Brayshaw, Viney, Oliver, Jones...no slouches there though. We can set the midfield up to negate or attach and exploit our advantage. It's not the first time this year Marshall has lost the ruck stats yet we've won in the centre.
What about the Ruck?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16983
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3626 times
- Been thanked: 2897 times
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30093
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
There are losing rucks and then there are losing rucks.
If you watch how Marshall went about it, he was often just looking to negate his opponents to prevent them from hang a good tap -out.
Result was yes that the Dee's easily won the HOs, but the Dees ruckmen were not actually tapping the ball to their mids advantage.
The Dees actually have a very good midfield and their mids were their better players yesterday.
With Marshall you know:
- That he is going to COMPETE and try his heart out each week
- That he is mobile and quick. So he is part of the reason why we often outnumber our opponents around the ground
- He has played very few games as a No 1 ruck at AFL level, and so he is just going to grow and grow in what he delivers
- That he is going to have games where he will rip the opposition apart with his marking and link play, and that he will bob up with braces of goals every so often
If you watch how Marshall went about it, he was often just looking to negate his opponents to prevent them from hang a good tap -out.
Result was yes that the Dee's easily won the HOs, but the Dees ruckmen were not actually tapping the ball to their mids advantage.
The Dees actually have a very good midfield and their mids were their better players yesterday.
With Marshall you know:
- That he is going to COMPETE and try his heart out each week
- That he is mobile and quick. So he is part of the reason why we often outnumber our opponents around the ground
- He has played very few games as a No 1 ruck at AFL level, and so he is just going to grow and grow in what he delivers
- That he is going to have games where he will rip the opposition apart with his marking and link play, and that he will bob up with braces of goals every so often
Last edited by saintsRrising on Sun 21 Apr 2019 11:25am, edited 1 time in total.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5876
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
- Contact:
Re: What about the Ruck?
Sure there may be games where we’ll lose the clearance count, but having a relieving ruckman like Acres - and choosing Acres over a second ruckman/plodder- gives you an extra runner/midfielder which is always a positive .... and will probably more than counterbalance losing the clearance count on those occasions.
Also, having an extra midfielder like Acres means they will be there to clear the ball themselves... and also will be there to give our midfielders a chop out/keep them fresh.
So Acres is more than a relieving ruckman ... he’s also a relieving midfielder and extra clearance player.
All I see is positives!
We are missing some important players, and we need to keep thinking laterally and outside of the box.
Also, having an extra midfielder like Acres means they will be there to clear the ball themselves... and also will be there to give our midfielders a chop out/keep them fresh.
So Acres is more than a relieving ruckman ... he’s also a relieving midfielder and extra clearance player.
All I see is positives!
We are missing some important players, and we need to keep thinking laterally and outside of the box.
Last edited by samoht on Sun 21 Apr 2019 11:37am, edited 2 times in total.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30093
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
Not sure why, Pup and the Ghost were two of many St Kilda rucks that did well around the ground well before GT arrived.
He also brought in Knoble,who was great at winning HOs, but whom was pretty useless around the ground.
Unfortunately GT could not handle the best ruckman he every had in Everritt. Indeed GT could not handle any of the "bad boys ". Players like Everitt, Hall, Guerra, Lawrence etc..
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
Yeah this is the most important stat, rather than hitouts. You bring in another ruckman and you are then down a.midfielder. We can't afford to do that unless the ruckman we bring in is very very effective.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
Not sure why people think we need to change anything.
RoMa’s played in 4 games, we’ve won the hitouts in one game and we actually lost that game.
Right now we’re quicker, fitter and more mobile compared to our rivals. Why bring in someone like Longer who will only slow us down?
RoMa’s played in 4 games, we’ve won the hitouts in one game and we actually lost that game.
Right now we’re quicker, fitter and more mobile compared to our rivals. Why bring in someone like Longer who will only slow us down?
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5876
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
- Contact:
Re: What about the Ruck?
RoMa contested the ruck 95% of the time ..Acres didn’t even relieve this time, but playing 1 pure ruckman (only) gave us an extra runner.
If RoMa tires, Acres, Bruce and Membrey - even Long (he actually went up against Gawn in a ruck contest) - can relieve him ... and contest say 10 of the contests between them, to give him a breather.
If RoMa tires, Acres, Bruce and Membrey - even Long (he actually went up against Gawn in a ruck contest) - can relieve him ... and contest say 10 of the contests between them, to give him a breather.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16983
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3626 times
- Been thanked: 2897 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
So hypothetical...
If we lost the games to GC and Hawthorn, ppl still wouldn’t think this was an issue?
I feel like the wins are muddying up the fact that there could still be an issue here.
Gawn was close to best afield for Melbourne. Just because they’re midfield sucked on the day doesn’t change that
If we lost the games to GC and Hawthorn, ppl still wouldn’t think this was an issue?
I feel like the wins are muddying up the fact that there could still be an issue here.
Gawn was close to best afield for Melbourne. Just because they’re midfield sucked on the day doesn’t change that
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9036 times
- Been thanked: 3929 times
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
RoMa and Blake are prototype midfielders who can pinch hit in the ruck designed specifically for the modern game and its new rules.
The old ruck debate is a dinosaur discussion.
The old ruck debate is a dinosaur discussion.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11941
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3650 times
- Been thanked: 2548 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
Ahh ....let's hope that old saying doesn't bite is on the backside
Uhhhm...A week is a long time in football
Uhhhm...A week is a long time in football
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
Agreed. Saints are clearly ahead of and equal with the comp in this regards. We have worked it out early.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
I'm still thinking we need to play another ruckman . Trouble is that the second option is Billy and he seems to be only just travelling at VFL level atm. Really needs to lift his KPI's. That said, I think Marshall's flexibility has been a major factor in our improvement. Coaches probably smarter than me!tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Sun 21 Apr 2019 9:17pmAgreed. Saints are clearly ahead of and equal with the comp in this regards. We have worked it out early.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
- Location: Del Mar, California
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
Back in the day we had Ruck-Rovers or followers, I remember Travis Payze. And we had blokes like Alan Morrow and Brian Mynott in the ruck, they would've only been about 6"2", but were strong and skilled with use of the body.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
I just read your op properly.skeptic wrote: ↑Sun 21 Apr 2019 12:53am The debate continues...
Max Gawn - 20d, 9 kicks, 11 handballs, 4 marks, 2 tackles, 1 behind and 32 hit outs
Preuss - 15d, 10 kicks, 5 handballs, 3 marks, 2 tackles, 2 goals and 16 hit outs
Marshall - 13d, 5 kicks, 8 handballs, 2 marks, 2 tackles, 13 hit outs
Safe to say that Marshall was beaten today by 2 very seasoned rucks... not disgraced by any means because it was always an incredibly tall order (haha) for him.
I still think he needs help... this is the type of thing I’d like to protect him from a little. It appears that neither Longer or Pierce are getting to the standard we’d hope any time soon.
Do we ask the kid to ride it alone all season and then make getting a decent back up a priority or is one of the others worth a shot?
IMO you are SO blinkered.
Marshall was beaten in the ruck but its called great experience. He is still young, physically immature and he will lose more. But he is a gun.
The mids stood up when Marshall was struggling IMO alot because Marshall has done the same back and they are well trained. We won the contested possessions and Melbourne were dominated in the forward line because they were way too big.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
Great spin with Stonecold not being able to respond.
We won 3 games out of 4 last year when Longer rucked. He only played 5 games last year.
Longer has been our preferred ruck for the last 3 years. If you look at our win/loss ratio his presence makes a big difference. Go figure - players/mids respond to some-one who really puts his body on the line to help them.
No one thinks Longer is the next Natanui. But he makes our blokes stand tall. He is much cheaper than Hickey. Hickey cost us $600,000 a year and he only played half his games and he would never dominate and we would lose.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11941
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3650 times
- Been thanked: 2548 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
Great spin regarding Longer.Shaggy wrote: ↑Sun 21 Apr 2019 11:39pmGreat spin with Stonecold not being able to respond.
We won 3 games out of 4 last year when Longer rucked. He only played 5 games last year.
Longer has been our preferred ruck for the last 3 years. If you look at our win/loss ratio his presence makes a big difference. Go figure - players/mids respond to some-one who really puts his body on the line to help them.
No one thinks Longer is the next Natanui. But he makes our blokes stand tall. He is much cheaper than Hickey. Hickey cost us $600,000 a year and he only played half his games and he would never dominate and we would lose.
If Longer is going cheap as you imply there could be a fair bit of demand, so I guess stoney would want us to extend Billy's contract before we lose him and before he is snapped up by the opposition.
Can't wait for an update by an itk on who might be chasing him
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
I Still think we are a KPF short, which is a role Marshall can play well. Billy hasnt put his hand up at VFL level yet and when he does I think he will come back in as we will be a better team for his inclusion. All that said, we are more than getting away with playing, in effect two extra mids at the momentScollop wrote: ↑Mon 22 Apr 2019 12:53amGreat spin regarding Longer.Shaggy wrote: ↑Sun 21 Apr 2019 11:39pmGreat spin with Stonecold not being able to respond.
We won 3 games out of 4 last year when Longer rucked. He only played 5 games last year.
Longer has been our preferred ruck for the last 3 years. If you look at our win/loss ratio his presence makes a big difference. Go figure - players/mids respond to some-one who really puts his body on the line to help them.
No one thinks Longer is the next Natanui. But he makes our blokes stand tall. He is much cheaper than Hickey. Hickey cost us $600,000 a year and he only played half his games and he would never dominate and we would lose.
If Longer is going cheap as you imply there could be a fair bit of demand, so I guess stoney would want us to extend Billy's contract before we lose him and before he is snapped up by the opposition.
Can't wait for an update by an itk on who might be chasing him
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8582
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1532 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
We won the Brisbane game in spite of Longer. Stefan Martin dominated. Billy had 1 mark and 1 tackle. Hitouts were 22-42. Six coach’s votes to Martin.Shaggy wrote: ↑Sun 21 Apr 2019 11:39pmGreat spin with Stonecold not being able to respond.
We won 3 games out of 4 last year when Longer rucked. He only played 5 games last year.
Longer has been our preferred ruck for the last 3 years. If you look at our win/loss ratio his presence makes a big difference. Go figure - players/mids respond to some-one who really puts his body on the line to help them.
No one thinks Longer is the next Natanui. But he makes our blokes stand tall. He is much cheaper than Hickey. Hickey cost us $600,000 a year and he only played half his games and he would never dominate and we would lose.
Billy didn’t play a game in 2016 so I’m not sure how he was the preferred ruck. That was also our best season since 2011 but somehow we play better with Billy?
I’d also like to know where Billy played last year when he wasn’t in the ruck? Small forward?
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 11:35am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
One of the trends of 2019 so far is winning hitouts and losing games.
As someone wrote above, you have to look at the combined impact of Marshall and Acres against Gawn and Preuss.
We won the clearances and contested possession. The point of winning a hitout is to enable your midfielders to win a clearance - by that measure, Gawn and Preuss were totally ineffective. If the point of a ruckman is to enable the midfield then you're better off just enabling the midfield like we are doing.
At some point Marshall will get tired and he may need a rest and/or some help. But I'd be concerned about the impact on our game style if we played a second big guy who can't play another position.
As someone wrote above, you have to look at the combined impact of Marshall and Acres against Gawn and Preuss.
We won the clearances and contested possession. The point of winning a hitout is to enable your midfielders to win a clearance - by that measure, Gawn and Preuss were totally ineffective. If the point of a ruckman is to enable the midfield then you're better off just enabling the midfield like we are doing.
At some point Marshall will get tired and he may need a rest and/or some help. But I'd be concerned about the impact on our game style if we played a second big guy who can't play another position.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2075
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 224 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
There's another element to this - and I'd be interested to hear what the ruck experts out there think. When you're playing a 'help out your mates', team-style of footy - which is what it looks like to me when I see Lonie on the half-back flank and players with the courage to leave their man and help out when needed - is there actually something to be said for having random players (e.g., Long on Saturday) pinch-hit in the ruck? Does it actually help build that camaraderie and sense that they're all in it together?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 5:20pm
- Location: donvale
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Re: What about the Ruck?
I still think Longer has a role to play vs the monster rucks.
Particularly if we make the finals.
He is an elite tap ruckman who could play a cameo role in big games, ala Clark Keating.
If he splits the ruck duties 50/50 with Marshall then we maximise his strengths (tap work) and minimise his weaknesses (spread and endurance) and vice-versa for Marshall who can rest at full-forward.
This duo will create headaches for opposition ruck duos in big games, due to their points of difference.
Particularly if we make the finals.
He is an elite tap ruckman who could play a cameo role in big games, ala Clark Keating.
If he splits the ruck duties 50/50 with Marshall then we maximise his strengths (tap work) and minimise his weaknesses (spread and endurance) and vice-versa for Marshall who can rest at full-forward.
This duo will create headaches for opposition ruck duos in big games, due to their points of difference.
its time to make a name for yourself like you've never made before!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3376
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
Malthouse wrote a good article this weekend about ruckmen and their influence, One area where Marshall leads the league is metres gained, Not just hit outs but being a link player, moving the ball. he is quality below the knees for his size. Yes we got beat on hit outs but the mids were able to negate the impact. Those who say it wont work against a quality midfield i would argue, Oliver, Viney, Brayshaw is the equal of any starting 3 in the comp at clearance work.
We cant go back to Longer , yes win hits outs but 5 possessions and 1 mark per game means we play 17v 18.
Bruce to help out at Centre bounces and then push forward with Acres then working around the ground, and Brown if required down back.
We cant go back to Longer , yes win hits outs but 5 possessions and 1 mark per game means we play 17v 18.
Bruce to help out at Centre bounces and then push forward with Acres then working around the ground, and Brown if required down back.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 383 times
Re: What about the Ruck?
I think it is only a matter of time before Longer comes in, particularly if we have a couple of losses, or injuries. Funny, some wins, and people think Marshall is a gun - he might get there, but long way to go yet imo. The only issue with Billy coming in is the change in structure and tactics for the mids - they will have to mostly rove to a winning ruck, rather than the opposition ruck or a random hit to the ground.
Still, while we are winning I don't think they will change much with the ruck set up.
Still, while we are winning I don't think they will change much with the ruck set up.