stonecold wrote:Joffa Burns wrote:stonecold wrote:Posters on this forum just need a whipping boy, Billy's turn at the minute!!!!!
Part and parcel for some, comes with supporting the Saints with some posters, par for course!!!!!
How about enjoying a group of 'Young Guys' and enjoy the fact we actually had a 'Win', no, let's stay negative instead!!!!!
Disappointing!!!!!
I apologize, I was taking the repeated comment "Hickledik is cooked" to be negative.
Obviously I was wrong!!!!!!
No need, at least you admit you looking for a whipping boy!!!!!
Bruce the Ruckman, that says it all!!!!!
Nice work Jaffa, hard to take you too serious!!!!!
Yep, agree with you LF, Bruce aint no ruckman and never will be as long as his butt points south!
He is not competitive at centre bounces and clearances.
He can however mark, kick, run, defend his opponent if his opponent runs forward or run forward himself and become a target and kick a goal.
Unfortunately Billy Farmer-Cox can't do any of the above and was slaughtered by the mobile Stef Martin.
Since we got absolutely smashed at the clearances against the likely wooden spooner on Saturday, would you think we'd be worse off dropping Billy Farmer-Cox and adding another runner and playing Bruce in the ruck? Would Bruce have performed better than Bill against Martin? Couldn't have gone any worse.
Let's not be progressive and look for change, let's stick with plods like Billy, Brown and Webster and finish 13th or 14th.