Rumour on fox

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Tommyj
Club Player
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue 08 May 2018 10:26am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767307Post Tommyj »

Saints to give 4 to GC for 6 and 24 apparently we're after Smith and Port want M king


Tommyj
Club Player
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue 08 May 2018 10:26am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767308Post Tommyj »

Tommyj wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 11:41am Saints to give 4 to GC for 6 and 24 apparently we're after Smith and Port want M king
And GC want all 3 south Aussies


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16894
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3583 times
Been thanked: 2852 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767309Post skeptic »

I wonder how desperate GC are... 6 and 24 is good but if their strategy is to get all 3 SA boys in the hopes that they all stay there together, seems to me pick 4 could be even more valuable


Tommyj
Club Player
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue 08 May 2018 10:26am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767310Post Tommyj »

True I'm still tossing up between Smith and King I know we need mids but I think king could be a super star and I would hate the regret


User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767312Post rodgerfox »

6 and 24 for 4?


Is 24 really enough of a sweetener to give up two spots in the first round?

I wouldn't have thought so.


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767313Post Ghost Like »

Possibly a matter of trust Roger. If Port are true to their word & Bailey Smith was always our target, provided none of Walsh, Lukosious or Rankine were available. 24 is a bonus as St Kilda have said they'll be using 5 picks at the draft plus a rookie.

24 is a lot better than 79.


silverhalo
Club Player
Posts: 1015
Joined: Tue 20 Oct 2015 5:52pm
Has thanked: 170 times
Been thanked: 234 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767317Post silverhalo »

rodgerfox wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 12:23pm 6 and 24 for 4?


Is 24 really enough of a sweetener to give up two spots in the first round?

I wouldn't have thought so.
DEFINITE NO FROM ME


silverhalo
Club Player
Posts: 1015
Joined: Tue 20 Oct 2015 5:52pm
Has thanked: 170 times
Been thanked: 234 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767318Post silverhalo »

Tommyj wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 12:03pm True I'm still tossing up between Smith and King I know we need mids but I think king could be a super star and I would hate the regret
+1


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767321Post st.byron »

rodgerfox wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 12:23pm 6 and 24 for 4?


Is 24 really enough of a sweetener to give up two spots in the first round?

I wouldn't have thought so.
I thought the same thing.


fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767322Post fugazi »

I'd do it, unless one of the top 3 slide.
If we would take any of King, Rozee or Smith, we would get pick 24 for free.


Nee!
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16894
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3583 times
Been thanked: 2852 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767327Post skeptic »

fugazi wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 1:35pm I'd do it, unless one of the top 3 slide.
If we would take any of King, Rozee or Smith, we would get pick 24 for free.
Sure but the thing is we can take them anyway or get something perceived as more valuable by doing nothing.

If we want King, and we take Smith at 6 because Port snap him up at 5, is it worth it just to get a pick at 24.

We quite literally have all the bargaining power.

If they really want a player at pick 4 that won’t be there at 6 and it sounds like it’s part of a 3 pronged attack to keep the SA Boyd together...
get them to pay for it so that it really benefits us


User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767328Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

Massive chance that the swap will happen.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767331Post vacuous space »

So we've got one article today saying that we're keeping pick 4 and Fox reporting the exact opposite. The player we're into seems to change daily as well. Media outlets have clearly decided Saints supporters are good for some easy clicks. Tomorrow it's going to be Caldwell, the next day it's going to be Ben King that we've been targeting all along. By the time the draft actually happens we'll probably have a rumour of some absurd multi-team trade that'll never happen.

If we're genuinely into all of Rozee, Smith and King, trading down makes a lot of sense. Get a player we like and a second round pick as a bonus.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 479 times
Been thanked: 310 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767334Post saintbob »

Ports 5 ands 15 for our 4 and 36, and a guarantee they don't take Smith


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767335Post Joffa Burns »

rodgerfox wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 12:23pm 6 and 24 for 4?


Is 24 really enough of a sweetener to give up two spots in the first round?

I wouldn't have thought so.
How about we swap first rounders next year as well?

We’d need to back ourselves in to finish higher than GCS.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
DJ Higgins
Club Player
Posts: 1867
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 269 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767338Post DJ Higgins »

Please dont do this. There are 4 elites this year, then we drop in ability. this is all on paper of course but if we can get King, Rankin or Luko we get one of them. We dont trade down and get Smith. Not knocking the kid but btu he is an inside mid which we dont need. We need outside speed and a target up forward and in that order.


fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767340Post fugazi »

If we are genuinely split between 3 players, we may as well take the extra pick. If Port see us willing to trade with GC they may pony up with 5 /15 to get Rozee, but would be foolish to do so, and so almost certainly wont.

Another top 30 pick in this draft is definitely worth looking at.


Nee!
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767341Post dragit »

saintbob wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 2:48pm Ports 5 ands 15 for our 4 and 36, and a guarantee they don't take Smith
If port know we want smith, why would they do that deal?


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8376
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 1169 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767342Post Devilhead »

If it is Smith we are after then I would take the chance and do the swap

GC take Rozee at 4 to keep the S.A. boys together and even if Port take Smith then King will still there on the board and then we have 24

Re: King - the guy is literally a beanpole and for sure he will get absolutely smashed by seasoned AFL backs - might not be body ready for another 5 to 6 years and then there is his knee ...... will it hold up??

Truth is we need mids with breakaway speed and spread - both Smith and Caldwell have it

I actually prefer Caldwell from what I have seen but Smith has low bust factor - would love to get another pick inside 15 but that's not going to happen - should get a decent player with 24 though


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5873
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 837 times
Been thanked: 785 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767347Post samuraisaint »

saintbob wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 2:48pm Ports 5 ands 15 for our 4 and 36, and a guarantee they don't take Smith
That one I would do, for sure.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18839
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1568 times
Been thanked: 1962 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767350Post SaintPav »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 1:59pm Massive chance that the swap will happen.
Do tell.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767351Post Cairnsman »

5 & 15 is likely.


guitars4
Club Player
Posts: 776
Joined: Fri 10 Aug 2018 11:56pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767353Post guitars4 »

Cairnsman wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 8:37pm 5 & 15 is likely.
Would be very nice if it does happen :D


User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767354Post Linton Lodger »

Whatever the order may be, the Top 4 will probably be: Walsh, Lukotious, Rankine and M King.

So it depends on who we want. We can probably safely say that Walsh, the best mid, won't be there at 4. Are we interested in any of the other 3, that's the question? If so we'd keep Pick 4.

If we're not interested in whoever of those is left at 4, then we probably want Smith or Rozee. So we've got to look at a trade as it would be daft to take Smith at 4, not taking the chance to get him and another 1st round pick.

If we got Pick 6, it would not guarantee we get the player we want? Pick 5 would be a safe bet.

So if we want Lukotious, Rankine or M King we keep Pick 4, if we want Smith or Rozee, we trade for Pick 5 and another.

I don't think 6 & 24 is a great deal. if we don't want one of the top 4, then Pick 5 & 15 from Port is the deal we want (5 & 10 would be great, but Port would have rocks in their head). It would ensure we got Smith and then another late first rounder.
Last edited by Linton Lodger on Sun 18 Nov 2018 9:01pm, edited 3 times in total.


Crossy66
Club Player
Posts: 1096
Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Re: Rumour on fox

Post: # 1767355Post Crossy66 »

guitars4 wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 8:54pm
Cairnsman wrote: Sun 18 Nov 2018 8:37pm 5 & 15 is likely.
Would be very nice if it does happen :D
That could mean max and Caldwell. Not bad.
I'm thinking we're might end up with max and smith/ rozee by the end of this


Post Reply