Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Sat 24 Apr 2021 11:53amThe club and coach use strategists, analysts and compile and review data and statistics.CURLY wrote: ↑Sat 24 Apr 2021 11:08amJoffa Burns wrote: ↑Sat 24 Apr 2021 11:04amWhere have I referred to SC points Curly?CURLY wrote: ↑Sat 24 Apr 2021 10:37amJoffa Burns wrote: ↑Sat 24 Apr 2021 10:22amLol, wrong again Curly.CURLY wrote: ↑Fri 23 Apr 2021 11:17pmJoffa Burns wrote: ↑Fri 23 Apr 2021 10:05pmPerhaps you are watching replays of Swans matches between 2012 - 2017 when all of that and more was true of Dan the elite mid.CURLY wrote: ↑Fri 23 Apr 2021 7:28pmJoffa Burns wrote: ↑Fri 23 Apr 2021 6:08pmInteresting comment, what do you base this on?
Is it his contribution, leadership, training standards, on-field coaching or something else to which you refer?
The reason I ask is statistically he appears to have little positive impact when playing.
In 2019 we won only one of the five games he played (win ratio 20%) against a win/loss season of 40% with Hannebery hardly setting the game alight with an average 25 possessions and not registering elite in any category.
In 2020 we averaged a win/loss ratio of 58% and 62% with Dan in the team across his 8 games where he averaged 17 possessions and again failed to register as elite in any category.
Lastly, I was at the Bulldogs final and his game was way overrated by TV viewers in my opinion as Hannebery was by himself for large parts of the game on the wing and was not pushing back deep into defence like the half forwards and other wingers were doing.
Dan was an elite player, absolute gut running gun midfielder in his prime, but since 2018 has been a butt average AFL player who can barely get on the park.
It is sad to watch the decline of someone who was an AFL champion to become what Dan now is, a broken down player desperately clinging to the past and trying to get back.
I wish he could get back, but it is getting highly more unlikely by the week as the game gets quicker and he is slowing and struggling with injury, now that is fact.
I think we structure up better when he’s around the clearances. He also sets us up with basically every disposal always takes the best option. Rarely let’s the ball gets past he either kills the loose ball so we get another contest rather than letting the opposition walk it out.
It is not true at St Kilda.
Firstly continuity of performance of teams in any elite sport is essential, basketball, rowing, League, AFL ask any high performance coach in all team sports. You structure up better when you play games together and learn how each other play and read each others game. How can any saints player have a f@rking clue about 13 game Dan?
Uses basically every disposal & always takes the best option? Those are elite player statements.
14% of his kicks in 2020 were clangers and he didn't register elite in any category.
He didn't even get much of it and when he did his disposal was average.
Hannebery is shot and needs to retire, he has little to SWA to offer.
He was recruited as a broken down has-been and has done nothing to suggest to anyone other than a cool-aide sipper that he has any chance of turning this around.
I believe in patterns, below is undeniable.
I guess the desperate could argue he played more games in 2020 than 2019 so he's on the way back
Year Games
2010 - 19
2011 - 22
2012 - 22
2013 - 21
2014 - 16
2015 - 22
2016 - 22
2017 - 21
2018 - 14
2019 - 5
2020 - 8
2012 - 0 to date
14% he misses so 86% he’s using it well sounds very good to me. As I said when he plays we look better as a group especially around clearances.
I’m a footy layman but you have no idea at all about the modern game.
Clangers are unopposed errors under no pressure, 14% changers doesn’t mean 86% efficiency You crack me up Curly.
If I look up his efficiency it would be lucky to be above 50%.
Don’t let the facts or stats get in the way of your reality Curly.
Our win % ratio is down when Hannebery plays over the past two seasons combined. He has low possessions and doesn’t rate elite in any category, furthermore he is largely unavailable and does not provide continuity of a group midfield.
But go on thinking he’s a gun and adding value to the club Curly
As I said Oracle we set up better we look better organised. You just keep using SuperCoach points as a gauge of a footballers worth.
Stop making up bulls***.
You again prove your knowledge on the game is as extensive as your umpiring expertise.
Look better? That means a lot as we actually lose more when he plays. But Curly knows football
I don’t need stats to see the impact a player has. Similar situation to Paton or Geary in our back half we look better set up when they play. Ryder makes us look better. I don’t need to look at numbers to determine that.
But Curly knows football
Of course they do but I guarantee they watch the game first then go to the stats. I guarantee Ratten asks his defence coach what the hell is going on with our structure before he grabs a stat sheet or our midfield coach why are they walking the ball out of stoppages.