Yep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
Big Fish No 2
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
thats not an answer
am i your fave poster ?
am i your fave poster ?
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
I think the mod might have an idea whether they are the same poster and confirmed it on the admin forum as per below cut and paste:
Just for your benefit (not that you care) aka as written below by the moderator in this instance most certainly refers to " also known as"
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
[/quote]
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14010
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1314 times
- Been thanked: 2092 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
Keep that head in the sand saynta!saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:07pmYep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
And as I said earlier, not sure it's possible to 'bully' a troll. Especially when all that 'bullying' consists of is telling them to stop trolling
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
And they do by banning the troll under his many guises.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:07pmYep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
I'm at a loss to understand your point other than you think he is unfairly treated.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
Yep, And I am not talking about the past. If you look through this thread and others in recent days, you will see that he is being bullied. Not on AFAIC.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:13pmAnd they do by banning the troll under his many guises.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:07pmYep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
I'm at a loss to understand your point other than you think he is unfairly treated.
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13311
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 669 times
- Been thanked: 1957 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
Saynta is like a troll bodyguard
Ps. I like my hat
Ps. I like my hat
Last edited by The Fireman on Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:23pm, edited 1 time in total.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14010
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1314 times
- Been thanked: 2092 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
The clear pattern of their behaviour is very relevant.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:19pmYep, And I am not talking about the past. If you look through this thread and others in recent days, you will see that he is being bullied. Not on AFAIC.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:13pmAnd they do by banning the troll under his many guises.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:07pmYep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
I'm at a loss to understand your point other than you think he is unfairly treated.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
To who. Not to me.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:22pmThe clear pattern of their behaviour is very relevant.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:19pmYep, And I am not talking about the past. If you look through this thread and others in recent days, you will see that he is being bullied. Not on AFAIC.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:13pmAnd they do by banning the troll under his many guises.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:07pmYep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
I'm at a loss to understand your point other than you think he is unfairly treated.
In a court of law you don't get to see a person's priors until after he has been found guilty and convicted.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
careful people
the Secret Seven are holding a secret meeting in a secret location
they are forming their attack plan
the Secret Seven are holding a secret meeting in a secret location
they are forming their attack plan
Seeya
*************
*************
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5095
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 286 times
- Been thanked: 279 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
Indeed, but I always wanted to be the fat pryck in the red with mismatched boots, as I always said it was like looking into a mirror. But I am a team player and settled for playing my role.......asiu wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:03pmyestakeaway wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:50pmHad a bit of a look back .... at the time, I named the gang as follows:asiu wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:27pmyesJoffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 2:25pmThat is not narrowing it down all that much, all those hats look a little fabulous in my humble opinion.
Are you the gentleman on the left (when looking at the screen) with the full beard who appears to be pointing his revolver at Big Red?
He appears to have a dead animal adorned to a very fine looking wide brimmed cattleman hat.
coz Big Red has a Bigger Knife
would you trust anyone in a gang
that would have you as a member ??
no siree
From left - True Believer, Saintadamski, Saint Pav, degruch, asiu, The Fireman, St Byron, Hit the Boundary, Skeptic. Joffa was in the saloon at time looking after the lonely lady, being the HOHOH (head honcho of the HOHs).
Not correct? Names are wrong? Skeptic did say at the time that it bore a stunning resemblance.
but
didn’t TB and i swap hats , in that thread ???
obviously , the hat stays where it is
and the gang member moves
The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14010
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1314 times
- Been thanked: 2092 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
But love faceless internet trolls?
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14010
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1314 times
- Been thanked: 2092 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
That's not necessarily a good thing, and this isn't a court of law.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:25pmTo who. Not to me.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:22pmThe clear pattern of their behaviour is very relevant.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:19pmYep, And I am not talking about the past. If you look through this thread and others in recent days, you will see that he is being bullied. Not on AFAIC.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:13pmAnd they do by banning the troll under his many guises.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:07pmYep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
I'm at a loss to understand your point other than you think he is unfairly treated.
In a court of law you don't get to see a person's priors until after he has been found guilty and convicted.
The essence of trolling is a pattern of behaviour, so of course it's relevant.
Last edited by The_Dud on Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:30pm, edited 1 time in total.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
If this were a court of law; unless granted early parole, I think Ted would still be incarcerated for previous crime against the state and therefore would not have been free and able to commit the current crimes.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:25pmTo who. Not to me.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:22pmThe clear pattern of their behaviour is very relevant.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:19pmYep, And I am not talking about the past. If you look through this thread and others in recent days, you will see that he is being bullied. Not on AFAIC.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:13pmAnd they do by banning the troll under his many guises.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:07pmYep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
I'm at a loss to understand your point other than you think he is unfairly treated.
In a court of law you don't get to see a person's priors until after he has been found guilty and convicted.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
Oh for f*** sake , go away, you are starting to bore me to tears.
And I'm being polite.
No justification for bullying IMHFO, that is.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:30pmIf this were a court of law; unless granted early parole, I think Ted would still be incarcerated for previous crime against the state and therefore would not have been free and able to commit the current crimes.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:25pmTo who. Not to me.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:22pmThe clear pattern of their behaviour is very relevant.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:19pmYep, And I am not talking about the past. If you look through this thread and others in recent days, you will see that he is being bullied. Not on AFAIC.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:13pmAnd they do by banning the troll under his many guises.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:07pmYep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
I'm at a loss to understand your point other than you think he is unfairly treated.
In a court of law you don't get to see a person's priors until after he has been found guilty and convicted.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14010
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1314 times
- Been thanked: 2092 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
And no justification for trolling.
The latter doesn't exist without the former (if at all).
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
Possibly but my definition of trolling or baiting for that matter is what you do every time someone has the temerity to criticise a maggot.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:33pmAnd no justification for trolling.
The latter doesn't exist without the former (if at all).
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
i luv Trading with Ted Time
this our third year of it
it’s the bees knees of footy entertainment
leading into the cricket christmas christ ‘n plum pud
season
although
by the time chrissy actuslly arrives
i’m not interested in eating MORE pudding
september they were in coles
... thats not ridgydidge
this our third year of it
it’s the bees knees of footy entertainment
leading into the cricket christmas christ ‘n plum pud
season
although
by the time chrissy actuslly arrives
i’m not interested in eating MORE pudding
september they were in coles
... thats not ridgydidge
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
Yawn.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:12pmKeep that head in the sand saynta!saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 4:07pmYep, and with respect, it is up to the mods to moderate this forum, not a bunch of pile on bullies.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:55pmWe'll luckily the moderator isn't sucked in by his trolling as evidenced below.saynta wrote: ↑Tue 27 Oct 2020 3:37pm
Well, you guys keep saying he is a troll, but that doesn't make it a given fact. What has he posted that is so upsetting or so far from reality that he can be laughed at or humiliated? I just don't like a whole lot of posters piling in on one guy. I find it nauseating and unnecessary.
If it's hideous and lives under a bridge - it likely be a TROLL.
I rest my case your honour.
tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post
johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling
Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling
- trolling
BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:40pmYou haven’t talked about a trade at all. Nor have you talked about what you have heard other than jumping on the back of a poster with reliable sources. You have just posted obvious generalisations in the hope to inflame those sick of your party trick. I am watching very carefully. When you have an actual rumour that you can articulate fully stating the player / club then you are welcome to post it. But saying we are working on something (no specifics) and it is going to big (no specifics) is as obvious as you posting that the sun will rise tomorrow and then set again. The most obvious motivation is trolling for a reaction. Credit is given to the posters who have responded with disdain but no abuse. However you have flagged yourself again.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:33pmSo we can't speculate or talk about trades? We can't pass on thing we hear?BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:20pmYou are staying the obvious and getting VERY close to trolling.johnearljames wrote: ↑Sun 25 Oct 2020 1:14pmThey bloody are. Trust me.
Now the GF is done, trade time is coming very fast.
Who is the sook that reported it?
And as I said earlier, not sure it's possible to 'bully' a troll. Especially when all that 'bullying' consists of is telling them to stop trolling
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
This is worse than the PM thread hijack on bigfooty.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
You actually read threads on Big Footy ?
I never cease to be amazed by this forum.
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Big Fish No 2
Yeah.
The multi, multi, multi, multi quoting over here drives me crazy.
The multi, multi, multi, multi quoting over here drives me crazy.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....