Was worth the risk.Laurie wrote: ↑Sat 16 Jul 2022 10:54pm @ Saynta
Has he been a good signing ?
As i have read many a time on this forum was cooked before we signed him.
Plays a game in the VFL and you get excited on the hope that he is picked next week.
I guess he will at the expense of Jones.
But is he our future going forward.?
BOOM BOOM
Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23087
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9016 times
- Been thanked: 3925 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1227
- Joined: Fri 22 Mar 2019 10:46pm
- Has thanked: 554 times
- Been thanked: 388 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Call me a conservative but I reckon you're wasting your, "BOOM BOOM".
There's only so much BOOM in the world.
Try a BAM or even dust off the TADA.
Seriously alot of arguments have been won on the back of a well placed CHA CHA CHA.
If you have to use the BOOM mix it with BADA BING...BADA BOOM. Only one BOOM is used in this classic and this effectively is saving a BOOM for another zinger.
Just a few thoughts
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12431
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2661 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Michael Gardiner came to us having not played footy for 12 months and seemingly stuffed
Did not play in 07
Missed most of 08
Played a crucial role in 09/10
Sometimes you take a risk on quality
Did not play in 07
Missed most of 08
Played a crucial role in 09/10
Sometimes you take a risk on quality
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Looks like Bytel and Hanners are certain to be picked. Jones will go out so our midfield will be full of plodders
Steele
Crouch
Sebby
Hanners
Bytel
No line breakers there except Hanners....Crickey what a crisis!
Steele
Crouch
Sebby
Hanners
Bytel
No line breakers there except Hanners....Crickey what a crisis!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23087
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9016 times
- Been thanked: 3925 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Good advice.SAINT-LEE wrote: ↑Sun 17 Jul 2022 12:53amCall me a conservative but I reckon you're wasting your, "BOOM BOOM".
There's only so much BOOM in the world.
Try a BAM or even dust off the TADA.
Seriously alot of arguments have been won on the back of a well placed CHA CHA CHA.
If you have to use the BOOM mix it with BADA BING...BADA BOOM. Only one BOOM is used in this classic and this effectively is saving a BOOM for another zinger.
Just a few thoughts
- SaintDippa
- Club Player
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sun 20 Aug 2006 10:28pm
- Location: Mean Streets of Ringwood North
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 116 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
[quote=Vortex post_id=1968527 time=1658013077 user_id=23596]
Looks like Bytel and Hanners are certain to be picked. Jones will go out so our midfield will be full of plodders
Steele
Crouch
Sebby
Hanners
Bytel
No line breakers there except Hanners....Crickey what a crisis!
[/quote]
We should be using Gresh, Sinclair, Hill, Butler, Higgins, nwm, DMac as the run past receivers. We have the speed just need the game plan to utilise.
OH LA LA.
Looks like Bytel and Hanners are certain to be picked. Jones will go out so our midfield will be full of plodders
Steele
Crouch
Sebby
Hanners
Bytel
No line breakers there except Hanners....Crickey what a crisis!
[/quote]
We should be using Gresh, Sinclair, Hill, Butler, Higgins, nwm, DMac as the run past receivers. We have the speed just need the game plan to utilise.
OH LA LA.
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Jones & Hill should be the first out this week IMO, both are playing bruise free footy again!silverhalo wrote: ↑Sat 16 Jul 2022 4:12pm Hanners with 29 possies and 5 clearances at three quarter time
Comes straight back into the seniors next week
IN: Hanners
OUT: Byrnes
I'd expect that won't be the only change either
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
on paper I'd agree, but game day experience tells me all those players are stop and prop types, crab kicks to the side, backwards, or to whatever the safest option is within their skill set.SaintDippa wrote: ↑Sun 17 Jul 2022 11:26amWe should be using Gresh, Sinclair, Hill, Butler, Higgins, nwm, DMac as the run past receivers. We have the speed just need the game plan to utilise.
OH LA LA.
Our list is in bad shape.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3375
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Hanners needs more than 70% game time at VFL level. Bytel the same before they rush back to AFL level.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Our midfield is in crisis, it needs extra crabs immediately.older saint wrote: ↑Sun 17 Jul 2022 11:46amHanners needs more than 70% game time at VFL level. Bytel the same before they rush back to AFL level.
- SaintDippa
- Club Player
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sun 20 Aug 2006 10:28pm
- Location: Mean Streets of Ringwood North
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 116 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
[quote=Vortex post_id=1968554 time=1658018020 user_id=23596]
[quote=SaintDippa post_id=1968551 time=1658017562 user_id=2727]
[quote=Vortex post_id=1968527 time=1658013077 user_id=23596]
Looks like Bytel and Hanners are certain to be picked. Jones will go out so our midfield will be full of plodders
Steele
Crouch
Sebby
Hanners
Bytel
No line breakers there except Hanners....Crickey what a crisis!
[/quote]
We should be using Gresh, Sinclair, Hill, Butler, Higgins, nwm, DMac as the run past receivers. We have the speed just need the game plan to utilise.
OH LA LA.
[/quote]
on paper I'd agree, but game day experience tells me all those players are stop and prop types, crab kicks to the side, backwards, or to whatever the safest option is within their skill set.
Our list is in bad shape.
[/quote]
I would spin it different. The habitual stop/proppers do so because they know if they go there's nothing ahead to target. Thats structure, system, coaching.
Why do Cats, Dees, Freo, Sydney always play on or feed a run past to keep the ball moving forward?
I'd argue high IQ coaching.
[quote=SaintDippa post_id=1968551 time=1658017562 user_id=2727]
[quote=Vortex post_id=1968527 time=1658013077 user_id=23596]
Looks like Bytel and Hanners are certain to be picked. Jones will go out so our midfield will be full of plodders
Steele
Crouch
Sebby
Hanners
Bytel
No line breakers there except Hanners....Crickey what a crisis!
[/quote]
We should be using Gresh, Sinclair, Hill, Butler, Higgins, nwm, DMac as the run past receivers. We have the speed just need the game plan to utilise.
OH LA LA.
[/quote]
on paper I'd agree, but game day experience tells me all those players are stop and prop types, crab kicks to the side, backwards, or to whatever the safest option is within their skill set.
Our list is in bad shape.
[/quote]
I would spin it different. The habitual stop/proppers do so because they know if they go there's nothing ahead to target. Thats structure, system, coaching.
Why do Cats, Dees, Freo, Sydney always play on or feed a run past to keep the ball moving forward?
I'd argue high IQ coaching.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Fri 07 May 2010 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 302 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Too funny BOOM BADABOOMSAINT-LEE wrote: ↑Sun 17 Jul 2022 12:53amCall me a conservative but I reckon you're wasting your, "BOOM BOOM".
There's only so much BOOM in the world.
Try a BAM or even dust off the TADA.
Seriously alot of arguments have been won on the back of a well placed CHA CHA CHA.
If you have to use the BOOM mix it with BADA BING...BADA BOOM. Only one BOOM is used in this classic and this effectively is saving a BOOM for another zinger.
Just a few thoughts
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23087
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9016 times
- Been thanked: 3925 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Wood needs to go too. Tries hard but makes too many mistakes.
Also sick of players who continually fumble the ball and drop easy marks. You reading Gresh?
Also sick of players who continually fumble the ball and drop easy marks. You reading Gresh?
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13953
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1314 times
- Been thanked: 2082 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
How much they pay him?
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12431
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2661 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Not sure
But you need to pay 95% of the cap
No one else wanted to come to StK
Should we have paid a C grade player 800?
But you need to pay 95% of the cap
No one else wanted to come to StK
Should we have paid a C grade player 800?
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30092
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
We did not pay Michael Gardiner a massive and long-term deal like we did with Hanna's.
So if Gardiner never got on the park it was no big deal.
Whereas the size of Hanna's contract meant that we could not pursue players like say Treloar when the opportunity arose.
So yes trade price in pick for Hannas was worth the risk. We all know that if on the park he is real quality.
But that massive contract as written was not worth the risk. If it had of been more performance related then all good, but it was not.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- saintkid
- Club Player
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 312 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Cheers saintsRrising for a sensible post, pointing out the bleeding obvious.saintsRrising wrote: ↑Sun 17 Jul 2022 9:02pmWe did not pay Michael Gardiner a massive and long-term deal like we did with Hanna's.
So if Gardiner never got on the park it was no big deal.
Whereas the size of Hanna's contract meant that we could not pursue players like say Treloar when the opportunity arose.
So yes trade price in pick for Hannas was worth the risk. We all know that if on the park he is real quality.
But that massive contract as written was not worth the risk. If it had of been more performance related then all good, but it was not.
How someone can compare the Gardiner signing with Hannebery's is mind boggling and quite frankly, delusional.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:04pm
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
Pretty sure we actually had to pay the full cap, can’t keep paying 95% after doing it for a few years so we really needed to pay someone and hanners was the lucky one available.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23242
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1794 times
Re: Sandy v Coburg ...1.05 today
FFS get Sinclair on the ball
Our BEST player uses it superbly get him in the guts running forward of centre Brett you dumb schmuck
I’d rather see Lienert come back in and play off HB - can use it too and too hood for VFL
There are things we can do
Our BEST player uses it superbly get him in the guts running forward of centre Brett you dumb schmuck
I’d rather see Lienert come back in and play off HB - can use it too and too hood for VFL
There are things we can do
“Yeah….nah””