Battle 'testing the waters'
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 710 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Can someone point out a good game Battle has played?
What did he do in that game? What attributes did he show that will develop and why haven’t they? Q
Surely, players have to earn a place based on their talent (King,Hill) or for the more mortal and common player, their accomplishments and efforts (Wilkie, Sinclair)
We don’t just ‘fence off’ a position just to see if player X may develop into a KPP there?
So what has Battle got, besides a great look, a great name and a strong and honest presentation?
What did he do in that game? What attributes did he show that will develop and why haven’t they? Q
Surely, players have to earn a place based on their talent (King,Hill) or for the more mortal and common player, their accomplishments and efforts (Wilkie, Sinclair)
We don’t just ‘fence off’ a position just to see if player X may develop into a KPP there?
So what has Battle got, besides a great look, a great name and a strong and honest presentation?
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6284
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1097 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Saintsational thought:
v Tigers Rnd 5 2021 worthy of 1/2 a vote
v Dons Rnd 12 2020 worthy of 3 votes
v Tigers Rnd 15 2019 worthy of 3 votes
v Eagles Rnd 8 2019 worthy of 4 votes
v Crows Rnd 6 2019 worthy of 4 votes
v Freo Rnd 3 2019 worthy of 1/2 a vote
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12052
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2601 times
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6284
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1097 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Sun 29 Aug 2021 5:43pm
v Tigers Rnd 5 2021 worthy of 1/2 a vote - 48 v 134
v Dons Rnd 12 2020 worthy of 3 votes - 68 v 33
v Tigers Rnd 15 2019 worthy of 3 votes - 70 v 103
v Eagles Rnd 8 2019 worthy of 4 votes - 70 v 88
v Crows Rnd 6 2019 worthy of 4 votes - 68 v 97
v Freo Rnd 3 2019 worthy of 1/2 a vote - 66 v 71
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
- Sanctorum
- Club Player
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
- Has thanked: 1470 times
- Been thanked: 998 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
I have long argued that I believe Josh Battle can be developed into the old "follower" position, such as played by Nat Fyfe, Marcus Bontempelli, Christian Petracca, Jake Stringer and others.
That idea has been rubbished by some on this forum on the grounds that he is too slow and not agile below his knees - I contend that he is young enough for the Saints development team to set up programmes for Battle to gain those levels of fitness and skills.
Imagine how much better St Kilda would be with such a player??? Josh Battle could be that.....
"To do good is noble. To tell others to do good is even nobler and much less trouble.."
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue 28 Apr 2009 4:16pm
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Josh Battle, along with Ben Long and Dan McKenzie all suffer from being "Whipping Boys" but the all share having "a strong and honest presentation", a quality openly missing in those thrashings we witnessed this season.They are always heavily criticised regardless by some on this forum, when there are other players on this list who consistently offer less in this area. It always amazes me that other players, EG Kent, seem to get a pass mark, when they are vastly inadequate in this quality. In the clinches of tough close finals football, it's Josh Battle and Co that will hold the line when it's needed!shanegrambeau wrote: ↑Sun 29 Aug 2021 5:19pm So what has Battle got, besides a great look, a great name and a strong and honest presentation?
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
I actually think Battle has been relatively loved and encouraged from within this site. Kent is your quintessential whipping boy.St Plugger wrote: ↑Sun 29 Aug 2021 8:32pmJosh Battle, along with Ben Long and Dan McKenzie all suffer from being "Whipping Boys" but the all share having "a strong and honest presentation", a quality openly missing in those thrashings we witnessed this season.They are always heavily criticised regardless by some on this forum, when there are other players on this list who consistently offer less in this area. It always amazes me that other players, EG Kent, seem to get a pass mark, when they are vastly inadequate in this quality. In the clinches of tough close finals football, it's Josh Battle and Co that will hold the line when it's needed!shanegrambeau wrote: ↑Sun 29 Aug 2021 5:19pm So what has Battle got, besides a great look, a great name and a strong and honest presentation?
Plus, Battle was a participant in those thrashings.
Plus, he's the one searching for his value.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16875
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3576 times
- Been thanked: 2841 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
I would agree that by and large, the reception on Battle has been fairly positive.
Earned a few more detractors this year having not maintained his improvement
Earned a few more detractors this year having not maintained his improvement
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12052
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2601 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
He’s overrated IMO
People fascinated with size of players tend to want those players to succeed… like Blake Acres and Nick Coffield… and Battle
Yet… seem to want other players to fail… especially small forwards
Some supporters also believe with size comes aggression, and that’s what’s required to be a good player?!
I lean more towards ability, skill and courage.
Bowling a few people over doesn’t make you a good footballer, especially if you can’t get a kick. Nor does being 190+ if your s***!
People fascinated with size of players tend to want those players to succeed… like Blake Acres and Nick Coffield… and Battle
Yet… seem to want other players to fail… especially small forwards
Some supporters also believe with size comes aggression, and that’s what’s required to be a good player?!
I lean more towards ability, skill and courage.
Bowling a few people over doesn’t make you a good footballer, especially if you can’t get a kick. Nor does being 190+ if your s***!
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
There's a few Saints players out there testing the water at the moment, when will they get the results back.
The Off season is very slow this year.
The Off season is very slow this year.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue 28 Apr 2009 4:16pm
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
No, IMO most here have ranked the small forwards with Butler and Higgins at the top of their list, with Long next, followed by Lonie and Kent trailing at the bottom of the list.
It's not wanting them to fail, they do so by their own performances, with Kent consistently being the most disappointing!
If you could fuse both Lonie and Kent into the one player, they would be an excellent small. Imagine Lonies attitude, ball skills and football intelligence with Kents physical attributes. Alas each requires what the other possess!!
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16875
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3576 times
- Been thanked: 2841 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
I never get this bizarre logic that bring critical of performance is wanting players to fail.
Why BM hates Battle so much and wills him to fail is beyond me
Why BM hates Battle so much and wills him to fail is beyond me
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
It's not so much people want players to fail, I hope not anyway. I think it's more about a preconceived bias once an opinion has been shared - sometimes it's hard to come back if it means admitting you were wrong.
It becomes a matter of who you are protective of and who you've gone out on a limb for (or against).
It is quite bizarre how some players can be protected by their past yet others are not allowed to move on from their past.
Let's face it, we are at the end of a decade of having an average list of players that we all have hoped or seen something in a player that gives us belief our list is improving. More often than not that player becomes a false dawn or stagnates.
Players like Battle, Lonie, Long, Kent are likely our current Newnes / Acres. All have played very good games that have become outliers in their careers, we wish they were the norm but have been left frustrated.
DMac is a freak in that he was one of those but pushed through to now become best 25, if not best 22. He is the exception. I do not include Webster, he's always been best 25 (22) when given a good run with injuries.
Our improvement must come from the likes of our mid tier improving that the likes of Ross and Dunstan are pushed down or out. Then our kids need to become that mid tier.
I think we've seen that the past two seasons, hence the movement and whispers in relation to Battle, Ross and Dunstan.
It becomes a matter of who you are protective of and who you've gone out on a limb for (or against).
It is quite bizarre how some players can be protected by their past yet others are not allowed to move on from their past.
Let's face it, we are at the end of a decade of having an average list of players that we all have hoped or seen something in a player that gives us belief our list is improving. More often than not that player becomes a false dawn or stagnates.
Players like Battle, Lonie, Long, Kent are likely our current Newnes / Acres. All have played very good games that have become outliers in their careers, we wish they were the norm but have been left frustrated.
DMac is a freak in that he was one of those but pushed through to now become best 25, if not best 22. He is the exception. I do not include Webster, he's always been best 25 (22) when given a good run with injuries.
Our improvement must come from the likes of our mid tier improving that the likes of Ross and Dunstan are pushed down or out. Then our kids need to become that mid tier.
I think we've seen that the past two seasons, hence the movement and whispers in relation to Battle, Ross and Dunstan.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 266 times
- Been thanked: 574 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
If Battle played for another side, and was "testing the waters", there'd be a thread on how he fits our needs, is only 22 and has played 40 games and we should go after him.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16875
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3576 times
- Been thanked: 2841 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Would there be though?
To me… Battle is clearly talented enough to be playing at AFL level.
The issue becomes where does he fit in our side
He’s down the order as a forward behind King, Membrey, a resting ruck and Sharman (for now) + with rumours that we make a play at Bing
He’s not a midfielder and did not excel at that position
As a defender, he’s not big enough for CHB and is behind Coffield and Highmore for the medium tall type
Purely to me that’s the issue.
I don’t see where he fits
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 266 times
- Been thanked: 574 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
There was a thread on Levi Casboult. There's your answer.skeptic wrote: ↑Tue 31 Aug 2021 9:57amWould there be though?
To me… Battle is clearly talented enough to be playing at AFL level.
The issue becomes where does he fit in our side
He’s down the order as a forward behind King, Membrey, a resting ruck and Sharman (for now) + with rumours that we make a play at Bing
He’s not a midfielder and did not excel at that position
As a defender, he’s not big enough for CHB and is behind Coffield and Highmore for the medium tall type
Purely to me that’s the issue.
I don’t see where he fits
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1410 times
- Been thanked: 1426 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Just by the way, do we know if Josh has expressed a preference for where he would like to play?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Tue 13 Oct 2020 9:25pm
- Has thanked: 502 times
- Been thanked: 110 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
I really like what Battle can bring to the table play him as a forward leave him there for a few games and if he doesn't do well then move him down back.
I remember similar talk about another player who played as a swing man he was not playing well and got a few injury's there was a lot of talk about trading him.
We didn't and he ended up working on his game and being a very good player his name Brendan Goddard so lets see how next season pans out.
Using him to trade for Bing in a deal with picks whatever the club is getting together would be a good move as we get a quality player back.
I remember similar talk about another player who played as a swing man he was not playing well and got a few injury's there was a lot of talk about trading him.
We didn't and he ended up working on his game and being a very good player his name Brendan Goddard so lets see how next season pans out.
Using him to trade for Bing in a deal with picks whatever the club is getting together would be a good move as we get a quality player back.
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
The Saints with a decision on swingman Josh Battle who is expected to stay at Moorabbin after his name was floated in recent trade talks.
"Sometimes your flexibility is your greatest strength but your greatest weakness too," Ratten said.
"He's had some good success on the wing, he's had good success as the second ruck, but he probably hasn't nailed the tall (spot) at either end.
"That's something we're discussing, do we give him a preferred end to go to? We've got to make sure we look after him, he's had a couple of stress fractures, that's probably the talking point as to where we shape him.
"We think we'll still keep him through the midfield at times and pick an end to go to."
"Sometimes your flexibility is your greatest strength but your greatest weakness too," Ratten said.
"He's had some good success on the wing, he's had good success as the second ruck, but he probably hasn't nailed the tall (spot) at either end.
"That's something we're discussing, do we give him a preferred end to go to? We've got to make sure we look after him, he's had a couple of stress fractures, that's probably the talking point as to where we shape him.
"We think we'll still keep him through the midfield at times and pick an end to go to."
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1077 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
I rate Ratten but I dont think he is doing Battle any favours attempting to turn him into a wingman. He needs to be settled into defence or trade him IMO.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Pick a spot FFS Brett stop having a bet each way and confusing the guyWayne42 wrote: ↑Sun 12 Sep 2021 7:46pm The Saints with a decision on swingman Josh Battle who is expected to stay at Moorabbin after his name was floated in recent trade talks.
"Sometimes your flexibility is your greatest strength but your greatest weakness too," Ratten said.
"He's had some good success on the wing, he's had good success as the second ruck, but he probably hasn't nailed the tall (spot) at either end.
"That's something we're discussing, do we give him a preferred end to go to? We've got to make sure we look after him, he's had a couple of stress fractures, that's probably the talking point as to where we shape him.
"We think we'll still keep him through the midfield at times and pick an end to go to."
I see we have just emphasised development....no wonder the Josh’s of the world go backwards
“Yeah….nah””
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Seems the water was tepid at best. Perhaps this is a reason Clav got chopped because Battle wasn't going anywhere.
Battle has one year left & appears our back-up for the backline, forwardline, ruck. I cannot see wing as an option, at all.
Battle has one year left & appears our back-up for the backline, forwardline, ruck. I cannot see wing as an option, at all.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Josh was pinned as a forward who would develop into a mid in his last few years as a junior because of his size and engine. Ratten has at least explored that.Teflon wrote: ↑Sun 12 Sep 2021 9:10pmPick a spot FFS Brett stop having a bet each way and confusing the guyWayne42 wrote: ↑Sun 12 Sep 2021 7:46pm The Saints with a decision on swingman Josh Battle who is expected to stay at Moorabbin after his name was floated in recent trade talks.
"Sometimes your flexibility is your greatest strength but your greatest weakness too," Ratten said.
"He's had some good success on the wing, he's had good success as the second ruck, but he probably hasn't nailed the tall (spot) at either end.
"That's something we're discussing, do we give him a preferred end to go to? We've got to make sure we look after him, he's had a couple of stress fractures, that's probably the talking point as to where we shape him.
"We think we'll still keep him through the midfield at times and pick an end to go to."
I see we have just emphasised development....no wonder the Josh’s of the world go backwards
Josh wasn't going forward ahead of Bruce, Paddy or Marshall, same with Carlisle and Brown and then Wilkie as an intercept rebounder.
His work rate and ability to read the flight of the ball is great but his ability to dominate a key position is sketchy in terms of contested possessions. He is a third banana.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12052
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2601 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
We have excellent 3rd bananas at both ends
Wilkie, Highmore, Coffield
Membrey, Sharman
Wilkie, Highmore, Coffield
Membrey, Sharman
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Battle 'testing the waters'
Oh I fully agree. Not sure about Coffield yet but for once Battle, given his junior career, athletic ability and skill, might just have been the best available when selected but has failed to find his niche in the big time so far, acknowledging some unfortunately timed injuries.