Brad Crouch
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12077
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2605 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Brad Hill, Zac Jones and now Brad Couch... is everyone coming to us???
What exactly are we giving up to secure these players?
We have no draft picks, we have no good players we would want to trade (except Bruce which is a terrible mistake)
Yet every man and his dog are playing with us next year.
Why not mention Fyfe and Dusty?
What exactly are we giving up to secure these players?
We have no draft picks, we have no good players we would want to trade (except Bruce which is a terrible mistake)
Yet every man and his dog are playing with us next year.
Why not mention Fyfe and Dusty?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Brad Crouch
I agree, can't get everyone, and would be nice to have a couple of reasonable draft picks left to use. Hill will be good, but the others? Meh. Crouch is probably trying to bump up his contract at Adelaide, would be expensive, and we have a few of his type anyway who are near his standard.B.M wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 1:36pm Brad Hill, Zac Jones and now Brad Couch... is everyone coming to us???
What exactly are we giving up to secure these players?
We have no draft picks, we have no good players we would want to trade (except Bruce which is a terrible mistake)
Yet every man and his dog are playing with us next year.
Why not mention Fyfe and Dusty?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon 02 Sep 2019 1:22pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Where in the forum rules does it clearly state you have to provide a definite link and/or a source to any information you might be privy to?
Can someone clearly show this rule to me and others and post it right here please. Thank you very much.
Otherwise, I feel like I am getting unfairly singled out and bullied here. It's obvious I can't always provide detailed details on a rumour nor should I have to post a link about something I have read online or saw on TV or heard on the radio every time. I don't have time for that. Try Google next time.
Can someone clearly show this rule to me and others and post it right here please. Thank you very much.
Otherwise, I feel like I am getting unfairly singled out and bullied here. It's obvious I can't always provide detailed details on a rumour nor should I have to post a link about something I have read online or saw on TV or heard on the radio every time. I don't have time for that. Try Google next time.
Last edited by johnnyrayflamingo on Mon 23 Sep 2019 2:43pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon 02 Sep 2019 1:22pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Thank you poster Takeaway. The scrutiny about my posts is mind boggling.takeaway wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 1:00pmSome might prefer the link, but others not that concerned about it. The post provides the rumour/news/ etc, and if the forumite wants to find out more, quite easy to check. If the forumite thinks it is rubbish, as are a lot of the media reports as well, just ignore it.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 11:57amI think most people would agree that posting a summary of news and a link to the article is well received by members of this forum.linmarnic wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 9:27amCheers Ted. I like coming here to see the latest trade news rather than search all over the net.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 9:08am Just helping out some Saints fans here. Cor Blimey!
When summary is posted without link the actual message of the article can be somewhat blurred as it is the writers interpretation of what they have read.
Posting a link removes ambiguity and allows forum members to enjoy the article in its entirety.
This of course does not sit well with some members of the forum as it removes their ability to pretend to have access to club inside information.
A couple of old posters using this style were parkeysainter & tedtheodorelogan2018. It’s fair to suggest flamingo posts in a strikingly similar manner to the above two departed forum members.
What if JRF posts the info using his array of contacts before the media does, should he state source=private?
Anyway, keep it going JRF - Just Reporting Facts.
- barneyboyz
- Club Player
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Might be worthy of a quiet discussion with someone down at Slater & Gordon???johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 2:40pm Where in the forum rules does it clearly state you have to provide a definite link and/or a source to any information you might be privy to?
Can someone clearly show this rule to me and others and post it right here please. Thank you very much.
Otherwise, I feel like I am getting unfairly singled out and bullied here. It's obvious I can't always provide detailed details on a rumour nor should I have to post a link about something I have read online or saw on TV or heard on the radio every time. I don't have time for that. Try Google next time.
Interesting comments coming from many quarters on here, and for quite some time too. Now, who cares where anyone gets their info from? I'm pretty sure the poster has never actually claimed to be an ITK??? but many comments are or could be concieved to be bullying.
At a time when we are asked to be mindful of mental health (and the consequences of), I think we can all understand that "yes" this person is a little short on details, but for Pete's sake, do we really need to go down the path of such vitriol? surely not
Why read a thread simply based on the need to catch someone out bulltishing??? If you don't get this bloke, then don't read
Ha ha and some of the bullies change their names too
St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960 ![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11557
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3525 times
- Been thanked: 2465 times
Re: Brad Crouch
The mod made an effort to provide you an opportunity to avoid getting a permanent ban. The mod was helping you by posting th specific rule here in this thread. Have the respect and courtesy to read the post by BfUSA and stop playing the victimjohnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 2:40pm Where in the forum rules does it clearly state you have to provide a definite link and/or a source to any information you might be privy to?
Can someone clearly show this rule to me and others and post it right here please. Thank you very much.
Otherwise, I feel like I am getting unfairly singled out and bullied here. It's obvious I can't always provide detailed details on a rumour nor should I have to post a link about something I have read online or saw on TV or heard on the radio every time. I don't have time for that. Try Google next time.
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13245
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 644 times
- Been thanked: 1908 times
Re: Brad Crouch
As one of the bullies I would like to see this stirrer removed permanently
PS He is good at what he does....causes disharmony on the forum...gets banned..comes back ..... causes disharmony .. will get banned again.. ground hog day.
I feel inclined to use similar tactics on a Collingwood forum. But can't be bothered..
PS He is good at what he does....causes disharmony on the forum...gets banned..comes back ..... causes disharmony .. will get banned again.. ground hog day.
I feel inclined to use similar tactics on a Collingwood forum. But can't be bothered..
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Brad Crouch
You sir/madame display in the above post a perfect example of what is wrong with todays society.barneyboyz wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 3:47pmMight be worthy of a quiet discussion with someone down at Slater & Gordon???johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 2:40pm Where in the forum rules does it clearly state you have to provide a definite link and/or a source to any information you might be privy to?
Can someone clearly show this rule to me and others and post it right here please. Thank you very much.
Otherwise, I feel like I am getting unfairly singled out and bullied here. It's obvious I can't always provide detailed details on a rumour nor should I have to post a link about something I have read online or saw on TV or heard on the radio every time. I don't have time for that. Try Google next time.
Ha ha and some of the bullies change their names too
Don’t like something you read, play the bullying card and run to an ambulance chaser.
Go to Slater and Gordon and take action because people call you out on a football forum for being a fake ITK???
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
If you want to sue someone, start with me!
Slater & Gordon over being called a fake ITK
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Post if the year!
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun 22 Sep 2019 8:19pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Brad Crouch
A lot of sooking going on in this thread, the people calling JRF are the loudest and pettiest and just sound like dobbers, I hope we can snag Crouchy, imagine him and Hill added to the team.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12077
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2605 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Exactly how are we ‘snagging’ Crouch?
Adelaide just going to give us one of there best players?
Adelaide just going to give us one of there best players?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun 22 Sep 2019 8:19pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Brad Crouch
it's "thier".
And yeah sure they are just going to give us one of "thier" players, what is this, a school yard push and shove session.
I just said it would be good to snag him, maybe look up the word snag in the urban dictionary.
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Brad Crouch
"thier" is not right either.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun 22 Sep 2019 8:19pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Wayne42 wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 8:24pm"thier" is not right either.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Brad Crouch
not the urban dictionary again
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Brad Crouch
i used that yesty to look up spinking
another newbie
it could be a fun cricket season
at this rate
are there any odds on Ted making it all the way to R1 ?
another newbie
it could be a fun cricket season
at this rate
are there any odds on Ted making it all the way to R1 ?
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Brad Crouch
That sounds like something johnnytheherorbogun would say.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Back on Brad Crouch. At this stage I think it most unlikely he joins us.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16891
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Interesting to see that a number of new posters have joined in the last few days who have prioritised sticking up for JohnnyraysaintsRrising wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 9:53pmThat sounds like something johnnytheherorbogun would say.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Poor old Johnny Ray.....skeptic wrote:Interesting to see that a number of new posters have joined in the last few days who have prioritised sticking up for JohnnyraysaintsRrising wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 9:53pmThat sounds like something johnnytheherorbogun would say.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12077
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2605 times
Re: Brad Crouch
I love it when people resort to correcting grammar on a fan forum... it generally means they have no point.
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Brad Crouch
What's your point.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12077
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2605 times
Re: Brad Crouch
That people who resort to correcting grammar, have no decent argument... thought that was pretty easy to understand?!
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4639
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 506 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Would want more than crouch for Bruce and next years first rounder!
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: Brad Crouch
Yep gotta say I agree.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2019 2:40pm Where in the forum rules does it clearly state you have to provide a definite link and/or a source to any information you might be privy to?
Can someone clearly show this rule to me and others and post it right here please. Thank you very much.
Otherwise, I feel like I am getting unfairly singled out and bullied here. It's obvious I can't always provide detailed details on a rumour nor should I have to post a link about something I have read online or saw on TV or heard on the radio every time. I don't have time for that. Try Google next time.
If I needed a link every time, I’d just read the news.