Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
The_Dud wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 1:42pm
I’m thinking there’s a lot of old white dudes here who have become worried not everyone bows down to their every thought anymore like they did 40 years ago.
You have it back to front dudley. As usual.
We all know you are ageist as well, so drop off with the insults.
To the contrary, I think I’m pretty spot on.
And how is it ‘ageist’ to say older people are more ‘conservative’ than younger people? I’m pretty sure that’s well documented in voting patterns.
The leftie, thought control PC police are the problem, not the old white guys ffs. As I said you have it back to front. Who is actually trying to get people to bow down or conform to their every thought or view of the worLd ffs?
You are using the term "old white dudes" as an insult and now you are trying to weasel out.
The_Dud wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 1:42pm
I’m thinking there’s a lot of old white dudes here who have become worried not everyone bows down to their every thought anymore like they did 40 years ago.
You have it back to front dudley. As usual.
We all know you are ageist as well, so drop off with the insults.
To the contrary, I think I’m pretty spot on.
And how is it ‘ageist’ to say older people are more ‘conservative’ than younger people? I’m pretty sure that’s well documented in voting patterns.
The leftie, thought control PC police are the problem, not the old white guys ffs. As I said you have it back to front. Who is actually trying to get people to bow down or conform to their every thought or view of the worLd ffs?
You are using the term "old white dudes" as an insult and now you are trying to weasel out.
“When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.”
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
The_Dud wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 1:42pm
I’m thinking there’s a lot of old white dudes here who have become worried not everyone bows down to their every thought anymore like they did 40 years ago.
You have it back to front dudley. As usual.
We all know you are ageist as well, so drop off with the insults.
To the contrary, I think I’m pretty spot on.
And how is it ‘ageist’ to say older people are more ‘conservative’ than younger people? I’m pretty sure that’s well documented in voting patterns.
The leftie, thought control PC police are the problem, not the old white guys ffs. As I said you have it back to front. Who is actually trying to get people to bow down or conform to their every thought or view of the worLd ffs?
You are using the term "old white dudes" as an insult and now you are trying to weasel out.
“When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.”
Bull s***.
You certainly fit the bill as being ageist.
ageist
/ˈeɪdʒɪst/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
adjective: ageist; adjective: agist
1.
characterized by or showing prejudice or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age.
"a lot of ageist jokes about not being able to use technology"
The_Dud wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 1:42pm
I’m thinking there’s a lot of old white dudes here who have become worried not everyone bows down to their every thought anymore like they did 40 years ago.
You have it back to front dudley. As usual.
We all know you are ageist as well, so drop off with the insults.
To the contrary, I think I’m pretty spot on.
And how is it ‘ageist’ to say older people are more ‘conservative’ than younger people? I’m pretty sure that’s well documented in voting patterns.
The leftie, thought control PC police are the problem, not the old white guys ffs. As I said you have it back to front. Who is actually trying to get people to bow down or conform to their every thought or view of the worLd ffs?
You are using the term "old white dudes" as an insult and now you are trying to weasel out.
“When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.”
Bull s***.
You certainly fit the bill as being ageist.
ageist
/ˈeɪdʒɪst/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
adjective: ageist; adjective: agist
1.
characterized by or showing prejudice or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age.
"a lot of ageist jokes about not being able to use technology"
bigcarl wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 2:15pm
Just own it, Dud. You are ageist
Do I think a lot of the older generation are out of touch with ‘modern’ society and the way the world is headed, and are too stubborn to reflect on their beliefs and acknowledge that things that were once deemed acceptable no longer are? Yep, sure do.
Do I think a lot of the older generation are the complete opposite to this? Yep, sure do.
It’s not my fault if you fit into the former.
And hey, there’s plenty of younger people who are racist/homophobic/sexist etc. too, and I equally disagree with them.
What of it?
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
bigcarl wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 2:15pm
Just own it, Dud. You are ageist
Do I think a lot of the older generation are out of touch with ‘modern’ society and the way the world is headed, and are too stubborn to reflect on their beliefs and acknowledge that things that were once deemed acceptable no longer are? Yep, sure do.
Do I think a lot of the older generation are the complete opposite to this? Yep, sure do.
It’s not my fault if you fit into the former.
And hey, there’s plenty of younger people who are racist/homophobic/sexist etc. too, and I equally disagree with them.
bigcarl wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 2:15pm
Just own it, Dud. You are ageist
Do I think a lot of the older generation are out of touch with ‘modern’ society and the way the world is headed, and are too stubborn to reflect on their beliefs and acknowledge that things that were once deemed acceptable no longer are? Yep, sure do.
Do I think a lot of the older generation are the complete opposite to this? Yep, sure do.
It’s not my fault if you fit into the former.
And hey, there’s plenty of younger people who are racist/homophobic/sexist etc. too, and I equally disagree with them.
What of it?
I’m offended!
Well, Boomers are the easily offended generation.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
bigcarl wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 1:50pm
Who was that clown of a security guard who wanted to break up an on field scuffle between two players? I suspect he hadn’t been to a lot of football matches.
That's racist.
I wouldn't have thought it is.
I think making assumptions about someone's abilities based on their actions is pretty reasonable.
Making those same assumptions based on their race however....
If the truth be know, everyone is a racist to some extent, some more than others. As you state, some just deny it.
I don't think everyone is.
But plenty are.
Many have changed it, and some are trying to change it.
Some don't even realise they are.
But some deny it, even when told that they are.
And then there are others that refuse to change.
I actually empathise with most, except the ones that refuse to change, and the ones that deny it.
Maybe you need to stop using words incorrectly. You made a statement about those throwing the phrase "leftie" around, but you are using the exact behaviour that elicits that response.
You are misusing the word "racist". People are not being racist, they are discriminating. To be racist means to hold a belief or view that a person, or group of people, are in some way inferior or less worthy than others, or to hold a dislike/hatred of them, based purely on race. People are discriminating when they judge someone to be a new arrival to Australia, based purely on appearance.
These people are phoney lefties and fake environmentalists, particularly the s*** eating green supporters. They are fence sitters and soy boy/soy girl brainwashed drones.
don't think you can eat s***, actually, on a vegan diet.
bigcarl wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 1:50pm
Who was that clown of a security guard who wanted to break up an on field scuffle between two players? I suspect he hadn’t been to a lot of football matches.
That's racist.
I wouldn't have thought it is.
I think making assumptions about someone's abilities based on their actions is pretty reasonable.
Making those same assumptions based on their race however....
Well he was lucky a green-headed maggot stopped him.
bigcarl wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 2:15pm
Just own it, Dud. You are ageist
Do I think a lot of the older generation are out of touch with ‘modern’ society and the way the world is headed, and are too stubborn to reflect on their beliefs and acknowledge that things that were once deemed acceptable no longer are? Yep, sure do.
Do I think a lot of the older generation are the complete opposite to this? Yep, sure do.
It’s not my fault if you fit into the former.
And hey, there’s plenty of younger people who are racist/homophobic/sexist etc. too, and I equally disagree with them.
What of it?
I’m offended!
Well, Boomers are the easily offended generation.
Another blatant lie. It's not the older generation who have been tagged as "snowflakes".
Snowflake (slang) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Snowflake is a 2010s derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are overly-emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions.
Sound familiar?
Last edited by saynta on Thu 20 Jun 2019 5:10pm, edited 1 time in total.
The_Dud wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 1:42pm
I’m thinking there’s a lot of old white dudes here who have become worried not everyone bows down to their every thought anymore like they did 40 years ago.
Oh I see, so stereotyping according to colour and age is Ok if the subject is white, and old, but otherwise it's racist!!
It would be funny except for the fact that moralising SJW preachers like you are actually blind to your own blatant hypocrisy!
The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
bigcarl wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 2:15pm
Just own it, Dud. You are ageist
Do I think a lot of the older generation are out of touch with ‘modern’ society and the way the world is headed, and are too stubborn to reflect on their beliefs and acknowledge that things that were once deemed acceptable no longer are? Yep, sure do.
Do I think a lot of the older generation are the complete opposite to this? Yep, sure do.
It’s not my fault if you fit into the former.
And hey, there’s plenty of younger people who are racist/homophobic/sexist etc. too, and I equally disagree with them.
What of it?
I’m offended!
Well, Boomers are the easily offended generation.
Another blatant lie. It's not the older generation who have been tagged as "snowflakes".
Snowflake (slang) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Snowflake is a 2010s derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are overly-emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions.
Sound familiar?
It wasn’t me who started a thread to have a whinge because I was upset about something.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
And there we have it, a regulation response from the “Elitist Inner Suburb Socialist Lefts on how to respond to a factual succinct rebuttal” hand book.
The go to ….. “you are a racist” comment …… and the old classic “Screaming LEFTIES !!!” statement.
Obviously hit a nerve.
Those bully boy tactics are text book Bazza. Good to see that you didn’t disappoint.
Must be very frustrating being called out for what they are.
I think it's cute that you think you rebutted something with facts.
The_Dud wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 1:42pm
I’m thinking there’s a lot of old white dudes here who have become worried not everyone bows down to their every thought anymore like they did 40 years ago.
Oh I see, so stereotyping according to colour and age is Ok if the subject is white, and old, but otherwise it's racist!!
It would be funny except for the fact that moralising SJW preachers like you are actually blind to your own blatant hypocrisy!
I didn’t stereotype anyone, you stereotyped yourselves.
I’ve thoroughly explained my reasoning in this thread if you care to read and respond to specific points (which funnily enough no one has).
I’m sorry if you’re offended.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
bigcarl wrote: ↑Thu 20 Jun 2019 1:50pm
Who was that clown of a security guard who wanted to break up an on field scuffle between two players? I suspect he hadn’t been to a lot of football matches.
That's racist.
I wouldn't have thought it is.
I think making assumptions about someone's abilities based on their actions is pretty reasonable.
Making those same assumptions based on their race however....
I think soy milk kills the capacity to have a sense of humour. Brain cells too.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
