Would we?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16896
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2853 times
Re: Would we?
I’ve said for a while, if we were going to splurge on a big name, Tim Taranto would be my ideal choice.
Elite goal kicking mid. Him, Steele and Crouch in the middle… with a number of others rotating through, we’d be unstoppable
Elite goal kicking mid. Him, Steele and Crouch in the middle… with a number of others rotating through, we’d be unstoppable
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Would we?
What would it cost the club to get Taranto to the Saints, GWS would want a big return to trade to a specific club.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 692 times
- Been thanked: 775 times
Re: Would we?
Taranto would be ideal, right combo of inside /outside and can go forward.
You would expect if he nominated us, that we'd have to give up a first and a second?
Vs DeGoey who is a free agent.
Prefer Taranto overall (better clubman) , but it's a big cost in picks.
You would expect if he nominated us, that we'd have to give up a first and a second?
Vs DeGoey who is a free agent.
Prefer Taranto overall (better clubman) , but it's a big cost in picks.
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 503 times
Re: Would we?
I'd defintiely take Taranto, but we are now going well enough that we probably won't have the necessary draft picks to trade for him.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 692 times
- Been thanked: 775 times
Re: Would we?
Steele, Crouch, Taranto, Jones and Gresham
That's a good starting midfield.
That's a good starting midfield.
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Would we?
No brainer, always go for the Free Agent........................ALWAYS!!!Banger9798 wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 8:30am Taranto would be ideal, right combo of inside /outside and can go forward.
You would expect if he nominated us, that we'd have to give up a first and a second?
Vs DeGoey who is a free agent.
Prefer Taranto overall (better clubman) , but it's a big cost in picks.
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5511
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Re: Would we?
Really? Always?SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 11:17amNo brainer, always go for the Free Agent........................ALWAYS!!!Banger9798 wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 8:30am Taranto would be ideal, right combo of inside /outside and can go forward.
You would expect if he nominated us, that we'd have to give up a first and a second?
Vs DeGoey who is a free agent.
Prefer Taranto overall (better clubman) , but it's a big cost in picks.
Some of the free agents available this season...
Michael Hurley
Shaun Higgins
Jarrod Brander
Matt De Boer
Lachlan Keeffe
Adam Kennedy
Daniel Lloyd
Zach Sproule
Jake Stein
Jacob Wehr
Mitch Brown
Majak Daw
Ben Cunnington
Todd Goldstein
Kyron Hayden
Tom Lynch
Kayne Turner
Josh Walker
Trent Dumont
Sam Mayes
Trent McKenzie
Steven Motlop
Sam Skinner
Ben Miller
Bigoa Nyuon
Matt Parker
Just to name a few...
So, you'd take any of them over Taranto?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Would we?
That's not what I was saying. If it was out of 2 players and one of them was a Free Agent and the other wasn't, I would always take the Free Agent.Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 11:39amReally? Always?SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 11:17amNo brainer, always go for the Free Agent........................ALWAYS!!!Banger9798 wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 8:30am Taranto would be ideal, right combo of inside /outside and can go forward.
You would expect if he nominated us, that we'd have to give up a first and a second?
Vs DeGoey who is a free agent.
Prefer Taranto overall (better clubman) , but it's a big cost in picks.
Some of the free agents available this season...
Michael Hurley
Shaun Higgins
Jarrod Brander
Matt De Boer
Lachlan Keeffe
Adam Kennedy
Daniel Lloyd
Zach Sproule
Jake Stein
Jacob Wehr
Mitch Brown
Majak Daw
Ben Cunnington
Todd Goldstein
Kyron Hayden
Tom Lynch
Kayne Turner
Josh Walker
Trent Dumont
Sam Mayes
Trent McKenzie
Steven Motlop
Sam Skinner
Ben Miller
Bigoa Nyuon
Matt Parker
Just to name a few...
So, you'd take any of them over Taranto?
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5511
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Re: Would we?
OK. Let's make it about two players then.SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 11:49am That's not what I was saying. If it was out of 2 players and one of them was a Free Agent and the other wasn't, I would always take the Free Agent.
Taranto v Shaun Higgins
or
Taranto v Zach Sproule
or
Taranto v Steven Motlop
or
Taranto v Michael Hurley
So, you'd take any of those players over Taranto because they're free agents and cost us nothing?
Would you have taken any of them over Brad Hill, Paddy Ryder, Dougall Howard, or Zak Jones? How about Dan Butler or Jack Higgins?
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3356
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Would we?
Love to get Taranto as i think GWs use of him has only scratched the surface.
That said isn't Amon a free agent ? Taranto a better player but not sure we can afford both?
That said isn't Amon a free agent ? Taranto a better player but not sure we can afford both?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 921
- Joined: Sat 24 Oct 2020 10:22am
- Has thanked: 217 times
- Been thanked: 906 times
Re: Would we?
De Goey for mine…Hopper and Taranto would cost too much in draft picks, plus De Goey is the explosive, dynamic player we need (should have been Petracca!).
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Would we?
Please stop splitting hairs. If the 2 players were roughly as good as each other I would always go for the Free Agent. That way we still have the draft pick in hand to use in the National draft. If you are always trading away your picks then eventually you will fail because you will have no youth coming through.Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 1:00pmOK. Let's make it about two players then.SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 11:49am That's not what I was saying. If it was out of 2 players and one of them was a Free Agent and the other wasn't, I would always take the Free Agent.
Taranto v Shaun Higgins
or
Taranto v Zach Sproule
or
Taranto v Steven Motlop
or
Taranto v Michael Hurley
So, you'd take any of those players over Taranto because they're free agents and cost us nothing?
Would you have taken any of them over Brad Hill, Paddy Ryder, Dougall Howard, or Zak Jones? How about Dan Butler or Jack Higgins?
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5511
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Re: Would we?
Splitting hairs? You're the one making ridiculous grandiose statements. I'm merely calling that out.
Excrement!SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 2:24pmIf the 2 players were roughly as good as each other I would always go for the Free Agent. That way we still have the draft pick in hand to use in the National draft. If you are always trading away your picks then eventually you will fail because you will have no youth coming through.
It all depends on the draft picks and the draft pool.
You can't be absolute in your approach. That is the quickest way to fail.
You need to be felxible and understand the needs of the club against the players available.
Take last season. We stayed quiet during the trade period because we wanted to draft Windhager and Owens. We needed the picks.
We couldn't get close to Carlton's offer to Cerra and get the players we wanted.
Given Ben King's preference to stay at the Suns and Hannebery's self imposed pay cut, we are now in a position to go hard for another player. Taranto would be an awesome get.
DeGoey, whilst a good player, comes with a huge amount of baggage that we don't really need. He has a history of violence and lying to his club.
We can do better.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Would we?
Lying is encouraged at Collingwood.Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 2:50pmSplitting hairs? You're the one making ridiculous grandiose statements. I'm merely calling that out.Excrement!SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 2:24pmIf the 2 players were roughly as good as each other I would always go for the Free Agent. That way we still have the draft pick in hand to use in the National draft. If you are always trading away your picks then eventually you will fail because you will have no youth coming through.
It all depends on the draft picks and the draft pool.
You can't be absolute in your approach. That is the quickest way to fail.
You need to be felxible and understand the needs of the club against the players available.
Take last season. We stayed quiet during the trade period because we wanted to draft Windhager and Owens. We needed the picks.
We couldn't get close to Carlton's offer to Cerra and get the players we wanted.
Given Ben King's preference to stay at the Suns and Hannebery's self imposed pay cut, we are now in a position to go hard for another player. Taranto would be an awesome get.
DeGoey, whilst a good player, comes with a huge amount of baggage that we don't really need. He has a history of violence and lying to his club.
We can do better.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2590
- Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
- Has thanked: 2043 times
- Been thanked: 1162 times
Re: Would we?
Not really sure what brand of crack you're smoking LLS however, these players are NOT free agents (restricted or free): -Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 11:39amReally? Always?SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 11:17amNo brainer, always go for the Free Agent........................ALWAYS!!!Banger9798 wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 8:30am Taranto would be ideal, right combo of inside /outside and can go forward.
You would expect if he nominated us, that we'd have to give up a first and a second?
Vs DeGoey who is a free agent.
Prefer Taranto overall (better clubman) , but it's a big cost in picks.
Some of the free agents available this season...
Michael Hurley
Shaun Higgins
Jarrod Brander
Matt De Boer
Lachlan Keeffe
Adam Kennedy
Daniel Lloyd
Zach Sproule
Jake Stein
Jacob Wehr
Mitch Brown
Majak Daw
Ben Cunnington
Todd Goldstein
Kyron Hayden
Tom Lynch
Kayne Turner
Josh Walker
Trent Dumont
Sam Mayes
Trent McKenzie
Steven Motlop
Sam Skinner
Ben Miller
Bigoa Nyuon
Matt Parker
Just to name a few...
So, you'd take any of them over Taranto?
Matt Parker
Trent Dumont
Tom Lynch
Mitch Brown
Majak Daw
Shaun Higgins
Go you red, black & white warriors
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8376
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 1169 times
Re: Would we?
With the draft haul from last year I would want to be adding to that .... so Taranto for 2 firsts or DeGoey free agent and some high end youth?
DeGoey thanks along with some more youngsters ..... and Clarkson to get the best of DeGoey ..... at some stage the penny will drop
DeGoey thanks along with some more youngsters ..... and Clarkson to get the best of DeGoey ..... at some stage the penny will drop
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23016
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8912 times
- Been thanked: 3884 times
Re: Would we?
Posters are conveniently overlooking Tim's expressed wishes to remain in Sydney and be a one club player.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5511
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Re: Would we?
Same stuff the AFL website is smoking!
https://www.afl.com.au/news/702794/ever ... e-signings
Where's your source?
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 692 times
- Been thanked: 775 times
Re: Would we?
Nice work Life Long, a critique off pure reason.Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 2:50pmSplitting hairs? You're the one making ridiculous grandiose statements. I'm merely calling that out.Excrement!SunnyErnie wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 2:24pmIf the 2 players were roughly as good as each other I would always go for the Free Agent. That way we still have the draft pick in hand to use in the National draft. If you are always trading away your picks then eventually you will fail because you will have no youth coming through.
It all depends on the draft picks and the draft pool.
You can't be absolute in your approach. That is the quickest way to fail.
You need to be felxible and understand the needs of the club against the players available.
Take last season. We stayed quiet during the trade period because we wanted to draft Windhager and Owens. We needed the picks.
We couldn't get close to Carlton's offer to Cerra and get the players we wanted.
Given Ben King's preference to stay at the Suns and Hannebery's self imposed pay cut, we are now in a position to go hard for another player. Taranto would be an awesome get.
DeGoey, whilst a good player, comes with a huge amount of baggage that we don't really need. He has a history of violence and lying to his club.
We can do better.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Think it might be a wasted effort here though.
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
- diddley
- Club Player
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Sat 29 Oct 2016 12:53am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: Would we?
All of that list (besides maybe Shaun Higgins) have been delisted at some point of their career, which makes them Free Agents for life. (Tim Membrey also fits in that category when his contracts run out, just a heads up)Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 4:21pmSame stuff the AFL website is smoking!
https://www.afl.com.au/news/702794/ever ... e-signings
Where's your source?
(Tom Lynch would be the North Melbourne player, not the Richmond player)
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16896
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2853 times
Re: Would we?
Not really.
It’s clearly a conversation about who forumites want more so then how realistic it is that we can actually get them.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5511
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
Re: Would we?
That's correct...And your point?diddley wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 11:56pmAll of that list (besides maybe Shaun Higgins) have been delisted at some point of their career, which makes them Free Agents for life. (Tim Membrey also fits in that category when his contracts run out, just a heads up)Life Long Saint wrote: ↑Tue 24 May 2022 4:21pmSame stuff the AFL website is smoking!
https://www.afl.com.au/news/702794/ever ... e-signings
Where's your source?
(Tom Lynch would be the North Melbourne player, not the Richmond player)
The original poster that I quoted made the claim that they'd choose a free agent over a trade every single time. I merely pointed out some of the free agents available that we could potentially target instead of Taranto.
And, yes, it's Tom Lynch the ex-Saint, Crow, and current Roo.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Would we?
thats , an interesting bit of knowledge... have been delisted at some point of their career, which makes them Free Agents for life.
ta
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Would we?
I can't see us delisting Tom Highmore. If he negotiates with us for a longer contract, he might get it.
A better offer from another club would probably offer better chances of playing but greater financial reward would almost certainly mean performance based clauses.
We plucked him from obscurity and have nurtured and developed him.
If we start looking for taller defender options, you might say he is surplus.
For now, I'm happy with Battle, Wilkie and then Lienert and Highmore.
But we'd be mad to not look for a bonafide tall Defender. Highmore is a hybrid interceptor who is learning to be a defender and not a third banana.
A better offer from another club would probably offer better chances of playing but greater financial reward would almost certainly mean performance based clauses.
We plucked him from obscurity and have nurtured and developed him.
If we start looking for taller defender options, you might say he is surplus.
For now, I'm happy with Battle, Wilkie and then Lienert and Highmore.
But we'd be mad to not look for a bonafide tall Defender. Highmore is a hybrid interceptor who is learning to be a defender and not a third banana.