Carlisle
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18580
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 843 times
Re: Carlisle
Glad we’re contesting this. Even if we get it reduced to one week. It shows that we are sick of being reamed by the AFL.
Key sticking point for me is they are prepared to accept Fyfe, Buddy etc can have accidents, but Carlisle ... nah, not him. He’s a dog, plus he plays for a club we don’t respect.
Key sticking point for me is they are prepared to accept Fyfe, Buddy etc can have accidents, but Carlisle ... nah, not him. He’s a dog, plus he plays for a club we don’t respect.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23012
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8910 times
- Been thanked: 3884 times
Re: Carlisle
I'm glad they are contesting it. Backing our player.
But the AFL being the grubs that they are, and the Saints not being feared or respected, I fear that the two weeks will stand and the club will do it's 10 grand cold.
But the AFL being the grubs that they are, and the Saints not being feared or respected, I fear that the two weeks will stand and the club will do it's 10 grand cold.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6285
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1098 times
Re: Carlisle
Then I would suggest the Court of Arbitration as a next step - and see if they don't uphold Precedent - seeing that our whole legal system is built upon it.
This has to be a line in the sand moment!!!!!
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18580
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 843 times
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Carlisle
Twaddle.iwantmeseats wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 1:38pm Contesting that is ridiculous. What you’d expect from this admin
Took his eyes off he ball and clotheslined him.
Ridiculous.
FFS
Hardly even made contact.
Have a look at the replay. Probably knocked himself out on landing.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Carlisle
Just watched a reply of the incident.
It is abundantly clear that Riewoldt was concussed when his head hit his own knee. There is no way he was injured by Carlisle's sloppy spoiling attampt. Michael Christian (and Steven Hocking) you are turnips!
We need to bring in an expert witness (a doctor) to say that the most plausible explanation for Riewoldt's concussion was his own knee to his head.
Any fair hearing has to throw out the original decision by the MRP. 1 week, bulls***, he should be playing next week.
It is abundantly clear that Riewoldt was concussed when his head hit his own knee. There is no way he was injured by Carlisle's sloppy spoiling attampt. Michael Christian (and Steven Hocking) you are turnips!
We need to bring in an expert witness (a doctor) to say that the most plausible explanation for Riewoldt's concussion was his own knee to his head.
Any fair hearing has to throw out the original decision by the MRP. 1 week, bulls***, he should be playing next week.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8376
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 1169 times
Re: Carlisle
What's the chance our management has picked up on the knee knock?
Either way if they are thinking of using the Caddy (medium impact) hit as the precedent then they are using the wrong one if they want a reduced penalty - They need to use the Rance hit (low impact) as a precedent - go all the way not half way - push the boundaries and fight fire with fire
Either way if they are thinking of using the Caddy (medium impact) hit as the precedent then they are using the wrong one if they want a reduced penalty - They need to use the Rance hit (low impact) as a precedent - go all the way not half way - push the boundaries and fight fire with fire
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13782
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1313 times
- Been thanked: 2053 times
Re: Carlisle
He 100% does not hit his own knee, not even close.Linton Lodger wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 5:37pm Just watched a reply of the incident.
It is abundantly clear that Riewoldt was concussed when his head hit his own knee. There is no way he was injured by Carlisle's sloppy spoiling attampt. Michael Christian (and Steven Hocking) you are turnips!
We need to bring in an expert witness (a doctor) to say that the most plausible explanation for Riewoldt's concussion was his own knee to his head.
Any fair hearing has to throw out the original decision by the MRP. 1 week, bulls***, he should be playing next week.
Making up crap to try get your guy off is no better than what you’re accusing the AFL of doing.
1 week sounds about right, I’m sure that’s what it will end up being.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Carlisle
hmmmm
2 weeks is upheld
2 weeks is upheld
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Carlisle
Appeal the appeal
What a load of s***.
What a load of s***.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11564
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3528 times
- Been thanked: 2465 times
Re: Carlisle
So the 2 weeks is upheld and it's basically Saints getting shafted while Buddy Franklin, Fyfe, Mason Cox and other teams get away with no penalty. Let's make noise whenever we see other teams and other players infringe and we think those players are guilty. What is the point of not saying anything, if other clubs are not assisting us and if we are going to cop it then let's call those incidents for what they are.Devilhead wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 6:09pm What's the chance our management has picked up on the knee knock?
Either way if they are thinking of using the Caddy (medium impact) hit as the precedent then they are using the wrong one if they want a reduced penalty - They need to use the Rance hit (low impact) as a precedent - go all the way not half way - push the boundaries and fight fire with fire
The way we fight back is to speak out and embarrass the AFL everytime they make a wrong decision that favours players like Fyfe and Budddy Franklin when they have clearly done the wrong thing and they get off. Be annoying until we are treated equally. The CEO and the board needed to mention the Cox incident and the Fyfe knee and Buddy getting away with an incident that is an illegal head high hit that knocked out a player. Why don't they get on the offensive before they turn up? Why not be the antagonist and highlight the inconsistencies of the kangaroo court that is the AFL tribunal and MRP?
Last edited by Scollop on Tue 29 May 2018 7:50pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:04pm
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: Carlisle
Agree, this narrative that he knocked himself on his knee makes us supporters seem delusional. He was knocked silly when Jake hit him, then was made worse how he landed. No malice in the play, just unlucky. Doesn’t mean that 2 weeks may be a bit too harsh for an accident.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 7:27pmHe 100% does not hit his own knee, not even close.Linton Lodger wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 5:37pm Just watched a reply of the incident.
It is abundantly clear that Riewoldt was concussed when his head hit his own knee. There is no way he was injured by Carlisle's sloppy spoiling attampt. Michael Christian (and Steven Hocking) you are turnips!
We need to bring in an expert witness (a doctor) to say that the most plausible explanation for Riewoldt's concussion was his own knee to his head.
Any fair hearing has to throw out the original decision by the MRP. 1 week, bulls***, he should be playing next week.
Making up crap to try get your guy off is no better than what you’re accusing the AFL of doing.
1 week sounds about right, I’m sure that’s what it will end up being.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6285
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 1098 times
Re: Carlisle
Just ……..
No seriously just ……..
What the right royal f@rk!!!
I have held my tongue - but seriously!
Richo condemned Carlisle to his two weeks when he said that he was expecting a week - therefore the tribunal hears 'My man done f***ed up' and from there you cannot deny the high/high result.
THE ONLY DEFENCE WE HAD WAS 'NOTHING TO SEE HERE - MOVE ALONG'
We must appeal this - or stop looking for Free Agents, because who would want to come to a club where you can be knocked out one week, and then two weeks later go for a legitimate spoil which does not connect with the ball, but rather with a players head and get 2 weeks for it!
Remember that Paddy was knocked out by a hit to the face, which he did not even get a free for.
Remember Jake got a free paid against him for holding the ball while he was knocked out.
Remember Burton knocked Higgins into next week and we were told that the action was within the bounds of the game therefore it was okay
Remember Cox chose to bump to the head region and could have damaged the neck - but this action is Okay
If what Jake did was against the laws of the game then I look forward to every spoil next week being pinged for incorrectly playing our 'great' game
But we will just shut up and take it!
Free Jake!!
No seriously just ……..
What the right royal f@rk!!!
I have held my tongue - but seriously!
Richo condemned Carlisle to his two weeks when he said that he was expecting a week - therefore the tribunal hears 'My man done f***ed up' and from there you cannot deny the high/high result.
THE ONLY DEFENCE WE HAD WAS 'NOTHING TO SEE HERE - MOVE ALONG'
We must appeal this - or stop looking for Free Agents, because who would want to come to a club where you can be knocked out one week, and then two weeks later go for a legitimate spoil which does not connect with the ball, but rather with a players head and get 2 weeks for it!
Remember that Paddy was knocked out by a hit to the face, which he did not even get a free for.
Remember Jake got a free paid against him for holding the ball while he was knocked out.
Remember Burton knocked Higgins into next week and we were told that the action was within the bounds of the game therefore it was okay
Remember Cox chose to bump to the head region and could have damaged the neck - but this action is Okay
If what Jake did was against the laws of the game then I look forward to every spoil next week being pinged for incorrectly playing our 'great' game
But we will just shut up and take it!
Free Jake!!
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23012
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8910 times
- Been thanked: 3884 times
Re: Carlisle
The AFL runs itself a bit like the Queensland justice system..
Put an indigenous kid and a public schoolboy before the courts and guess which one gets gaol time while the other one gets a slap on the wrist.
Now guess which one Carlisle gets treated like.
Put an indigenous kid and a public schoolboy before the courts and guess which one gets gaol time while the other one gets a slap on the wrist.
Now guess which one Carlisle gets treated like.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9024
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: Carlisle
I think I've found the problem with the coaching staff - they are legally blind. It also seems to afflict a number of posters here.
The club argued that the strike should be downgraded from high to medium impact. Given that he was knocked out, I guess his head would need to have been severed for high impact.
Arguing that, in the past, our players have suffered similar blows without the culprit being suspended for two weeks is a rationalisation. Rightly or wrongly, the system is that the outcome of the contact determines punishment - not the act. So, the same reckless act which misses the head or contacts the body will get no punishment, but hit the head and knock someone out and you'll get two weeks. Intent is another step up.
The club argued that the strike should be downgraded from high to medium impact. Given that he was knocked out, I guess his head would need to have been severed for high impact.
Arguing that, in the past, our players have suffered similar blows without the culprit being suspended for two weeks is a rationalisation. Rightly or wrongly, the system is that the outcome of the contact determines punishment - not the act. So, the same reckless act which misses the head or contacts the body will get no punishment, but hit the head and knock someone out and you'll get two weeks. Intent is another step up.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18840
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Carlisle
“Your guy”.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 7:27pmHe 100% does not hit his own knee, not even close.Linton Lodger wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 5:37pm Just watched a reply of the incident.
It is abundantly clear that Riewoldt was concussed when his head hit his own knee. There is no way he was injured by Carlisle's sloppy spoiling attampt. Michael Christian (and Steven Hocking) you are turnips!
We need to bring in an expert witness (a doctor) to say that the most plausible explanation for Riewoldt's concussion was his own knee to his head.
Any fair hearing has to throw out the original decision by the MRP. 1 week, bulls***, he should be playing next week.
Making up crap to try get your guy off is no better than what you’re accusing the AFL of doing.
1 week sounds about right, I’m sure that’s what it will end up being.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23012
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8910 times
- Been thanked: 3884 times
Re: Carlisle
The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 7:27pm1 week sounds about right, I’m sure that’s what it will end up being.Linton Lodger wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 5:37pm Just watched a reply of the incident.
It is abundantly clear that Riewoldt was concussed when his head hit his own knee. There is no way he was injured by Carlisle's sloppy spoiling attampt. Michael Christian (and Steven Hocking) you are turnips!
We need to bring in an expert witness (a doctor) to say that the most plausible explanation for Riewoldt's concussion was his own knee to his head.
Any fair hearing has to throw out the original decision by the MRP. 1 week, bulls***, he should be playing next week.
You will wake up one day hopefully.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23012
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8910 times
- Been thanked: 3884 times
Re: Carlisle
Gave himself away there didn't he?SaintPav wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 9:15pm“Your guy”.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 7:27pmHe 100% does not hit his own knee, not even close.Linton Lodger wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 5:37pm Just watched a reply of the incident.
It is abundantly clear that Riewoldt was concussed when his head hit his own knee. There is no way he was injured by Carlisle's sloppy spoiling attampt. Michael Christian (and Steven Hocking) you are turnips!
We need to bring in an expert witness (a doctor) to say that the most plausible explanation for Riewoldt's concussion was his own knee to his head.
Any fair hearing has to throw out the original decision by the MRP. 1 week, bulls***, he should be playing next week.
Making up crap to try get your guy off is no better than what you’re accusing the AFL of doing.
1 week sounds about right, I’m sure that’s what it will end up being.
![]()
Told you all he was a troll.
Probably an AFL plant.They are grubby enough to do that.
Last edited by saynta on Wed 30 May 2018 11:06am, edited 1 time in total.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13782
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1313 times
- Been thanked: 2053 times
Re: Carlisle
AFL plantsaynta wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 9:29pmGave himself away there didn't he?SaintPav wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 9:15pm“Your guy”.The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 7:27pmHe 100% does not hit his own knee, not even close.Linton Lodger wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 5:37pm Just watched a reply of the incident.
It is abundantly clear that Riewoldt was concussed when his head hit his own knee. There is no way he was injured by Carlisle's sloppy spoiling attampt. Michael Christian (and Steven Hocking) you are turnips!
We need to bring in an expert witness (a doctor) to say that the most plausible explanation for Riewoldt's concussion was his own knee to his head.
Any fair hearing has to throw out the original decision by the MRP. 1 week, bulls***, he should be playing next week.
Making up crap to try get your guy off is no better than what you’re accusing the AFL of doing.
1 week sounds about right, I’m sure that’s what it will end up being.
![]()
Told you all he was a troll.
Probably an AFL plant.They are grubby enough to do mm hat.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
How was the flat-Earth today?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Stevie Wonder can see his head didn’t touch his knee. If you’re trying to think of ways to get him off at least have them based in reality.
Believe it or not, you can support St Kilda and be objective at the same time. Some around here think these things are mutually exclusive
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Carlisle
I don't get it?
What is mm hat?
Is it hippie jargon or subliminal advertising?
A code name for the latest designer drug or a cheap ugly truckers hat?
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Carlisle
Agree on the premise of appeal, but the reality is that jake himself was knocked out and missed a while second game from an act that was completely avoidable...perfectionist wrote: ↑Tue 29 May 2018 8:59pm I think I've found the problem with the coaching staff - they are legally blind. It also seems to afflict a number of posters here.
The club argued that the strike should be downgraded from high to medium impact. Given that he was knocked out, I guess his head would need to have been severed for high impact.
Arguing that, in the past, our players have suffered similar blows without the culprit being suspended for two weeks is a rationalisation. Rightly or wrongly, the system is that the outcome of the contact determines punishment - not the act. So, the same reckless act which misses the head or contacts the body will get no punishment, but hit the head and knock someone out and you'll get two weeks. Intent is another step up.
At least this instance was a mid air collision, where the merits of a "reasonable attempt to spoil" could be argued within the context of the play.
The problem with punishinment based on injury outcome is that it doesn't really discourage players from doing so again when 80% of the time the recipient isn't knocked out.
The inconsistencies and character favouritism in our game are an embarrassment... imagine trying to educate soneone new to the game and trying to explain the difference between rances hit on Breust vs what Carlisle did. They are virtually identical, only one of the recipients has a slightly harder/thicker skull...
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6072
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 336 times
- Been thanked: 1557 times
Re: Carlisle
The look away spoil = a dead set giveaway and reckless, no....stupid!
High contact = got him in the head but only cause he couldnt get to the ball in time
High impact = couldn't return to field, he probably could have but you know OHS and all.
2 weeks.
The game is officially f***ed. I almost hate watching modern football. Might go to the local footy this weekend just for a taste of reality.
I would have spent half my career suspended under these rules.
High contact = got him in the head but only cause he couldnt get to the ball in time
High impact = couldn't return to field, he probably could have but you know OHS and all.
2 weeks.
The game is officially f***ed. I almost hate watching modern football. Might go to the local footy this weekend just for a taste of reality.
I would have spent half my career suspended under these rules.
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4639
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 506 times
Re: Carlisle
Really should have tried to get it down graded to accidental - would that have helped?
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Carlisle
hey Backfromwhenever
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
is there any chance of getting the 'last post' thingie back ?
or is it here somewhere 'n i'm not onto it
this scrolling the whole page to read the last contribution is doin my head in
EDIT ... i found it ... via the time .... Doh
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
is there any chance of getting the 'last post' thingie back ?
or is it here somewhere 'n i'm not onto it
this scrolling the whole page to read the last contribution is doin my head in
EDIT ... i found it ... via the time .... Doh
Last edited by asiu on Wed 30 May 2018 12:33am, edited 1 time in total.
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2011 10:58pm
- Location: qld
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 48 times