TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Nice work Saints.
If we were taking the picks to the draft I’d be dubious, given it appears we will trade them I think it’s a great move and opens up opportunity.
If we were taking the picks to the draft I’d be dubious, given it appears we will trade them I think it’s a great move and opens up opportunity.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Would they take #18 back for Bonar?
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:04pm
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
We haven't got a free pick 45. The points difference between pick 6 and picks 12 and 18 combined is the equivalent of pick 45. The only reason that freo would accept picks 12 and 18 instead of pick 6 is that that they have an academy kid Liam Henry who is going to be subject to bidding at some point in the first round and this way they could have him and another first round pick, however they could have had this with pick 6 and make up the points for the bid with their 2nd round pick/what they get for Langdon.Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 3:06pmI can't imagine that we are going to give both 12 and 18 to Freo - why would Freo take them after knowing that we got a free pick 45 for the trade - why would they not see it as the same as pick 6 and therefore no benefit???
It does not sweeten the deal if I go to the shops to buy an $50.00 item and rather than giving them $50.00 I give then 2 x $20.00. That only works on 5 year olds!
In short, I have no idea what is happening now!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
- Location: Mentone
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 263 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
I think they want 18 for something other than Hill - possibly Howard.amusingname wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 3:59pmWe haven't got a free pick 45. The points difference between pick 6 and picks 12 and 18 combined is the equivalent of pick 45. The only reason that freo would accept picks 12 and 18 instead of pick 6 is that that they have an academy kid Liam Henry who is going to be subject to bidding at some point in the first round and this way they could have him and another first round pick, however they could have had this with pick 6 and make up the points for the bid with their 2nd round pick/what they get for Langdon.Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 3:06pmI can't imagine that we are going to give both 12 and 18 to Freo - why would Freo take them after knowing that we got a free pick 45 for the trade - why would they not see it as the same as pick 6 and therefore no benefit???
It does not sweeten the deal if I go to the shops to buy an $50.00 item and rather than giving them $50.00 I give then 2 x $20.00. That only works on 5 year olds!
In short, I have no idea what is happening now!
One year will be our year
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
13 and 32 for 18 and Bruce
13 & Steven for 24, 36, 37
-------
24, 36 - Howard, Ryder, Gray and 62
37 - Z.Jones
12, Rnd 1 2020 & 32 - BKing
62 - Butler
------
Get Acres, Clark, Coffield, Sinclair, Gresham into the middle. Try some players out. McKenzie v gcs in 2018 was brilliant in the middle won us the game.
-----
13 & Steven for 24, 36, 37
-------
24, 36 - Howard, Ryder, Gray and 62
37 - Z.Jones
12, Rnd 1 2020 & 32 - BKing
62 - Butler
------
Get Acres, Clark, Coffield, Sinclair, Gresham into the middle. Try some players out. McKenzie v gcs in 2018 was brilliant in the middle won us the game.
-----
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Forget Hill GET BEN KING!!
We got ZJones, Hind, Parker, Kent, Long, Billings
how many little wingers do we need??
Geary Carlisle Webster
Wilkie Howard Savage
Hind Ross ZJones
Billings BKing Parker
Gresham MKing Membrey
Marshal Steele, Clark
Ryder Acres Dunstan Coffield
Another pre season into the young guns we will be fine.
Rotate the king twins, rotate marshal and ryder
Thats a good team.
We got ZJones, Hind, Parker, Kent, Long, Billings
how many little wingers do we need??
Geary Carlisle Webster
Wilkie Howard Savage
Hind Ross ZJones
Billings BKing Parker
Gresham MKing Membrey
Marshal Steele, Clark
Ryder Acres Dunstan Coffield
Another pre season into the young guns we will be fine.
Rotate the king twins, rotate marshal and ryder
Thats a good team.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 570 times
- Been thanked: 109 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Don’t overate his performance he has yet to show us his best but he must be coached properly & played in position his build and tank do not grow on trees, I agree his time is next year & I have no doubt he will fulfill his potential hopefully with us!
PADDLEPOP1000
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
I’d be pissed off if we got rid of Acres before he had a year of Ratten in charge
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6285
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1097 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Yes Mr Nameamusingname wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 3:59pmWe haven't got a free pick 45. The points difference between pick 6 and picks 12 and 18 combined is the equivalent of pick 45. The only reason that freo would accept picks 12 and 18 instead of pick 6 is that that they have an academy kid Liam Henry who is going to be subject to bidding at some point in the first round and this way they could have him and another first round pick, however they could have had this with pick 6 and make up the points for the bid with their 2nd round pick/what they get for Langdon.Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 3:06pmI can't imagine that we are going to give both 12 and 18 to Freo - why would Freo take them after knowing that we got a free pick 45 for the trade - why would they not see it as the same as pick 6 and therefore no benefit???
It does not sweeten the deal if I go to the shops to buy an $50.00 item and rather than giving them $50.00 I give then 2 x $20.00. That only works on 5 year olds!
In short, I have no idea what is happening now!
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
With all due respect SMS, I would NOT like to see a St Kilda side which continues to include the likes of Geary, Webster and Savage who to me are relics of an unsuccessful past and need to be moved on from plus I have serious doubts on Hind and Parker (including because I believe we have better options)
Plus I have a question mark over Ross despite his CV (just 22 goals from 124 games plus can we select Ross, Steele and Dunstan in the same side noting Steele tackles and handballs and Dunstan is "in and under" so of more team value than Ross?).
And Carlisle is a genuine outer defence KPP, not an accountable last line KPP. You are taking away his strength of intercept marking.
Added to that, Coffield is genuine CLASS, as with Clark and they will be our 2 mid sized defenders with (hopefully) Roberton, then Battle and a contest between Austin, Claravino and Howard on the last line.
And, we only have ONE King on our List.
Plus I have a question mark over Ross despite his CV (just 22 goals from 124 games plus can we select Ross, Steele and Dunstan in the same side noting Steele tackles and handballs and Dunstan is "in and under" so of more team value than Ross?).
And Carlisle is a genuine outer defence KPP, not an accountable last line KPP. You are taking away his strength of intercept marking.
Added to that, Coffield is genuine CLASS, as with Clark and they will be our 2 mid sized defenders with (hopefully) Roberton, then Battle and a contest between Austin, Claravino and Howard on the last line.
And, we only have ONE King on our List.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
- Location: incarnate
- Has thanked: 286 times
- Been thanked: 694 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Yep bold move but well played.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 3:52pm Nice work Saints.
If we were taking the picks to the draft I’d be dubious, given it appears we will trade them I think it’s a great move and opens up opportunity.
Hopefully we get Hill done, He really is the big ticket item here.
Nee!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
- Location: incarnate
- Has thanked: 286 times
- Been thanked: 694 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
To the top wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 5:35pm With all due respect SMS, I would NOT like to see a St Kilda side which continues to include the likes of Geary, Webster and Savage who to me are relics of an unsuccessful past and need to be moved on from plus I have serious doubts on Hind and Parker (including because I believe we have better options)
Plus I have a question mark over Ross despite his CV (just 22 goals from 124 games plus can we select Ross, Steele and Dunstan in the same side noting Steele tackles and handballs and Dunstan is "in and under" so of more team value than Ross?).
And Carlisle is a genuine outer defence KPP, not an accountable last line KPP. You are taking away his strength of intercept marking.
Added to that, Coffield is genuine CLASS, as with Clark and they will be our 2 mid sized defenders with (hopefully) Roberton, then Battle and a contest between Austin, Claravino and Howard on the last line.
And, we only have ONE King on our List.
What does Savage have to do to demonstrate his worth.
Had a great year. Couple of games he kept us in it.
Not a star but a very good player that knows the drill.
Nee!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
- Location: incarnate
- Has thanked: 286 times
- Been thanked: 694 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Unfair on Savage who had a really good year.To the top wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 5:35pm With all due respect SMS, I would NOT like to see a St Kilda side which continues to include the likes of Geary, Webster and Savage who to me are relics of an unsuccessful past and need to be moved on from plus I have serious doubts on Hind and Parker (including because I believe we have better options)
Plus I have a question mark over Ross despite his CV (just 22 goals from 124 games plus can we select Ross, Steele and Dunstan in the same side noting Steele tackles and handballs and Dunstan is "in and under" so of more team value than Ross?).
And Carlisle is a genuine outer defence KPP, not an accountable last line KPP. You are taking away his strength of intercept marking.
Added to that, Coffield is genuine CLASS, as with Clark and they will be our 2 mid sized defenders with (hopefully) Roberton, then Battle and a contest between Austin, Claravino and Howard on the last line.
And, we only have ONE King on our List.
Not sure what he has to do to get some
appreciation on here
Nee!
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
f*** yes.
I thought they would do this. Posted as such on here weeks ago.
Fantastic to see.
I thought they would do this. Posted as such on here weeks ago.
Fantastic to see.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
I reckon we will go 12,18 to Freo in exchange for Freo pick 27 which goes to Sydney for Jones.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
- Location: Del Mar, California
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Even if we end up taking 12 & 18 into the draft I'm still happy. This years draft appears quite shallow and I reckon it's a crap shoot between 6-12-18. Now we got two chances to stuff it up, or more positively two chances to pick up a good kid.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8375
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 1169 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Is everyone forgetting that we still need to use at least 3 picks in the National.Draft?
If we are trading in players for all these picks then we are gonna have to trade out to get picks back to use
Unless of course we use picks 80 100 120
If we are trading in players for all these picks then we are gonna have to trade out to get picks back to use
Unless of course we use picks 80 100 120
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sat 10 Dec 2011 3:40pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Interesting take on the GWS trade swap
https://www.3aw.com.au/what-fremantle-w ... -off-side/
https://www.3aw.com.au/what-fremantle-w ... -off-side/
The Oracle sees all, hears all, knows all.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
- Location: incarnate
- Has thanked: 286 times
- Been thanked: 694 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Ouch!theoracle wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 8:31pm Interesting take on the GWS trade swap
https://www.3aw.com.au/what-fremantle-w ... -off-side/
Bell has really screwed up here.
Whether we end up getting him or not, I'm pleased that we stuck to our guns and refused to get intimidated into a bad deal.
We are offering Hill overs for salary to get him here, where Essendon and Pies or Tigers seem to get players coming on reduced salaries....then we get this extrapolation that we obviously value him at 900k ...We should give 2 first round draft picks.....So we get screwed both on the trade and on the salary pay out.
Nee!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Granted Savage played very well v Fremantle - but look at his follow up games and then you see where I have my reservations
As I have put on here before, I have always been of the school that you build from defence - hence delighted with Coffield and Clark, with the reports on Roberton (who is equally adept off both feet unlike many these days) and with the way Battle has presented himself. Then you have Carlisle plus looking for a last line KPP defender - so Austin, Claravino and now possibly Howard
These resources - plus Wilkie - put a line thru Savage (and Webster, McKenzie and other flank defenders on our List
Each of Carlisle, Roberton, Clark, Coffield, Battle and Austin are excellent users of the ball so offensive weapons coming out of defence
Plus we can disrupt by pushing Battle forward
So that is my rationale
As I have put on here before, I have always been of the school that you build from defence - hence delighted with Coffield and Clark, with the reports on Roberton (who is equally adept off both feet unlike many these days) and with the way Battle has presented himself. Then you have Carlisle plus looking for a last line KPP defender - so Austin, Claravino and now possibly Howard
These resources - plus Wilkie - put a line thru Savage (and Webster, McKenzie and other flank defenders on our List
Each of Carlisle, Roberton, Clark, Coffield, Battle and Austin are excellent users of the ball so offensive weapons coming out of defence
Plus we can disrupt by pushing Battle forward
So that is my rationale
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16885
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3580 times
- Been thanked: 2844 times
Re: TRADE: Saints picks 6 & 59 for Giants 12 & 18
Have really enjoyed your posts on team/list as of late TTT. Agree with this one wholeheartedlyTo the top wrote: ↑Thu 10 Oct 2019 10:34pm Granted Savage played very well v Fremantle - but look at his follow up games and then you see where I have my reservations
As I have put on here before, I have always been of the school that you build from defence - hence delighted with Coffield and Clark, with the reports on Roberton (who is equally adept off both feet unlike many these days) and with the way Battle has presented himself. Then you have Carlisle plus looking for a last line KPP defender - so Austin, Claravino and now possibly Howard
These resources - plus Wilkie - put a line thru Savage (and Webster, McKenzie and other flank defenders on our List
Each of Carlisle, Roberton, Clark, Coffield, Battle and Austin are excellent users of the ball so offensive weapons coming out of defence
Plus we can disrupt by pushing Battle forward
So that is my rationale