SS Bannings

[johnearljames]

I have the best avatar.

[Joffa Burns]

When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.

You should see what happens on St Kilda facebook groups. No moderators at all.

I don't agree with VPN bans. Ban the user and when they come back with a new user they usually are a lot better.

A leopard doesn't change its spot:

Cairnsman (3/3)
- baiting a poster (severe category)
- abusing other posters
- trolling and causing an ongoing dispute
==> nic ban 20/05/19
==> Now known as Highettman

Highettman (3/3)
- multiple breaches in one day
- cause of ongoing dispute with ss1986
- Constantly posting negative comments about a poster
NOTE: this results in a second permanent ban for this poster
- was given last chance and that was revoked once stating a posting outrgaeous negative claims about another poster
- NOW banned permanently

Pundit
- banned permanenty via I.P. as trolling forum on non football matters and found to be Highettman / Cairnsman

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post

johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling

Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling

[johnearljames]

When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.

You should see what happens on St Kilda facebook groups. No moderators at all.

I don't agree with VPN bans. Ban the user and when they come back with a new user they usually are a lot better.

A leopard doesn't change its spot:

Cairnsman (3/3)
- baiting a poster (severe category)
- abusing other posters
- trolling and causing an ongoing dispute
==> nic ban 20/05/19
==> Now known as Highettman

Highettman (3/3)
- multiple breaches in one day
- cause of ongoing dispute with ss1986
- Constantly posting negative comments about a poster
NOTE: this results in a second permanent ban for this poster
- was given last chance and that was revoked once stating a posting outrgaeous negative claims about another poster
- NOW banned permanently

Pundit
- banned permanenty via I.P. as trolling forum on non football matters and found to be Highettman / Cairnsman

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post

johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling

Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling

?

[saynta]

When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.

You should see what happens on St Kilda facebook groups. No moderators at all.

I don't agree with VPN bans. Ban the user and when they come back with a new user they usually are a lot better.

A leopard doesn't change its spot:

Cairnsman (3/3)
- baiting a poster (severe category)
- abusing other posters
- trolling and causing an ongoing dispute
==> nic ban 20/05/19
==> Now known as Highettman

Highettman (3/3)
- multiple breaches in one day
- cause of ongoing dispute with ss1986
- Constantly posting negative comments about a poster
NOTE: this results in a second permanent ban for this poster
- was given last chance and that was revoked once stating a posting outrgaeous negative claims about another poster
- NOW banned permanently

Pundit
- banned permanenty via I.P. as trolling forum on non football matters and found to be Highettman / Cairnsman

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post

johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling

Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling

Exactly.

[The_Dud]

When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.

You should see what happens on St Kilda facebook groups. No moderators at all.

I don't agree with VPN bans. Ban the user and when they come back with a new user they usually are a lot better.

A leopard doesn't change its spot:

Cairnsman (3/3)
- baiting a poster (severe category)
- abusing other posters
- trolling and causing an ongoing dispute
==> nic ban 20/05/19
==> Now known as Highettman

Highettman (3/3)
- multiple breaches in one day
- cause of ongoing dispute with ss1986
- Constantly posting negative comments about a poster
NOTE: this results in a second permanent ban for this poster
- was given last chance and that was revoked once stating a posting outrgaeous negative claims about another poster
- NOW banned permanently

Pundit
- banned permanenty via I.P. as trolling forum on non football matters and found to be Highettman / Cairnsman

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post

johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling

Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling

?

Having trouble keeping track of all your aliases Ted?

[johnearljames]

When someone has repeatedly been banned I tend to agree that person should be banned permanently, whatever nic they return with. VPNs can complicate identification but it’s usually pretty obvious by the posting style who the ‘returned’ poster is.

You should see what happens on St Kilda facebook groups. No moderators at all.

I don't agree with VPN bans. Ban the user and when they come back with a new user they usually are a lot better.

A leopard doesn't change its spot:

Cairnsman (3/3)
- baiting a poster (severe category)
- abusing other posters
- trolling and causing an ongoing dispute
==> nic ban 20/05/19
==> Now known as Highettman

Highettman (3/3)
- multiple breaches in one day
- cause of ongoing dispute with ss1986
- Constantly posting negative comments about a poster
NOTE: this results in a second permanent ban for this poster
- was given last chance and that was revoked once stating a posting outrgaeous negative claims about another poster
- NOW banned permanently

Pundit
- banned permanenty via I.P. as trolling forum on non football matters and found to be Highettman / Cairnsman

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Tedtheodorelogan2018 (3/3)
- continually commenting on another poster
- inappropriate post using a sexually explicit term
- culturally inappropriate post

johnnyrayflamingo (3/3) aka tedtheodorelogan2018
- trolling
- deliberate baiting and trolling
- trolling

Johnearljames (1/3) aka tedtheodorelogan
- trolling

?

Having trouble keeping track of all your aliases Ted?

Still ?

[Harves Man]

Do what I do . Don't have an avatar. That way you cannot upset anyone.

Wouldn't have a clue who dud's avatar is anyway, much less how it could upset anybody.

So, a wiseguy, huh?

[SaintPav]

It doesn’t take long for posters to revert back to type and the patterns are easy to detect after a while.

Anyway, having a persona of a persona is pretty f***ed up. Anyone who can fake that must be a little touched.

[ace]

Do what I do . Don't have an avatar. That way you cannot upset anyone.

Wouldn't have a clue who dud's avatar is anyway, much less how it could upset anybody.

You have confused me.
I thought the avatar was a selfie of Dud.

[saynta]

Do what I do . Don't have an avatar. That way you cannot upset anyone.

Wouldn't have a clue who dud's avatar is anyway, much less how it could upset anybody.

So, a wiseguy, huh?

Well, not a stooge anyway.

[saynta]

Do what I do . Don't have an avatar. That way you cannot upset anyone.

Wouldn't have a clue who dud's avatar is anyway, much less how it could upset anybody.

You have confused me.
I thought the avatar was a selfie of Dud.

That thought did enter my mind, but I dismissed it almost immediately. Dud is not that good looking.

[SaintPelican66]

It doesn’t take long for posters to revert back to type and the patterns are easy to detect after a while.

Anyway, having a persona of a persona is pretty f***ed up. Anyone who can fake that must be a little touched.

If the above is true then who do you think I used be?

Mind you, I have been behaving myself by ignoring the antagonists.

[SaintPav]

It doesn’t take long for posters to revert back to type and the patterns are easy to detect after a while.

Anyway, having a persona of a persona is pretty f***ed up. Anyone who can fake that must be a little touched.

If the above is true then who do you think I used be?

Mind you, I have been behaving myself by ignoring the antagonists.

Kells.

[asiu]

Pluggs

[st.byron]

It doesn’t take long for posters to revert back to type and the patterns are easy to detect after a while.

Anyway, having a persona of a persona is pretty f***ed up. Anyone who can fake that must be a little touched.

If the above is true then who do you think I used be?

Mind you, I have been behaving myself by ignoring the antagonists.

That degree of “look at me, look at me” is Tedistic.

[asiu]

lol at tedistic