Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:14pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 76 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
Doubt we would get a FRDP, overrated by a lot of supporters, does have much needed pace and certainly has a dip but decision making and disposal are below standard in a side that already has its share of ball butchers
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2603 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
He does
That’s why we should retain him
If he’s a good player - why on earth would we get rid of him?!
That is illogical
You DONT get better by getting rid of talent
You get better by adding it
Not a hard concept to fathom?!
That’s why we should retain him
If he’s a good player - why on earth would we get rid of him?!
That is illogical
You DONT get better by getting rid of talent
You get better by adding it
Not a hard concept to fathom?!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
Ask the top ten draft picks of the era about the impact Hamill had on their professionalism and their development. I have, there is no doubt in my mind he was setting standards not seen at our club in decades.B.M wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 6:56pm Hamill??
Hamill was traded for pick 4
Hamill played 98 games for StK
Finished top 3 in the B&F once and averaged 1.2goals per game
Nothing startling about that
G-Train for pick 18 the same year much better
Dal for the first rounder acquired from Hall trade
Schneider and Dempster for pick 26 trumps them all imo
But Steele was a steal!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11551
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3522 times
- Been thanked: 2464 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
I understand what you are saying regarding paying big coin and not getting a return, but I reckon when it comes to injuries, you just have to wear it. I’d rather hang onto him because I’m pretty sure that his preparation will be first rate and he’ll be ready to go round 1 next year.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 2:26pmThats a great assessment.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 2:06pm He's a very good player. Trading him would be a huge mistake. He's one of the few guys in our team who can make something out of nothing. He was very good in the first half of the season before his knee started troubling him.
If there's no guarantee of getting someone better, why would you do it?
However, since getting a huge (HUGE) contract extension in 2019, he has played 50% of games, falling injured again this year, just in time for do or die games and finals?
So for you, it's better the devil you know.
You can’t say that Gresh is worth a good pick if we trade him but logically it’s better to get rid of him. How can you predict whether a player gets injured? How do you know our draftee won’t get injured as often?
The TPP is relevant but surely we need to keep our good players. I reckon we should target young mids who are not getting regularly senior games. Like we did with Steele. I’m sure oppo teams are trying to lure Bytel.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
Gresham's injuries aren't really a factor. His upside in team like Richmond is massive compared to the task he has in a team like St.Kilda. whether we like it or not, Gresh is our unknown x factor. His ceiling is something like 25+ disposals, 2 goals and 5 clearances a game and you could still expect half that in a poor showing.Scollop wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 7:38pmI understand what you are saying regarding paying big coin and not getting a return, but I reckon when it comes to injuries, you just have to wear it. I’d rather hang onto him because I’m pretty sure that his preparation will be first rate and he’ll be ready to go round 1 next year. 7thCQ SAINT wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 2:26pmThats a great assessment.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 2:06pm He's a very good player. Trading him would be a huge mistake. He's one of the few guys in our team who can make something out of nothing. He was very good in the first half of the season before his knee started troubling him.
If there's no guarantee of getting someone better, why would you do it?
However, since getting a huge (HUGE) contract extension in 2019, he has played 50% of games, falling injured again this year, just in time for do or die games and finals?
So for you, it's better the devil you know.
You can’t say that Gresh is worth a good pick if we trade him but logically it’s better to get rid of him. How can you predict whether a player gets injured? How do you know our draftee won’t get injured as often?
The TPP is relevant but surely we need to keep our good players. I reckon we should target young mids who are not getting regularly senior games. Like we did with Steele. I’m sure oppo teams are trying to lure Bytel.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
Why do you want to make our close opponents better FFS?CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 8:13pmGresham's injuries aren't really a factor. His upside in team like Richmond is massive compared to the task he has in a team like St.Kilda. whether we like it or not, Gresh is our unknown x factor. His ceiling is something like 25+ disposals, 2 goals and 5 clearances a game and you could still expect half that in a poor showing.Scollop wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 7:38pmI understand what you are saying regarding paying big coin and not getting a return, but I reckon when it comes to injuries, you just have to wear it. I’d rather hang onto him because I’m pretty sure that his preparation will be first rate and he’ll be ready to go round 1 next year. 7thCQ SAINT wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 2:26pmThats a great assessment.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 2:06pm He's a very good player. Trading him would be a huge mistake. He's one of the few guys in our team who can make something out of nothing. He was very good in the first half of the season before his knee started troubling him.
If there's no guarantee of getting someone better, why would you do it?
However, since getting a huge (HUGE) contract extension in 2019, he has played 50% of games, falling injured again this year, just in time for do or die games and finals?
So for you, it's better the devil you know.
You can’t say that Gresh is worth a good pick if we trade him but logically it’s better to get rid of him. How can you predict whether a player gets injured? How do you know our draftee won’t get injured as often?
The TPP is relevant but surely we need to keep our good players. I reckon we should target young mids who are not getting regularly senior games. Like we did with Steele. I’m sure oppo teams are trying to lure Bytel.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2603 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
In that case, if setting standards and leadership, rather than actual output is what we measure trade value
D.Hannebery and pick 38 (Battle) for pick 29
Is outstanding value
D.Hannebery and pick 38 (Battle) for pick 29
Is outstanding value
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Tue 13 Oct 2020 9:25pm
- Has thanked: 502 times
- Been thanked: 110 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
I would not trade him he played some good footy early in the season and we need quality player like him in the midfield especially now we are likely to loose hill.
Also I heard Essendon is going to offer Bytel a 2 year deal compared to the 1 year we are talking about he is another player who we can not afforded to trade I know he has been injured but his last 6 weeks at Sandy were very good.
Bytel is a better option then jones who I don't see in our future so trade jones for what we can get 3 or 4 rounder with what we get for hill as well.
Also I heard Essendon is going to offer Bytel a 2 year deal compared to the 1 year we are talking about he is another player who we can not afforded to trade I know he has been injured but his last 6 weeks at Sandy were very good.
Bytel is a better option then jones who I don't see in our future so trade jones for what we can get 3 or 4 rounder with what we get for hill as well.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
It was outstanding value, Hamill gave us 98 games though, as you mentioned.
And I'd take Hamill's 98 games as a true high half forward at 184cm and 95kg's over anything that has been produced at St,Kilda since, even without the leadership factor.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2603 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
In his last season and a half he was shot!
Hamill was a workhorse medium forward.
But as far as output goes, Gehrig was twice the player.
Sean Dempster was a dual AA defender who played 155 games
Jack Steele is also a dual AA and B&F and twice the player Hamill was
I think Hamill was a good player, and as ferocious a player as there’s been
But there was in that period, many better players, and there have been many better since!
I rate Membrey, a three time leading goalkicker higher than Hamill.
Hamill was a workhorse medium forward.
But as far as output goes, Gehrig was twice the player.
Sean Dempster was a dual AA defender who played 155 games
Jack Steele is also a dual AA and B&F and twice the player Hamill was
I think Hamill was a good player, and as ferocious a player as there’s been
But there was in that period, many better players, and there have been many better since!
I rate Membrey, a three time leading goalkicker higher than Hamill.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11551
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3522 times
- Been thanked: 2464 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
Dempster wasn’t a ‘dual’ All Australian
Love the Skunk but I rate Sammy higher than both Sean and Membrey. If Skunk keeps playing for five more years or whatever he keeps playing for, I may reassess then
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Dempster
Love the Skunk but I rate Sammy higher than both Sean and Membrey. If Skunk keeps playing for five more years or whatever he keeps playing for, I may reassess then
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Dempster
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
The trade for Hanners was outstanding. 98 games would have changed our history dramatically but it didn't.
For most of the football world, the Hamill trade was a coup. He took the number 4 straight from Kernahan. We took a favourite son of Carlton's and his impact at St.Kilda has been vaunted as outstanding by players who are in our Hall of Fame.
Here's a reminder of just how much he impacted as a leading, high half forward. He was a medium forward playing CHF.
- Munga
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5287
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
Windhager doesn't need to tackle when he doesn't let his man get the ball in the first placemeher baba wrote: ↑Mon 22 Aug 2022 6:41pmThe stats show him as having made an average of 3.17 tackles per game this year. In comparison, the stats for the much-vaunted Ben Long were 3.05 per game, and for Windhager 2.17 per game.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
That's tongue in cheek, I get what you're saying. As a full time mid I wouldn't compare him with Longy.
Steele, Crouch, Jones, Ross etc. I would.
I wasn't just talking tackles, but chase, defensive pressure, defensive positioning etc.
But while we're on tackles (avg):
Crouch 7.14
Steele 7.11
Owens 4.14
Butler 4.05
Jones 3.54
Ross 3.38
Gresham 3.17
So he's the bottom of the pile there. A first year player and a forward ahead of him. But regardless of that, he doesn't seem to help the team defensively as much as he should (even quoted so by players).
It's a real shame. He could be an absolute star.
Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
- Sanctorum
- Club Player
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
- Has thanked: 1470 times
- Been thanked: 998 times
Re: Does Gresham hold 1st round trade value??
I'm not saying categorically St Kilda should get rid of Gresham nor that I don't rate him, it's simply that I feel he has not stepped up to the next level which his earlier years suggested he would do, and that's in part due to his deficiencies that I pointed out previously. So like many others he is currently only just an average player on the list, there are far too many in this category! I'm also not totally convinced that at age 25 he will improve a hell of a lot. If his best position is midfield or small half-forward, as the latter are there others who are superior to Gresham - Higgins, Butler? As a midfielder is he equal or better than the current squad and are Windhager, Owens and Bytel likely to become better than Gresham in the immediate future?
My argument is that in 12 months time he will be RFA and may well choose to go elsewhere then, so if the club can get real value him this year in a trade that will substantially improve the list I'd give it very serious consideration. The club has made it clear that there will be a brutal overhaul of the current list with all options on the table, and there's no reason to believe that Gresham will be immune to this process.
Yes, there's no question the club has done some really dumb deals that have come back to bite them in the bum in the past, but as an optimist I have faith they've got to get that right sooner or later.
My argument is that in 12 months time he will be RFA and may well choose to go elsewhere then, so if the club can get real value him this year in a trade that will substantially improve the list I'd give it very serious consideration. The club has made it clear that there will be a brutal overhaul of the current list with all options on the table, and there's no reason to believe that Gresham will be immune to this process.
Yes, there's no question the club has done some really dumb deals that have come back to bite them in the bum in the past, but as an optimist I have faith they've got to get that right sooner or later.
"To do good is noble. To tell others to do good is even nobler and much less trouble.."
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist