The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23154
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9102 times
Been thanked: 3948 times

The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

Post: # 1915246Post saynta »

From the herald sun.com.au

5. Bad ol’ Saints

In the final quarter of a dreary game, the Saints had eight turnovers by foot and one by hand.

Port Adelaide was plucky in victory and the Saints sloppy in defeat and after recent wins against Brisbane, Collingwood and Richmond, it was desperately disappointing from the Saints.

In a tight game, Port kicked 2.3 in the final quarter from St Kida’s turnovers.

It’s not a big score, but the Saints robbed themselves of scoring opportunities.

Brad Hill turned the ball over twice and Port scored from both of them – a Dan Butler turnover was a goal and a Jack Sinclair turnover was a goal.

Inaccuracy also haunted them.

The main culprits being Rowan Marshall with 2.2, Luke Dunstan 0.1 from three shots and Dean Kent 0.1 from two shots.

It was a bad game from the finals aspirants.


Banger9798
SS Life Member
Posts: 2786
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 784 times

Re: The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

Post: # 1915254Post Banger9798 »

Hard to disagree
I give Sinclair a pass on this though, he has been nailing 90% of those difficult kicks this year.


The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17046
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3662 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

Post: # 1915257Post skeptic »

Correct me if I’m wrong but Hill’s turnovers both led to behinds?


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5026
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

Post: # 1915266Post maverick »

Yea both behinds
He was lucky but that’s the facts
Sinclair was a goal though
Poor forward entries and turnovers at half forward don’t look as bad but they are… never scrutinised as much


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17046
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3662 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

Post: # 1915271Post skeptic »

maverick wrote: Mon 19 Jul 2021 2:30pm Yea both behinds
He was lucky but that’s the facts
Sinclair was a goal though
Poor forward entries and turnovers at half forward don’t look as bad but they are… never scrutinised as much
Feels to me like there’s a bit of scapegoating going on. A lot of ppl fixating on Hill and then you have stuff like this that’s implying that it was worse then it was.

Really sucks that there was another racial controversy involving our club and this time it was directed at Hill


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5107
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1456 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

Post: # 1915273Post Yorkeys »

Port are a well drilled side, top 4 easily. They cause even the best to turnover. Pressure the ball carrier, defend the outlets as a team and have good marking players/spoilers throughout. Jonas leads an excellent defence.

Perhaps equally the emphasis from a not so lazy journo could highlight when we got through, but then negatives make news, play to the self serving stereo type.

Shows we need more contested marking players and should not get tired in the final quarter after a hard game and travel. Bad ol Saints indeed, soft target for a dribbling fool.


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5878
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 460 times
Contact:

Re: The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

Post: # 1915280Post samoht »

skeptic wrote: Mon 19 Jul 2021 12:55pm Correct me if I’m wrong but Hill’s turnovers both led to behinds?

But those costly 3 or 4 turnovers (out of the 8 in the last quarter, in which Hill had 2 very poor kicks under little or no pressure) happened when it looked like we were about to stream towards goal each time.

The momentum swing at this critical stage of the game, when it felt like we were winning the last quarter and in control, is what lead to our loss. It wasn't so much Port's great play.

In contrast:
Connolly in only his 4th game displayed the poise and skill that many of his experienced team mates lacked in the last quarter, with that brilliant pass of his (to Marshall, I think).
The kid knew exactly what to do.


terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2537
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 384 times

Re: The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

Post: # 1915283Post terry smith rules »

samoht wrote: Mon 19 Jul 2021 3:39pm
skeptic wrote: Mon 19 Jul 2021 12:55pm Correct me if I’m wrong but Hill’s turnovers both led to behinds?

But those costly 3 or 4 turnovers (out of the 8 in the last quarter, in which Hill had 2 very poor kicks under little or no pressure) happened when it looked like we were about to stream towards goal each time.

The momentum swing at this critical stage of the game, when it felt like we were winning the last quarter and in control, is what lead to our loss. It wasn't so much Port's great play.

In contrast:
Connolly in only his 4th game displayed the poise and skill that many of his experienced team mates lacked in the last quarter, with that brilliant pass of his (to Marshall, I think).
The kid knew exactly what to do.
Exactly,brilliantly stated


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17046
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3662 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: The F F's The Tackle..Dislikes

Post: # 1915296Post skeptic »

samoht wrote: Mon 19 Jul 2021 3:39pm
skeptic wrote: Mon 19 Jul 2021 12:55pm Correct me if I’m wrong but Hill’s turnovers both led to behinds?

But those costly 3 or 4 turnovers (out of the 8 in the last quarter, in which Hill had 2 very poor kicks under little or no pressure) happened when it looked like we were about to stream towards goal each time.

The momentum swing at this critical stage of the game, when it felt like we were winning the last quarter and in control, is what lead to our loss. It wasn't so much Port's great play.

In contrast:
Connolly in only his 4th game displayed the poise and skill that many of his experienced team mates lacked in the last quarter, with that brilliant pass of his (to Marshall, I think).
The kid knew exactly what to do.
I’d say some of the poor set shots and absolutely fluffed forward entries and the Butler screw up were a lot more damaging


Post Reply