Got to be better than Tim Englishst.byron wrote: ↑Fri 22 Oct 2021 5:36pmYeah true that we have Heath. But we did go for Xerri and missed. So there's clearly a need there. Tom Campbell?????? I seriously hope not. The delisted ruckman fifth in line at the bottom team. Sure to be a winning strategy.magnifisaint wrote: ↑Fri 22 Oct 2021 5:32pmIs your name David King? It's easy to hurl abuse.terry smith rules wrote: ↑Fri 22 Oct 2021 5:07pm Just more poor team management from our club
Literally left with two ruckman, and now the saviour I guess is the 29yo Campbell who at best is a poor mans McKernan
I am left astounded by what our strategy (if any ) is?
PS And god forbid we go for Mason Cox, that could just about be a straw looking for a camel
That have Max Heath in the wings.
Paul Hunter delisted
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8146
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 230 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
Don't get me wrong I don't rate Hunter but apparently we are targeting the 4th back up ruck man from the team that won the wooden spoon .
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2011 7:19pm
- Has thanked: 613 times
- Been thanked: 402 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
I am somewhat dismayed at the naysayers who crank into life the minute the club's tries its best to solve an ongoing problem.
We need a backup ruckman for Paddy who is in the twilight of his career and can't be expected to play every game next season.
The club looked around for a quality backup ruckman, a big ask at the best of times.
We tried for Trystan Xerri but NM wanted too big a price.
Paul Hunter clearly cannot cut the mustard.
Tom Campbell did a pretty job double teaming with Goldstein. Good enough to keep Xerri out of the Kangas best 22 for almost all of 2021.
He is available to us for nothing and a proven AFL performer.
Campbell is a dramatic improvement on Hunter.
Heath hasn't played VFL let alone AFL.
Whatever the club does in this space it will never satisfy some.
Similar negative remarks were made when we recruited Paddy and he made all the naysayers eat their words.
I am not suggesting Campbell is in the same league as Paddy, but if the club signs him then we should get behind the decision.
We need a backup ruckman for Paddy who is in the twilight of his career and can't be expected to play every game next season.
The club looked around for a quality backup ruckman, a big ask at the best of times.
We tried for Trystan Xerri but NM wanted too big a price.
Paul Hunter clearly cannot cut the mustard.
Tom Campbell did a pretty job double teaming with Goldstein. Good enough to keep Xerri out of the Kangas best 22 for almost all of 2021.
He is available to us for nothing and a proven AFL performer.
Campbell is a dramatic improvement on Hunter.
Heath hasn't played VFL let alone AFL.
Whatever the club does in this space it will never satisfy some.
Similar negative remarks were made when we recruited Paddy and he made all the naysayers eat their words.
I am not suggesting Campbell is in the same league as Paddy, but if the club signs him then we should get behind the decision.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17032
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3647 times
- Been thanked: 2921 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
Yeah it does seem underwhelming not that I care that much I guess if he’s better than Paulbangaulegend wrote: ↑Fri 22 Oct 2021 8:55pm Don't get me wrong I don't rate Hunter but apparently we are targeting the 4th back up ruck man from the team that won the wooden spoon .
Still feels like we could do better. Surely there’d be a better option somewhere in the various state leagues
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
IMO Tom Campbell is hardly better than Paul Hunter I hope he proves me wrongdamienc wrote: ↑Fri 22 Oct 2021 9:06pm I am somewhat dismayed at the naysayers who crank into life the minute the club's tries its best to solve an ongoing problem.
We need a backup ruckman for Paddy who is in the twilight of his career and can't be expected to play every game next season.
The club looked around for a quality backup ruckman, a big ask at the best of times.
We tried for Trystan Xerri but NM wanted too big a price.
Paul Hunter clearly cannot cut the mustard.
Tom Campbell did a pretty job double teaming with Goldstein. Good enough to keep Xerri out of the Kangas best 22 for almost all of 2021.
He is available to us for nothing and a proven AFL performer.
Campbell is a dramatic improvement on Hunter.
Heath hasn't played VFL let alone AFL.
Whatever the club does in this space it will never satisfy some.
Similar negative remarks were made when we recruited Paddy and he made all the naysayers eat their words.
I am not suggesting Campbell is in the same league as Paddy, but if the club signs him then we should get behind the decision.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 317 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
A real highlight for me is people looking at North Melbourne's ladder position to judge their ruck depth.
Most teams play one maybe two genuine rucks and they had/have goldy.
It's like saying stuart MacGil was an ordinary spinner because he rarely played for Australia.
Most teams play one maybe two genuine rucks and they had/have goldy.
It's like saying stuart MacGil was an ordinary spinner because he rarely played for Australia.
Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 317 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5971
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 334 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
So we assume someone has already signed, and hence this delisting?
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
Like we should have got behind recruiting Dan Hannebery? Campbell is fifth ruckman in line at the bottom team. Goldstein, Coleman-Jones, Xerri, Edwards ahead of him. The issue is not so much recruiting Tom Campbell, but continuing to recruit past it players instead of younger fellas. Is it a fair argument to say that Hannebery, apart from not being able to get on the park has taken a chunk of the salary cap that could have been deployed elsewhere? That and we paid way overs for Hill as well. Outcome? Not in a position to make a genuine play for Ladhams.damienc wrote: ↑Fri 22 Oct 2021 9:06pm I am somewhat dismayed at the naysayers who crank into life the minute the club's tries its best to solve an ongoing problem.
We need a backup ruckman for Paddy who is in the twilight of his career and can't be expected to play every game next season.
The club looked around for a quality backup ruckman, a big ask at the best of times.
We tried for Trystan Xerri but NM wanted too big a price.
Paul Hunter clearly cannot cut the mustard.
Tom Campbell did a pretty job double teaming with Goldstein. Good enough to keep Xerri out of the Kangas best 22 for almost all of 2021.
He is available to us for nothing and a proven AFL performer.
Campbell is a dramatic improvement on Hunter.
Heath hasn't played VFL let alone AFL.
Whatever the club does in this space it will never satisfy some.
Similar negative remarks were made when we recruited Paddy and he made all the naysayers eat their words.
I am not suggesting Campbell is in the same league as Paddy, but if the club signs him then we should get behind the decision.
I hope Campbell does a great job. I hope he's more than serviceable. But it's not just nay-saying to look at the club's old bloke / past their best/ superannuant recruiting pattern with a critical eye. Especially if it's cost us opportunities to make a play for good young prospects that could become long term players.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
Do you think it's irrelevant that Campbell is fifth choice at the bottom side? Yes they have Goldy, but there are 3 others there ahead of Campbell. They had five ruckman and the one they're not keeping is Campbell. Just frustrates me that the club keeps on picking up past it old blokes to plug gaps.nostalgicsaint wrote: ↑Fri 22 Oct 2021 9:27pm A real highlight for me is people looking at North Melbourne's ladder position to judge their ruck depth.
Most teams play one maybe two genuine rucks and they had/have goldy.
It's like saying stuart MacGil was an ordinary spinner because he rarely played for Australia.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
I he was 24 maybe but almost 30 it's a no from menostalgicsaint wrote: ↑Fri 22 Oct 2021 9:29pm As for the comparison...
https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... 2=S&type=A
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
This is probably the type of thing that makes an ex Saint suggest we are not in the Premiership business but simply playing AFL.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7079
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 366 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
Tom Campbell has always been a solid backup ruck option. Paul Hunter was losing ruck contests to mid-sized utilities.
Think Hunter ever would have had a game like this? https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... s?mid=9419
Think Hunter ever would have had a game like this? https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... s?mid=9419
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
There’s a fair bit of s*** that gets posted here and I don’t need to quote lines - but Hunter unfortunately wasn’t that great and Cambell wasnt last guy in the squad in the bottom team
(We might not get him anyway) We do need a break glass in emergency guy and hopefully we have one lined up who is better than Hunter
But good on him and thanks - how many blokes get to boast an afl career ?
(We might not get him anyway) We do need a break glass in emergency guy and hopefully we have one lined up who is better than Hunter
But good on him and thanks - how many blokes get to boast an afl career ?
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 138 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
Maybe we have someone else in mind ...... a rabbit out of the hat?
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
- lewdogs
- Club Player
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Tue 17 Jun 2008 2:11pm
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 182 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
Tom Campbell's stats look half decent for a back-up. 30 isn't even that old for a ruckman.
The club clearly identified that Hunter just wasn't up to it. I don't mind the move at all of getting Campbell in, while young Heath develops for a few years.
As for Paul, thank you for your time at the club. Was asked to play some tough roles for us. All the best.
The club clearly identified that Hunter just wasn't up to it. I don't mind the move at all of getting Campbell in, while young Heath develops for a few years.
As for Paul, thank you for your time at the club. Was asked to play some tough roles for us. All the best.
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
I think damienc hit the nail on the head that Campbell was chosen in front of Xerri last season, so he must be OK. Yes he's 30 but then again I wish Paddy was 30.
In an ideal season he will only play when we want to rest Paddy, he won't be signed to take the place of Paddy or RoMa. He's our emergency, not our future. That's for the likes of Heath and maybe Xerri next season.
Seem a good move if he is Hunter's replacement. I don't know who else there is / was, we certainly couldn't afford to waste money buying one, well not this year.
In an ideal season he will only play when we want to rest Paddy, he won't be signed to take the place of Paddy or RoMa. He's our emergency, not our future. That's for the likes of Heath and maybe Xerri next season.
Seem a good move if he is Hunter's replacement. I don't know who else there is / was, we certainly couldn't afford to waste money buying one, well not this year.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
I hope it’s not Mason Cox.
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 706 times
- Been thanked: 783 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
He had a decent game against Freo
Good luck to him, but not AFL standard.
We need someone who can come in and at least hold their own in the ruck.
Good luck to him, but not AFL standard.
We need someone who can come in and at least hold their own in the ruck.
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10783
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 830 times
Re: Paul Hunter delisted
"Hi Paul, just a phone call to say thankyou".
"Does that mean I am cut".
"Yes, you better get to hospital before you lose too much blood".
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA