No doubt we were intimidated by Melbourne...and certain playersYorkeys wrote: ↑Mon 09 May 2022 8:59pm The change I'd like to see is we come out and are not intimidated by Geelong. Really put it to them. And not be pathetic with chances on goal.
Too often we are meek, wait for them to run all over us. Almost apologise and slow down if we are on top at times.
They are not as good as us, but I am not sure our players and coaches know it. If they beat us at least hurt them because you cant lose three in a row and consider yourself a serious contender for top 4.
We were soft against Port and Melbourne. You can play below your ability but at least get a reputation for being hard. May treated some of our players with contempt and got away with it. Didn't like the look of that.
Changes for next week
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7345
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 147 times
Re: Changes for next week
saint4life
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Changes for next week
Butler out, Sharman in
Webster out, Highmore in
Windhager out, Billings in
Bombing long to the square out, lowering the eyes in
One more move I would consider
Play Marshall as the lone ruckman, rest Ryder and bring in Byrnes. Run the old Cats off their feet FFS!!!
Webster out, Highmore in
Windhager out, Billings in
Bombing long to the square out, lowering the eyes in
One more move I would consider
Play Marshall as the lone ruckman, rest Ryder and bring in Byrnes. Run the old Cats off their feet FFS!!!
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13326
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 679 times
- Been thanked: 1964 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Changes for next week
It just goes to show how much you know
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8382
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1907 times
- Been thanked: 884 times
Re: Changes for next week
I believe this is the first time the two small forwards issue has been explained in this way.samoht wrote: ↑Mon 09 May 2022 6:51pm There's an obvious pattern, that we're refusing to see/acknowledge.
We need to start realising that small specialist forwards get monstered in big, pressure games - they just don't get a look in.
We've seen it time and again.
I'd be tempted to leave out both Higgins and Butler for slightly bigger-bodied players from now on - because, even if we make the finals, they are not going to get the job done - and will be our weak link.
I'd be playing Owens instead of Butler.
A lot of us have said 'oh, we can't play Hayes or Lienert because we'll be too tall'
But being too small is also an issue.
I fully agree, it seems futile to keep playing both Butler and Snags, in the hope they'll come good.
One of them needs to get dropped to spend at least a week in the baby-poo colours, until they reinvent themselves, and rediscover their mojo.
We can't afford to keep playing both, as they aren't reliable and dependable.
Higgins misses, and Butler goes missing.
Not good enough
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8382
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1907 times
- Been thanked: 884 times
Re: Changes for next week
Read Scollop's nice post a bit higher up.Teflon wrote: ↑Mon 09 May 2022 8:12pmI thought Crouch was our best mid better than Steele tbhWellardSaint wrote: ↑Mon 09 May 2022 9:45amButler
Higgins
King (4 touches?)
Crouch (got 27 touches but I cannot recall many of them, strangely)
It's not just the numbers, it's what he doesn't do with the ball.
I remember Buckley being asked in a presser why he didn't tag Tom Mitchell who was getting big numbers.
'He doesn't hurt you'.
It's like Ross pre-2022, 30+ touches, but the kicks were usually to oppo players, high helicopters, or to no-man's land
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10783
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 830 times
Re: Changes for next week
Christian had to fine Jones to protect the reputation of the dumb ar$e umpire who fell for Oliver's staging.
No way Christian could offer a suspension, he would be laughed out of the tribunal.
No way Christian could offer a suspension, he would be laughed out of the tribunal.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: Changes for next week
Been off the grid for a week but got back in time to watch Sunday ( perhaps should have stayed off the grid an extra day, but least missed the week before)
From what i saw Sunday:
Out: Butler (inj), Long, Windheager (sub)
in: Billings, Geary.
From what i saw Sunday:
Out: Butler (inj), Long, Windheager (sub)
in: Billings, Geary.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12074
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3693 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Re: Changes for next week
Matt Crouch was dropped from the Crows team even though he has no trouble racking up possessions
I think we need to do the same thing. Maybe Gresh gets a wake up call (especially if he’s carrying an injury)
Out: Gresham, Butler, Webster
In: Billings, Clark, Highmore
I think Highmore might be better suited as a taller option if Geelong have Cameron, Hawkins and one other ruckman who sometimes rests up forward.
Higgins gets another week but needs to lift. Same with Max King. If he’s carrying an injury he should be managed.
I think we need to do the same thing. Maybe Gresh gets a wake up call (especially if he’s carrying an injury)
Out: Gresham, Butler, Webster
In: Billings, Clark, Highmore
I think Highmore might be better suited as a taller option if Geelong have Cameron, Hawkins and one other ruckman who sometimes rests up forward.
Higgins gets another week but needs to lift. Same with Max King. If he’s carrying an injury he should be managed.
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: Changes for next week
Just watched the replay of our VFL game & my ins/outs have changed -
Out: Webster, Wanganeen-Milera (rest), Gresham (inj) & Butler (inj)
Ins: Lienert, Clark, Billings, Sharman
On a wet day Lienert was so much more cleaner than Highmore. Owens is an absolute inside beast and will become a very good AFL player. He is unlucky to miss.
We simply have to find room in our forward 50 for Sharman, to give us another option when our other marking forwards are being held.
Out: Webster, Wanganeen-Milera (rest), Gresham (inj) & Butler (inj)
Ins: Lienert, Clark, Billings, Sharman
On a wet day Lienert was so much more cleaner than Highmore. Owens is an absolute inside beast and will become a very good AFL player. He is unlucky to miss.
We simply have to find room in our forward 50 for Sharman, to give us another option when our other marking forwards are being held.
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5971
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 334 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: Changes for next week
Can’t help thinking that even if we made ten changes, we still wouldn’t match Melbourne’s midfield.
As for Geelong, our record is even worse.
But last year we were close.
Atrocious kicking cost is one..
Who will be the Cameron killer?
As for Geelong, our record is even worse.
But last year we were close.
Atrocious kicking cost is one..
Who will be the Cameron killer?
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19109
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1605 times
- Been thanked: 2022 times
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19109
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1605 times
- Been thanked: 2022 times
Re: Changes for next week
Is Gresham injured IS or are you just speculating?Impatient Sainter wrote: ↑Tue 10 May 2022 3:55pm Just watched the replay of our VFL game & my ins/outs have changed -
Out: Webster, Wanganeen-Milera (rest), Gresham (inj) & Butler (inj)
Ins: Lienert, Clark, Billings, Sharman
On a wet day Lienert was so much more cleaner than Highmore. Owens is an absolute inside beast and will become a very good AFL player. He is unlucky to miss.
We simply have to find room in our forward 50 for Sharman, to give us another option when our other marking forwards are being held.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- D.B.Cooper
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2182
- Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
- Has thanked: 786 times
- Been thanked: 735 times
Re: Changes for next week
Byrnes (Byrbes) has been either medical sub, emergency for the seniors and close to BOG in his last 2 VFL games.
If he does not get promoted this week in place of Butler there is very little selection integrity IMO.
You need to reward performance at the lower level.
Assuming Butler is the only injury-
In: Billings, Byrnes, Leinert
Out: Higgins, Butler, Paton
Perhaps NWM needs a rest and Higgins or Paton receive a reprieve but doubt it on indigenous (Doug Nicholls) round as he'd be primed to play.
If he does not get promoted this week in place of Butler there is very little selection integrity IMO.
You need to reward performance at the lower level.
Assuming Butler is the only injury-
In: Billings, Byrnes, Leinert
Out: Higgins, Butler, Paton
Perhaps NWM needs a rest and Higgins or Paton receive a reprieve but doubt it on indigenous (Doug Nicholls) round as he'd be primed to play.
There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Changes for next week
Why is Paton being targeted? Webster was on Gray against Port & on Pickett on Sunday (even though it was the free against Sinclair that gave away the 3rd).
Get rid of Higgins and we lose our 2nd most effective forward.
With Butler OUT, Sharman should come IN. Lienert should play but for Webster or Battle.
Billings & Byrnes should come in for Wood & Jones. Jones was poor in clearances and disposal efficiency.
As someone else said, Owens deserves another shot but not sure where unless medi-sub. Clark needs another week, much as Jones needed.
Get rid of Higgins and we lose our 2nd most effective forward.
With Butler OUT, Sharman should come IN. Lienert should play but for Webster or Battle.
Billings & Byrnes should come in for Wood & Jones. Jones was poor in clearances and disposal efficiency.
As someone else said, Owens deserves another shot but not sure where unless medi-sub. Clark needs another week, much as Jones needed.
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5971
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 334 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: Changes for next week
Yeah, I was surprised they picked JOnes.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Tue 10 May 2022 9:46pm Why is Paton being targeted? Webster was on Gray against Port & on Pickett on Sunday (even though it was the free against Sinclair that gave away the 3rd).
Get rid of Higgins and we lose our 2nd most effective forward.
With Butler OUT, Sharman should come IN. Lienert should play but for Webster or Battle.
Billings & Byrnes should come in for Wood & Jones. Jones was poor in clearances and disposal efficiency.
As someone else said, Owens deserves another shot but not sure where unless medi-sub. Clark needs another week, much as Jones needed.
All you lot reported he was underdone in the VFL..let alone ready for AFL.
What does that tell you about Byrnes and Bytel?
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23245
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1799 times
Re: Changes for next week
I don’t get the Paton hate - Webster was ordinary and found outGhost Like wrote: ↑Tue 10 May 2022 9:46pm Why is Paton being targeted? Webster was on Gray against Port & on Pickett on Sunday (even though it was the free against Sinclair that gave away the 3rd).
Get rid of Higgins and we lose our 2nd most effective forward.
With Butler OUT, Sharman should come IN. Lienert should play but for Webster or Battle.
Billings & Byrnes should come in for Wood & Jones. Jones was poor in clearances and disposal efficiency.
As someone else said, Owens deserves another shot but not sure where unless medi-sub. Clark needs another week, much as Jones needed.
It’s like those potting Crouch - I thought he was genuinely one of our better mids, Steele turned it over often and blazed away but gets free pass cause he’s had a great year last year (not the case this year tbh)
Wood just doesn’t do enough - Billing’s to replace
Anyone suggesting we drop Higgins after his best start to an AFL year has rocks in their head
Butler hasn’t done enough regardless of injuries - he’s a small GOAL kicking forward …not just a tackler
Truth is over the next 2 years we need to have done if our kids become quality to replace our “role players” so guys like
Wood
Webster
McKenzie
Lienert
Butler
Need to be under pressure to be replaced for us to go next level and we need an elite midfielder
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12074
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3693 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Re: Changes for next week
Crouch was ok for the whole game and his last quarter was very good but by half way through the second quarter, he'd picked up 20 odd possessions and we were 47 points down!! People who look at the stat sheet before voting don't have a feel for the game. I think Hill, Howard, Sincs, Membrey, and Steele and another half dozen players helped keep us competitive in that middle period and they contributed more than Crouch. I reckon you haven't bothered watching the replayTeflon wrote: ↑Wed 11 May 2022 12:14amI don’t get the Paton hate - Webster was ordinary and found outGhost Like wrote: ↑Tue 10 May 2022 9:46pm Why is Paton being targeted? Webster was on Gray against Port & on Pickett on Sunday (even though it was the free against Sinclair that gave away the 3rd).
Get rid of Higgins and we lose our 2nd most effective forward.
With Butler OUT, Sharman should come IN. Lienert should play but for Webster or Battle.
Billings & Byrnes should come in for Wood & Jones. Jones was poor in clearances and disposal efficiency.
As someone else said, Owens deserves another shot but not sure where unless medi-sub. Clark needs another week, much as Jones needed.
It’s like those potting Crouch - I thought he was genuinely one of our better mids, Steele turned it over often and blazed away but gets free pass cause he’s had a great year last year (not the case this year tbh)
Wood just doesn’t do enough - Billing’s to replace
Anyone suggesting we drop Higgins after his best start to an AFL year has rocks in their head
Butler hasn’t done enough regardless of injuries - he’s a small GOAL kicking forward …not just a tackler
Truth is over the next 2 years we need to have done if our kids become quality to replace our “role players” so guys like
Wood
Webster
McKenzie
Lienert
Butler
Need to be under pressure to be replaced for us to go next level and we need an elite midfielder
In 2 years time we also should be looking to replace some of our so called 'first 22'.
Seb Ross and Brad Crouch should be competing for a spot imo with players like Bytel, Windy and Owens by that stage
I loved your call last year on Billings before the trade period....why shouldn't Billings and maybe even Gresham be competing for a spot in 2 years time with some of our youngsters?
We could also look at Coffield and Clark for trades if they aren't living up to expectations considering they were top 10 draft picks like Billings
Just on Butler...Isn't it obvious why his form dropped off?
I don't understand why we needed to recruit Higgins when we already had Butler, Gresham, Billings and Long who can ALL play the small forward role.
When one extra small comes in there will always be a drop off in form for the other smalls. It's a natural occurrence when you cannibalise opportunities for one forward versus another
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6472
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Changes for next week
Are you suggesting Crouch should be dropped?Scollop wrote: ↑Wed 11 May 2022 3:17amCrouch was ok for the whole game and his last quarter was very good but by half way through the second quarter, he'd picked up 20 odd possessions and we were 47 points down!! People who look at the stat sheet before voting don't have a feel for the game. I think Hill, Howard, Sincs, Membrey, and Steele and another half dozen players helped keep us competitive in that middle period and they contributed more than Crouch. I reckon you haven't bothered watching the replayTeflon wrote: ↑Wed 11 May 2022 12:14amI don’t get the Paton hate - Webster was ordinary and found outGhost Like wrote: ↑Tue 10 May 2022 9:46pm Why is Paton being targeted? Webster was on Gray against Port & on Pickett on Sunday (even though it was the free against Sinclair that gave away the 3rd).
Get rid of Higgins and we lose our 2nd most effective forward.
With Butler OUT, Sharman should come IN. Lienert should play but for Webster or Battle.
Billings & Byrnes should come in for Wood & Jones. Jones was poor in clearances and disposal efficiency.
As someone else said, Owens deserves another shot but not sure where unless medi-sub. Clark needs another week, much as Jones needed.
It’s like those potting Crouch - I thought he was genuinely one of our better mids, Steele turned it over often and blazed away but gets free pass cause he’s had a great year last year (not the case this year tbh)
Wood just doesn’t do enough - Billing’s to replace
Anyone suggesting we drop Higgins after his best start to an AFL year has rocks in their head
Butler hasn’t done enough regardless of injuries - he’s a small GOAL kicking forward …not just a tackler
Truth is over the next 2 years we need to have done if our kids become quality to replace our “role players” so guys like
Wood
Webster
McKenzie
Lienert
Butler
Need to be under pressure to be replaced for us to go next level and we need an elite midfielder
In 2 years time we also should be looking to replace some of our so called 'first 22'.
Seb Ross and Brad Crouch should be competing for a spot imo with players like Bytel, Windy and Owens by that stage
I loved your call last year on Billings before the trade period....why shouldn't Billings and maybe even Gresham be competing for a spot in 2 years time with some of our youngsters?
We could also look at Coffield and Clark for trades if they aren't living up to expectations considering they were top 10 draft picks like Billings
Just on Butler...Isn't it obvious why his form dropped off?
I don't understand why we needed to recruit Higgins when we already had Butler, Gresham, Billings and Long who can ALL play the small forward role.
When one extra small comes in there will always be a drop off in form for the other smalls. It's a natural occurrence when you cannibalise opportunities for one forward versus another
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: Changes for next week
Ratts said he is carrying a hip injury, but is obviously playing through it. I thought with his drop off in form he may need a rest, plus with others that can come in.SaintPav wrote: ↑Tue 10 May 2022 6:41pmIs Gresham injured IS or are you just speculating?Impatient Sainter wrote: ↑Tue 10 May 2022 3:55pm Just watched the replay of our VFL game & my ins/outs have changed -
Out: Webster, Wanganeen-Milera (rest), Gresham (inj) & Butler (inj)
Ins: Lienert, Clark, Billings, Sharman
On a wet day Lienert was so much more cleaner than Highmore. Owens is an absolute inside beast and will become a very good AFL player. He is unlucky to miss.
We simply have to find room in our forward 50 for Sharman, to give us another option when our other marking forwards are being held.
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Changes for next week
Assuming the club wants to win on Saturday arvo, it won't be following the suggestions of some posters that we might drop one or all of Gresham, Higgins and Crouch.
Many posters on footy forums don't seem to grasp the basic truth that, even though your club's best players sometimes have bad games, that doesn't stop them from being the best players. Nor does it suddenly transform inexperienced and/or FAQ players in the VFL into match-winning stars.
Another basic truth is that Ratten's coaching philosophy appears to demand a consistent basic team structure throughout the season. He experimented with playing three talls up front against Richmond, but subsequently abandoned the idea. Every player in his team consistently plays a specific role and, when one is injured or down on form, he's going to be looking for a like-for-like replacement as much as possible. That's why he will always be far more inclined to select players like Wood, Butler, Webster and NWM than many fans would wish, and would probably prefer to play Hill at half-back as much as he can.
When Billings and Clark come back, it will be to fill roles in which they are competent: in the same way that Jones replaced Windhager. Eg, Billings would replace Wood or NWM, and Clark perhaps Webster (although that's going to be an extremely tough call).
Many posters on footy forums don't seem to grasp the basic truth that, even though your club's best players sometimes have bad games, that doesn't stop them from being the best players. Nor does it suddenly transform inexperienced and/or FAQ players in the VFL into match-winning stars.
Another basic truth is that Ratten's coaching philosophy appears to demand a consistent basic team structure throughout the season. He experimented with playing three talls up front against Richmond, but subsequently abandoned the idea. Every player in his team consistently plays a specific role and, when one is injured or down on form, he's going to be looking for a like-for-like replacement as much as possible. That's why he will always be far more inclined to select players like Wood, Butler, Webster and NWM than many fans would wish, and would probably prefer to play Hill at half-back as much as he can.
When Billings and Clark come back, it will be to fill roles in which they are competent: in the same way that Jones replaced Windhager. Eg, Billings would replace Wood or NWM, and Clark perhaps Webster (although that's going to be an extremely tough call).
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5077
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1449 times
- Been thanked: 1512 times
Re: Changes for next week
True meher baba, no knee jerking, play the proven better players consistently until they demonstrate they are no longer a better player. However Sunday showed up potential dilemmas. I'd argue for example Windhager would probably have been at least as good as Jones, but we traded off investment in the future for the expectation Jones would perform very well
on the day notwithstanding his recent history. I admit I am not a Jones fan and think Windhager will be a beauty however I'd like to see some lateral thinking in selection and roles from time to time. We don't score enough against good defences because we lack attacking avenues.
on the day notwithstanding his recent history. I admit I am not a Jones fan and think Windhager will be a beauty however I'd like to see some lateral thinking in selection and roles from time to time. We don't score enough against good defences because we lack attacking avenues.
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5971
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 334 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: Changes for next week
Saints TV
Some comments about our players against Melbourne and predictions for the Geelong game.
Some interesting points.
Some comments about our players against Melbourne and predictions for the Geelong game.
Some interesting points.
Last edited by shanegrambeau on Wed 11 May 2022 12:02pm, edited 1 time in total.
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Changes for next week
Bombing long to the square and ego out, get a brain in!!!
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus