Ryder to Saints (two year deal)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16888
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3580 times
- Been thanked: 2848 times
Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)
Would be good if this thread could just stick to discussing Ryder as most have done without making it into a drama about what individual forumite's temperaments
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 598 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
- Contact:
Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)
In other words, save us from "ourselves".... ( after all, "ourselves" and "stupidity" here are interchangeable/synonymous terms).
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2603 times
Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)
Only people who think it’s a good idea are those trying to convince themselves its a good idea, in case it happens.
They also believe/d that every stk decision is a good one, until hindsight suggests it wasn’t.
I respect those who are willing to call the mistake early and risk some humble pie... because on most occasions they are right and invariably Stk makes a poor call.
Stk history is littered with terrible decisions
To continue to delude oneself of that fact, and the fact they continue to make poor decisions is strange imo
They also believe/d that every stk decision is a good one, until hindsight suggests it wasn’t.
I respect those who are willing to call the mistake early and risk some humble pie... because on most occasions they are right and invariably Stk makes a poor call.
Stk history is littered with terrible decisions
To continue to delude oneself of that fact, and the fact they continue to make poor decisions is strange imo
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)
I'll be quite relaxed if we don't get him, happy with Marshall doing it himself.B.M wrote: ↑Tue 17 Sep 2019 6:31pm Only people who think it’s a good idea are those trying to convince themselves its a good idea, in case it happens.
They also believe/d that every stk decision is a good one, until hindsight suggests it wasn’t.
I respect those who are willing to call the mistake early and risk some humble pie... because on most occasions they are right and invariably Stk makes a poor call.
Stk history is littered with terrible decisions
To continue to delude oneself of that fact, and the fact they continue to make poor decisions is strange imo
However, I won't be too fussed if we do get him. I don't think we will be paying huge money and in the absolute worst case scenario, Ryder will play for Sandy and we'll have a backup if Marshall gets injured.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon 02 Sep 2019 1:22pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)
Exactly.Linton Lodger wrote: ↑Tue 17 Sep 2019 6:38pmI'll be quite relaxed if we don't get him, happy with Marshall doing it himself.B.M wrote: ↑Tue 17 Sep 2019 6:31pm Only people who think it’s a good idea are those trying to convince themselves its a good idea, in case it happens.
They also believe/d that every stk decision is a good one, until hindsight suggests it wasn’t.
I respect those who are willing to call the mistake early and risk some humble pie... because on most occasions they are right and invariably Stk makes a poor call.
Stk history is littered with terrible decisions
To continue to delude oneself of that fact, and the fact they continue to make poor decisions is strange imo
However, I won't be too fussed if we do get him. I don't think we will be paying huge money and in the absolute worst case scenario, Ryder will play for Sandy and we'll have a backup if Marshall gets injured.