ace wrote: ↑Thu 28 Nov 2019 12:35pm
jaxons wrote: ↑Wed 27 Nov 2019 9:54pm
Just to be clear we are legally not allowed to trade our future first pick next year.
ARE YOU KIDDING JAXONS
Either Round 1 OR any number of later rounds BUT not both round 1 and later rounds ?
how did Melbourne get away with trading their 2020 picks
Round 1 to North
Round 2 to Fremantle
Round 4 to Hawthorn
https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-09-29/ ... they-stand
Was this a result of
1. a rule change making this now allowable
2. the AFL has made a mistake on their website
3. the AFL is serially corrupt having failed to cancel the O'Meara trade because they knew Gold Coast would lose O'Meara in the pre-season draft for nothing.
I called the O'Meara trade on Saintsational, on the HUN comments and the AGE comments on the day of the trade.
No mention by the CORRUPT media reporters protecting the AFL until a week later when at the end of a different story in the HUN, AFL recognition of an "error" was slipped in.
ok.. I also dont seem to understand the rules..
I think Melbourne had two first rounders in 2019... So over a two year period, 2019-2020, they will have 2 first rounders.
Which I take as legal. And other rounds are therefore not affected.
Saints had 2 first rounders in 2018, so did not need to use a first rounder in 2019.. in 2018-2019 we had two.
But why coundn't we trade our 2020 first rounder for someones 2019 first rounder?
I mean.. we have no 2nd rounder in either year.... So one of the two we have no first or second and the other, we have a first but no second... why does it matter which order that happens? i.e 2019 no 1st no 2nd 2020 no 2nd... compared to 2019 no 2nd 2020 no 1st no 2nd
I am clearly missing something.. but the rules seem strange