2023-24
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Waltzing St Kilda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2010 5:20am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
2023-24
Well, we're married to nice-guy Ratten now until at least mid-season 2024 (reportedly the AFL won't allow us more than a six-month payout).
Anyone see any cause for optimism? Especially if we finish tenth, say, after being 8-3?
Anyone see where the improvement is going to come from?
Our incoming CEO bet the farm on Hannebury, Hill, Crouch etc and now says we're not a top four side.
in the off-deason he'll probably gamble bigtime (again) on De Goey -- another desperate quickfix to generate some much-needed enthusiasm.
But is anyone enthusiastic?
Anyone see any cause for optimism? Especially if we finish tenth, say, after being 8-3?
Anyone see where the improvement is going to come from?
Our incoming CEO bet the farm on Hannebury, Hill, Crouch etc and now says we're not a top four side.
in the off-deason he'll probably gamble bigtime (again) on De Goey -- another desperate quickfix to generate some much-needed enthusiasm.
But is anyone enthusiastic?
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8256
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1849 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: 2023-24
2023 will be like 2021 all over again.
We'll come up against a Bombers side that's lost most of its games, and we'll roll over and let em tickle our bellies.
We'll lose games that we're supposed to win, and Ratts will keep trotting out platitudes.
We'll come up against a Bombers side that's lost most of its games, and we'll roll over and let em tickle our bellies.
We'll lose games that we're supposed to win, and Ratts will keep trotting out platitudes.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤![🤍](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: 2023-24
You hit the nail on its head Waltzing. Satan has destroyed us with his quick fixes. All he has achieved is putting us into “No Man’s Land”. Continually finishing between 9th and 12th is the worst possible result. Not good enough to challenge and not bad enough to get the cream of the best draft picks!Waltzing St Kilda wrote: ↑Sun 10 Jul 2022 5:58pm Well, we're married to nice-guy Ratten now until at least mid-season 2024 (reportedly the AFL won't allow us more than a six-month payout).
Anyone see any cause for optimism? Especially if we finish tenth, say, after being 8-3?
Anyone see where the improvement is going to come from?
Our incoming CEO bet the farm on Hannebury, Hill, Crouch etc and now says we're not a top four side.
in the off-deason he'll probably gamble bigtime (again) on De Goey -- another desperate quickfix to generate some much-needed enthusiasm.
But is anyone enthusiastic?
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16888
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3580 times
- Been thanked: 2847 times
Re: 2023-24
Take the current team
Add in a De Goey and Amon...
Draft another promising kid and maybe see some incremental improvement in the kids that may force out some of the under performing senior players.
It doesn’t feel like a complete train wreck to me.
Look at this group of players...
Billings, Jones, Gresh, Hannebery, Clark, Coffield, Joyce, Wood, Paton, Lienert, Butler and Higgins
All there to consistently play to a particular standard and all tend to miss more often then not for one reason or another. Some it’s injury, some it’s not enough opportunity... some just have a harder role than others.
Now, obviously you can’t just get rid of them all. But you need to upgrade the right ones and persevere with the right ones.
That’s where Ratten is supposed to earn his money. Making the right calls there regardless of what we all think. Say he keeps the right 6 that get closer to their potential and moves on 6 that don’t and replaces them with talent either traded or drafted that do better...
Then of course you have the core youth... Bytel, Connolly, Byrnes, Hayes, Heath etc. + the regular playing draftees - same deal
Make the right calls, improve it a little bit more.
We make a bunch of really good decisions, the turn around potential here is huge and can occur quickly. Heck a month ago we were almost certainly finals bound.
IMO the single biggest coach killer in AFL football is the mistake of overrating and overvaluing players on the list... and IMO you tend to see it a lot when teams are winning.
This club is extremely is guilty of persevering with players that haven’t and won’t perform close to the standard expected of them for far too long. 3-4 years some of them.
A guy like Kent for example, barely kicked goals or got touches in the year we made the finals. Had a handful of games early where he got 6-7 touches and kicked 2 goals late (clutch) and the majority praised those performances... but barely got near it after that. Then for two years since his output is more or less the same... 5-6 touches, barely hits the score board and people are suddenly thinking, hey now that we’re not winning this actually isn’t that good.
He’s been on the list what... 4-5years and up until round 1 this year people were calling him top 22... the number of forumites here that were thankful he got the nod was embarrassing. He’s terrible and has been so for ages.
I’m iffy with Rats... always have been because he has this criteria and to my way of thinking (and yes who am I)... it is far too heavily weighted towards unrealistic potential/expectation and not based on seen performance or realistic possibility of said standard being met.
IMO, he needs to have a good, emotionless look at his list, figure out who will realistically reach the level of performance he thinks they can and make the call.
Add in a De Goey and Amon...
Draft another promising kid and maybe see some incremental improvement in the kids that may force out some of the under performing senior players.
It doesn’t feel like a complete train wreck to me.
Look at this group of players...
Billings, Jones, Gresh, Hannebery, Clark, Coffield, Joyce, Wood, Paton, Lienert, Butler and Higgins
All there to consistently play to a particular standard and all tend to miss more often then not for one reason or another. Some it’s injury, some it’s not enough opportunity... some just have a harder role than others.
Now, obviously you can’t just get rid of them all. But you need to upgrade the right ones and persevere with the right ones.
That’s where Ratten is supposed to earn his money. Making the right calls there regardless of what we all think. Say he keeps the right 6 that get closer to their potential and moves on 6 that don’t and replaces them with talent either traded or drafted that do better...
Then of course you have the core youth... Bytel, Connolly, Byrnes, Hayes, Heath etc. + the regular playing draftees - same deal
Make the right calls, improve it a little bit more.
We make a bunch of really good decisions, the turn around potential here is huge and can occur quickly. Heck a month ago we were almost certainly finals bound.
IMO the single biggest coach killer in AFL football is the mistake of overrating and overvaluing players on the list... and IMO you tend to see it a lot when teams are winning.
This club is extremely is guilty of persevering with players that haven’t and won’t perform close to the standard expected of them for far too long. 3-4 years some of them.
A guy like Kent for example, barely kicked goals or got touches in the year we made the finals. Had a handful of games early where he got 6-7 touches and kicked 2 goals late (clutch) and the majority praised those performances... but barely got near it after that. Then for two years since his output is more or less the same... 5-6 touches, barely hits the score board and people are suddenly thinking, hey now that we’re not winning this actually isn’t that good.
He’s been on the list what... 4-5years and up until round 1 this year people were calling him top 22... the number of forumites here that were thankful he got the nod was embarrassing. He’s terrible and has been so for ages.
I’m iffy with Rats... always have been because he has this criteria and to my way of thinking (and yes who am I)... it is far too heavily weighted towards unrealistic potential/expectation and not based on seen performance or realistic possibility of said standard being met.
IMO, he needs to have a good, emotionless look at his list, figure out who will realistically reach the level of performance he thinks they can and make the call.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4895
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1410 times
- Been thanked: 1429 times
Re: 2023-24
Can Brett be hard-nosed, make hard decisions, develop young players?
How do you rate him in regard to Max King's use and development.
Was Brett extended because the players and coaches are comfortable with him or his ability to make them uncomfortable when we play crap.
How do you rate him in regard to Max King's use and development.
Was Brett extended because the players and coaches are comfortable with him or his ability to make them uncomfortable when we play crap.
- Waltzing St Kilda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2010 5:20am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Re: 2023-24
The problem with the current admin taking a good, hard, emotionless look at the list is that they'll delist handy players like Hind and Acres (partly to make the way for the new Brad Hill, no doubt).
I don't blame them for delsting McCaetin but even he is tearing it up after a shrewd move to the backline (something we seem incapable of).
We'e 17 rounds in and it looks likely we'll only have one All Australian contender -- Sinclair (probably on the bench if he make it at all).
And even though NWM and Windhager have been impressive at time, not one Rising Star nomination so far.
Our development of players is appalling.
Max King is back to treading water. The sight of him on Saturday night twirling the ball in his run-up -- and missing, predictably -- was immensely frustrating.
I don't blame them for delsting McCaetin but even he is tearing it up after a shrewd move to the backline (something we seem incapable of).
We'e 17 rounds in and it looks likely we'll only have one All Australian contender -- Sinclair (probably on the bench if he make it at all).
And even though NWM and Windhager have been impressive at time, not one Rising Star nomination so far.
Our development of players is appalling.
Max King is back to treading water. The sight of him on Saturday night twirling the ball in his run-up -- and missing, predictably -- was immensely frustrating.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6415
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 854 times
- Been thanked: 1012 times
Re: 2023-24
Waltzing St Kilda wrote: ↑Sun 10 Jul 2022 5:58pm Well, we're married to nice-guy Ratten now until at least mid-season 2024 (reportedly the AFL won't allow us more than a six-month payout).
Anyone see any cause for optimism? Especially if we finish tenth, say, after being 8-3?
Anyone see where the improvement is going to come from?
Our incoming CEO bet the farm on Hannebury, Hill, Crouch etc and now says we're not a top four side.
in the off-deason he'll probably gamble bigtime (again) on De Goey -- another desperate quickfix to generate some much-needed enthusiasm.
But is anyone enthusiastic?
Always enthusiastic, I like winning and losing not so much but I hate it even more when the footy season ends.
After 2024 comes 2025, what's not to love.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9367
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 655 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: 2023-24
Vortex wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 6:04pmWaltzing St Kilda wrote: ↑Sun 10 Jul 2022 5:58pm Well, we're married to nice-guy Ratten now until at least mid-season 2024 (reportedly the AFL won't allow us more than a six-month payout).
Anyone see any cause for optimism? Especially if we finish tenth, say, after being 8-3?
Anyone see where the improvement is going to come from?
Our incoming CEO bet the farm on Hannebury, Hill, Crouch etc and now says we're not a top four side.
in the off-deason he'll probably gamble bigtime (again) on De Goey -- another desperate quickfix to generate some much-needed enthusiasm.
But is anyone enthusiastic?
Always enthusiastic, I like winning and losing not so much but I hate it even more when the footy season ends.
After 2024 comes 2025, what's not to love.
agree 100% If I was influenced simply by "results" then I would never have started following this club. I've now got my head around the fact that I'm not going to see the Saints win their second flag in the years I have left (I'm now 77) and I go to matches now with the view to enjoying the company of good pals and watching the footy!
Results can take care of themselves as far as this old fart is concerned.
St Kilda forever ![🔴](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f534.svg)
![⚪️](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/26aa.svg)
( God help me)
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 691 times
- Been thanked: 773 times
Re: 2023-24
Reasons for optimism:
We've played some excellent footy this year, and won 9 games, and lost a couple we dominated (Port in the wet), which is easy to forget.
Compared to the last few years our skills have gone up, we can consistently hit those shortpasses coming out of the backline.
Not so long ago, that was heart in mouth stuff
We have recruited well in the last couple of years, including good NGA and mid season draft picks.
We are a KP player down in defence, and we seem to have a perennial issue of undersized backmen. Wilkie cannot give 6-8cm away and win every week!
We have virtually been without our early draft picks Coffield and Clark this year. They are in the age bracket that should be hitting their prime in next 3 years. That is just very bad luck that should change next year
Our players want to stay and we have no /little internal strife....huge positive
Players want to come to the club....Amon for instance, possibly DeGoey or Taranto. A few years ago we couldn't attract anyone.
We've played some excellent footy this year, and won 9 games, and lost a couple we dominated (Port in the wet), which is easy to forget.
Compared to the last few years our skills have gone up, we can consistently hit those shortpasses coming out of the backline.
Not so long ago, that was heart in mouth stuff
We have recruited well in the last couple of years, including good NGA and mid season draft picks.
We are a KP player down in defence, and we seem to have a perennial issue of undersized backmen. Wilkie cannot give 6-8cm away and win every week!
We have virtually been without our early draft picks Coffield and Clark this year. They are in the age bracket that should be hitting their prime in next 3 years. That is just very bad luck that should change next year
Our players want to stay and we have no /little internal strife....huge positive
Players want to come to the club....Amon for instance, possibly DeGoey or Taranto. A few years ago we couldn't attract anyone.
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9068
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Re: 2023-24
I'm worried that Max is not going forward in development- natural skills aside, he doesn't seem to be progressing much in team related work, or other forward skills. I think he is going into his shell under pressure.Yorkeys wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 5:15pm Can Brett be hard-nosed, make hard decisions, develop young players?
How do you rate him in regard to Max King's use and development.
Was Brett extended because the players and coaches are comfortable with him or his ability to make them uncomfortable when we play crap.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6415
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 854 times
- Been thanked: 1012 times
Re: 2023-24
It pains me to say this but he's just soft as butter. I can't think of a bigger sook to have ever played the game. His incredibly poor attitude is infectious and would be so dispiriting as a fellow forward playing in the same forward line.spert wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 7:13pmI'm worried that Max is not going forward in development- natural skills aside, he doesn't seem to be progressing much in team related work, or other forward skills. I think he is going into his shell under pressure.Yorkeys wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 5:15pm Can Brett be hard-nosed, make hard decisions, develop young players?
How do you rate him in regard to Max King's use and development.
Was Brett extended because the players and coaches are comfortable with him or his ability to make them uncomfortable when we play crap.
Could end up being the Jack Billings of our forward line.
Sometime it's not the coach or the board or the car park attendants, sometimes it's just crap player attitude.
Should of held off giving the number 12 jumper to him too.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4895
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1410 times
- Been thanked: 1429 times
Re: 2023-24
True, true. But....Banger9798 wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 6:50pm Reasons for optimism:
We've played some excellent footy this year, and won 9 games, and lost a couple we dominated (Port in the wet), which is easy to forget.
Compared to the last few years our skills have gone up, we can consistently hit those shortpasses coming out of the backline.
Not so long ago, that was heart in mouth stuff
We have recruited well in the last couple of years, including good NGA and mid season draft picks.
We are a KP player down in defence, and we seem to have a perennial issue of undersized backmen. Wilkie cannot give 6-8cm away and win every week!
We have virtually been without our early draft picks Coffield and Clark this year. They are in the age bracket that should be hitting their prime in next 3 years. That is just very bad luck that should change next year
Our players want to stay and we have no /little internal strife....huge positive
Players want to come to the club....Amon for instance, possibly DeGoey or Taranto. A few years ago we couldn't attract anyone.
doesn't it have that groundhog day feel about it to you?
Can't see the catalyst to break the cycle of not being good enough, not cracking in when it really matters, no really clever attacking ploys.
Seems so white bread going through the motions with no serious intent. Endless.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: 2023-24
Hard to be too optimistic when you see our team in free fall after a bright start . For sure there are positives but as a lot of posters have said the brand of footy we play is just not sustainable long term & it is just too hit & miss IMO. We need structure & a game plan that everyone is capable of delivering .We have played good quarters here & there but nothing solid, bad starts, catch up footy, dominate for a quarter & let teams back in fight like hell to scrap out a win or just get owned as has happened since the bye. Ryder has been a great player but time is starting to wear him down which is only natural , our defence has been solid even though under sized ,our mid field is just too pedestrian we don't have any explosiveness they have been ok , Ross Steele & Crouch have all given it a real crack Gresh up & down, Jones after missing the start of the season just hasn't been the same player. Marshall has had a handful of good games but not the player he was, Members very similar, Butler a shadow of the player 2 years ago , Higgins has been ok but has missed a few games for various reasons, . The Kids have been handy NWM looks like a real prospect ,Windy & Mitch very promising ,Max (King)looked liked he was going to be a world beater earlier in the year but looks like a defeated man ATM . DMAC before injured was very good ,Billings injured for most of start of the year IMO disappointing, Wood has been ok at times but not great. Battle & Wilkie have been amazing Jimmy handy, Paton a shadow of the player he was ,Dougs has struggled but has been ok . Clark & Coffield injury has just ruined their year but both haven't reached their potential yet. Sinclair far & away our best player & has continued on from last year . So where is the change going to come from I don't see our current list capable of pushing for a flag in the next 2 or 3 years unless we either recruit some genuine class midfielders & draft blokes to fill our deficiencies no more flankers .
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 691 times
- Been thanked: 773 times
Re: 2023-24
Yorkeys wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 7:41pmTrue, true. But....Banger9798 wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 6:50pm Reasons for optimism:
We've played some excellent footy this year, and won 9 games, and lost a couple we dominated (Port in the wet), which is easy to forget.
Compared to the last few years our skills have gone up, we can consistently hit those shortpasses coming out of the backline.
Not so long ago, that was heart in mouth stuff
We have recruited well in the last couple of years, including good NGA and mid season draft picks.
We are a KP player down in defence, and we seem to have a perennial issue of undersized backmen. Wilkie cannot give 6-8cm away and win every week!
We have virtually been without our early draft picks Coffield and Clark this year. They are in the age bracket that should be hitting their prime in next 3 years. That is just very bad luck that should change next year
Our players want to stay and we have no /little internal strife....huge positive
Players want to come to the club....Amon for instance, possibly DeGoey or Taranto. A few years ago we couldn't attract anyone.
doesn't it have that groundhog day feel about it to you?
Can't see the catalyst to break the cycle of not being good enough, not cracking in when it really matters, no really clever attacking ploys.
Seems so white bread going through the motions with no serious intent. Endless.
Yes, the ground hog day vibe is there.
But if we compare how we were feeling pre and post the bye about the team.
Pre Bye at 8 & 3 we thought we had a pretty good team, post bye having lost 4/5 we think we're ordinary and our previous bullishness was misplaced
Truth is somewhere in between .
I am personally still more optimistic than any time in the last 6 years, and think we are not that far away from being a consistently good side.
One or two players short and obviously some mental and structural issues to sort out
Our first half vs Freo was excellent...not sure what happened in the 3Q, but we got beaten around stoppage and their talls dominated a very undersized backline
Paton, Coffield and Clark in form would make a huge difference to this side.
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
Re: 2023-24
Pick your first choice 22 (23)
Put their statistics alongside (age, height, weight and games played)
Then list those on our List not included in that 22 (23)
And see what you arrive at
Noting the Club has indicated it will review all players available as free agents to see if they would compliment our List and our objectives, will look to appropriately trade and will go to the Draft (which all Clubs will do)
After you have attended the foregoing challenge you may then be in a position to see why our window of opportunity is over the next 2 years, depending on who we can add to our List as established players of class
The addition of experience will compliment our youth, currently the 3 drafted ahead of 2022 and already “ best 22”
And we look for Coffield and Clark to enjoy better luck, both top 10 selections with class
It is our core, so KPP, where we lack resource - and some class out of the centre square
Currently our “best 22” includes some making up the numbers - and to give some idea where optimal is I include the likes of Webster and Ross in this category because Webster loses his feet just to easily and Ross can not run forward with the ball, stopping and propping just to much
And there are others in the same category
Plus Ryder’s age
We have a bit invested in Heath and Adams, particularly
Because this is where our deficiencies are most evident - along with another key forward
Leave the emotion aside and attend the analysis
The Club are realistic in their analysis - hence the commentary on the Coach and the football department
Put their statistics alongside (age, height, weight and games played)
Then list those on our List not included in that 22 (23)
And see what you arrive at
Noting the Club has indicated it will review all players available as free agents to see if they would compliment our List and our objectives, will look to appropriately trade and will go to the Draft (which all Clubs will do)
After you have attended the foregoing challenge you may then be in a position to see why our window of opportunity is over the next 2 years, depending on who we can add to our List as established players of class
The addition of experience will compliment our youth, currently the 3 drafted ahead of 2022 and already “ best 22”
And we look for Coffield and Clark to enjoy better luck, both top 10 selections with class
It is our core, so KPP, where we lack resource - and some class out of the centre square
Currently our “best 22” includes some making up the numbers - and to give some idea where optimal is I include the likes of Webster and Ross in this category because Webster loses his feet just to easily and Ross can not run forward with the ball, stopping and propping just to much
And there are others in the same category
Plus Ryder’s age
We have a bit invested in Heath and Adams, particularly
Because this is where our deficiencies are most evident - along with another key forward
Leave the emotion aside and attend the analysis
The Club are realistic in their analysis - hence the commentary on the Coach and the football department
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2185
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
- Location: by the seaside..
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 185 times
Re: 2023-24
At Hawthorn, Ratten was the feel good assistant was a perfect foil to Clarko the strategic genius and at times harsh critic who cools deliver a fearsome rocket.
We don’t have a strategic genius in the coaches box nor anyone who can give the players a rocket when required
We don’t have a strategic genius in the coaches box nor anyone who can give the players a rocket when required
“If you want the rainbow you gotta put up with rain” Dolly Parton
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: 2023-24
I think you put too much faith in the football department . When I actually see real change on & off the field I might be more sympathetic but ATM as one poster said "Ground Hog Day"Killa wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 9:09pm Pick your first choice 22 (23)
Put their statistics alongside (age, height, weight and games played)
Then list those on our List not included in that 22 (23)
And see what you arrive at
Noting the Club has indicated it will review all players available as free agents to see if they would compliment our List and our objectives, will look to appropriately trade and will go to the Draft (which all Clubs will do)
After you have attended the foregoing challenge you may then be in a position to see why our window of opportunity is over the next 2 years, depending on who we can add to our List as established players of class
The addition of experience will compliment our youth, currently the 3 drafted ahead of 2022 and already “ best 22”
And we look for Coffield and Clark to enjoy better luck, both top 10 selections with class
It is our core, so KPP, where we lack resource - and some class out of the centre square
Currently our “best 22” includes some making up the numbers - and to give some idea where optimal is I include the likes of Webster and Ross in this category because Webster loses his feet just to easily and Ross can not run forward with the ball, stopping and propping just to much
And there are others in the same category
Plus Ryder’s age
We have a bit invested in Heath and Adams, particularly
Because this is where our deficiencies are most evident - along with another key forward
Leave the emotion aside and attend the analysis
The Club are realistic in their analysis - hence the commentary on the Coach and the football department
Re: 2023-24
In the first instance, to attract available players from other Clubs you need a selling point
Quite frankly, our List as it was just a couple of years ago and having Seaford as HQ attracted no one
Now we are on a different trajectory - courtesy of the administration, the Coach and the football department and an improved List which has further potential
Some Clubs with equally poor on field performances had the selling points of “establishment clubs” playing at the MCG and afforded “block buster” games by the AFL
Now we offer the facilities we have, a stable administration with a highly respected Coach and a List which includes a core of very talented youth, starting with Clark, Coffield, Paton, King, Wanganeen-Milera, Windhager and Owen
What we do not have is Riewoldt, Kossi, Hayes, Dal Santo, Montagna et al allowing this youth to develop v with the cover and assistance of that experience
We went to State Leagues to conscript short term resources to fill the demographic hole on our List
Hayes started playing where?
The 3 kids we have introduced this year have been thrown straight into the cauldron - so in the mid field not eased into the 22
By way of comparison, now past 100 games, look at the development of Sinclair who started as an average forward flanker
And look at Steele after the Coach’s challenge to him
Plus Marshall off the Rookie List (from the VFL)
I do know as fact that the Coach expressed surprise at the lack of player development resource when he came to the Club (and noting he and Richardson are close)
And he put the challenge to the younger players
And, yes, I do have inside information
Quite frankly, our List as it was just a couple of years ago and having Seaford as HQ attracted no one
Now we are on a different trajectory - courtesy of the administration, the Coach and the football department and an improved List which has further potential
Some Clubs with equally poor on field performances had the selling points of “establishment clubs” playing at the MCG and afforded “block buster” games by the AFL
Now we offer the facilities we have, a stable administration with a highly respected Coach and a List which includes a core of very talented youth, starting with Clark, Coffield, Paton, King, Wanganeen-Milera, Windhager and Owen
What we do not have is Riewoldt, Kossi, Hayes, Dal Santo, Montagna et al allowing this youth to develop v with the cover and assistance of that experience
We went to State Leagues to conscript short term resources to fill the demographic hole on our List
Hayes started playing where?
The 3 kids we have introduced this year have been thrown straight into the cauldron - so in the mid field not eased into the 22
By way of comparison, now past 100 games, look at the development of Sinclair who started as an average forward flanker
And look at Steele after the Coach’s challenge to him
Plus Marshall off the Rookie List (from the VFL)
I do know as fact that the Coach expressed surprise at the lack of player development resource when he came to the Club (and noting he and Richardson are close)
And he put the challenge to the younger players
And, yes, I do have inside information
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1998
- Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2010 11:35am
- Been thanked: 1198 times
Re: 2023-24
Player development has been an issue for years. We now have ( what I believe as well as many who have much greater knowledge than me ) one of the best in the business. Damian Carrol will be incredibly important to the future of our success. You may not see the results immediately but I think player development will be one of our key successes
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9023
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: 2023-24
Things could be a lot worse. Some d**khead could come into your aged care home coughing his lungs out but declare that he has the "right" not to wear a mask and therefore the right to infect who he wants, when he wants. Apparently, morons have the right to be a moron. This happened today.
- Waltzing St Kilda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2010 5:20am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Re: 2023-24
Good to hear.tony74 wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 10:52pm Player development has been an issue for years. We now have ( what I believe as well as many who have much greater knowledge than me ) one of the best in the business. Damian Carrol will be incredibly important to the future of our success. You may not see the results immediately but I think player development will be one of our key successes
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 691 times
- Been thanked: 773 times
Re: 2023-24
What a wankerperfectionist wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 11:02pm Things could be a lot worse. Some d**khead could come into your aged care home coughing his lungs out but declare that he has the "right" not to wear a mask and therefore the right to infect who he wants, when he wants. Apparently, morons have the right to be a moron. This happened today.
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1077 times
Re: 2023-24
If we trade in quality players there is a possibly there will be a slight trend upwards - but dont expect Rattens coaching to improve, he has completely maxed out in 2020.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: 2023-24
How do you know?Zed wrote: ↑Tue 12 Jul 2022 9:43pm At Hawthorn, Ratten was the feel good assistant was a perfect foil to Clarko the strategic genius and at times harsh critic who cools deliver a fearsome rocket.
We don’t have a strategic genius in the coaches box nor anyone who can give the players a rocket when required
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4241
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1390 times
Re: 2023-24
Improvement?
King
Wanganeen-Milera
Windhager
Owens
Higgins
Clark
Coffield
Byrnes
Connolly
Sharman
All these guys can get better and most likey will
Who can we depend on for consistent output?
Marshall
Steele
Crouch
Ross
Webster
Wilkie
Howard (despite the naysayers)
Sinclair
Battle
Gresham
Hill (despite the naysayers)
Membrey
The inconsistent and the not-quite-there
Billings
Long
Paton
Highmore
Jones
Hayes
Little or no value going forward
Wood
Joyce
Leinert
Done
Geary
Hannebery
Kent
Campbell
The unknown and the unlikely
Adams
Bytel
Allison
Peris
King
Wanganeen-Milera
Windhager
Owens
Higgins
Clark
Coffield
Byrnes
Connolly
Sharman
All these guys can get better and most likey will
Who can we depend on for consistent output?
Marshall
Steele
Crouch
Ross
Webster
Wilkie
Howard (despite the naysayers)
Sinclair
Battle
Gresham
Hill (despite the naysayers)
Membrey
The inconsistent and the not-quite-there
Billings
Long
Paton
Highmore
Jones
Hayes
Little or no value going forward
Wood
Joyce
Leinert
Done
Geary
Hannebery
Kent
Campbell
The unknown and the unlikely
Adams
Bytel
Allison
Peris