You can still pass on the virus before you are tested as positive.amusingname wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 10:58pmAgain, he is not positive so can’t pass it on. He may possibly become positive, hence being in isolation, but couldn’t pass anything on before he develops the virus.
Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:04pm
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
He and the team have all tested negative 3 times since flying to Perth, and he has been in isolation since Sunday. It wouldn’t be possible for him to test negative, pass it on to someone, but then test negative again.happy feet wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 11:00pmYou can still pass on the virus before you are tested as positive.amusingname wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 10:58pmAgain, he is not positive so can’t pass it on. He may possibly become positive, hence being in isolation, but couldn’t pass anything on before he develops the virus.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Its not that hard to understand. But its obviously very hard to accept.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1021 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
We live in a mad world. When will this be all over. Footy doesn't really seem that interesting or important all of a sudden.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Patients have tested positive up to 2 weeks post a negative test result. That’s why a potential exposure means a 2 week isolation period.amusingname wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 11:06pmHe and the team have all tested negative 3 times since flying to Perth, and he has been in isolation since Sunday. It wouldn’t be possible for him to test negative, pass it on to someone, but then test negative again.happy feet wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 11:00pmYou can still pass on the virus before you are tested as positive.amusingname wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 10:58pmAgain, he is not positive so can’t pass it on. He may possibly become positive, hence being in isolation, but couldn’t pass anything on before he develops the virus.
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Patients have tested positive up to 2 weeks post a negative test result. That’s why a potential exposure means a 2 week isolation period.amusingname wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 11:06pmHe and the team have all tested negative 3 times since flying to Perth, and he has been in isolation since Sunday. It wouldn’t be possible for him to test negative, pass it on to someone, but then test negative again.happy feet wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 11:00pmYou can still pass on the virus before you are tested as positive.amusingname wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 10:58pmAgain, he is not positive so can’t pass it on. He may possibly become positive, hence being in isolation, but couldn’t pass anything on before he develops the virus.
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12218
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2632 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
So we really don’t know if Marshall is positive yet?
Either he tested negative so is right to play.
Or we assume he could be positive - and perhaps his team mates who are close contacts?
Either he tested negative so is right to play.
Or we assume he could be positive - and perhaps his team mates who are close contacts?
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
So we isolate all of Paddy's close contacts and Paul Hunter's. And he played on Saturday so all of St Kilda and Port. And all of their families and close contacts. Where does it stop?
Someone at the Precinct had it when Roma was there. There is a small chance that he has it hence he goes into isolation. But not his contacts.
I'm in isolation at the moment because I was somewhere in the vicinity of the positive case at the MCC. But they are not isolating the 300 odd people I was in contact with between Sunday and Thursday. It wouldn't take long until half the state was in isolation.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:04pm
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Correct, but if the person was only around others at the start of the 2 weeks following exposure period and tested negative after contact with others (such as Rowan and the rest of the team), there is no risk to the rest of the team, as he wasn’t either positive or infectious before he was in isolation.happy feet wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 11:28pmPatients have tested positive up to 2 weeks post a negative test result. That’s why a potential exposure means a 2 week isolation period.amusingname wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 11:06pmHe and the team have all tested negative 3 times since flying to Perth, and he has been in isolation since Sunday. It wouldn’t be possible for him to test negative, pass it on to someone, but then test negative again.happy feet wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 11:00pmYou can still pass on the virus before you are tested as positive.amusingname wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 10:58pmAgain, he is not positive so can’t pass it on. He may possibly become positive, hence being in isolation, but couldn’t pass anything on before he develops the virus.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:04pm
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
I didn’t think it was that hard a situation to explain. Rowan does not have the virus, he may develop it in the next week, that’s why he is in isolation. He has tested negative numerous times as have the rest of the team. You cannot pass on the virus if you don’t have it. So as long as he is in isolation, the rest of the team is alright to train and play.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13879
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1313 times
- Been thanked: 2075 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
I think you misunderstand me.bigcarl wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 9:51pmIt is safe for the vast majority. What are we to do? Shut down society forever? That is hardly realistic and certainly not desirable.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 9:39pmThere are some people who can’t be vaccinated and have to rely on everyone else doing the right thing for protection.bigcarl wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 7:27pmVaccination will mitigate it to no more serious than the seasonal flu. Not pleasant, but you can live with it without being imprisoned every couple of months.perfectionist wrote: ↑Tue 20 Jul 2021 7:23pmExcept that, being vaccinated doesn't stop you from either getting the virus or passing it on to others, including those who have been vaccinated. That's the dilemma. Of course, if everyone was vaccinated, then a measure of protection against severe illness is afforded. At the moment, that is the out strategy. But this time last year, there was no delta variant, so who knows what's around the corner. Sometimes, coronaviruses just stop mutating. Hopefully Covid-19 will be one of them.
It may be that everyone needs a booster every year because it mutates. If so, that’s okay if it keeps us out of lockdown.
Even Dan Andrews says, “We will not be going into lockdown to protect people who will not protect themselves.”
I hope you have had your shots Dud, or will once you are eligible.
If you decide against it, that’s ok. Just take responsibility for the consequences
I am 1000% behind the vaccine and personally think it (and all) should be mandatory. Alas I am not eligible yet, but let’s not get in to that sh*tshow…
My post was about those who vaccines won’t work for, people with cancer, autoimmune or other immunologic disease, or an organ transplant. They don’t get the option of choosing, they have to rely on everybody else doing the right thing.
That’s where the “if you don’t want the vaccine that’s fine, it’s a risk you have to live with” falls apart for me, as it’s not just you, it’s risking the lives of others who don’t get the luxury of being selfish.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18600
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1924 times
- Been thanked: 852 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
The_Dud wrote: ↑Wed 21 Jul 2021 12:43am I am 1000% behind the vaccine and personally think it (and all) should be mandatory. Alas I am not eligible yet, but let’s not get in to that sh*tshow…
My post was about those who vaccines won’t work for, people with cancer, autoimmune or other immunologic disease, or an organ transplant. They don’t get the option of choosing, they have to rely on everybody else doing the right thing.
That’s where the “if you don’t want the vaccine that’s fine, it’s a risk you have to live with” falls apart for me, as it’s not just you, it’s risking the lives of others who don’t get the luxury of being selfish.
We can help those vulnerable people and “do the right thing” by getting the jab and reaching herd immunity. That way it cannot get a foothold in the community.
Everyone else who has the opportunity and doesn’t take it, they can take their chances as far as I am concerned. In fact, they would be the selfish ones for putting the vulnerable … people with cancer, autoimmune and other immunological diseases or an organ transplant … at greater risk of it running rampant through the community. And yes, I realise the jab doesn’t always guarantee 100 per cent immunity or stop you spreading it.
But any case, it seems it has been decided. In the words of the premier, “we won’t be going into lockdown to protect those who refuse to protect themselves.” Even he realises the lockdowns must stop and life must go on.
- Sanctorum
- Club Player
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
- Has thanked: 1486 times
- Been thanked: 1024 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
So true Vortex, there are far more important things in life right now with so much uncertainty due to the pandemic, especially for young families that lack the financial security to feed and educate their kids and pay off mortgages.
It is reminiscent of my youth when the Cold War was in full swing and there was so much strife all over the world, epitomised by this 1959 hit from the Kingston Trio:
"To do good is noble. To tell others to do good is even nobler and much less trouble.."
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
- Sanctorum
- Club Player
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
- Has thanked: 1486 times
- Been thanked: 1024 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
By far the biggest mistake by both Federal and State governments has been the fear that they espoused about the risks of blood clots from the AZ vaccine for the under 60s. To put this in perspective, the following rationalisation in an article by Liam Mannix in The Age yesterday should be passed on to everyone that is hesitant about getting the jab that is in plentiful supply in every state:bigcarl wrote: ↑Wed 21 Jul 2021 2:04amThe_Dud wrote: ↑Wed 21 Jul 2021 12:43am I am 1000% behind the vaccine and personally think it (and all) should be mandatory. Alas I am not eligible yet, but let’s not get in to that sh*tshow…
My post was about those who vaccines won’t work for, people with cancer, autoimmune or other immunologic disease, or an organ transplant. They don’t get the option of choosing, they have to rely on everybody else doing the right thing.
That’s where the “if you don’t want the vaccine that’s fine, it’s a risk you have to live with” falls apart for me, as it’s not just you, it’s risking the lives of others who don’t get the luxury of being selfish.
We can help those vulnerable people and “do the right thing” by getting the jab and reaching herd immunity. That way it cannot get a foothold in the community.
Everyone else who has the opportunity and doesn’t take it, they can take their chances as far as I am concerned. In fact, they would be the selfish ones for putting the vulnerable … people with cancer, autoimmune and other immunological diseases or an organ transplant … at greater risk of it running rampant through the community. And yes, I realise the jab doesn’t always guarantee 100 per cent immunity or stop you spreading it.
But any case, it seems it has been decided. In the words of the premier, “we won’t be going into lockdown to protect those who refuse to protect themselves.” Even he realises the lockdowns must stop and life must go on.
"I know the risk (of the AstraZeneca vaccine) pales in comparison to others I take every day, yet I am worried about getting a blood clot and dying.
The answer to why this is – why I find myself worrying far more about AstraZeneca’s side effects than I probably should – reveals how our brains think about risk. And how they often get it wrong.
Being younger than 50, my chance of developing a blood clot after my first jab is around three in 100,000, per Australian figures. Should I be one of the unlucky few to get a clot, my chances of dying from it are around three in 100.
That’s a risk of death of something like 0.00009 per cent. That pales in comparison to the known risk of sudden death of some other activities I undertake, like drinking too much, riding a scooter in Bali (fun but, on reflection, very stupid), or, you know, driving my car.
And, unlike drinking too much beer, getting a vaccine comes with all sorts of direct and indirect benefits to me and my community, not the least of which is protection from a virus that has a 0.004 per cent chance of killing me.
Something’s wrong here, isn’t it? Why am I more worried about a side effect that is rarer than binge drinking or car driving? If my brain were evaluating risk accurately, wouldn’t I find the sight of a large pint of beer worrying – and an AstraZeneca jab no cause for concern at all?"
There's also the established research in the UK which shows that the risk of women getting a blood clot from the AZ vaccine is 1:250,000, compared to the risk of 1:1000 for women taking the pill!!!
It's not too late for a major media campaign to get this important message out there....
"To do good is noble. To tell others to do good is even nobler and much less trouble.."
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9040
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
That's not the main reason people are hesitant about getting the AstraZeneca vaccine. It's its efficacy. So far, it has been shown to be about 60+% effective while the Pfizer vaccine is at 95%. Pfizer also has side effects - more to do with heart issues. But if you going to take an imperfect vaccine, it makes sense to go with the one that is 95% effective rather than one that is 60% effective. I have no doubt that had we ordered the Pfizer vaccine when it was available to us (40 million doses in September last year) our vaccination rate would be 50+% rather than 12%. We have plenty of AstraZeneca - enough to vaccinate everyone in Australia NOW. However, whilst the chance of getting AstraZeneca side effects is very low, the chance of getting Covid-19 is also low. There are currently about 1500 cases in Australia - out of 26 million, so on that basis, you have a 1 in 17,000 chance of getting the virus. If it was 1 in 5, like in Britain and the US, people would be lining up to get whatever is going - including AstraZeneca. And why didn't we order AstraZeneca? Simple - it's $4 a dose while Pfizer is $28.
- Sanctorum
- Club Player
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
- Has thanked: 1486 times
- Been thanked: 1024 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
All my children aged 55 to 36 have had no hesitation in getting the AZ jab and in each case their GP has endorsed the view that there is no real difference between the AZ and Pfizer in terms of efficacy.perfectionist wrote: ↑Wed 21 Jul 2021 11:51amThat's not the main reason people are hesitant about getting the AstraZeneca vaccine. It's its efficacy. So far, it has been shown to be about 60+% effective while the Pfizer vaccine is at 95%. Pfizer also has side effects - more to do with heart issues. But if you going to take an imperfect vaccine, it makes sense to go with the one that is 95% effective rather than one that is 60% effective. I have no doubt that had we ordered the Pfizer vaccine when it was available to us (40 million doses in September last year) our vaccination rate would be 50+% rather than 12%. We have plenty of AstraZeneca - enough to vaccinate everyone in Australia NOW. However, whilst the chance of getting AstraZeneca side effects is very low, the chance of getting Covid-19 is also low. There are currently about 1500 cases in Australia - out of 26 million, so on that basis, you have a 1 in 17,000 chance of getting the virus. If it was 1 in 5, like in Britain and the US, people would be lining up to get whatever is going - including AstraZeneca. And why didn't we order AstraZeneca? Simple - it's $4 a dose while Pfizer is $28.
I'm certainly no authority but current scientific research indicates that Pfizer and AZ vaccines are now considered to have similar rates of efficacy, the only real issue being the possible side-effects of blood clots from AZ which I covered in my post above.
Price could well have been a consideration, but the main factor that led to Federal health authorities (not ScoMo or Hunt) to opt for AZ over Pfizer at that time was that the latter had to be stored at supercold temperatures whereas AZ had the advantage of being able to be stored, transported and handled at standard refrigerated conditions of between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit for at least six months. Then there was the real advantage of Australia being able to manufacture AZ locally instead of relying on importing Pfizer in a very competitive global marketplace.
In analysing Australia's handling of the vaccine rollout we should not overlook the fact that the government had signed a deal in 2020 to buy 51 million doses of the UQ-CSL vaccine which ultimately failed 3rd phase trials and was abandoned in December forcing them to go back to the drawing board to source more doses of the other vaccines.
"To do good is noble. To tell others to do good is even nobler and much less trouble.."
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18600
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1924 times
- Been thanked: 852 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
As I understand it, AstraZeneca is not as good at stopping you from actually getting COVID. But is equal with - if not better than - the others at keeping you out of hospital. IE, you may still get a mild case but won’t get seriously ill.perfectionist wrote: ↑Wed 21 Jul 2021 11:51amThat's not the main reason people are hesitant about getting the AstraZeneca vaccine. It's its efficacy. So far, it has been shown to be about 60+% effective while the Pfizer vaccine is at 95%.
Any case it was all that was available to me at the time, so I took it. No side effects.
Twelve per cent of the population vaccinated is lamentable and says something about pampered, entitled Australians.
Just get it done so we don’t have to lockdown every couple of months.
Last edited by bigcarl on Wed 21 Jul 2021 2:50pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
It was always going to be like the boy with the barrow as soon as we gave people choice and pharmaceutical companies a reason to run campaigns.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10192
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Agree. I had mine done ASAP. As Ive posted just give a cut off date then all open no more lockdowns.bigcarl wrote: ↑Wed 21 Jul 2021 1:29pmAs I understand it, AstraZeneca is not as good at stopping you from actually getting COVID. But is equal with - if not better than - the others at keeping you out of hospital. IE, you may still get a mild case but won’t get seriously ill.perfectionist wrote: ↑Wed 21 Jul 2021 11:51amThat's not the main reason people are hesitant about getting the AstraZeneca vaccine. It's its efficacy. So far, it has been shown to be about 60+% effective while the Pfizer vaccine is at 95%.
Any case it was all that was available to me at the time, so I took it. No side effects.
Twelve per cent of the population vaccinated is lamentable and says something about pampered, entitled Australians.
Just get it done so we don’t have to lockdown every couple of months.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12218
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2632 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 583 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
I’m getting my second AZ shot on August 16. Just in time to go and see the Saints in the finals!
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 5:20pm
- Location: donvale
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
I had my first Pfizer vaccination about 5 weeks ago and had no significant ill effects until about a week ago, just as I was contemplating dose two.
While I was at the Suns game on the Gold Coast I felt like I was going to collapse, with a heavy sensation around my heart and a sense of nausea and light headedness .
A week later, after many GP and an 11 hour ememergency department visit many things have been ruled out, but heart inflammation is still on the table (I'm finally getting a stress echo test later this arvo to rule out angina).
I'm 52, not overweight, but with a family history of heart disease that was not fatal until well into my relatives' 70's.
If angina is ruled out as I suspect it will be, all that is left for a differential diagnosis is heart inflammation, which is a known "rare" side effect of Pfizer vaccination, that is more common in young males after their second dose.
If you are in any doubt about your susceptibility to clotting (AZ) or heart inflammation (Pfizer), don't get vaccinated!
Needless to say, regardless of my health outcome I won't be getting dose two.
While I was at the Suns game on the Gold Coast I felt like I was going to collapse, with a heavy sensation around my heart and a sense of nausea and light headedness .
A week later, after many GP and an 11 hour ememergency department visit many things have been ruled out, but heart inflammation is still on the table (I'm finally getting a stress echo test later this arvo to rule out angina).
I'm 52, not overweight, but with a family history of heart disease that was not fatal until well into my relatives' 70's.
If angina is ruled out as I suspect it will be, all that is left for a differential diagnosis is heart inflammation, which is a known "rare" side effect of Pfizer vaccination, that is more common in young males after their second dose.
If you are in any doubt about your susceptibility to clotting (AZ) or heart inflammation (Pfizer), don't get vaccinated!
Needless to say, regardless of my health outcome I won't be getting dose two.
its time to make a name for yourself like you've never made before!
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Stay safe & strong dc. The suggestion is always to consult your physician, if any doubt, act on the side of caution. Understandable & reasonable your reluctance.darylcowie wrote: ↑Fri 23 Jul 2021 1:47pm I had my first Pfizer vaccination about 5 weeks ago and had no significant ill effects until about a week ago, just as I was contemplating dose two.
While I was at the Suns game on the Gold Coast I felt like I was going to collapse, with a heavy sensation around my heart and a sense of nausea and light headedness .
A week later, after many GP and an 11 hour ememergency department visit many things have been ruled out, but heart inflammation is still on the table (I'm finally getting a stress echo test later this arvo to rule out angina).
I'm 52, not overweight, but with a family history of heart disease that was not fatal until well into my relatives' 70's.
If angina is ruled out as I suspect it will be, all that is left for a differential diagnosis is heart inflammation, which is a known "rare" side effect of Pfizer vaccination, that is more common in young males after their second dose.
If you are in any doubt about your susceptibility to clotting (AZ) or heart inflammation (Pfizer), don't get vaccinated!
Needless to say, regardless of my health outcome I won't be getting dose two.
All others, not at risk of clotting or heart inflammation, should get a jab if vaccination is our only hope to stop living on our knees.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 5:20pm
- Location: donvale
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Cardiologist said all is ok with my heart today, which eased my anxiety somewhat, but failed to explain my symptoms, which are now easing, but I won't risk ivaccination again.
Vaccine hesitancy is justified, we still have freedom of choice in this country.
Having said that I really feel for airline and aged care workers.
Lockdowns this year have inspired ny partner and I to bring forward our planned retirement relocation to Queensland, whereas last year AFL made lockdowns just bearable.
Vaccine hesitancy is justified, we still have freedom of choice in this country.
Having said that I really feel for airline and aged care workers.
Lockdowns this year have inspired ny partner and I to bring forward our planned retirement relocation to Queensland, whereas last year AFL made lockdowns just bearable.
its time to make a name for yourself like you've never made before!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18600
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1924 times
- Been thanked: 852 times
Re: Marshall to miss (Tier 1 Covid exposure)
Glad to hear you are ok. I agree jabs should be a choice. No one is making you take them. I fear that Covid is with us for good, though, and hope that you are not at risk when we do eventually open up as we must.darylcowie wrote: ↑Fri 23 Jul 2021 7:20pm Cardiologist said all is ok with my heart today, which eased my anxiety somewhat, but failed to explain my symptoms, which are now easing, but I won't risk ivaccination again.
Vaccine hesitancy is justified, we still have freedom of choice in this country