Votes v Tiges
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8582
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1532 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
Crouch
Sinclair
Gresham
Ross
McKenzie
Sinclair
Gresham
Ross
McKenzie
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
- Location: StKilda East
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 233 times
- Contact:
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12463
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2662 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11239
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
Gresham
Sinclair
Crouch
Wilkie
Steele
Sinclair
Crouch
Wilkie
Steele
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
- MCG-Unit
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
- Location: Land of the Giants
- Has thanked: 548 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
- Templar
- Club Player
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004 11:03am
- Has thanked: 256 times
- Been thanked: 157 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
5. Sinclair (4 quarter consistent no nonsense high percentage workman like effort)
4. Crouch (Best game for Saints)
3. King (Cometh the hour, cometh the man)
2. Ryder (Tap ruck dominator)
1. Steele (Getting his mojo back)
4. Crouch (Best game for Saints)
3. King (Cometh the hour, cometh the man)
2. Ryder (Tap ruck dominator)
1. Steele (Getting his mojo back)
Not "Simon Templar". He was here first. Please change my username to Bumstead and if possible make me one of those very large sandwiches, thanks!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18614
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1959 times
- Been thanked: 859 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 171 times
- Been thanked: 383 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
5 Sinclair
4 King
2 Crouch
2 Gresham
1 Wilkie
1 Steele
4 King
2 Crouch
2 Gresham
1 Wilkie
1 Steele
" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6078
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1567 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6323
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1121 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
Maybe not so much
[However the top 6 account for 88.5% of the votes so far]
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
- Location: StKilda East
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 233 times
- Contact:
Re: Votes v Tiges
5 Sinclair
4 Crouch
3 Steele
1 McKenzie
1 Gresham
1 King
Just as a note, The Age's John Pierik who has reported the Saint's last two games hasn't a clue.
Two weeks in a row Sinclair has been arguably the Saints best player and he didn't get a mention in the best players in either game.
He just looks at the top possession players statistically and goes from there.
4 Crouch
3 Steele
1 McKenzie
1 Gresham
1 King
Just as a note, The Age's John Pierik who has reported the Saint's last two games hasn't a clue.
Two weeks in a row Sinclair has been arguably the Saints best player and he didn't get a mention in the best players in either game.
He just looks at the top possession players statistically and goes from there.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6323
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1121 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
Sometimes even our own do this - lol
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Thu 22 Apr 2004 5:35am
- Location: Done with MN. Happily retired in Vic.
- Has thanked: 1310 times
- Been thanked: 239 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
Super tough to give votes. Very even team game.
Votes this week are personal bias skewed for sure (humans can't help it).
5. Sinclair (good all day and his pack punch in the 3rd was the turning point - in retrospect)
4. Ross (don't like him much but he was a leader and set the tone in the 3rd and 4th.
3. Membrey. Really there when we needed him.
2. Ryder (maybe we would not have won without him?)
1. King. Two of his goals were absolute spine tinglers.
I watched the replay closely.
Crouch played really well but only twice was a game changer. Good game though.
Marshall, Battle, Webster and Leinert did very important things. Say Hi to my bias.
Votes this week are personal bias skewed for sure (humans can't help it).
5. Sinclair (good all day and his pack punch in the 3rd was the turning point - in retrospect)
4. Ross (don't like him much but he was a leader and set the tone in the 3rd and 4th.
3. Membrey. Really there when we needed him.
2. Ryder (maybe we would not have won without him?)
1. King. Two of his goals were absolute spine tinglers.
I watched the replay closely.
Crouch played really well but only twice was a game changer. Good game though.
Marshall, Battle, Webster and Leinert did very important things. Say Hi to my bias.
Nothing better than a good Dad Joke.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11239
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
Most journos just look at the stats, hence why Seb is named among the best every week.StPeter wrote: ↑Mon 04 Apr 2022 9:50pm
Just as a note, The Age's John Pierik who has reported the Saint's last two games hasn't a clue.
Two weeks in a row Sinclair has been arguably the Saints best player and he didn't get a mention in the best players in either game.
He just looks at the top possession players statistically and goes from there.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12463
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2662 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
That is just rubbish. He has been a good player all year and bloody good against the Tigers. Do you even attend or watch Saints games?Bernard Shakey wrote: ↑Tue 05 Apr 2022 12:53pmMost journos just look at the stats, hence why Seb is named among the best every week.StPeter wrote: ↑Mon 04 Apr 2022 9:50pm
Just as a note, The Age's John Pierik who has reported the Saint's last two games hasn't a clue.
Two weeks in a row Sinclair has been arguably the Saints best player and he didn't get a mention in the best players in either game.
He just looks at the top possession players statistically and goes from there.
Re: Votes v Tiges
And that whoever it is kicked 2 goals
The work done by those who run the flanks closing down options and which does not appear in stats is a case in point. On Sunday this relentless running from defence to attack by the likes of Number 7 and Number 8 but not reflected in disposals was vital to the end result
Everyone has a part to me play
You don’t get to stand with your hands on your hips
It is constant moving honouring team patterns the players are educated to
This is why I do not subscribe to “best players”, instead recognising the contribution to team and result
The work done by those who run the flanks closing down options and which does not appear in stats is a case in point. On Sunday this relentless running from defence to attack by the likes of Number 7 and Number 8 but not reflected in disposals was vital to the end result
Everyone has a part to me play
You don’t get to stand with your hands on your hips
It is constant moving honouring team patterns the players are educated to
This is why I do not subscribe to “best players”, instead recognising the contribution to team and result
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11239
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
I'm not just talking about this year. Seb was very good on Sunday and probably turned the game.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 05 Apr 2022 2:38pmThat is just rubbish. He has been a good player all year and bloody good against the Tigers. Do you even attend or watch Saints games?Bernard Shakey wrote: ↑Tue 05 Apr 2022 12:53pmMost journos just look at the stats, hence why Seb is named among the best every week.StPeter wrote: ↑Mon 04 Apr 2022 9:50pm
Just as a note, The Age's John Pierik who has reported the Saint's last two games hasn't a clue.
Two weeks in a row Sinclair has been arguably the Saints best player and he didn't get a mention in the best players in either game.
He just looks at the top possession players statistically and goes from there.
I'm talking about the games where he has 30 possessions and 60% of them are turnovers.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
Got any stats to back that up ?Bernard Shakey wrote: ↑Tue 05 Apr 2022 4:37pmI'm not just talking about this year. Seb was very good on Sunday and probably turned the game.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 05 Apr 2022 2:38pmThat is just rubbish. He has been a good player all year and bloody good against the Tigers. Do you even attend or watch Saints games?Bernard Shakey wrote: ↑Tue 05 Apr 2022 12:53pmMost journos just look at the stats, hence why Seb is named among the best every week.StPeter wrote: ↑Mon 04 Apr 2022 9:50pm
Just as a note, The Age's John Pierik who has reported the Saint's last two games hasn't a clue.
Two weeks in a row Sinclair has been arguably the Saints best player and he didn't get a mention in the best players in either game.
He just looks at the top possession players statistically and goes from there.
I'm talking about the games where he has 30 possessions and 60% of them are turnovers.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9124
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 436 times
Re: Votes v Tiges
I thought Crouch and Wood were a big influence in the 3rd and 4th, more so than Ross.minneapolis wrote: ↑Tue 05 Apr 2022 10:03am Super tough to give votes. Very even team game.
Votes this week are personal bias skewed for sure (humans can't help it).
5. Sinclair (good all day and his pack punch in the 3rd was the turning point - in retrospect)
4. Ross (don't like him much but he was a leader and set the tone in the 3rd and 4th.
3. Membrey. Really there when we needed him.
2. Ryder (maybe we would not have won without him?)
1. King. Two of his goals were absolute spine tinglers.
I watched the replay closely.
Crouch played really well but only twice was a game changer. Good game though.
Marshall, Battle, Webster and Leinert did very important things. Say Hi to my bias.