Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 23 Aug 2022 10:03am
So how many weeks did he end up getting?
Clearly the f****** short sighted Muppet should not have reported Ben in the first place.
Never was a case to answer,
Thats the point. Bang reports him when it clearly was not reportable.
So basically you've been crying for days over the umpire saying the word 'reported' a couple of times...
No 50m penalty was paid... the game is reviewed afterwards for incidents anyway... on-field reports are basically irrelevant... it was thrown out as expected...
Storm in a tea-cup (if that?)
But nothing can stop Cryin' Curly!
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 23 Aug 2022 10:03am
So how many weeks did he end up getting?
Clearly the f****** short sighted Muppet should not have reported Ben in the first place.
Never was a case to answer,
Thats the point. Bang reports him when it clearly was not reportable.
So basically you've been crying for days over the umpire saying the word 'reported' a couple of times...
No 50m penalty was paid... the game is reviewed afterwards for incidents anyway... on-field reports are basically irrelevant... it was thrown out as expected...
Storm in a tea-cup (if that?)
But nothing can stop Cryin' Curly!
Umpire reported a player for a nothing incident based on who it was. Remember Ziebel belting McKenzie earlier in the season and not a thing no fifty no free no report.