Sinc's breakout year

[saynta]

https://www.saints.com.au/video/1022640 ... 2983683001

[Banger9798]

Absolutely ripper year.
If Clark could have a breakout year in 2022 like that we'd be laughing

[bangaulegend]

He really went to another level & was very consistent as well . I was very surprised he didn't poll a vote in the Brownlow

[B.M]

But Dunstan polled 11

Doesn’t that mean he had a better year than sincs?!

[bangaulegend]

But Dunstan polled 11

Doesn’t that mean he had a better year than sincs?!

BM you & I both know that's not how it goes

[Sainter_Dad]

But Dunstan polled 11

Doesn’t that mean he had a better year than sincs?!

BM you & I both know that's not how it goes

Wont stop him baiting - Again a thread about someone else has to be hijacked by B.M

[Yorkeys]

Might be because Sincs makes hard things look easy and Luke makes the easy look hard. Umps are technicians not analysts.

[B.M]

Just pointing out the obvious

Brownlow Votes rewards influential game

TBA rewards high level consistency

AA rewards high level in a position performance relative to opposition

All three accolades measure performance

[Sainter_Dad]

Just pointing out the obvious

Brownlow Votes rewards influential game

TBA rewards high level consistency

AA rewards high level in a position performance relative to opposition

All three accolades measure performance

Or just crapping on another St Kilda player because it suits your agenda

[Banger9798]

If you play in the backline you can forget Brownlow votes

[Yorkeys]

Is that why Cripps doesn't bother?

[B.M]

That’s where the TBA comes in

Defenders get rewarded, tagger S get rewarded, role players get rewarded!

AA is the best measure relative to opposition players

[B.M]

Sainter dad

Which StK player did I crap on?!

[happy feet]

Just pointing out the obvious

Brownlow Votes rewards influential game

TBA rewards high level consistency

AA rewards high level in a position performance relative to opposition

All three accolades measure performance

Or just crapping on another St Kilda player because it suits your agenda

Watch out they will run to the mods and you will be banned.

[saynta]

Just pointing out the obvious

Brownlow Votes rewards influential game

TBA rewards high level consistency

AA rewards high level in a position performance relative to opposition

All three accolades measure performance

Or just crapping on another St Kilda player because it suits your agenda

Watch out they will run to the mods and you will be banned.

FFS give it a rest. Second time I have felt the need to say that to you.

Have you ever been banned? Has someone reported any of your posts?

I certainly haven't. Just because your jaundiced mate says so, doesn't make it the truth, so stop talking bulls***.

This is a footy forum so talk footy and not try and start fights.

[B.M]

Happy Feet said he is on a crusade to bring me down?!

Good luck to him… not sure why he can be bothered

[happy feet]

Just pointing out the obvious

Brownlow Votes rewards influential game

TBA rewards high level consistency

AA rewards high level in a position performance relative to opposition

All three accolades measure performance

Or just crapping on another St Kilda player because it suits your agenda

Watch out they will run to the mods and you will be banned.

FFS give it a rest. Second time o have felt the need to say that to you.

Have you ever been banned? Has someone reported any of your posts?

I certainly haven't. Just because your jaundiced mate says so, doesn't make it the truth, so stop talking bulls***.

This is a footy forum so talk footy and not try and start fights.

Well how about you and your jaundiced mate give it a rest. I just call out what I see as many posts and comments on here are cruelled by snide remarks that are not necessary. I’ll deal with the other one now.

[Sainter_Dad]

Sainter dad

Which StK player did I crap on?!

Comparing Dunstan's 11 Brownlow votes to Sinclair is effectively saying that Dunstan should be rated higher than Sinclair.

In isolation - this comment may well be acceptable - however EVERY thread you post to makes comments on Dunstan/Ross et. al. and it is getting tiresome

How about some genuine positive input about Sinclair's Breakout year - ie the title of the thread

I have a high tolerance level for B.S but you (and The_Dud vs Curly) are really making it a chore to come to this Forum.

[happy feet]

Happy Feet said he is on a crusade to bring me down?!

Good luck to him… not sure why he can be bothered

I said I would call out your snide remarks and inappropriate comments when they are made as it drags down the tone of this forum. I also said I like a lot of what you post and will readily admit you know more about the game than me, but that you are not always right, especially as much as what is said on here is opinion based. For some reason if you don’t get the last say or someone disagrees with you you get narky. I will say this again, you are not always correct.

Many have left this forum because of the comments made that are personalised and unfair. They just can’t be bothered. If I recall correctly did you leave and head over to Big Footy for the same reason?

I guess we have lockdown to thank a to why I have the time to be here as well.

[B.M]

I course I think I’m right

It’d be strange if I wrote something that I think is wrong?!

Happy Feet
You should put your hand up to moderate if you want to police the forum?

[saynta]

Just pointing out the obvious

Brownlow Votes rewards influential game

TBA rewards high level consistency

AA rewards high level in a position performance relative to opposition

All three accolades measure performance

Or just crapping on another St Kilda player because it suits your agenda

Watch out they will run to the mods and you will be banned.

FFS give it a rest. Second time I have felt the need to say that to you.

Have you ever been banned? Has someone reported any of your posts?

I certainly haven't. Just because your jaundiced mate says so, doesn't make it the truth, so stop talking bulls***.

This is a footy forum so talk footy and not try and start fights.

Well how about you and your jaundiced mate give it a rest. I just call out what I see as many posts and comments on here are cruelled by snide remarks that are not necessary. I’ll deal with the other one now.

And your snide remarks are? You don't have to be a pain and make enemies you know.

Happy for you to play it either way. Prefer to get along with you though.

" jaundiced mate " No prizes around here for second.

[CQ SAINT]

If all your players are playing well and beating their opponents, they usually end up playing finals, regardless of how they rank in the TBA, that's how you measure performance.
The awards are meaningless without finals.

[happy feet]

I course I think I’m right

It’d be strange if I wrote something that I think is wrong?!

Happy Feet
You should put your hand up to moderate if you want to police the forum?

Why do you leave and go to Big Footy them come back?

Just respect others opinions and drop the snide remarks and put downs and this place will be better for it.

A for the record I don’t want to moderate a website.

[Mr Magic]

Am I correct?
Hind accepting Essendope's offer gave Sinclair the chance to play HB after Paton's injury?

Lucky for us Hind accepted their offer then.

[B.M]

Hind or Hill at HB?