to frequent? After all the free kick count has been the ārock solid evidenceā for systematic cheating against the Saints for years, and all of a suddenā¦
Iām just concerned for you guys, as I know youāre all so passionate about the quality of umpiring, and Iād hate for you to be labelled hypocrites, or worse.
+50 on the year. Swings and roundabouts.![]()
This is Duds way of saying the umpire made a blatant mistake.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8255
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1849 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: Windhager and protected area
Watched Dogs v Shitney tonight, umps were realistic with telling guys on the mark to stand, also giving guy with ball a better chance to kick w/out impediment, polar opposite of how they treat us
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ā¤![š¤](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee