Sandringham v Bombers

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961265Post Wayne42 »

20 minute mark of first quarter @ Trevor Barker Beach Oval.
Sandy 1-0-6 v Bummers 5-6-36.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961266Post Wayne42 »

Sandy Team Line Up for today..

Sandringham Zebras
FB
[45] Jack Peris,[34] Tom Highmore,[43] Cooper Sharman
HB
[79] Nick Hodgson,[50] Anthony Seaton,[37] Leo Connolly
C
[31] Jarrod Lienert,[57] Jack McHale,[70] Blake Watson
HF
[61] Tyson Milne,[17] Marcus Windhager,[42] Max Heath
FF
[51] Darby Hipwell,[55] Goy Lok,[72] Johnathan Haidon
FOL
[62] Mitch Riordan,[52] Cody Henness,[25] Dean Kent
IC
[32] Mason Wood,[39] Darragh Joyce,[38] Tom Campbell,[54] Scott Beilby,[30] Matthew Allison


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961268Post Wayne42 »

Quarter Time Scores
Sandy 2-4-16 v Bummers 5-8-38


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961273Post Wayne42 »

Sandy playing better in the early part of the 2nd quarter
Sandy 4-5-29 v Bummers 5-9-39


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961274Post Wayne42 »

Heath done nothing so far.

Sharman hardly sited but has just kicked a goal, hopefully he now gets more involved.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961275Post Wayne42 »

Eleni Glouftsis is umpiring in this game.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961277Post Wayne42 »

25 minute mark 2nd Quarter.

Sandy 6-6-42 v Bummers 9-9-63


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961278Post Wayne42 »

Sharman kicks his second goal, he's good with the ball, when he can get it.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961279Post Wayne42 »

Half Time Scores.

Sandy 7-6-48 v Bummers 10-9-69.

Player Stats.

https://www.afl.com.au/vfl/matches/4264#player-stats


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961286Post Wayne42 »

Allison has taken a couple of marks on a lead and has kicked, from just on 50 meters out, 1 goal 1 behind.

Sharman has just kicked from about 48 meters out and he put it straight through the goal posts for his 3rd goal.

Sandy 9-7-61 v Bummers 11-10-76


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961288Post Wayne42 »

Joyce gets the aid of a 50 meter penalty and goals from 30 meters out, kick was straight as an arrow.
Scores Sandy 69 to Bummers 83.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961290Post Wayne42 »

3 Quarter time..

Sandy 10-9-69 v Bombers 13-11-89


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961293Post Wayne42 »

6 minutes into the last quarter
Sandy 81 v Bombers 89.

Goals to Winhager and Wood.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23246
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961295Post Teflon »

Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 4:54pm Allison has taken a couple of marks on a lead and has kicked, from just on 50 meters out, 1 goal 1 behind.

Sharman has just kicked from about 48 meters out and he put it straight through the goal posts for his 3rd goal.

Sandy 9-7-61 v Bummers 11-10-76
Gee imagine Sharman under the roof perfect conditions for a lead up forward ???????
Nah..,,,let’s go Dan Butler to save us…
**** joke
Probably poor rain at SCH next week then they’ll bring Sharman in
Utter idiots


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961297Post Wayne42 »

Windhager having a big last quarter, kicks his 2nd for the quarter.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2537
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 384 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961298Post terry smith rules »

Marcus W far too good to play in VFL

Dominating


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2537
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 384 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961300Post terry smith rules »

Umpires now dominating for the filth


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961302Post Wayne42 »

Final Scores
Sandy 13-12-90 v Bombers 15-14-104

Sandy best Campbell 37 hit outs, Windy, Leinert, Joyce.
Sharman is a great kick at goal, he just struggles to get it.
Heath, on today’s effort is way off.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23154
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9101 times
Been thanked: 3946 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961303Post saynta »

terry smith rules wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 5:34pm Umpires now dominating for the filth
That maggot and her two male accomplices are three s*** umpires. :roll:

In the back, around the neck, play on if your colours aren't red and black.

Who says drug cheating doesn't pay FFS. :roll:


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23246
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961313Post Teflon »

Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 5:48pm Final Scores
Sandy 13-12-90 v Bombers 15-14-104

Sandy best Campbell 37 hit outs, Windy, Leinert, Joyce.
Sharman is a great kick at goal, he just struggles to get it.
Heath, on today’s effort is way off.
If Sharman kicked 3 he’s done his job
If I’m AFL we had a game plan to honour and look for the lead up player - not max king all the time Sharman would be fine
We don’t
I think it’s time to tell Membrey for the next block of games his role is not secure


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8393
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961316Post Devilhead »

Teflon wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 6:06pm
Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 5:48pm Final Scores
Sandy 13-12-90 v Bombers 15-14-104

Sandy best Campbell 37 hit outs, Windy, Leinert, Joyce.
Sharman is a great kick at goal, he just struggles to get it.
Heath, on today’s effort is way off.
If Sharman kicked 3 he’s done his job
If I’m AFL we had a game plan to honour and look for the lead up player - not max king all the time Sharman would be fine
We don’t
I think it’s time to tell Membrey for the next block of games his role is not secure
No you play all 3 in the forwardline .... its not friggin brain surgery


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12679
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2707 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961317Post B.M »

Sharman had 6 possessions in a VFL game

And he’s the answer?

He is a good kick at goal… outside of that he is pretty average

But he has got Mat Allison covered


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961318Post Wayne42 »

Teflon wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 6:06pm
Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 5:48pm Final Scores
Sandy 13-12-90 v Bombers 15-14-104

Sandy best Campbell 37 hit outs, Windy, Leinert, Joyce.
Sharman is a great kick at goal, he just struggles to get it.
Heath, on today’s effort is way off.
If Sharman kicked 3 he’s done his job
If I’m AFL we had a game plan to honour and look for the lead up player - not max king all the time Sharman would be fine
We don’t
I think it’s time to tell Membrey for the next block of games his role is not secure
If Sharman had more ability he would kick more than 3 goals, not go missing for large parts of the game,and, Sandy would then have a better
chance at winning.
Sharman might still be a better bet than Membrey, purely because Membrey's game is way off his best or he just doesn't play the way he used to.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8393
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961319Post Devilhead »

Next week we have the McFartin brothers & Rampe ..... they all need to be made accountable ..... Gresh & Higgo down forward and our forwardline looks dangerous

Drop Long and Butler and bring in Windhager and Steele for more midfield grunt and consider Highmore for a backline player ...... DMac comes in for Clark if he is battling fitness


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
MCG-Unit
SS Life Member
Posts: 3155
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
Location: Land of the Giants
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Sandringham v Bombers

Post: # 1961323Post MCG-Unit »

Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 3:59pm Eleni Glouftsis is umpiring in this game.
Chelsea Roffey goal umpire


No Contract, No contact :shock:
Post Reply