What we need
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4241
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1390 times
Re: What we need
Why would Battle play CHB?. He held that position for most of 2019 and played very well.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
- Location: Tassie
- Has thanked: 479 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: What we need
Dunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
- Location: Tassie
- Has thanked: 479 times
- Been thanked: 310 times
Re: What we need
Coffield needs to be added to the midfield list.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 8:24pmWhy would Battle play CHB? More valuable moving up and down the ground, trouble shooting. He's not a CHB or a CHF.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 7:42pm If the club has indicated that a key forward is on the shopping list, then can we assume that Battle will play CHB in 2021 and beyond? Where does this leave Clavarino? It looks like he'll escape the chop, so how long does he sit in the seconds biding his time?
The current midfield is:
Ross
Steele
Jones
Gresham
Hannebery
Clark ( perhaps in 2021?)
Billings
Dunstan
Sinclair
Bytel
Byrnes
The top 7 of those are all good players.if we added two more of high quality we could find ourselves with a formidable midfield.
The return of Gresham, a full season from Hannebery, and the continued improvement of Clarke in itself will make us a better team. Throw in one genuine midfielder of quality and look out. No team could treat our midfield as something to exploit.
We're getting close to having a complete team, which is something we haven't seen since 2009.
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: What we need
So good that he didn't play there in 2020???
Good player but neither a CHB or CHF. Can pinch hit in both spots but more valuable roaming and given roles that suit his versatility.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1558
- Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
- Location: NE Victoria
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 283 times
Re: What we need
I don’t think Coffield will ever play midfield. Rebounding defender as a junior and looks best suited in that role.saintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 4:03amCoffield needs to be added to the midfield list.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 8:24pmWhy would Battle play CHB? More valuable moving up and down the ground, trouble shooting. He's not a CHB or a CHF.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 7:42pm If the club has indicated that a key forward is on the shopping list, then can we assume that Battle will play CHB in 2021 and beyond? Where does this leave Clavarino? It looks like he'll escape the chop, so how long does he sit in the seconds biding his time?
The current midfield is:
Ross
Steele
Jones
Gresham
Hannebery
Clark ( perhaps in 2021?)
Billings
Dunstan
Sinclair
Bytel
Byrnes
The top 7 of those are all good players.if we added two more of high quality we could find ourselves with a formidable midfield.
The return of Gresham, a full season from Hannebery, and the continued improvement of Clarke in itself will make us a better team. Throw in one genuine midfielder of quality and look out. No team could treat our midfield as something to exploit.
We're getting close to having a complete team, which is something we haven't seen since 2009.
summertime and the living is easy ........
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18834
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1567 times
- Been thanked: 1959 times
Re: What we need
Agree and it's should be obvious by the way he plays. It's an important role too because he is a good decision maker and has all the attributes to be the captain of our backline for the next ten years.Gershwin wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 9:19amI don’t think Coffield will ever play midfield. Rebounding defender as a junior and looks best suited in that role.saintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 4:03amCoffield needs to be added to the midfield list.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 8:24pmWhy would Battle play CHB? More valuable moving up and down the ground, trouble shooting. He's not a CHB or a CHF.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 7:42pm If the club has indicated that a key forward is on the shopping list, then can we assume that Battle will play CHB in 2021 and beyond? Where does this leave Clavarino? It looks like he'll escape the chop, so how long does he sit in the seconds biding his time?
The current midfield is:
Ross
Steele
Jones
Gresham
Hannebery
Clark ( perhaps in 2021?)
Billings
Dunstan
Sinclair
Bytel
Byrnes
The top 7 of those are all good players.if we added two more of high quality we could find ourselves with a formidable midfield.
The return of Gresham, a full season from Hannebery, and the continued improvement of Clarke in itself will make us a better team. Throw in one genuine midfielder of quality and look out. No team could treat our midfield as something to exploit.
We're getting close to having a complete team, which is something we haven't seen since 2009.
How many rebound entries and scores were able to set up because of him after the opposing team got it straight out of the centre? People should pay more attention when watching the game because his intercept marking and kicking are important weapons which saved us in the first final.
In footy, like life, you play to your strengths.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: What we need
I agree with what you've written SP but I also believe he has the talent, the size and the skills to move into the midfield. Much like Yeo did after cutting his teeth across the half back line. We are extremely fortunate to have someone like Nick on our list.SaintPav wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 9:31amAgree and it's should be obvious by the way he plays. It's an important role too because he is a good decision maker and has all the attributes to be the captain of our backline for the next ten years.Gershwin wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 9:19amI don’t think Coffield will ever play midfield. Rebounding defender as a junior and looks best suited in that role.saintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 4:03amCoffield needs to be added to the midfield list.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 8:24pmWhy would Battle play CHB? More valuable moving up and down the ground, trouble shooting. He's not a CHB or a CHF.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 7:42pm If the club has indicated that a key forward is on the shopping list, then can we assume that Battle will play CHB in 2021 and beyond? Where does this leave Clavarino? It looks like he'll escape the chop, so how long does he sit in the seconds biding his time?
The current midfield is:
Ross
Steele
Jones
Gresham
Hannebery
Clark ( perhaps in 2021?)
Billings
Dunstan
Sinclair
Bytel
Byrnes
The top 7 of those are all good players.if we added two more of high quality we could find ourselves with a formidable midfield.
The return of Gresham, a full season from Hannebery, and the continued improvement of Clarke in itself will make us a better team. Throw in one genuine midfielder of quality and look out. No team could treat our midfield as something to exploit.
We're getting close to having a complete team, which is something we haven't seen since 2009.
How many rebound entries and scores were able to set up because of him after the opposing team got it straight out of the centre? People should pay more attention when watching the game because his intercept marking and kicking are important weapons which saved us in the first final.
In footy, like life, you play to your strengths.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 567 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: What we need
I’m not sure if Coffield becomes a full time mid or not but looking at his progress last year, if he has another year improving at that rate we are going to have an exceptional player. He could potentially move to a wing setting up the play but we might lose some of his intercept marking which is becoming very important. A bit like what Dempster used to do.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 10:25am
I agree with what you've written SP but I also believe he has the talent, the size and the skills to move into the midfield. Much like Yeo did after cutting his teeth across the half back line. We are extremely fortunate to have someone like Nick on our list.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5960
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 710 times
Re: What we need
Just for fun - let us do a x/10 exercise. That list of midfielders. How do you’d rate them out of ten, on exposed, stained form and relevance of that form going forward?saintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 4:03amCoffield needs to be added to the midfield list.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 8:24pmWhy would Battle play CHB? More valuable moving up and down the ground, trouble shooting. He's not a CHB or a CHF.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 7:42pm If the club has indicated that a key forward is on the shopping list, then can we assume that Battle will play CHB in 2021 and beyond? Where does this leave Clavarino? It looks like he'll escape the chop, so how long does he sit in the seconds biding his time?
The current midfield is:
Ross
Steele
Jones
Gresham
Hannebery
Clark ( perhaps in 2021?)
Billings
Dunstan
Sinclair
Bytel
Byrnes
The top 7 of those are all good players.if we added two more of high quality we could find ourselves with a formidable midfield.
The return of Gresham, a full season from Hannebery, and the continued improvement of Clarke in itself will make us a better team. Throw in one genuine midfielder of quality and look out. No team could treat our midfield as something to exploit.
We're getting close to having a complete team, which is something we haven't seen since 2009.
For reference, the leagues best, the very best, Dangerfield, Martin, Grambeau
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
But be harsh. Ask yourself, how much are they compared among the best
Ross 6/10
Steele. 8.5/10
Jones. 6.5/10
Gresham. 7/10
Hannebery. 6.5/10
Clark ( perhaps in 2021?). 7/10
Billings. 6/10
Dunstan 5/10
Sinclair 5.5/10
Bytel 5/10
Byrnes 2/10
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: What we need
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.saintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: What we need
You've got Roberton and Webster for pick 45, which one is the steak knives.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmAgreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.saintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: What we need
Don't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmAgreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.saintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: What we need
You're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmAgreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.saintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.![]()
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: What we need
Rubbish, you can't count.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:00pmYou're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmsaintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: What we need
You're a Grandfather?saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:03pmRubbish, you can't count.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:00pmYou're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmsaintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Even in general teams there is only one pick 35 and one pick 45. Even my three year old grand daughter would understand that.
![]()
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: What we need
twice removed
thats why so crusty
thats why so crusty
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: What we need
Great grand father even.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:20pmYou're a Grandfather?saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:03pmRubbish, you can't count.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:00pmYou're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmsaintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Even in general teams there is only one pick 35 and one pick 45. Even my three year old grand daughter would understand that.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
This is how I picture you after that news
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: What we need
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: What we need
If you are a Grandfather and indeed a Great Grandfather then why do you carry on like a two bob watch? (if youy are a Grandfather then you should know what 2 bob is worth).saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:02pmGreat grand father even.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:20pmYou're a Grandfather?saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:03pmRubbish, you can't count.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:00pmYou're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmsaintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Even in general teams there is only one pick 35 and one pick 45. Even my three year old grand daughter would understand that.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is how I picture you after that news![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 774 times
- Been thanked: 871 times
Re: What we need
At least he can count, even without taking his socks offSaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:39pmIf you are a Grandfather and indeed a Great Grandfather then why do you carry on like a two bob watch? (if youy are a Grandfather then you should know what 2 bob is worth).saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:02pmGreat grand father even.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:20pmYou're a Grandfather?saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:03pmRubbish, you can't count.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:00pmYou're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmsaintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Even in general teams there is only one pick 35 and one pick 45. Even my three year old grand daughter would understand that.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is how I picture you after that news![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Saint supporter since '62
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: What we need
Only your opinion, which I wouldn't give a half eaten rat's toss bag for.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:39pmIf you are a Grandfather and indeed a Great Grandfather then why do you carry on like a two bob watch? (if youy are a Grandfather then you should know what 2 bob is worth).saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:02pmGreat grand father even.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:20pmYou're a Grandfather?saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:03pmRubbish, you can't count.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:00pmYou're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmsaintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Even in general teams there is only one pick 35 and one pick 45. Even my three year old grand daughter would understand that.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is how I picture you after that news![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: What we need
Yep and I know that 36 comes after 35 and 46 follows on from 45.Trev from the Bush wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:48pmAt least he can count, even without taking his socks offSaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:39pmIf you are a Grandfather and indeed a Great Grandfather then why do you carry on like a two bob watch? (if youy are a Grandfather then you should know what 2 bob is worth).saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:02pmGreat grand father even.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:20pmYou're a Grandfather?saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:03pmRubbish, you can't count.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:00pmYou're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmsaintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amGhost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
Dunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Even in general teams there is only one pick 35 and one pick 45. Even my three year old grand daughter would understand that.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is how I picture you after that news![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: What we need
Trev from the Bush wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:48pmAt least he can count, even without taking his socks offSaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:39pmIf you are a Grandfather and indeed a Great Grandfather then why do you carry on like a two bob watch? (if youy are a Grandfather then you should know what 2 bob is worth).saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:02pmGreat grand father even.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:20pmYou're a Grandfather?saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:03pmRubbish, you can't count.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:00pmYou're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmsaintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amDunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Even in general teams there is only one pick 35 and one pick 45. Even my three year old grand daughter would understand that.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is how I picture you after that news![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: What we need
saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:51pmYep and I know that 36 comes after 35 and 46 follows on from 45.Trev from the Bush wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:48pmAt least he can count, even without taking his socks offSaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:39pmIf you are a Grandfather and indeed a Great Grandfather then why do you carry on like a two bob watch? (if youy are a Grandfather then you should know what 2 bob is worth).saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 4:02pmGreat grand father even.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:20pmYou're a Grandfather?saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:03pmRubbish, you can't count.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 3:00pmYou're a riot saynta. I was speaking in general terms.saynta wrote: ↑Sun 18 Oct 2020 10:50amDon't know how you came to the conclusion that there are two picks at 35 and two picks at 45SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 12:53pmsaintbob wrote: ↑Sat 17 Oct 2020 3:57amGhost Like wrote: ↑Fri 16 Oct 2020 9:59am100% agree.
Dunstan's disposal and pace seems to improve the longer he doesn't play. He's a slightly better tackler than Ross, his commitment and courage can never be questioned but he's as one sided as Ross, slower than Ross, less durable than Ross.
Ross needs to be one of our 4th to 6th midfielders, not Dunstan. I hope a club really wants him and he has a good finish to his AFL career...Win / Win.
Dunstan has been on our list since 2013 and hasn't been able to cement a spot so why are people so desperate to keep him, lets move him on and see what we can get for him.
It's the same as everyones blind faith in Lonie (2014), who bobs up every now and again and kicks a few goals usually against the lesser sides and then goes missing for weeks on end.
Agreed. Dunstan, Lonie, Roberton and Webster should be traded. If we were able to get pick 35 for Dunstan, 35 for Lonie, 45 for Roberton and 45 for Webster and then bundle all the picks up we might be able to move up the draft order. Pick 35 = 522 x 2 = 1044, Pick 45 = 347 x 2 = 694, 1044 + 694 = 1738 which is the equivalent of pick 6 (approx). Now I'm not saying a club would give us pick 6 for those 4 players but those points will give us extra bargaining power during the trade period.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Even in general teams there is only one pick 35 and one pick 45. Even my three year old grand daughter would understand that.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is how I picture you after that news![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)