Sharman had Stewart. Commentary even mentioned the job he did on him.
Sharman
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10126
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: Sharman
Sharman had Stewart. Commentary even mentioned the job he did on him.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Sharman
Mind you, Membrey could have held that mark across half back late in the game
We really did gift them some goals with disposals and not completing marks
Plus we missed some set shots late which should have seen a more comfortable win
Plus King had his hands to a few he could not complete
Adelaide - and this is a must win game so best side available on the park
We will miss Steele’s size around the contest which is a concern to me
Plus Steele can take an overhead grab - a point of difference from our other mids including (unfortunately) Ross who does have size
Crouch and Gresham did well and Jones improved
So pressure will be on them over the next couple of months to fill the void left by Steele
That said, we are not a one man side so fingers crossed that that assessment is found accurate
We really did gift them some goals with disposals and not completing marks
Plus we missed some set shots late which should have seen a more comfortable win
Plus King had his hands to a few he could not complete
Adelaide - and this is a must win game so best side available on the park
We will miss Steele’s size around the contest which is a concern to me
Plus Steele can take an overhead grab - a point of difference from our other mids including (unfortunately) Ross who does have size
Crouch and Gresham did well and Jones improved
So pressure will be on them over the next couple of months to fill the void left by Steele
That said, we are not a one man side so fingers crossed that that assessment is found accurate
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun 17 Jul 2016 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Sharman
For a young fella with only a few games under his belt, there looks to be some class to work with. Forget stats or who he played on, those with some footy nous can see a potential player there. Hope he works hard, is managed well and gets more opportunities. We never know what we might have here.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 464 times
Re: Sharman
I can't remember now - probably.WellardSaint wrote: ↑Mon 16 May 2022 6:42pmWas the Skunk goal, after the long kick by DMack?Jacks Back wrote: ↑Sun 15 May 2022 10:26am I noticed on a few occasions that Sharman was in the clear inside 50 but the player bringing the ball in chose a longer option - One of those was to the pocket to Membrey who kicked a goal but Sharman was by himself 30 metres out directly in front.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Sharman
If it was on the 3/4 time siren the ball came to Members from Seb. Just watched that third qtr again. Seb was massive in that. As was Gresh. And Crouch. Our mids really got on top.Jacks Back wrote: ↑Mon 16 May 2022 10:38pmI can't remember now - probably.WellardSaint wrote: ↑Mon 16 May 2022 6:42pmWas the Skunk goal, after the long kick by DMack?Jacks Back wrote: ↑Sun 15 May 2022 10:26am I noticed on a few occasions that Sharman was in the clear inside 50 but the player bringing the ball in chose a longer option - One of those was to the pocket to Membrey who kicked a goal but Sharman was by himself 30 metres out directly in front.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12077
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2605 times
Re: Sharman
I can tell you straight up
Stewart lined up on a wing - often on McKenzie - I know because it was about 30-40 meters from where I was sitting.
Stewart did start back occasionally, but often on the wing floating back
Stewart lined up on a wing - often on McKenzie - I know because it was about 30-40 meters from where I was sitting.
Stewart did start back occasionally, but often on the wing floating back
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Sharman
He did have Stewart as commentary noted
He was also in space several times not used
Don’t forget - we have a side used to looking up and seeing Butler….they now need to look up and see we not only have King…..Sharman is a genuine option
I just hope we do t go back to small forwards footy - play him we’ll be far more dangerous for it
Sharman had Stewart. Commentary even mentioned the job he did on him.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 921
- Joined: Sat 24 Oct 2020 10:22am
- Has thanked: 217 times
- Been thanked: 906 times
Re: Sharman
WellardSaint wrote: ↑Mon 16 May 2022 7:05pm Sharman had a running shot at goal in the last qtr, if he'd nailed it, would have been awesome.
I hope he stays in, as it lets Skunk off the leash
Sharman is a natural footballer with a great footy IQ.
I was concerned about his pre season but he seems to elevate his performance when he has better players around him.
I’m not a fan of us going with 3 small forwards, Cooper gives a nice balance to help out King and Membrey.
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 503 times
Re: Sharman
Probably not that relevant, but the official stats suggest that Stewart had the most disposals among the Cats.
FWIW
FWIW
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23011
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8909 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: Sharman
All good relevant points. Pisses me off no end when supposedly good marks drop simple ones.Killa wrote: ↑Mon 16 May 2022 8:16pm Mind you, Membrey could have held that mark across half back late in the game
We really did gift them some goals with disposals and not completing marks
Plus we missed some set shots late which should have seen a more comfortable win
Plus King had his hands to a few he could not complete
Adelaide - and this is a must win game so best side available on the park
We will miss Steele’s size around the contest which is a concern to me
Plus Steele can take an overhead grab - a point of difference from our other mids including (unfortunately) Ross who does have size
Crouch and Gresham did well and Jones improved
So pressure will be on them over the next couple of months to fill the void left by Steele
That said, we are not a one man side so fingers crossed that that assessment is found accurate
- D.B.Cooper
- Club Player
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
- Has thanked: 728 times
- Been thanked: 674 times
Re: Sharman
The way Membrey covers territory he basically plays as a winger who gets deep at both ends when required.
I'd like to see him (Membrey) take Woods role if that means slotting Sharman into the forward 50 more regularly.
I'd like to see him (Membrey) take Woods role if that means slotting Sharman into the forward 50 more regularly.
There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!