Why is Jaxons not “one of our own”?SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
Logan Austin
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Logan Austin
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- parkeysainter
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
- Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: Logan Austin
Its on AFL website. He has officially requested a trade to the Saints and is good mates with Jack Steele.
This trade will slide through easily and early.
This trade will slide through easily and early.
Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Logan Austin
http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... gan-AUSTIN
says it all. Doesn't stand out at SAFL and not good enough for powers top 22. Only get him if it really cheap and as a back up player for injured players. I would rather not get another list clogger
says it all. Doesn't stand out at SAFL and not good enough for powers top 22. Only get him if it really cheap and as a back up player for injured players. I would rather not get another list clogger
Last edited by DJ Higgins on Wed 18 Oct 2017 9:32pm, edited 1 time in total.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18838
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Logan Austin
He is indeedst.byron wrote:Jaxons is one of our own posters.SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Logan Austin
Easy enough to call it, as CQS did. Took the chance. Just sayin'... Jaxons is the Messiah for some. And they should know, they've followed a few in their time!st.byron wrote:Oh lord, you can twist anything whichever way you want to.Drake Huggins wrote:Then why not post the target's name if you know it's going to happen? No criticism of Jaxons, but he got scooped this time. Sorry, true believers.st.byron wrote:SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.
Jaxons first referred to a young defender from P.A. He didn't know it was going to happen. Just said a young defender was being looked at. CQ guessed the name and that equates to Jaxons being 'scooped'. Go figure........
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Logan Austin
It was a bloody good guess, but it absolutely was not out of left field. Jaxons gave a very good hint which narrowed it down to a small number of defenders at port. CQS guessed it (great guess, much credit), but Jaxons confirmed it immediately.Drake Huggins wrote:I don't doubt Jaxons, but let's not let fantasy get in the way of truth, kft. Jaxons has credibility, but let's not rewrite history. It just gives his knockers grist for the mill. CQS kade a bloody good call, that was completely out of left field on an unknown target and it looks like coming off. I'd been told the same. No slash on Jaxons. All hail CQS, a poster who puts some really good shyte on here.
Swallow your pride and give him some credit! geez.
1ac46a38
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Logan Austin
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 9add0b5f21
Michelangelo Rucci, The Advertiser wrote: St Kilda makes late trade play for young Port Adelaide full back Logan Austin
CONTRACTED Port Adelaide defender Logan Austin is wanted by St Kilda in a late play in the AFL trade period.
Austin, 22, is being promised more game time at St Kilda as the Saints seek to add to their defensive options after trying to sign GWS Giants defender Adam Tomlinson.
Austin, a fourth-round draft pick in 2014, is one of three Power players who could find new home in today’s frantic rush to the 1.30pm deadline to the close of the trade period.
Specialist forward Aaron Young is expected to score his trade to Gold Coast. And ruckman Matthew Lobbe yesterday joined Carlton’s wish list while Brisbane continued to haggle over the contract that he carries from Alberton and does not expire until the end of 2019.
Austin has played 13 AFL games in two seasons with Port Adelaide - and just two this year when his role in defence was taken by Tom Clurey.
Port Adelaide does hold the upper hand in any trade talks with St Kilda by holding Austin to a contract for next season. But the Power has emphasised in a busy trade program its willingness to move on players who are seeking more opportunity elsewhere.
So far, Port Adelaide has traded contracted forward Jarman Impey to Hawthorn, uncontracted midfielder Brendon Ah Chee to West Coast and released restricted free-agent utility Jackson Trengove to the Western Bulldogs.
The Power has drawn in contracted Melbourne key position player Jack Watts and free agents, midfielder Tom Rockliff (Brisbane) and midfielder-forward Steven Motlop (Geelong).
The trade period is facing a dramatic ending with deals still to be secured for Brownlow Medallist Gary Ablett in a go-home move to Geelong from Gold Coast and estranged Western Bulldogs forward Jake Stringer to Essendon.
1ac46a38
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Logan Austin
Good grief, Saint-stu. I don't need to swallow my pride. I value Jaxons, but in this case, another poster beat him to it. Is that so difficult for you to swallow? Credit where it's due. How many times do I have to post that this is not a criticism of Jaxons, but praise of CQS? Fair dinkum, have you drunk the Kool Aid?saint-stu wrote:It was a bloody good guess, but it absolutely was not out of left field. Jaxons gave a very good hint which narrowed it down to a small number of defenders at port. CQS guessed it (great guess, much credit), but Jaxons confirmed it immediately.Drake Huggins wrote:I don't doubt Jaxons, but let's not let fantasy get in the way of truth, kft. Jaxons has credibility, but let's not rewrite history. It just gives his knockers grist for the mill. CQS kade a bloody good call, that was completely out of left field on an unknown target and it looks like coming off. I'd been told the same. No slash on Jaxons. All hail CQS, a poster who puts some really good shyte on here.
Swallow your pride and give him some credit! geez.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Logan Austin
For others, he's just another opportunity to prove their superior intelligence and worldliness by seeing through his ruse......i.e. polish their own self image.Drake Huggins wrote: Easy enough to call it, as CQS did. Took the chance. Just sayin'... Jaxons is the Messiah for some. And they should know, they've followed a few in their time!
Here's a guy who comes on here with humility, not big noting and beating his own drum, just sharing info and people can't just accept it for what it is and allow others to enjoy that.
Apart from the pasting Jaxons has copped on here, I and various others are in the past few weeks according to those who aren't blinded by the light - an arse licker, a gullible sheep, projecting my messiah complex and swooning over a false prophet. Thanks guys. Champions each and every one of you.
Last edited by st.byron on Wed 18 Oct 2017 9:45pm, edited 1 time in total.
- MC Gusto
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6069
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 369 times
Re: Logan Austin
Drake Huggins are you for real? Have you read the post?
CQ guessed the player based on the clue
Jaxons confirmed right away
What am I missing?
Perhaps we should ask CQ ??
This place is unbelievable
CQ guessed the player based on the clue
Jaxons confirmed right away
What am I missing?
Perhaps we should ask CQ ??
This place is unbelievable
#1 Ryder fan
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Logan Austin
Some will argue black is white just to be right.MC Gusto wrote:Drake Huggins are you for real? Have you read the post?
CQ guessed the player based on the clue
Jaxons confirmed right away
What am I missing?
Perhaps we should ask CQ ??
This place is unbelievable
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Perth WA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Logan Austin
Craziness creeping in here. Did it really matter where or who initiated the likely trade?SaintPav wrote:Fine if that’s the case but no reason to get your nickers in a knot Gusto.MC Gusto wrote:That’s bulls***
Jaxons called it with a clue, Cq quite rightly guessed it - which was a good get and jaxons responded confirming
![]()
Thought CQ initially called it, but if Pines called it first, more than glad to be corrected.
It's no biggie.
Important thing here is do we need this person? What would we offer? Any expectancy on Ports side?
Is the leg now repaired without any future issue expected? Late trade deal could provided some risk but may also be a great opportunity if his kicking is as good as stated earlier.
Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Logan Austin
The Kool Aid tastes good Drake Huggins. You are completely wrong and you know it. You're just trolling now.Drake Huggins wrote:Good grief, Saint-stu. I don't need to swallow my pride. I value Jaxons, but in this case, another poster beat him to it. Is that so difficult for you to swallow? Credit where it's due. How many times do I have to post that this is not a criticism of Jaxons, but praise of CQS? Fair dinkum, have you drunk the Kool Aid?saint-stu wrote:It was a bloody good guess, but it absolutely was not out of left field. Jaxons gave a very good hint which narrowed it down to a small number of defenders at port. CQS guessed it (great guess, much credit), but Jaxons confirmed it immediately.Drake Huggins wrote:I don't doubt Jaxons, but let's not let fantasy get in the way of truth, kft. Jaxons has credibility, but let's not rewrite history. It just gives his knockers grist for the mill. CQS kade a bloody good call, that was completely out of left field on an unknown target and it looks like coming off. I'd been told the same. No slash on Jaxons. All hail CQS, a poster who puts some really good shyte on here.
Swallow your pride and give him some credit! geez.
1ac46a38
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Logan Austin
It's important that a valuable insider has been scared away by this negative crap don't you think?kalsaint wrote:Craziness creeping in here. Did it really matter where or who initiated the likely trade?SaintPav wrote:Fine if that’s the case but no reason to get your nickers in a knot Gusto.MC Gusto wrote:That’s bulls***
Jaxons called it with a clue, Cq quite rightly guessed it - which was a good get and jaxons responded confirming
![]()
Thought CQ initially called it, but if Pines called it first, more than glad to be corrected.
It's no biggie.
Important thing here is do we need this person? What would we offer? Any expectancy on Ports side?
Is the leg now repaired without any future issue expected? Late trade deal could provided some risk but may also be a great opportunity if his kicking is as good as stated earlier.
1ac46a38
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Logan Austin
He confirmed AFTER someone nominated. I have a bridge for sale, MCG. Great revenue, connects the northern and southern suburbs of Sydney. Honestly, what is it about Messiahs? Are you so fragile that you can't take a bit of truth about your hero? I value Jaxons, but slavish devotion, beyond any realistic criticism is a cult. It's only an internet forum, and some are carrying on as though it's life and death. If it makes you feel better, I concede. Jaxons is the Messiah, right about everything and I will not stain his immaculate reputation with facts.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16890
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3580 times
- Been thanked: 2850 times
Re: Logan Austin
Mods can I make a suggestion for next year...
2 years ago was the first Jaxons come on down thread.
Then last year it made a comeback and it was a fun call back to the year before.
Now it appears that the name in the title is simply drawing too much negative attention towards a poster that ain't asking for this much in the way of fan fare
If someone launches another thread next year, can we just call it a trade rumour thread or something
2 years ago was the first Jaxons come on down thread.
Then last year it made a comeback and it was a fun call back to the year before.
Now it appears that the name in the title is simply drawing too much negative attention towards a poster that ain't asking for this much in the way of fan fare
If someone launches another thread next year, can we just call it a trade rumour thread or something
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:30pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Logan Austin
This!st.byron wrote:Oh lord, you can twist anything whichever way you want to.Drake Huggins wrote:Then why not post the target's name if you know it's going to happen? No criticism of Jaxons, but he got scooped this time. Sorry, true believers.st.byron wrote:SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.
Jaxons first referred to a young defender from P.A. He didn't know it was going to happen. Just said a young defender was being looked at. CQ guessed the name and that equates to Jaxons being 'scooped'. Go figure........
Re: Logan Austin
You knew what you signed up for, believe me. #makingsaintsationalreallygrateagain.st.byron wrote:For others, he's just another opportunity to prove their superior intelligence and worldliness by seeing through his ruse......i.e. polish their own self image.Drake Huggins wrote: Easy enough to call it, as CQS did. Took the chance. Just sayin'... Jaxons is the Messiah for some. And they should know, they've followed a few in their time!
Here's a guy who comes on here with humility, not big noting and beating his own drum, just sharing info and people can't just accept it for what it is and allow others to enjoy that.
Apart from the pasting Jaxons has copped on here, I and various others are in the past few weeks according to those who aren't blinded by the light - an arse licker, a gullible sheep, projecting my messiah complex and swooning over a false prophet. Thanks guys. Champions each and every one of you.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Logan Austin
Let’s ask him.MC Gusto wrote:Drake Huggins are you for real? Have you read the post?
CQ guessed the player based on the clue
Jaxons confirmed right away
What am I missing?
Perhaps we should ask CQ ??
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=93983&hilit=Logan&s ... 5#p1703007
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18838
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Logan Austin
st.byron wrote:SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.
Fair enough.
I concede I was wrong.
Jaxons called it correctly.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
Re: Logan Austin
the only people I see using the word messiah are people like you. Everyone else just thinks that Jaxons is well connected at the St. Kilda football club and gives good inside knowledge before it is in the media. His record over the past 6 years shows he does that.Drake Huggins wrote:Easy enough to call it, as CQS did. Took the chance. Just sayin'... Jaxons is the Messiah for some. And they should know, they've followed a few in their time!st.byron wrote:Oh lord, you can twist anything whichever way you want to.Drake Huggins wrote:Then why not post the target's name if you know it's going to happen? No criticism of Jaxons, but he got scooped this time. Sorry, true believers.st.byron wrote:SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.
Jaxons first referred to a young defender from P.A. He didn't know it was going to happen. Just said a young defender was being looked at. CQ guessed the name and that equates to Jaxons being 'scooped'. Go figure........
That certainly does not make him anything worthy of worship. It just makes his posts about trades far more interesting than posts talking about him and posts that invent rubbish about people who would like him to keep posting.
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Logan Austin
Wow! A footy forum. Get a life. We're arguing over who got what right or wrong or may have not. I concede. I'm almost as big of a half-wit for arguing as those defending their guru. I'm wrong. I was always wrong. I will not ever challenge anything on here, or those who post. I apologise for the distress I've caused. How could I've been so insensitive?
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 464 times
Re: Logan Austin
I don't mind the postings of DH normally but on this one you're being a total tool and f***wit. DH - Drake Huggins more like Dick Head
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Logan Austin
Green Eyed ?Con Gorozidis wrote:+ 1.kosifantutti wrote:Actually it was Jaxons.Drake Huggins wrote:You're right, SP. I believe it was CQS, but I could be wrong. It wasn't Jaxons, but I didn't want to call it for fear of criticising the Messiah and drawing the predictable opprobrium that typically follows such an outrage. No disrespect to Jaxons, either. Valuable poster in the main.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=93983&hilit=Logan&s ... 5#p1702860
CQ guessed Logan Austin and Jaxons confirmed.
Jaxons is a genuine itk.
Not sure why people are bagging him. Weird.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?