That’s actually a really interesting question, no Gilbert or Acres to fill in. Maybe Carlisle?
Team vs Tigers
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Team vs Tigers
I have no issue with that if that’s the case, just call it omitted. Last time a player was managed they were lying - Acres was actually injured.BringBackMadDog wrote: ↑Thu 24 May 2018 11:01pmCoffield is a 19 y0 kid playing in his first year, he has played 7 games in a row, give him a week off to rest and then bring him back. I rather he get a week off now rather than he break down and miss a chunk of the seasonsaintspremiers wrote: ↑Thu 24 May 2018 7:51pm http://m.afl.com.au/news/teams/show-tea ... R201801410
Joyce & Patton emergency’s. I guess both will debut soon?
Jack Roo is playing which is good. I don’t want them taking us easy.
What’s the deal with Coffield being managed?
Cut the BS.
You’re either injured or omitted.
Omitted can be for many reasons. Cut out managed FFS!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- shrodes
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3061
- Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 781 times
- Been thanked: 420 times
Re: Team vs Tigers
To complicate things further, Majak Daw is listed as “Rested” this week. So now we have Rested, Managed and Omitted.saintspremiers wrote: ↑Thu 24 May 2018 11:40pmI have no issue with that if that’s the case, just call it omitted. Last time a player was managed they were lying - Acres was actually injured.BringBackMadDog wrote: ↑Thu 24 May 2018 11:01pmCoffield is a 19 y0 kid playing in his first year, he has played 7 games in a row, give him a week off to rest and then bring him back. I rather he get a week off now rather than he break down and miss a chunk of the seasonsaintspremiers wrote: ↑Thu 24 May 2018 7:51pm http://m.afl.com.au/news/teams/show-tea ... R201801410
Joyce & Patton emergency’s. I guess both will debut soon?
Jack Roo is playing which is good. I don’t want them taking us easy.
What’s the deal with Coffield being managed?
Cut the BS.
You’re either injured or omitted.
Omitted can be for many reasons. Cut out managed FFS!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004 5:32pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8256
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1849 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: Team vs Tigers
Jack R is a bit too mobile for most of our defenders, and he is good at taking a mark when he has to compete against
2 opponents- great pack mark, excellent judgement.
The danger is, that he could draw 2 defenders, which means any of their small forwards will be free to crumb.
And their delivery is miles better than ours, of course,
so expect them to be able to go coast to coast-
when we kick a point, which we will do a lot, expect them to get a goal from it.
2 opponents- great pack mark, excellent judgement.
The danger is, that he could draw 2 defenders, which means any of their small forwards will be free to crumb.
And their delivery is miles better than ours, of course,
so expect them to be able to go coast to coast-
when we kick a point, which we will do a lot, expect them to get a goal from it.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤![🤍](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Team vs Tigers
Very future focused side, I like it… may get smashed, but we are anyway when Brown, Gilbert, Bruce, Armo & Weller are in the side.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Team vs Tigers
It seemed that last week it was all up versus the tall guy Collingwood had in attack (not that he ever looked like taking a mark but received a couple of confusing frees) leaving unattended ground numbers hence the goals from close range against us
And who was responsible for the guy who kicked 6 and handed off a couple of others?
From a screen I could not identify a direct opponent
And who was responsible for the guy who kicked 6 and handed off a couple of others?
From a screen I could not identify a direct opponent
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Team vs Tigers
Are you "projecting" on me again my little stalker?
Meh.... at least you know how to take an order which is good ....... I get a feeling you'd enjoy being told what to do....lol
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23010
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8902 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: Team vs Tigers
I think he is being managed this week.To the top wrote: ↑Fri 25 May 2018 1:12pm It seemed that last week it was all up versus the tall guy Collingwood had in attack (not that he ever looked like taking a mark but received a couple of confusing frees) leaving unattended ground numbers hence the goals from close range against us
And who was responsible for the guy who kicked 6 and handed off a couple of others?
From a screen I could not identify a direct opponent
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18837
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1961 times
Re: Team vs Tigers
Teflon wrote: ↑Sat 26 May 2018 12:11pmAre you "projecting" on me again my little stalker?
Meh.... at least you know how to take an order which is good ....... I get a feeling you'd enjoy being told what to do....lol
![]()
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.