Votes v WCE
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Tue 22 Dec 2015 7:59pm
- Has thanked: 879 times
- Been thanked: 450 times
Votes v WCE
That was not the relaxing afternoon/early evening I was expecting.
Noone for the 5 votes.
4. Rowan Marshall. I’m a bit torn on this. At times he was well-beaten by his opponent, but I thought he fought hard all day and his overall effort was strong. Stood up well late.
3. Mich Owens. Love him.
3. Brad Crouch. In and under all day.
2. Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera . Is getting better and better.
2. Jack Sinclair . Seemed way off his game early, but lifted when required.
1. Dougal Howard . Shaded a very good opponent. Has his moments, but I thought was one of our best today.
I also thought Wood, Windhager and Gresham ( late) were ok, and credit to Caminiti who was awful early but fought back.
Noone for the 5 votes.
4. Rowan Marshall. I’m a bit torn on this. At times he was well-beaten by his opponent, but I thought he fought hard all day and his overall effort was strong. Stood up well late.
3. Mich Owens. Love him.
3. Brad Crouch. In and under all day.
2. Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera . Is getting better and better.
2. Jack Sinclair . Seemed way off his game early, but lifted when required.
1. Dougal Howard . Shaded a very good opponent. Has his moments, but I thought was one of our best today.
I also thought Wood, Windhager and Gresham ( late) were ok, and credit to Caminiti who was awful early but fought back.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2603 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13781
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1313 times
- Been thanked: 2051 times
Re: Votes v WCE
5. Owens
4. Sinclair
3. NWM
2. Crouch
1. Hill
4. Sinclair
3. NWM
2. Crouch
1. Hill
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8255
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1849 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: Votes v WCE
Not Sincs. He made too many errors and had only 12 touches to half time.
Michito gets my vote, nobody else.
Maybe Hill 2nd, esp that spoil on the wing. Amazing second effort
Michito gets my vote, nobody else.
Maybe Hill 2nd, esp that spoil on the wing. Amazing second effort
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤![🤍](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4241
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1390 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2603 times
Re: Votes v WCE
Sinclair’s second half was one of the reasons we got the win
18 possessions after HT
18 possessions after HT
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 774 times
- Been thanked: 871 times
Re: Votes v WCE
5. Marshall. Four quarter effort was one of his best games.
4. Crouch. I wish he would get more kicks, hand ball is his first instinct. But, 17 tackles was some effort.
3. Wood. Just so-so early, very good second half.
2. Howard. When Battle went down I feared he would be overwhelmed. Remained cool and became the intercept king.
1. Owens. This kid is something special and a big bag of goals is not far off.
4. Crouch. I wish he would get more kicks, hand ball is his first instinct. But, 17 tackles was some effort.
3. Wood. Just so-so early, very good second half.
2. Howard. When Battle went down I feared he would be overwhelmed. Remained cool and became the intercept king.
1. Owens. This kid is something special and a big bag of goals is not far off.
Saint supporter since '62
Re: Votes v WCE
This is hard..
5. Crouch
4. Owens
3. Sincs
2. Marshall (but got flogged early)
1. Byrnes (played his guts out while others slacked off in the first half)
5. Crouch
4. Owens
3. Sincs
2. Marshall (but got flogged early)
1. Byrnes (played his guts out while others slacked off in the first half)
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: Votes v WCE
crouch
marshall
owens
hill
sincs
marshall
owens
hill
sincs
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 691 times
- Been thanked: 772 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Fri 07 May 2010 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 202 times
- Been thanked: 296 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11547
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3520 times
- Been thanked: 2464 times
Re: Votes v WCE
5 Marshall
3 Owens
3 Sincs
2 Wood
1 Hill
1 Howard
Wood, Hill, Sinclair, Butler, NWM (becoming a jet), Gresham, Steele and especially Sinclair had a huge impact and were influential in us winning the game. We had to fight hard.
Marshall and Owens and our backline stood up. Webster and Wilkie solid as ever. They know how to defend. Dougall was much better. Even Cooper Sharman was good and had an impact to the game result.
3 Owens
3 Sincs
2 Wood
1 Hill
1 Howard
Wood, Hill, Sinclair, Butler, NWM (becoming a jet), Gresham, Steele and especially Sinclair had a huge impact and were influential in us winning the game. We had to fight hard.
Marshall and Owens and our backline stood up. Webster and Wilkie solid as ever. They know how to defend. Dougall was much better. Even Cooper Sharman was good and had an impact to the game result.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11547
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3520 times
- Been thanked: 2464 times
Re: Votes v WCE
Crouch again was prolific with touches but I thought most were insignificant. He had 18 possessions up until half time. At that point in the game we were 4 goals down. He was NOT the reason we got back into the game.
People somehow feel compelled to give him votes because he appears on top of the list with disposal count. He had zero centre clearances. He gets stoppage clearances with some 1m handballs that usually result in a secondary stoppage.
He was ok, and did a power of work and running and laid the most tackles (as Trev pointed out) but half his tackles are just insignificant with two other Saints players already at the scene and tackling the same player. I don’t think he deserves to be named in the best on ground…especially with people thinking he was more influential than Wood, Hill, Sinclair, Owens, or Marshall.
People somehow feel compelled to give him votes because he appears on top of the list with disposal count. He had zero centre clearances. He gets stoppage clearances with some 1m handballs that usually result in a secondary stoppage.
He was ok, and did a power of work and running and laid the most tackles (as Trev pointed out) but half his tackles are just insignificant with two other Saints players already at the scene and tackling the same player. I don’t think he deserves to be named in the best on ground…especially with people thinking he was more influential than Wood, Hill, Sinclair, Owens, or Marshall.
- Templar
- Club Player
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004 11:03am
- Has thanked: 255 times
- Been thanked: 157 times
Re: Votes v WCE
5 Hill (critical 1%ers that kept us in the game plus several elite pin point passes)
4 Crouch (pressure acts/tackles)
3 Owens (nailed what needed to through big sticks)
2 Wood (getting back to the Wood we knew early rounds)
1 Marshall (good to see clunking defensive intercepts)
4 Crouch (pressure acts/tackles)
3 Owens (nailed what needed to through big sticks)
2 Wood (getting back to the Wood we knew early rounds)
1 Marshall (good to see clunking defensive intercepts)
Not "Simon Templar". He was here first. Please change my username to Bumstead and if possible make me one of those very large sandwiches, thanks!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11547
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3520 times
- Been thanked: 2464 times
Re: Votes v WCE
As. i said;
People somehow feel compelled to give Crouch votes because he appears on top of the list with disposal count.
We were losing the game by a fair margin at half time. Crouch got 8 possessions in the second half!!
We needed players to perform and we needed centre clearances and to be clean going inside 50. How many pressure acts and tackles in the third and fourth quarters did Brad Crouch lay that helped St Kilda win the match? If someone answers that question I’ll stfu
When you are losing the game by 4 goals, you attack. You need players with flare and you need to move the ball quickly. You need guys that can run like Wood, Sinclair, Hill and Windy and Butts. Sharman, Steele, King, Byrnes and NWM had good metres gained and provided marking targets.
Marshall was awesome in the centre. He and Steele had 3 centre clearances each. Jack Steele had 6 x inside 50’s, Nasiah had 4 x inside 50’s. Mason Wood had 3 x inside 50’s and also snagged a goal at a critical time just before 3 quarter time.
If you value goals and pinpoint passes more than you do touches then you reward Owens, Butler, NWM, Hill, Howard, Sinclair, Webster and Wilkie. Max King’s kick to Windhager probably deserves a vote. He centred the footy hitting Windy on the chest, which led to a goal to Buttsy.
If we are rewarding effort, then Jack Higgins deserves to be in the votes for his 1 goal and 4 behinds
People somehow feel compelled to give Crouch votes because he appears on top of the list with disposal count.
We were losing the game by a fair margin at half time. Crouch got 8 possessions in the second half!!
We needed players to perform and we needed centre clearances and to be clean going inside 50. How many pressure acts and tackles in the third and fourth quarters did Brad Crouch lay that helped St Kilda win the match? If someone answers that question I’ll stfu
When you are losing the game by 4 goals, you attack. You need players with flare and you need to move the ball quickly. You need guys that can run like Wood, Sinclair, Hill and Windy and Butts. Sharman, Steele, King, Byrnes and NWM had good metres gained and provided marking targets.
Marshall was awesome in the centre. He and Steele had 3 centre clearances each. Jack Steele had 6 x inside 50’s, Nasiah had 4 x inside 50’s. Mason Wood had 3 x inside 50’s and also snagged a goal at a critical time just before 3 quarter time.
If you value goals and pinpoint passes more than you do touches then you reward Owens, Butler, NWM, Hill, Howard, Sinclair, Webster and Wilkie. Max King’s kick to Windhager probably deserves a vote. He centred the footy hitting Windy on the chest, which led to a goal to Buttsy.
If we are rewarding effort, then Jack Higgins deserves to be in the votes for his 1 goal and 4 behinds
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: Votes v WCE
maybe just put your votes in and stop trying to convince everyone how much smarter than them you are. an empty vessel and all that.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "