What is need to be a top four contender
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
What is need to be a top four contender
Despite the goal kicking yips returning, I still think the list is the best its looked in the last decade and we aren't necessarily too far off from being a top four side.
However, list improvement is still clearly needed. Therefore, what is it?
I for one still think we need another A-grade mid. We may not be able to get an elite mid, but another A-grade mid to complement Steele, Jones, Crouch, Gresham and Ross (when all are fit) may give us the extra inches needed.
I didn't include Hannebury in the above as I think it's a possibility that we've seen the last of him. Or at the least, we won't be part of any future flag tilt. His salary and contract length is also becoming a problem and may be the hurdle to overcome, if our list is to improve.
Thoughts?
However, list improvement is still clearly needed. Therefore, what is it?
I for one still think we need another A-grade mid. We may not be able to get an elite mid, but another A-grade mid to complement Steele, Jones, Crouch, Gresham and Ross (when all are fit) may give us the extra inches needed.
I didn't include Hannebury in the above as I think it's a possibility that we've seen the last of him. Or at the least, we won't be part of any future flag tilt. His salary and contract length is also becoming a problem and may be the hurdle to overcome, if our list is to improve.
Thoughts?
Bad management is bad management
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23243
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1796 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Nowhere near top 4 now imo
Paddy 1 year off retirement
Frawley patch job at best
1 paced midfield with no genuine outside dash and ball use capability
And our depth is paper thin with, outside Bytel/Byrnes, nothing coming through
To be genuine top 4 you need depth as there will be injuries
Then you look at our tail end list playing in the two’s....some spuds in there .....
What we do have going for us is a core that in 2-3 with some ruthless decisions made now could contend I include in that the likes of;
Marshall
King
Howard
Paton
Bytel
Byrnes
Clarke
Coffield
Wilkie
Higgins
Gresham
Steele
Imo players now at 26 plus who aren’t guns aren’t gonna be or they’re injury prone or struggle to hit a target I like Crouch but in 3 years time...not sure how durable he’ll be
I think we haven’t drafted long enough plus we’ve made some horrendous c**k up decisions as we all now know...
So how do you regenerate, give this core a shot, and make sure you still have some quality kids coming through ???
My main concern is all our recent top up players do just enough to leave us between 7th - 12.... no mans land and never really challenging the big boys consistently except for the odd game here and there.....
Paddy 1 year off retirement
Frawley patch job at best
1 paced midfield with no genuine outside dash and ball use capability
And our depth is paper thin with, outside Bytel/Byrnes, nothing coming through
To be genuine top 4 you need depth as there will be injuries
Then you look at our tail end list playing in the two’s....some spuds in there .....
What we do have going for us is a core that in 2-3 with some ruthless decisions made now could contend I include in that the likes of;
Marshall
King
Howard
Paton
Bytel
Byrnes
Clarke
Coffield
Wilkie
Higgins
Gresham
Steele
Imo players now at 26 plus who aren’t guns aren’t gonna be or they’re injury prone or struggle to hit a target I like Crouch but in 3 years time...not sure how durable he’ll be
I think we haven’t drafted long enough plus we’ve made some horrendous c**k up decisions as we all now know...
So how do you regenerate, give this core a shot, and make sure you still have some quality kids coming through ???
My main concern is all our recent top up players do just enough to leave us between 7th - 12.... no mans land and never really challenging the big boys consistently except for the odd game here and there.....
“Yeah….nah””
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5969
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 328 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Very talented Players likely to improve and provide sustained value
Paton
Coffield
King
Marshall
Howard
Clarke
Players already very good and likely to remain so
Wilkie
Hill
Players who give reliable service and likely to continue to
Crouch
Ross
Joyce
Flashy players on/off
Butler
Higgins
Players who had value but will breakdown
Hannebury
Jones
Players who are near the end
Frawley
Ryder
Could bes but jury is out
Byrnes
Bytel
Paton
Coffield
King
Marshall
Howard
Clarke
Players already very good and likely to remain so
Wilkie
Hill
Players who give reliable service and likely to continue to
Crouch
Ross
Joyce
Flashy players on/off
Butler
Higgins
Players who had value but will breakdown
Hannebury
Jones
Players who are near the end
Frawley
Ryder
Could bes but jury is out
Byrnes
Bytel
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12463
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2662 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
We are a fair bit off
Port, Brisbane, Western Bulldogs, Melbourne, Richmond and Geelong all better
We are in the next pack with
Freo, Essendon, Carlton, Sydney
Port, Brisbane, Western Bulldogs, Melbourne, Richmond and Geelong all better
We are in the next pack with
Freo, Essendon, Carlton, Sydney
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3376
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Best 22 who would get games in top teams is always a good starting point:
- Steele
- Billings
- Marshall
- Clark
- Wilkie
- Howard
- Crouch
- Jones
- King
Off the top s of my head.
IMO what we lack to be top 4 is SILK . Clark and Hill are probably as close as we have but we need to find a players who when they have the ball is like Burgoyne was, like Cyril was, even like Dal Santo was.
Inside mids we have shown we can match - Steele, Crouch, Jones, Bytle, Ross,
Outside spread is an issue and classy HFF.
Not too far off but a couple holes to fill IMO
- Steele
- Billings
- Marshall
- Clark
- Wilkie
- Howard
- Crouch
- Jones
- King
Off the top s of my head.
IMO what we lack to be top 4 is SILK . Clark and Hill are probably as close as we have but we need to find a players who when they have the ball is like Burgoyne was, like Cyril was, even like Dal Santo was.
Inside mids we have shown we can match - Steele, Crouch, Jones, Bytle, Ross,
Outside spread is an issue and classy HFF.
Not too far off but a couple holes to fill IMO
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4298
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1424 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
The lack of highly talented young players is a worry. Yes, we have King, but Bytel and Byrnes are still with a question mark over them. We don't know what their best will be. Outside of that, there's nothing. What's really concerning is the lack of developing key defenders and ruckmen.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10761
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 827 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
It's not your best 11players that win premierships its the other 11.older saint wrote: ↑Sat 15 May 2021 6:11pm Best 22 who would get games in top teams is always a good starting point:
- Steele
- Billings
- Marshall
- Clark
- Wilkie
- Howard
- Crouch
- Jones
- King
Off the top s of my head.
IMO what we lack to be top 4 is SILK . Clark and Hill are probably as close as we have but we need to find a players who when they have the ball is like Burgoyne was, like Cyril was, even like Dal Santo was.
Inside mids we have shown we can match - Steele, Crouch, Jones, Bytle, Ross,
Outside spread is an issue and classy HFF.
Not too far off but a couple holes to fill IMO
You need 22 players to win a premiership.
It only takes a couple of mediocre players that the opposition can exploit to lose a premiership.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12463
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2662 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Every premiership team has mediocre players who look good in a good team or are just role players
If you find effective roles for your C Graders (like Richmond) you will be successful
If you find effective roles for your C Graders (like Richmond) you will be successful
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8391
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 138 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
We need - a key forward - a key back - some skilled outside run - another ruck
So not much at all
So not much at all
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23243
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1796 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Ofcourse but Ben Long and DMac ain’t getting games at Dogs Cats Tigers or Port ....
There’s C graders who play a role then there’s carrying players who aren’t up to it we have to many on our list that fall into the latter
“Yeah….nah””
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8391
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 138 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
We need - a key forward - a key back - some skilled outside run - another ruck
So not much at all
So not much at all
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23243
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1796 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Good post largely agreeolder saint wrote: ↑Sat 15 May 2021 6:11pm Best 22 who would get games in top teams is always a good starting point:
- Steele
- Billings
- Marshall
- Clark
- Wilkie
- Howard
- Crouch
- Jones
- King
Off the top s of my head.
IMO what we lack to be top 4 is SILK . Clark and Hill are probably as close as we have but we need to find a players who when they have the ball is like Burgoyne was, like Cyril was, even like Dal Santo was.
Inside mids we have shown we can match - Steele, Crouch, Jones, Bytle, Ross,
Outside spread is an issue and classy HFF.
Not too far off but a couple holes to fill IMO
I’d add we need another key defender and another ruck...Paddy has 1 at best left ...Love him to play 2 as I think he has the body that is durable enough
We really need a silk mid who can run from congestion and use it well...we are definitely 1 paced inside
Ironically if we landed B King....do you then say Marshall’s a full time ruck ??
You could settle Battle back in defence
“Yeah….nah””
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
I agree with Teflon our best 10 players are top 4 competent, but the remainder of our list are really poor. You only have to watch a couple of Sandringham games to acknowledge just how little depth we have coming through. As an example Hawthorn are 17th on the AFL ladder, but have far more potential depth playing at Box Hill than we have. Gallaghers & Lethleans attempt at topping up the list continuously with drafting and trading in mature aged recruits, has failed dismally and put our list 3-4 years behind where it should be.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Key forward - Bruce
Key back - Bruce can go back
Outside run - Hind
Another ruck - Hickey
There you go
Interesting;
Hickey - pick largely became Hannebery (out injured)
Bruce - pick largely became Jones (out injured)
Hind - didn't use pick
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1598 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Is Hind that good?Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Sun 16 May 2021 3:55pmKey forward - Bruce
Key back - Bruce can go back
Outside run - Hind
Another ruck - Hickey
There you go
Interesting;
Hickey - pick largely became Hannebery (out injured)
Bruce - pick largely became Jones (out injured)
Hind - didn't use pick
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
It was a jokeSaintPav wrote: ↑Sun 16 May 2021 4:10pmIs Hind that good?Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Sun 16 May 2021 3:55pmKey forward - Bruce
Key back - Bruce can go back
Outside run - Hind
Another ruck - Hickey
There you go
Interesting;
Hickey - pick largely became Hannebery (out injured)
Bruce - pick largely became Jones (out injured)
Hind - didn't use pick
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1598 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Sun 16 May 2021 4:47pmIt was a jokeSaintPav wrote: ↑Sun 16 May 2021 4:10pmIs Hind that good?Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Sun 16 May 2021 3:55pmKey forward - Bruce
Key back - Bruce can go back
Outside run - Hind
Another ruck - Hickey
There you go
Interesting;
Hickey - pick largely became Hannebery (out injured)
Bruce - pick largely became Jones (out injured)
Hind - didn't use pick
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4987
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1432 times
- Been thanked: 1469 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
Current list is better than sides that contended for wooden spoon. Granted. However...
Big picture issues.
1. Injuries, putting them all down to bad luck may be head in sand-ish. It seems clear Marshall's injury has been mishandled, came back too soon and what do we have. Roughy breaking Paton's leg was unforgivable notwithstanding it was not his intention (what was it by the way). Imagine Cummins bowling short to Smith in the nets on a wet pitch, nonsensical to be preseason training like that - friendly fire be damned. Were there no warning signs Gresh was feeling his achilles. Zac Jones is an injury waiting to happen; Hannebery, well. Our whole approach to injury risk management needs to be professionally reviewed because it is costing far too much. If it comes back that all were the act of god then so be it, but the attrition rate for soft tissue stuff to essential players and DMac is off the charts it seems and should not be passed off as simply back luck.
2. Unforced turnovers. They are killing us. Defence does not have time to reset. Learn to kick to advantage even if it means forcing a stoppage. Gifting goals is dumb footy.
3. Forward line need serious choreographing. Looks like free style ad libbing rather than any set moves or tactics.
4. Recruit sufficient number of players with footy smarts. We seem to have too many with no footy IQ despite their athleticism.
5. Develop younger players. Bytel, Byrnes, Clark all good stuff. Coffield, Long, Duncan, DMac, any young ruck: unaffordable waste.
Big picture issues.
1. Injuries, putting them all down to bad luck may be head in sand-ish. It seems clear Marshall's injury has been mishandled, came back too soon and what do we have. Roughy breaking Paton's leg was unforgivable notwithstanding it was not his intention (what was it by the way). Imagine Cummins bowling short to Smith in the nets on a wet pitch, nonsensical to be preseason training like that - friendly fire be damned. Were there no warning signs Gresh was feeling his achilles. Zac Jones is an injury waiting to happen; Hannebery, well. Our whole approach to injury risk management needs to be professionally reviewed because it is costing far too much. If it comes back that all were the act of god then so be it, but the attrition rate for soft tissue stuff to essential players and DMac is off the charts it seems and should not be passed off as simply back luck.
2. Unforced turnovers. They are killing us. Defence does not have time to reset. Learn to kick to advantage even if it means forcing a stoppage. Gifting goals is dumb footy.
3. Forward line need serious choreographing. Looks like free style ad libbing rather than any set moves or tactics.
4. Recruit sufficient number of players with footy smarts. We seem to have too many with no footy IQ despite their athleticism.
5. Develop younger players. Bytel, Byrnes, Clark all good stuff. Coffield, Long, Duncan, DMac, any young ruck: unaffordable waste.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2759
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 698 times
- Been thanked: 782 times
Re: What is need to be a top four contender
I don't think we are far away from top 4 as some on here suggest.
If we'd kicked straighter and beaten Cats, we would be talking about how close we are.
2 major concerns:
Depth is a concern for sure
Reliance on Ryder and Frawley to make us threat.
But into this side Paton Coffield and Gresham, all will be excellent skilful dangerous players and all under 23.
And Jones who has been in AA form until injury.
We need a swag of youngsters in this year to develop, but we have a very good nucleus.
Agree Chol from Tigers would be a good trade....and they are contracted to give us a player every year
If we'd kicked straighter and beaten Cats, we would be talking about how close we are.
2 major concerns:
Depth is a concern for sure
Reliance on Ryder and Frawley to make us threat.
But into this side Paton Coffield and Gresham, all will be excellent skilful dangerous players and all under 23.
And Jones who has been in AA form until injury.
We need a swag of youngsters in this year to develop, but we have a very good nucleus.
Agree Chol from Tigers would be a good trade....and they are contracted to give us a player every year
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi