Umpire strikes back
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 1320 times
Umpire strikes back
Tatts calls them out after last weeks terrible umpiring. So you guessed it they come out and absolutely destroy us. Yes we were bad no they didn’t cost us a win. What they did do though was basically kill the contest. The free and goal to Bruce was just a massive momentum gift to the WB.
Every hard tackle free WB
When Howard was polaxed front on in a marking contest and the umpire payed the mark to Naughton you could only laugh. The umpire even had the nerve to ask Howard if he was ok to stand the mark.
Just a night s*** effort rubbed in by biased incompetent cheating.
Every hard tackle free WB
When Howard was polaxed front on in a marking contest and the umpire payed the mark to Naughton you could only laugh. The umpire even had the nerve to ask Howard if he was ok to stand the mark.
Just a night s*** effort rubbed in by biased incompetent cheating.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Get real mate the umpires were ordinary but only an idiot would defend that effortCURLY wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:09pm Tatts calls them out after last weeks terrible umpiring. So you guessed it they come out and absolutely destroy us. Yes we were bad no they didn’t cost us a win. What they did do though was basically kill the contest. The free and goal to Bruce was just a massive momentum gift to the WB.
Every hard tackle free WB
When Howard was polaxed front on in a marking contest and the umpire payed the mark to Naughton you could only laugh. The umpire even had the nerve to ask Howard if he was ok to stand the mark.
Just a night s*** effort rubbed in by biased incompetent cheating.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 1320 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Correct but the umpiring was as biased as you’ll see.bangaulegend wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:12pmGet real mate the umpires were ordinary but only an idiot would defend that effortCURLY wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:09pm Tatts calls them out after last weeks terrible umpiring. So you guessed it they come out and absolutely destroy us. Yes we were bad no they didn’t cost us a win. What they did do though was basically kill the contest. The free and goal to Bruce was just a massive momentum gift to the WB.
Every hard tackle free WB
When Howard was polaxed front on in a marking contest and the umpire payed the mark to Naughton you could only laugh. The umpire even had the nerve to ask Howard if he was ok to stand the mark.
Just a night s*** effort rubbed in by biased incompetent cheating.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6603
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1309 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
100% correctCURLY wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:16pmCorrect but the umpiring was as biased as you’ll see.bangaulegend wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:12pmGet real mate the umpires were ordinary but only an idiot would defend that effortCURLY wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:09pm Tatts calls them out after last weeks terrible umpiring. So you guessed it they come out and absolutely destroy us. Yes we were bad no they didn’t cost us a win. What they did do though was basically kill the contest. The free and goal to Bruce was just a massive momentum gift to the WB.
Every hard tackle free WB
When Howard was polaxed front on in a marking contest and the umpire payed the mark to Naughton you could only laugh. The umpire even had the nerve to ask Howard if he was ok to stand the mark.
Just a night s*** effort rubbed in by biased incompetent cheating.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8095
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 605 times
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Missed a blatent 50m penalty for a Bulldog running through the protected area that was so obvious the Bulldogs fans were in hysterics when it wasn't paid.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 1320 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
That was Josh Bruce he just ran straight past the bloke trying to take his kick.Enrico_Misso wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:53pm Missed a blatent 50m penalty for a Bulldog running through the protected area that was so obvious the Bulldogs fans were in hysterics when it wasn't paid.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Sun 18 Apr 2004 9:23pm
- Has thanked: 394 times
- Been thanked: 200 times
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Did anyone overhear the "Voices in the Docklands carpark" as the umps boasted about teaching Ratts a lesson?
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10761
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 827 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
YES
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10761
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 827 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Heard them complaining that St Kilda was so pathetic that no-one including Ratts will even have noticed their punishment.Enrico_Misso wrote: ↑Sun 23 May 2021 1:54am Did anyone overhear the "Voices in the Docklands carpark" as the umps boasted about teaching Ratts a lesson?
"For us umpires to have a win the game needs to be a contest".
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Did they what.CURLY wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:09pm Tatts calls them out after last weeks terrible umpiring. So you guessed it they come out and absolutely destroy us. Yes we were bad no they didn’t cost us a win. What they did do though was basically kill the contest. The free and goal to Bruce was just a massive momentum gift to the WB.
Every hard tackle free WB
When Howard was polaxed front on in a marking contest and the umpire payed the mark to Naughton you could only laugh. The umpire even had the nerve to ask Howard if he was ok to stand the mark.
Just a night s*** effort rubbed in by biased incompetent cheating.
8 frees to 18 against at one stage then the little f****** maggots evened up in the last making a game total of 13 to 23 against.
I laughed when Bruce nearly shoulder bumped a saints player about to take his kick after marking with no reaction from those fuckers.
And yes the non awarding of a free to Howard was a disgrace, but will be defended by Chuck all the same.
No, the maggots didn't cost us a win but they deflated an already depressed group of players.
Grant THomas was one hundred percent correct when he talked about those see you next tusdays and their egos.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Curly is spot on. Yes we were ordinary but those little fuckers were cheats.bangaulegend wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:12pmGet real mate the umpires were ordinary but only an idiot would defend that effortCURLY wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:09pm Tatts calls them out after last weeks terrible umpiring. So you guessed it they come out and absolutely destroy us. Yes we were bad no they didn’t cost us a win. What they did do though was basically kill the contest. The free and goal to Bruce was just a massive momentum gift to the WB.
Every hard tackle free WB
When Howard was polaxed front on in a marking contest and the umpire payed the mark to Naughton you could only laugh. The umpire even had the nerve to ask Howard if he was ok to stand the mark.
Just a night s*** effort rubbed in by biased incompetent cheating.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
When they perform to,a level that borders on biased or cheating, yes they f****** well do.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Sun 18 Apr 2004 9:23pm
- Has thanked: 394 times
- Been thanked: 200 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
I just don't think they were as bad as St Kilda. Comparing them to us is a step too far
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
At least we were just incomperent, they wereincompetent, biased and possibly cheating.Ape_Man wrote: ↑Sun 23 May 2021 6:04pm
I just don't think they were as bad as St Kilda. Comparing them to us is a step too far
But hey, don't let me stop you from defending them.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Yep, can't deny that. Watching was soul destroying . But the heading to this thread is 100% correct. Spot on. Even those maggots families would have a hard job not agreeing with curly, or defending them.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Sun 18 Apr 2004 9:23pm
- Has thanked: 394 times
- Been thanked: 200 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
saynta wrote: ↑Sun 23 May 2021 6:07pmAt least we were just incomperent, they wereincompetent, biased and possibly cheating.Ape_Man wrote: ↑Sun 23 May 2021 6:04pm
I just don't think they were as bad as St Kilda. Comparing them to us is a step too far
But hey, don't let me stop you from defending them.
I never said the umpires were good.
I am saying we were far worse and made a joke that comparing them to us wasnt fair as we were absolutely putrid.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3376
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
3 sides out there, one was brilliant , two were pathetic.
Look what happens - whinge rough end of the stick, same as richmond Friday night,
Look what happens - whinge rough end of the stick, same as richmond Friday night,
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8391
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 138 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
I blame Roughy for breaking Paton's leg
It was the start of the rot
It was the start of the rot
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Maybe. But my view is that they were putrid as well.Ape_Man wrote: ↑Sun 23 May 2021 6:31pmsaynta wrote: ↑Sun 23 May 2021 6:07pmAt least we were just incomperent, they wereincompetent, biased and possibly cheating.Ape_Man wrote: ↑Sun 23 May 2021 6:04pm
I just don't think they were as bad as St Kilda. Comparing them to us is a step too far
But hey, don't let me stop you from defending them.
I never said the umpires were good.
I am saying we were far worse and made a joke that comparing them to us wasnt fair as we were absolutely putrid.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Umpire strikes back
Probably but when you dish up that effort you can't blame the umpiring IMOsaynta wrote: ↑Sun 23 May 2021 5:51pmCurly is spot on. Yes we were ordinary but those little fuckers were cheats.bangaulegend wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:12pmGet real mate the umpires were ordinary but only an idiot would defend that effortCURLY wrote: ↑Sat 22 May 2021 11:09pm Tatts calls them out after last weeks terrible umpiring. So you guessed it they come out and absolutely destroy us. Yes we were bad no they didn’t cost us a win. What they did do though was basically kill the contest. The free and goal to Bruce was just a massive momentum gift to the WB.
Every hard tackle free WB
When Howard was polaxed front on in a marking contest and the umpire payed the mark to Naughton you could only laugh. The umpire even had the nerve to ask Howard if he was ok to stand the mark.
Just a night s*** effort rubbed in by biased incompetent cheating.