Our Rucks, last weekend

[avid]

Hickey Stanley Longer
Disp 25 21 10
Cont 12 14 6
Clr 12 5 3
marks 7 4 5
Tacks 5 3 2
HOs 32 30 24
Goals 1 1 0
FF Pts v141 106 74

Statistically, this was probably Billy's best game in a long while.
Not sure we wouldn't have done better with the ones we gave away.
Hickey (plus this yr's pick 48) for the pick that got us Bytel. May pay off.
Stanley for the pick that got us Goddard. No pay-off whatsoever.

[avid]

My crap table above -- can't edit, can't fix -- hope you get the idea.
Almost gagged when I saw good old Hicks with 75 fantasy points at half time. Best FF rucking performance of 2019 so far.
(I'd just dropped him from my fantasy team for Marshall. Who got zero!)

Edit: Strangely, I can edit this one.
What's going on?

[Waltzing St Kilda]

What about McEvoy?

And when do we trade Marshall for some guy with a wooden leg?

[bigcarl]

What about McEvoy?

And when do we trade Marshall for some guy with a wooden leg?

Haha, good question considering the club’s recent track record.

[Jacks Back]

For some reason you can't edit the opening post. I'm not sure why as previously you could (I thought)

[Crossy66]

Hickey Stanley Longer
Disp 25 21 10
Cont 12 14 6
Clr 12 5 3
marks 7 4 5
Tacks 5 3 2
HOs 32 30 24
Goals 1 1 0
FF Pts v141 106 74

Statistically, this was probably Billy's best game in a long while.
Not sure we wouldn't have done better with the ones we gave away.
Hickey (plus this yr's pick 48) for the pick that got us Bytel. May pay off.
Stanley for the pick that got us Goddard. No pay-off whatsoever.

So if i understand correctly, the point of your article is how crap hickey and stanleys opponents must have been to allow them to both have career best games?

[King12]

Hickey Stanley Longer
Disp 25 21 10
Cont 12 14 6
Clr 12 5 3
marks 7 4 5
Tacks 5 3 2
HOs 32 30 24
Goals 1 1 0
FF Pts v141 106 74

Statistically, this was probably Billy's best game in a long while.
Not sure we wouldn't have done better with the ones we gave away.
Hickey (plus this yr's pick 48) for the pick that got us Bytel. May pay off.
Stanley for the pick that got us Goddard. No pay-off whatsoever.

So if i understand correctly, the point of your article is how crap hickey and stanleys opponents must have been to allow them to both have career best games?

Haha, that's what it looks like. Stanley actually beat Hickey according to the Fox commentator's, so in short, Hickey has had a career best game and still come 2nd. Any wonder he was traded.

[avid]

Hickey Stanley Longer
Disp 25 21 10
Cont 12 14 6
Clr 12 5 3
marks 7 4 5
Tacks 5 3 2
HOs 32 30 24
Goals 1 1 0
FF Pts v141 106 74

Statistically, this was probably Billy's best game in a long while.
Not sure we wouldn't have done better with the ones we gave away.
Hickey (plus this yr's pick 48) for the pick that got us Bytel. May pay off.
Stanley for the pick that got us Goddard. No pay-off whatsoever.

So if i understand correctly, the point of your article is how crap hickey and stanleys opponents must have been to allow them to both have career best games?

Well, that's actually a fair point.