Battle forward
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1123 times
Re: Battle forward
I was just thinking this - with Membrey so reliable overhead - but not having a huge impact forward - maybe Battle goes forward and Members as a link-up man / get out of trouble kick between the Arcs?
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10774
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 827 times
Re: Battle forward
How is Hugh going at Carlton.WellardSaint wrote: ↑Wed 11 Sep 2019 4:49pm I'm still amazed that he wasn't picked earlier in the draft,
he was pick #39.
We're incredibly lucky that he was still there when we had our 2nd pick.
He only went to defence to fill a big gap, Robbo being injured and Hugh Goddard not coming on as expected.
Still plodding not really adapted to our high speed game.
He and Mark McGough could make the core of a slow footy team.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
- DownAtTheJunction
- Club Player
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Sat 16 Feb 2008 10:24pm
- Location: Dark Side Of The Moon
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 87 times
Re: Battle forward
I like this as a thought but I'm not sure how happy he would be. I think he could play similarly to Jeremy Howe.Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Fri 07 Aug 2020 10:02am I was just thinking this - with Membrey so reliable overhead - but not having a huge impact forward - maybe Battle goes forward and Members as a link-up man / get out of trouble kick between the Arcs?
- DownAtTheJunction
- Club Player
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Sat 16 Feb 2008 10:24pm
- Location: Dark Side Of The Moon
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 87 times
Re: Battle forward
Good little thought there actually DATJ...
Does the significance of the play in the context of the match impact the score? Should it?
[/quote]
Considering Hind's score last week, he should do ok.
[/quote]
I haven't done any work on 'Impact' scores yet but I agree with you, CQ SAINT - 'the significance of the play in the context of the match' is absolutely important. Finding a fair multiplier for the action is always a challenge.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17024
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3644 times
- Been thanked: 2916 times
Re: Battle forward
Considering Hind's score last week, he should do ok.DownAtTheJunction wrote: ↑Fri 07 Aug 2020 1:16pmGood little thought there actually DATJ...
Does the significance of the play in the context of the match impact the score? Should it?
[/quote]
I haven't done any work on 'Impact' scores yet but I agree with you, CQ SAINT - 'the significance of the play in the context of the match' is absolutely important. Finding a fair multiplier for the action is always a challenge.
[/quote]
Don’t think it can be anything other than subjective.
I’d say back your judgement
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Battle forward
It would say "Utility" on his footy card.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10445
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1328 times
Re: Battle forward
Battle is a natural forward leads well is good overhead and protects the drop zone with good body use. Very hard to teach a lot of theses things and no matter the physical attributes or willingness a player has they just can't grasp forward play.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2011 7:19pm
- Has thanked: 613 times
- Been thanked: 402 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
- Has thanked: 2043 times
- Been thanked: 1163 times
Re: Battle forward
Absolutely agree. West Coast supporters will tell you that whilst they had a midfield to die for (albeit some with substance issues) it was a guy called Adam Hunter who won them many games in that 05/06 period by being the 'everywhere' guy. The ultimate modern swingman. That is precisely the player I see Battle becoming. A superb intercept mark down back (by necessity last year) but, who's a natural forward by training. Matthew Lloyd regularly says that (before he had the King twins) that Battle was the guy who had the biggest tank in junior football and the best natural kicking style. They're quite the attributes for a key forward (albeit a little undersized by modern standards).
Battle could develop into the perfect modern footballer - just as adept forward as back but with a big tank to play through the middle at times. I have a feeling he'll end up a big bodied wingman.
Go you red, black & white warriors
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 587 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: Battle forward
I think he, Membrey and King will be a great combination for a few years. When you add Butler and Hind running around at their feet that’s a very good mix.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1444 times
- Been thanked: 1489 times
Re: Battle forward
Josh makes defenders look over their shoulders too - for good reason, he plays hard.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14010
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1314 times
- Been thanked: 2092 times
Re: Battle forward
I love how he's being used this year all over the ground, he's like our very own Taysom Hill, looks comfortable anywhere they put him and can pop up and kick a few when needed.
Though lets just say I wasn't too confident when he was lining up, but he put them both straight thru the middle!
Though lets just say I wasn't too confident when he was lining up, but he put them both straight thru the middle!
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Battle forward
Battle is a natural forward and an excellent kick. Only 1cm shorter than Roo too actually, but bulkier and harder at it.. CHF material imhfo.