Mach thread: saints v bombers
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18580
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 843 times
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Kudos to Ratts, he said everyone keeps talking about a tough draw, he said every game is tough and if we play like that well we won't win.
Moved on to talk about mental health as that's what Spuds game is about.
Moved on to talk about mental health as that's what Spuds game is about.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
You are joking - didn’t see it coming??? rubbish couldn’t have said that surely..
If so resign Brett
Last edited by Teflon on Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:26am, edited 1 time in total.
“Yeah….nah””
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8376
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 1169 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
So they got ahead of themselves ...... seriously fk me
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Wow
Got ahead of themselves cause Brisbane missed all those gettable goals in last weeks loss????
What’s there to get ahead of FFS
This is amateur hour
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Do not mention Spud after that mentally inept performance
“Yeah….nah””
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Well he did, and he was quite sincere when he did it.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2009 2:31am
- Location: Perth
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 77 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Many seem to want Clarkson as coach. If he took over I suggest the following players that played tonight would never play again for SK:
Hill
Webster
Ross
Jones
Howard
The following would be told to get your sh. t together quickly or get lost:
Paton
Gresham
Butler
Billings
Marshall
Crouch
Butler
Ones that would be cosseted and encouraged:
Higgins
NWM
Clark
Another thing. We got done over by Port using their sub inappropriately (obviously the AFL doesn’t care). How the f…k did Windhager get left on the bench? Why wouldn’t you take the non-performing squib off and inject some passion. I’m a poofteenth from writing Ratten off.
Hill
Webster
Ross
Jones
Howard
The following would be told to get your sh. t together quickly or get lost:
Paton
Gresham
Butler
Billings
Marshall
Crouch
Butler
Ones that would be cosseted and encouraged:
Higgins
NWM
Clark
Another thing. We got done over by Port using their sub inappropriately (obviously the AFL doesn’t care). How the f…k did Windhager get left on the bench? Why wouldn’t you take the non-performing squib off and inject some passion. I’m a poofteenth from writing Ratten off.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Why hasn’t this team played 1 full 4 quarter gane of football this year ????????
We’ll coached sides don’t get by winning off a quarter here and there ….against good sides u get found found out
We’ll coached sides don’t get by winning off a quarter here and there ….against good sides u get found found out
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2021 7:37pm
- Location: Trentham
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 80 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Too small again and not hard enough. I don't believe the players in the main are soft they are just not hard enough - not like say McKenzie or Wilkie. Spuds game is now ironic.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2021 7:37pm
- Location: Trentham
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 80 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Too small again and not hard enough. I don't believe the players in the main are soft they are just not hard enough - not like say McKenzie or Wilkie. Spuds game is now ironic.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
I'm seriously starting to doubt if Ratten is the man to lead us to the Holy Grail .IMO I would put contract arrangements on hold till the end of the season .
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Don’t blame the puppet in the stands for pulling the wrong strings. The game was lost between the ears of the pussys on thd ground.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Not 1 4 quarter performance this yearYallingupsaints wrote: ↑Sat 18 Jun 2022 1:04am Don’t blame the puppet in the stands for pulling the wrong strings. The game was lost between the ears of the pussys on thd ground.
Puppet in stands not up to it
Pussys onfield need to be turned over
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
- Been thanked: 3 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
- Been thanked: 3 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 1:42am
- Has thanked: 704 times
- Been thanked: 75 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Good question. He appears to accept mediocrity from favoured players and drops those not in the loop.SaintJohno wrote: ↑Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:37pm If Ratts isn't able to inspire these guys for a really emotional game, is he really the guy that's going to get a premiership out of them?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
You can say that again.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Sounds like you love mediocrity
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
1 Flagg in over 100 years and your happy?
Righto..
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Not a sick measuring comp. I haven’t seen one in my lifetime so I don’t like mediocrity
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
- Been thanked: 3 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers
Stop picking them in the team then..
And even non natural players can show some heart and intensity. Those players should be ashamed of themselves.