Coaches Votes Round 4 v Hawks

[CURLY]

Makes the bloke who gave Hill no votes look even more silly.

You didn’t give him a vote.

I didn't do votes. The Dud didn't have Hill in the votes. Sums it up really.

It’s not too late.
I didn’t give votes to Hill either. That’s three idiots.

If you have a bias against them it makes you look stupid. Call it as you see it or don't do it.

[kosifantutti]

Here’s the thread if you want to show us all how we should have voted.

http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=103968

[The_Dud]

Makes the bloke who gave Hill no votes look even more silly.

You didn’t give him a vote.

I didn't do votes. The Dud didn't have Hill in the votes. Sums it up really.

It’s not too late.
I didn’t give votes to Hill either. That’s three idiots.

If you have a bias against them it makes you look stupid. Call it as you see it or don't do it.

6 posters either didn't give Hill a vote or only gave him 1...

Sinclair was better
Steele was better
Membrey and Gresh also kicked 4 goals each which were more impressive IMO
Ryder is a huge influence on the team

Hill was good but not quite good enough. I'm happy to have my own opinion instead of just parroting others

[CURLY]

Makes the bloke who gave Hill no votes look even more silly.

You didn’t give him a vote.

I didn't do votes. The Dud didn't have Hill in the votes. Sums it up really.

It’s not too late.
I didn’t give votes to Hill either. That’s three idiots.

If you have a bias against them it makes you look stupid. Call it as you see it or don't do it.

6 posters either didn't give Hill a vote or only gave him 1...

Sinclair was better
Steele was better
Membrey and Gresh also kicked 4 goals each which were more impressive IMO
Ryder is a huge influence on the team

Hill was good but not quite good enough. I'm happy to have my own opinion instead of just parroting others

Don't lie. You couldn't bring yourself to put Hill in because of your bias against him. Your no better than an umpire.

[The_Dud]

Makes the bloke who gave Hill no votes look even more silly.

You didn’t give him a vote.

I didn't do votes. The Dud didn't have Hill in the votes. Sums it up really.

It’s not too late.
I didn’t give votes to Hill either. That’s three idiots.

If you have a bias against them it makes you look stupid. Call it as you see it or don't do it.

6 posters either didn't give Hill a vote or only gave him 1...

Sinclair was better
Steele was better
Membrey and Gresh also kicked 4 goals each which were more impressive IMO
Ryder is a huge influence on the team

Hill was good but not quite good enough. I'm happy to have my own opinion instead of just parroting others

Don't lie. You couldn't bring yourself to put Hill in because of your bias against him. Your no better than an umpire.

Nope.

To get above the 5 players I mentioned IMO he needed to be cleaner with the ball / make less mistakes, especially in the role he plays.

23 touches at 69% with 6 clangers, compared to a similar player like Sinclair, 35 touches at 82% with 0 clangers.

Hill is sold as a very 'classy' player, while Sinclair is actually delivering that class.

Though to be fair we all know the actual 3-2-1 should rightly go to Justin Power, Nathan Toner and Jacob Mollison, they're the real heroes who did the hard work to get us over the line (again)!

[CURLY]

Makes the bloke who gave Hill no votes look even more silly.

You didn’t give him a vote.

I didn't do votes. The Dud didn't have Hill in the votes. Sums it up really.

It’s not too late.
I didn’t give votes to Hill either. That’s three idiots.

If you have a bias against them it makes you look stupid. Call it as you see it or don't do it.

6 posters either didn't give Hill a vote or only gave him 1...

Sinclair was better
Steele was better
Membrey and Gresh also kicked 4 goals each which were more impressive IMO
Ryder is a huge influence on the team

Hill was good but not quite good enough. I'm happy to have my own opinion instead of just parroting others

Don't lie. You couldn't bring yourself to put Hill in because of your bias against him. Your no better than an umpire.

Nope.

To get above the 5 players I mentioned IMO he needed to be cleaner with the ball / make less mistakes, especially in the role he plays.

23 touches at 69% with 6 clangers, compared to a similar player like Sinclair, 35 touches at 82% with 0 clangers.

Hill is sold as a very 'classy' player, while Sinclair is actually delivering that class.

Though to be fair we all know the actual 3-2-1 should rightly go to Justin Power, Nathan Toner and Jacob Mollison, they're the real heroes who did the hard work to get us over the line (again)!

Oh dud your a comedian. Just admit your constant attacks on Hill meant you couldn't give him votes. Unlike you I'm happy to admit when we finally get a decent run unlike the Collingwood game or Freo.

[The_Dud]

Makes the bloke who gave Hill no votes look even more silly.

You didn’t give him a vote.

I didn't do votes. The Dud didn't have Hill in the votes. Sums it up really.

It’s not too late.
I didn’t give votes to Hill either. That’s three idiots.

If you have a bias against them it makes you look stupid. Call it as you see it or don't do it.

6 posters either didn't give Hill a vote or only gave him 1...

Sinclair was better
Steele was better
Membrey and Gresh also kicked 4 goals each which were more impressive IMO
Ryder is a huge influence on the team

Hill was good but not quite good enough. I'm happy to have my own opinion instead of just parroting others

Don't lie. You couldn't bring yourself to put Hill in because of your bias against him. Your no better than an umpire.

Nope.

To get above the 5 players I mentioned IMO he needed to be cleaner with the ball / make less mistakes, especially in the role he plays.

23 touches at 69% with 6 clangers, compared to a similar player like Sinclair, 35 touches at 82% with 0 clangers.

Hill is sold as a very 'classy' player, while Sinclair is actually delivering that class.

Though to be fair we all know the actual 3-2-1 should rightly go to Justin Power, Nathan Toner and Jacob Mollison, they're the real heroes who did the hard work to get us over the line (again)!

Oh dud your a comedian. Just admit your constant attacks on Hill meant you couldn't give him votes. Unlike you I'm happy to admit when we finally get a decent run unlike the Collingwood game or Freo.

Not sure what else more I can say, I think I made it pretty clear... I wouldn't have thought who I have ranked 5th and 6th on ground in a big win would be so upsetting to you, but I guess we do know you get upset quite easily!

[CURLY]

Makes the bloke who gave Hill no votes look even more silly.

You didn’t give him a vote.

I didn't do votes. The Dud didn't have Hill in the votes. Sums it up really.

It’s not too late.
I didn’t give votes to Hill either. That’s three idiots.

If you have a bias against them it makes you look stupid. Call it as you see it or don't do it.

6 posters either didn't give Hill a vote or only gave him 1...

Sinclair was better
Steele was better
Membrey and Gresh also kicked 4 goals each which were more impressive IMO
Ryder is a huge influence on the team

Hill was good but not quite good enough. I'm happy to have my own opinion instead of just parroting others

Don't lie. You couldn't bring yourself to put Hill in because of your bias against him. Your no better than an umpire.

Nope.

To get above the 5 players I mentioned IMO he needed to be cleaner with the ball / make less mistakes, especially in the role he plays.

23 touches at 69% with 6 clangers, compared to a similar player like Sinclair, 35 touches at 82% with 0 clangers.

Hill is sold as a very 'classy' player, while Sinclair is actually delivering that class.

Though to be fair we all know the actual 3-2-1 should rightly go to Justin Power, Nathan Toner and Jacob Mollison, they're the real heroes who did the hard work to get us over the line (again)!

Oh dud your a comedian. Just admit your constant attacks on Hill meant you couldn't give him votes. Unlike you I'm happy to admit when we finally get a decent run unlike the Collingwood game or Freo.

Not sure what else more I can say, I think I made it pretty clear... I wouldn't have thought who I have ranked 5th and 6th on ground in a big win would be so upsetting to you, but I guess we do know you get upset quite easily!

No not at all just funny how you are so biased.

[saynta]

Makes the bloke who gave Hill no votes look even more silly.

You didn’t give him a vote.

I didn't do votes. The Dud didn't have Hill in the votes. Sums it up really.

It’s not too late.
I didn’t give votes to Hill either. That’s three idiots.

If you have a bias against them it makes you look stupid. Call it as you see it or don't do it.

6 posters either didn't give Hill a vote or only gave him 1...

Sinclair was better
Steele was better
Membrey and Gresh also kicked 4 goals each which were more impressive IMO
Ryder is a huge influence on the team

Hill was good but not quite good enough. I'm happy to have my own opinion instead of just parroting others

Don't lie. You couldn't bring yourself to put Hill in because of your bias against him. Your no better than an umpire.

Nope.

To get above the 5 players I mentioned IMO he needed to be cleaner with the ball / make less mistakes, especially in the role he plays.

23 touches at 69% with 6 clangers, compared to a similar player like Sinclair, 35 touches at 82% with 0 clangers.

Hill is sold as a very 'classy' player, while Sinclair is actually delivering that class.

Though to be fair we all know the actual 3-2-1 should rightly go to Justin Power, Nathan Toner and Jacob Mollison, they're the real heroes who did the hard work to get us over the line (again)!

Yeah sure. The dawks were gifted 5 goals from frees with three of them from players who took a dive FFS.